
More than 80% of world's coral reefs hit by worst bleaching event in history
More than 84 per cent of the world's coral reefs have been affected by extreme heat stress in what has now become the most widespread coral bleaching event on record, scientists confirmed on Tuesday.
The mass bleaching, which began in early 2023, has impacted reefs in at least 83 countries and territories, including biodiversity hotspots like Australia 's Great Barrier Reef, the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean, and reefs across the South Pacific and Southeast Asia.
This is the fourth global coral bleaching event ever recorded, and the second in the last decade, according to the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
'As the oceans continue to warm, coral bleaching is becoming more frequent, more intense, and more widespread,' Derek Manzello, coordinator of the Coral Reef Watch programme at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), said.
A heat stress map released by NOAA's Coral Reef Watch shows large parts of the Pacific and Caribbean oceans in dark red and purple – the highest alert levels for coral bleaching.
The agency recently expanded its warning system to account for how extreme the heat stress has become, with the new levels indicating widespread bleaching and a high risk of coral death.
Bleaching occurs when ocean temperatures rise above normal for prolonged periods, forcing corals to expel the algae they rely on for food and colour. Left without this algae, corals turn white and become more vulnerable to disease and death.
The current event, confirmed by NOAA and the International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI), has already surpassed the previous record bleaching event from 2014–2017, which affected 68.2 per cent of reefs worldwide. This marks the fourth recorded global bleaching event, and the second in less than a decade.
The damage is being driven by sustained marine heatwaves, compounded by the climate crisis and El Niño conditions. Scientists say some reefs, such as those off the coast of Mexico and in the southern Great Barrier Reef, have already suffered coral mortality rates above 40 to 90 per cent in certain zones.
However, scientists fear, the ongoing bleaching event may never end.
"We may never see the heat stress that causes bleaching dropping below the threshold that triggers a global event," Mark Eakin, executive secretary for the International Coral Reef Society and retired coral monitoring chief for the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, said, according to The Associated Press.
"We're looking at something that's completely changing the face of our planet and the ability of our oceans to sustain lives and livelihoods," Mr Eakin said.
Coral reefs, often called the 'rainforests of the sea', support about 25 per cent of all marine species. They also provide critical services for humans – supporting fisheries, protecting coastlines from erosion and storms, and fuelling tourism industries.
Yet the escalating threat to reefs highlights a broader failure to curb greenhouse gas emissions, which are heating up the planet and driving heat on land and ocean to record levels. In 2023, global sea surface temperatures outside the polar regions reached their highest annual average in recorded history at 20.87 degrees Celsius.
'Climate model predictions for coral reefs have been suggesting for years that bleaching impacts would increase in frequency and magnitude as the ocean warms,' said Jennifer Koss, director of NOAA's Coral Reef Conservation Program (CRCP).
The group's update comes as the US president Donald Trump is aggressively increasing production of fossil fuels which are the primary drivers of global heat, despite the rest of the world rapidly increasing clean energy production.
Florida's coral reefs were among the earliest and hardest hit during this global bleaching event. NOAA described the 2023 marine heatwave in the region as the most severe on record – starting earlier, lasting longer, and reaching more extreme temperatures than any previous event. In response, the agency says it undertook emergency interventions, including relocating coral nurseries to deeper, cooler waters and deploying sunshades to shield vulnerable reefs, as part of its Mission: Iconic Reefs programme.
Efforts are underway to potentially repopulate the corals in the future and find ways to make them more resilient. Last year, researchers also uncovered coral colonies in the Great Barrier Reef that can withstand higher temperatures.
But scientists stress that such interventions are not long-term solutions. "The best way to protect coral reefs is to address the root cause of climate change. And that means reducing the human emissions that are mostly from burning of fossil fuels – everything else is looking more like a Band-Aid rather than a solution," Mr Eakin said.
Scientists also warn there isn't enough time.
"I think people really need to recognise what they're doing – inaction is the kiss of death for coral reefs," said Melanie McField, co-chair of the Caribbean Steering Committee for the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network, a network of scientists that monitors reefs throughout the world.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired
A major US government website supporting public education on climate science looks likely to be shuttered after almost all of its staff were fired, the Guardian has learned. the gateway website for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa)'s Climate Program Office, will imminently no longer publish new content, according to multiple former staff responsible for the site's content whose contracts were recently terminated. 'The entire content production staff at (including me) were let go from our government contract on 31 May,' said a former government contractor who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. 'We were told that our positions within the contract were being eliminated.' Rebecca Lindsey, the website's former program manager, who was fired in February as part of the government's purge of probationary employees, described a months-long situation within Noaa where political appointees and career staff argued over the fate of the website. 'I had gotten a stellar performance review, gotten a bonus, gotten a raise. I was performing very well. And then I was part of that group who got the form letter saying, 'Your knowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to Noaa' – or something to that effect.' Lindsey said she had been worried that might be a target of the new administration soon after the election, but when a large Noaa contract was up for renewal at the end of May, her former boss told her that a demand came 'from above' to rewrite parts of the contract to remove the team's funding. 'It was a very deliberate, targeted attack,' said Lindsey. Lindsey said the content for was created and maintained by a contracted staff of about 10, with additional contributions from Noaa scientists, and its editorial content was specifically designed to be politically neutral, and faithful to the current state of the sciences. All of those staff have now been dismissed, she said. 'We operated exactly how you would want an independent, nonpartisan communications group to operate,' said Lindsey, and noted that is housed within the science division of Noaa, not its public affairs division. 'It does seem to be part of this sort of slow and quiet way of trying to keep science agencies from providing information to the American public about climate.' Noaa has been contacted for comment. It's unclear whether the website will remain visible to the public. The site was housed within the Communication, Education, and Engagement Division of Noaa, which describes itself as 'the largest team in the federal government dedicated to climate communication, education, and engagement'. The website receives hundreds of thousands of visits per month and is one of the most popular sources of information about climate science on the internet. The fired staff believe the changes to were targeted by political appointees within the Trump administration and specifically aimed at restricting public-facing climate information. 'It's targeted, I think it's clear,' said Tom Di Liberto, a former Noaa spokesperson who was also fired from his position earlier this year. 'They only fired a handful of people, and it just so happened to be the entire content team for I mean, that's a clear signal.' The purge spared two web developers, which Di Liberto says is a concerning sign. The contractor said: 'My bigger worry, long-term, is I would hate to see it turn into a propaganda website for this administration, because that's not at all what it was.' The contractor said that while there will still be some pre-written, scheduled content posted on the site this month, there are no plans for further new content: 'After that, we have no idea what will happen to the website.' Lindsey said she also fears a 'sinister possibility' that the administration may co-opt to publish its own anti-science content. Lindsey said the administration could now 'provide a content team from the Heartland Institute, leveraging our audience, our brand, our millions of people that we reach on social media every month. That's the worst-case scenario.' ' is one heck of a URL. If you wanted to basically keep the website alive to do something with later, this is what you would do if you're the [Trump] administration,' said Di Liberto. 'It's clear that the administration does not accept climate science, so it's certainly concerning.' The cuts also mean that there is now also no one left to run social media accounts, which have hundreds of thousands of followers. Since staff in charge of did a lot of pushback on misinformation, their absence may help anti-science information flourish there more readily. 'We were an extremely well-trusted source for climate information, misinformation and disinformation because we actually, legitimately would answer misinformation questions,' said the contractor. 'We'd answer reader emails and try to combat disinformation on social media. 'We get attacked on social media by people who don't believe in climate change, and that's increased over the last six months or so as well.' The shutdown comes amid broader cuts to science funding across the government, including 'significant reductions to education, grants, research, and climate-related programs within Noaa', as stated in the 2026 'passback' budget Congress is currently deliberating. 'It seems like if they can't get rid of all the research, what they can do is make it impossible for anyone to know about it,' said Di Liberto. The contractor said they worry that what may have begun as a heavy-handed attempt by administration officials to limit public knowledge of human-caused climate change will have broader impacts on public education on the cyclical drivers of weather – as well as the results of publicly funded research conducted by Noaa scientists. 'To me, climate is more broad than just climate change. It's also climate patterns like El Niño and La Niña. Halting factual climate information is a disservice to the public. Hiding the impacts of climate change won't stop it from happening, it will just make us far less prepared when it does.'


The Guardian
5 days ago
- The Guardian
‘Ticking timebomb': sea acidity has reached critical levels, threatening entire ecosystems
The world's oceans are in worse health than realised, scientists have said today, as they warn that a key measurement shows we are 'running out of time' to protect marine ecosystems. Ocean acidification, often called the 'evil twin' of the climate crisis, is caused when carbon dioxide is rapidly absorbed by the ocean, where it reacts with water molecules leading to a fall in the pH level of the seawater. It damages coral reefs and other ocean habitats and, in extreme cases, can dissolve the shells of marine creatures. Until now, ocean acidification had not been deemed to have crossed its 'planetary boundary'. The planetary boundaries are the natural limits of key global systems – such as climate, water and wildlife diversity – beyond which their ability to maintain a healthy planet is in danger of failing. Six of the nine had been crossed already, scientists said last year. However, a new study by the UK's Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML), the Washington-based National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Oregon State University's Co-operative Institute for Marine Resources Studies found that ocean acidification's 'boundary' was also reached about five years ago. 'Ocean acidification isn't just an environmental crisis – it's a ticking timebomb for marine ecosystems and coastal economies,' said PML's Prof Steve Widdicombe, who is also co-chair of the Global Ocean Acidification Observing Network. The study drew on new and historical physical and chemical measurements from ice cores, combined with advanced computer models and studies of marine life, which gave the scientists an overall assessment of the past 150 years. It found that by 2020 the average ocean condition worldwide was already very close to – and in some regions beyond – the planetary boundary for ocean acidification. This is defined as when the concentration of calcium carbonate in seawater is more than 20% below preindustrial levels. The deeper in the ocean they looked, the worse the findings were, the scientists said. At 200 metres below the surface, 60% of global waters had breached the 'safe' limit for acidification. 'Most ocean life doesn't just live at the surface,' said PML's Prof Helen Findlay. 'The waters below are home to many more different types of plants and animals. Since these deeper waters are changing so much, the impacts of ocean acidification could be far worse than we thought.' This had, she added, huge implications for important underwater ecosystems such as tropical and even deep-sea coral reefs that provided essential habitats and nursery grounds for the young of many species. As pH levels drop, calcifying species such as corals, oysters, mussels and tiny molluscs known as sea butterflies struggle to maintain their protective structures, leading to weaker shells, slower growth, reduced reproduction and decreased survival rates. The authors underlined that decreasing CO2 emissions was the only way to deal with acidification globally, but that conservation measures could and should focus on the regions and species that were most vulnerable. Jessie Turner, director of the International Alliance to Combat Ocean Acidification, who was not involved in the study, said: 'This report makes it clear: we are running out of time and what we do – or fail to do – now is already determining our future. 'We are coming to terms with an existential threat while grappling with the difficult reality that much suitable habitat for key species has already been lost. It's clear that governments can no longer afford to overlook acidification in mainstream policy agendas,' she said.


Daily Mirror
06-06-2025
- Daily Mirror
Grim issue with 'terrible' smell could jeopardise holidays at top destinations
A grim problem with a "terrible" smell has arisen on a vast swathe of coastline in the Americas, from Puerto Rico to Guyana, affecting hotel bookings and even shutting schools A grim issue with a "terrible" smell could be jeopardising travel plans for tourists visiting the sun-kissed beaches of the Caribbean. Masses of a type of seaweed named sargassum have swamped a broad stretch of coast from Puerto Rico to Guyana, affecting locations across the West Atlantic, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico. La Vanguardia, a Spanish newspaper, reported that scientists observed a record amount of the troublesome macroalgae in May, but the situation could deteriorate even further this month. The seaweed invasion is reportedly hampering tourism industries in Mexico and Colombia. Meanwhile, anti-seaweed defences have been activated in the Dominican Republic, whilst the popular holiday destination of Barbados faces dips in hotel reservations. Argentina's Infobae has highlighted that this expansive belt of sargassum may extend for hundreds or even thousands of miles. Satellite imagery suggests it's drifting through the Caribbean and potentially heading for the US' southern coastline. Researchers at the University of South Florida's Optical Oceanography Laboratory warned of a whopping 150% increase in Caribbean levels, uncovering a shocking 40 million metric tonnes in the Atlantic, Caribbean Sea, and Gulf of Mexico. It also emits an unpleasant smell (likened to rotten eggs) when it rots, which is reportedly such an issue that it's led to school closures in Martinique. Yet, scientists don't know why the sargassum levels have doubled to these record-breaking levels. However, experts have suggested that changes in rainfall, wind, currents, and warming waters may impact its proliferation. Brian Barnes, an assistant research professor at the University of South Florida, remarked: "The peaks seem to be getting bigger year after year." Yet, the reasons behind this dramatic increase remain a puzzle. He confessed: "It's the million-dollar question. I don't have a satisfactory answer." The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) describes sargassum as a type of large brown seaweed that floats in "island-like" masses. It also has structures known as pneumatocysts. Pneumatocysts, which provide buoyancy and allow the seaweed to float on the sea, look similar to berries and contain gas, primarily oxygen. Sometimes spanning miles, sargassum provides sustenance and breeding grounds for various marine life, including birds, sea turtles, fish, shrimp, and crabs. Some creatures, like the sargassum fish, even spend their entire existence within this floating habitat. Moreover, the NOAA notes that sargassum serves as a nursery for several commercially significant fish species such as amberjacks, mahi mahi, and jacks. Brian conceded that large amounts of seaweed on the open water is conducive with a "healthy and happy ecosystem", but it can also prove to be an issue for ecosystems when it gathers on the shore. He further explained that it can pose a problem for coral reefs, as it obstructs the sunlight they need to survive. Additionally, when it washes up on shore, the creatures living in it either perish or become easy prey for birds.