
Trump's World Liberty crypto tokens to become tradable
Remove Ads
Crypto TrackerPowered By
TOP COINS
TOP COIN SETS Ethereum
2,87,932 (
6.93 %) Buy XRP
260.65 (
4.21 %) Buy BNB
61,585 (
3.8 %) Buy Bitcoin
1,01,79,886 (
0.77 %) Buy Tether
86.01 (
0.05 %) Buy
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
99.9% SUPPORT
Holders of the digital tokens issued by World Liberty Financial , one of the crypto ventures of the family of Donald Trump, voted on Wednesday to make them tradeable, paving the way for their wide sale and purchase -- potentially boosting the value of the president's holdings of them.The World Liberty tokens, known as $WLFI, were sold to investors after the Trump family and their partners launched the venture - a "decentralised finance" platform that has also issued a stablecoin - last autumn.The tokens were not made tradeable at their initial sale. Instead, they gave holders a right to vote on some changes to the business, such as its underlying code. Early investors have said the primary draw of $WLFI was the connection to Trump and, in turn, their expectations the tokens would grow in value due to his backing.Making the tokens tradeable would see investors determine their price, enabling speculation, earning trading fees for exchanges that list them and likely stoking interest from a wider swath of crypto investors.The extent to which the Trump family, which reaps three-quarters of revenues from the initial sales of the tokens, will benefit from their wider trading is not clear.Gains in the tokens' price would, however, swell the value of the family's token holdings, the exact level of which is unclear.World Liberty and Trump's other crypto businesses have faced criticism from Democratic lawmakers and ethics experts as the president's administration reshapes regulations in the booming crypto sector.Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and Democratic Representative Maxine Waters sent a letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission earlier this year in which they said, "The Trump family's financial stake in World Liberty Financial represents an unprecedented conflict of interest with the potential to influence the Trump Administration's oversight-or lack thereof-of the cryptocurrency industry."The World Liberty tokens have not been designated as securities by the SEC, meaning they are not subject to the same scrutiny as investments like stocks.The White House has said Trump's assets are in a trust managed by his children and that there are no conflicts of interest.The White House has not released the details of the trust arrangement. The Trump family business has been placed into a trust whose sole beneficiary is the president, meaning that the hundreds of millions of dollars from crypto deals struck while Trump is in office could hypothetically be withdrawn at any time, or at the latest, be at his disposal when he leaves office in less than four years.Trump's company, DT Marks DEFI LLC, was set to receive 22.5 billion out of a total 100 billion $WLFI tokens, according to a description of the project released in October. The president held 15.75 billion of the tokens at the end of last year, according to a public financial disclosure report published last month.The Trump family has made around $500 million from World Liberty since the platform was launched, according to calculations based on the company's terms and conditions, transactions traced by crypto analysis firms and publicly-disclosed deals.Asked by Reuters how the vote would impact the value of $WLFI tokens held by Trump and his family, the White House press office said: "This is not an inquiry for the White House."The Trump Organization did not respond to a request for comment.In response to Reuters' questions about how the tokens will become tradable, a World Liberty spokesperson said: "Additional details are forthcoming." The venture says on its website that making $WLFI tradeable "brings us one step closer to building a more open, transparent, and powerful financial system.""The American public should be very concerned about the president's vested interests in the cryptocurrency market," said Chris Swartz, a former longtime attorney at the U.S. government's Office of Government Ethics, including under both Trump administrations, who now serves as senior ethics counsel for Democracy Defenders Action, a legal advocacy group."Not only is it a potential conduit for foreign emoluments and other illicit payments, but it puts the president in competition against other cryptocurrency issuers at the same time he is advocating for digital asset marketplace legislation. That is a clear conflict of interest."The World Liberty proposal to "formally initiate the tradability of the token," posted on its website on July 9, was approved by 99.94% of around 20,900 votes.Some voters cited expectations of price gains or support for Trump as reasons for their choice. "We invested to get rich," one wrote on the World Liberty website. "To make america great again," wrote another. The identities of nearly all holders are hidden behind wallet addresses.A Milan-based person using the name Paolo, who declined to give his full name, told Reuters he had bought 95,000 $WLFI tokens for about $5,000. $WLFI tokens were sold in two initial tranches at $0.015 and $0.05.Paolo said he voted in favour of making the tokens tradeable and planned to hold the tokens until they reach $12. "Then I try to buy more when the price drops," he said.The World Liberty proposal said the timing for making the tokens tradeable, and the eligibility requirements, would be determined at a later, unspecified date. Tokens held by World Liberty's founders, team and advisers would not be initially "unlocked" for trading and would be subject to a longer "unlock schedule," it said.The implementation of approved proposals would "occur within a reasonable time from the passage of the applicable proposal," according to the project description from October.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
FBI scoured Epstein records for Trump mentions, US Senator claims
Senator Dick Durbin has claimed that hundreds of FBI agents were tasked with combing through the Epstein files, specifically looking for mentions of Trump. read more Five years after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest and death in prison, questions linger about who else might have been involved in his crimes. Many are now pointing at President Donald Trump, who earlier this year ordered a full FBI and DOJ review of Epstein's evidence. The outcome? A quiet DOJ memo released weeks ago, stating no further charges were needed—no new suspects, no infamous 'client list,' just Ghislaine Maxwell, already convicted. Epstein was arrested in 2019 during Trump's first term, with authorities seizing what they described as a mountain of evidence from his homes, enough to convict Maxwell. Epstein, however, died in his cell before facing trial. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's supporters expected the Epstein files to be declassified as soon as he began his second term. Instead, in February, Attorney General Pam Bondi distributed binders labelled 'The Epstein Files: Phase I' to right-wing influencers. Bondi claimed her team was sifting through 'tens of thousands' of videos, promising the full files would eventually be released. But FBI Director Kash Patel, appearing on Joe Rogan's podcast, bluntly stated there was nothing new to share. Days later, the DOJ's memo confirmed his stance. Senator Dick Durbin, in letters to Patel posted on his Senate website, has revealed that hundreds of FBI agents were tasked with combing through the Epstein files, specifically looking for mentions of Trump. 'According to information my office received, the FBI was pressured to put approximately 1,000 personnel in its Information Management Division (IMD) … on 24-hour shifts to review approximately 100,000 Epstein-related records in order to produce more documents that could then be released on an arbitrarily short deadline,' Durbin wrote. This effort, spanning tens of thousands of hours over two weeks in March, culminated in a final memo that wasn't released until June. 'My office was told that these personnel were instructed to 'flag' any records in which President Trump was mentioned,' he added. The three-month delay between the review and the memo's release has raised questions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What was found, and why hasn't it been made public? Trump, once vocal about declassifying the files, now appears to be urging his team to keep quiet. Congressman Dan Goldman, in a letter, expressed concern: 'The convergence of your unexplained delay in releasing the Epstein Files … raises serious questions about whether President Trump has intervened to prevent the public release … to hide his own embarrassing and potentially criminal conduct.' Trump's response has only fueled the fire. He's lashed out at his own supporters, calling them ' weaklings' and saying he doesn't need their backing. When The Wall Street Journal published an old birthday note from Trump to Epstein, in which Trump wrote they 'have certain things in common' and wished for 'another wonderful secret,' Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the outlet.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Nothing will be good enough': Trump's latest on Epstein Files shows frustration with 'troublemakers'
Trump said nothing on Epstein will make the troublemakers happy. President Donald Trump expressed his frustration with 'troublemakers' who are asking for the release of more files in connection with Jeffrey Epstein and said nothing will be good enough for them and they will keep asking for more. "I have asked the Justice Department to release all Grand Jury testimony with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, subject only to Court Approval. With that being said, and even if the Court gave its full and unwavering approval, nothing will be good enough for the troublemakers and radical left lunatics making the request. It will always be more, more, more. MAGA!" Trump wrote. The administration is embroiled over the Epstein issue as it is facing resistance inside and outside. While MAGA commentators are pushing for the release of more files, Trump has sued The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over a report claiming that Trump wrote a birthday message to Epstein in 2003 in which he doodled a naked woman. 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret," the message said as WSJ reported. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Trump denied ever writing the letter and vowed to drag Murdoch into court to testify. Trump's statement came a day after the DOJ requested the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Epstein. Bondi's top deputy, Todd Blanche, submitted the motion to unseal the Epstein transcripts, as well as those in the case against convicted British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, just one day after Trump publicly directed the department to take that step. Trump was the president when Epstein, the convicted sex offender, committed suicide in 2019 in his prison cell. Once, Trump was close to Epstein as several photos revealed but Trump claimed that he had a fallout with Epstein over a real estate issue. Recently, Elon Musk triggered a major controversy when he said Donald Trump was named in the Epstein files. Within days, the DOJ and the FBI closed the Epstein case and said the disgraced financier did not have any client list and there was no foul play in his death.


New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
The Epstein web: Return of the man who knew too much
Robert Maxwell's mysterious death at sea in 1991—with his body found floating near the Canary Islands—and later revelations of his cooperation with Israeli intelligence are part of the shadow legacy Ghislaine inherited. That she embedded herself so deeply into the Anglo-American elite without scrutiny for so long speaks not only to privilege, but to protection. Prince Andrew's entanglement is no longer a matter of speculation. His now-settled civil case with Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of abusing her as a minor, came with a multi-million-dollar payout and a permanently-damaged reputation. The photograph of him with Giuffre, Maxwell in the background, remains iconic—not just for what it shows, but for how it was denied. The prince's association with Epstein, even after Epstein's first conviction, and the disastrous BBC interview that followed, confirmed what many already feared: that the British establishment had, at best, turned a blind eye. At worst, it was complicit. Numerous observers, including former intelligence professionals, have long speculated that Epstein was a facilitator—creating honeypots, filming the powerful, and quietly handing over the results to interested parties. Former Israeli officer Ari Ben-Menashe and American whistleblowers have suggested Epstein's operation bore the hallmarks of classic compromat used for control or blackmail. Why else would such a man be funded, protected, and even after conviction be welcomed by the world's most influential people? Epstein's death in a high-security New York prison in 2019, officially ruled a suicide, though surveillance footage vanished and the guards reportedly slept through it, only deepened suspicions. It was the perfect ending for a man who knew too much. At first glance, Trump appears as just another name in Epstein's contact list who famously called Epstein 'a terrific guy' in 2002. But since Epstein's death, many within Trump's base have seized on the scandal as proof of a global elite network rotten to its core—a real-world echo of what the QAnon, the far-right conspiracy movement, claims about a secret cabal of child-abusing elites that Trump was chosen to expose. While neither Clinton nor Trump has faced charges over Epstein's activities, their documented ties continue to raise uncomfortable questions. To many on the right, Epstein became symbolic of a decadent ruling class—jet-setting, untouchable and predatory. The fact that Epstein's ties to Clinton were longer and deeper than to Trump has not gone unnoticed. Nor has the fact that Epstein's prosecution accelerated under the Trump-era department of justice.