
Fed's rate-cut delay intact as inflation fears override Trump pressure
Trump appeared near the point of trying to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell this week, but backed off with a nod to the market disruption that would likely follow, and the U.S. central bank's policy rate outlook remains virtually unchanged despite the drama.
Fed officials haven't mentioned raising rates, but headlines about an imminent Powell firing caused U.S. Treasury yields to jump, not exactly what Trump wants as he yearns for cheaper financing for massive federal deficits.
On Friday the president repeated his criticism of Powell and said the Fed's policy rate should be 1%, a low level typically used by the Fed to boost a weak economy not, as the Fed is currently attempting to do, temper inflation with tight monetary policy.
The Fed is expected to hold its benchmark rate steady in the 4.25%-4.50% range at its July 29-30 meeting, a level policymakers regard as at least moderately restrictive. The Fed last cut rates in December, when policymakers started assessing the possible impact on prices from the import tariffs that Trump quickly began imposing after returning to the White House in January.
Rate cuts are expected to resume later this year, with investors anticipating a quarter-percentage-point reduction in September.
But those odds slipped to nearly 50-50 this week after the Consumer Price Index showed inflation rose to 2.7% in June from 2.4% in the prior month. A trend that saw declining prices for goods is beginning to shift, adding to overall inflation, in a sign businesses may have begun passing some of the tariffs along to consumers.
Powell and other Fed officials said they expected price increases to quicken this summer. They have been reluctant to cut rates until it is clear how much inflation is in train, how long it persists, and whether the economy begins to slow enough to ease the pressure on prices.
Fed policymakers will receive two more months of jobs and inflation data before their meeting in September, and investors - and Trump administration officials - will be listening closely to Powell's post-meeting press conference on July 30 for language that leans towards a rate cut then or not.
In the final comments before policymakers begin a "blackout" period on public statements before the next meeting, the focus remained largely on inflation and how June's uptick showed prices rising across an array of largely imported goods.
Trade and tariff issues are now "the key drivers of the U.S. economic outlook," Fed Governor Adriana Kugler said on Thursday, adding that with price pressures building, the central bank needed to keep rates steady "for some time" to hold inflation and inflationary psychology in check.
"I see upward pressure on inflation from trade policies, and I expect additional price increases later in the year," she said. Maintaining tight monetary policy for now "is important to keep longer-run inflation expectations anchored."
Fed Governor Christopher Waller, mentioned as a possible replacement for Powell, disagreed in comments later on Thursday, repeating his call for a rate cut at the meeting in two weeks to account for what he sees as a coming economic slowdown and the likelihood that the impact of tariffs on inflation won't last.
"With inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate," Waller said in prepared remarks for a speech to the Money Marketeers of New York University.
'INFLECTION POINT'
The Fed used a historically rapid escalation of interest rates in 2022 to help contain a surge of inflation in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
By last fall, Fed officials were confident enough that inflation was receding towards the central bank's 2% target that they began to lower rates, delivering three cuts in the final four months of the year.
Trump made criticism of high inflation a centerpiece of his 2024 presidential campaign, pledging that prices would actually fall on his watch while also promising to raise tariffs.
As Trump's inauguration arrived, the economy was still growing above trend and the labor market remained tight. Fed officials and staff worried that while tariffs, like any tax, should in theory have only a one-time price impact, those conditions coupled with the recent bout of high inflation could lead to a more persistent problem.
The focus on tariffs as a source of inflation and a reason for delaying rate cuts has been central to Trump's ire at Powell, but U.S. central bankers this week said the CPI data for June showed why they are concerned, with inflation still above target and possibly poised to move higher.
Kugler estimated that coming data will show the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index the Fed uses for its inflation target increased 2.5% in June, while the "core" measure excluding food and energy items rose 2.8%, higher than in May.
"We may be at an inflection point," as far as inflation is concerned, Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic told Fox Business a day after the CPI release. Nearly half of goods saw price increases that annualize to 5% or more, he said, a ratio he uses to monitor inflation's breadth during the pandemic surge. That was double the share in January.
"The headline number moved away from our target, not towards it ... We've seen the highest increase in prices that we've seen all year," Bostic said. "We are seeing things underlying in the economy that suggest inflation pressures are up ... The price pressures are real."
In economic projections issued in June, Fed officials expected PCE inflation to hit 3% by the end of this year but still anticipated being able to cut rates by half a percentage point.
"It's important to note that it's still early days for the effects of tariffs, which take time to come into full force," New York Fed President John Williams said this week. "Though we are only seeing relatively modest effects of tariffs in the hard aggregate data so far, I expect those effects to increase in coming months."
(Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns, Paul Simao and Andrew Heavens)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Dubai Eye
11 hours ago
- Dubai Eye
US threatens Mexican airline flights over airline competition issues
The Trump administration said it is taking a series of actions against Mexico over the government's decisions to rescind some flight slots for American carriers and force US cargo carriers to relocate operations in Mexico City. US Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement the department could disapprove flight requests from Mexico if the government fails to address US concerns over decisions made in 2022 and 2023. The department is also proposing to withdraw antitrust immunity from the Delta Air Lines joint venture with Aeromexico to address competitive issues in the market. Mexico is the most popular international destination among US airline travellers. The Transportation Department said Mexico has not been in compliance with a bilateral air agreement since 2022 when it abruptly rescinded slots and then forced US all-cargo carriers to relocate operations in 2023. Duffy said Mexico was expected to allow construction to alleviate congestion at Mexico City's Benito Juarez International Airport (MEX), but that has yet to materialize three years later. "By restricting slots and mandating that all-cargo operations move out of MEX, Mexico has broken its promise, disrupted the market, and left American businesses holding the bag for millions in increased costs," the department said. The Transportation Department issued a pair of orders requiring Mexican airlines to file schedules with the department for all their US operations and requiring prior US approval before operating any large passenger or cargo aircraft charter flights to or from the United States. "Mexico has altered the playing field significantly for airlines in ways that reduce competition and allow predominant competitors to gain an unfair advantage in the US-Mexico market," the department said. "Mexico's actions harm airlines seeking to enter the market, existing competitor airlines, consumers of air travel and products relying on time-sensitive air cargo shipments traded between the two countries, and other stakeholders in the American economy." If the US rescinds antitrust approval for Delta and Aeromexico, they would be required to discontinue cooperation on common pricing, capacity management, and revenue sharing, but Delta would also be able to retain its equity stake in Aeromexico, maintain all of its existing flying in the US-Mexico market unimpeded and continue a partnership.


Gulf Today
13 hours ago
- Gulf Today
China reports robust trade, investment with Belt and Road countries
China has seen robust trade and investment with countries participating in Belt and Road cooperation over the past years, Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang told a press conference on Friday. The combined trade between China and its related countries increased from US$2.7 trillion in 2021 to US$3.1 trillion last year, with an average annual growth rate of 4.7 per cent, Li said. The volume accounted for 50.7 percent of China's total foreign trade in 2024, up from 45.3 percent in 2021, according to Xinhua. From 2021 to the first half this year, two-way investment between China and Belt and Road countries had accumulated to more than 240 billion U.S. dollars, including over 160 billion US$ dollars flowing into Belt and Road countries and over 80 billion dollars into China. Li said Belt and Road cooperation projects had advanced steadily, enhanced infrastructure connectivity, improved people's lives and fostered talent for local development. From 2021 to the first half of this year, China's overseas engineering contracts had reached a cumulative turnover of nearly 600 billion U.S. dollars. To develop emerging industries and expand cooperation space, China has signed investment cooperation memoranda with more than 50 Belt and Road countries in key sectors such as the digital, green, and blue economies. The Silk Road e-commerce cooperation has expanded to 36 partner countries. WAM


The National
15 hours ago
- The National
'Genius' move: What are the goals of the three US crypto bills?
US President Donald Trump has signed the Genius Act into law, setting the stage for greater cryptocurrency supervision in line with America's aim to be the global leader in digital asset s. The bipartisan bill is one of three that had both Capitol Hill and crypto enthusiasts buzzing, as it would set the US up for the future of finance, while also being a legacy move for Mr Trump, who has gone from crypto sceptic to champion. 'The Genius Act could become a defining milestone for stablecoin policy. Moving stablecoins out of regulatory ambiguity won't just enable institutional participation, it will require it,' said Omar Elassar, managing director of venture capital firm Animoca Brands Middle East. The National reported that cryptocurrencies will not become mainstream unless the acts enforce strong regulations. We take a look at the three acts and how they would redefine cryptocurrency regulation and its future. Genius Act: 'Long overdue' According to the White House, the Genius Act is meant to make America 'the undisputed leader in digital assets'. The 'long-overdue' law is intended to prioritise consumer protection and strengthen the US dollar's reserve currency status, in addition to improving national security, which is one of the Trump administration's pillars. Also, the Genius Act is aimed at bringing 'massive' investment and innovation to the US, the world's top economy – although the latter is being challenged by others, most notably by rival China. The bill details strict regulations for stablecoins, which aim to address cryptocurrencies' shortcomings by pegging their value to a unit of an underlying asset, are often issued on faster blockchains and backed by state-issued tender such as the dollar, pound, euro and highly liquid reserves including government treasuries or commodities such as precious metals. Also, a stablecoin is different from a central bank digital currency, or CBDC: the former is privately issued, while the latter is government-backed. Both, however, aim to make transactions faster, cheaper and more secure, and would serve emerging markets well. The Genius Act will usher in the creation of the first-federal regulatory system for stablecoins. It also requires 100 per cent reserve backing with liquid assets like the dollar or short-term Treasuries and mandates issuers to make monthly, public disclosures. Should a stablecoin issuer become insolvent, the Genius Act will prioritises stablecoin holders' claims over all other creditors, it added. 'The passage of the Genius Act is a true watershed moment for the US. It is a defining step for responsible crypto policy … giving issuers, builders, and regulators the clear rules they have been asking for,' said Ji-Hun Kim, president of the Washington-based Crypto Council for Innovation. All said, the Genius Act aims to ensure the greenback remains the world's reserve currency, help fight illicit activity in the crypto world and make the US the global leader for digital assets. Clarity Act: Dual supervision The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, or Clarity Act, meanwhile, aims to establish a regulatory framework for digital commodities – namely, the classification, offering, trading and supervision of digital assets. It will also define clear lines of jurisdiction between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, two of the top US asset regulators that have been monitoring the digital asset situation and cracked down on crime – most notably the case involving jailed FTX boss Sam Bankman-Fried. That means it is expected to be a strict law because, 'at its core, it introduces a dual-agency approach to oversight', said Jerry Huang, an associate at Canadian law firm McMillan. The Clarity Act calls for how digital assets may be offered, sold and traded in the US, and the registration of brokers, dealers and trading facilities, who must maintain fair trading and anti-manipulation systems, ensure real-time transparency and adopt anti-money laundering and know-your-customer programmes. These would help reduce 'legal uncertainty for issuers, developers and intermediaries, while strengthening investor protections and market integrity', Mr Huang added. Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act: 'Weapon' control The summary of the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act is to 'amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit the Federal reserve banks from offering certain products or services directly to an individual, to prohibit the use of central bank digital currency for monetary policy and for other purposes'. In other words, a CBDC carries the risk of the government being able to surveil people's financial transactions and 'suppress politically unpopular activity', said Congressman Tom Emmer, the bill's main author, who also noted that a CBDC is 'is government-controlled, programmable money'. 'For years, we have worked to educate our colleagues on the dangers of this insidious technology, which would undermine our values and destroy Americans' right to privacy. Now, we must codify [CBDC] to ensure that the United States' digital currency policy remains in the hands of the American people. The bill aims to prevent future administrations from weaponising CBDC technology against the American people, he said. The American Bankers Association agreed in a letter to Mr Emmer, saying that a CBDC 'is unnecessary in the US and would present unacceptable risks and costs to the financial system'. Are these bills bulletproof? Whether these three legislations work as they are intended to do so remains to be seen, especially as digital assets remain vulnerable to misuse and are being used in illegal activity – a lot. In 2024, more than 99 per cent of stablecoin volume was legitimate – but stablecoins accounted for about 60 per cent of illicit transaction across the crypto ecosystem, according to an analysis from blockchain platform TRM Labs. 'Their speed, liquidity, and perceived stability can make them attractive for ransomware payments, terrorist financing, romance and investment scams, sanctions evasion, over-the-counter fraud and large-scale laundering,' said Ari Redbord, a vice president at San Francisco-based TRM. That corroborates an earlier report from Chainalysis, which found out that 63 per cent of all illicit transaction volumes involve stablecoins. 'The integration of stablecoins into traditional finance creates new systemic risk vectors that extend beyond individual protocols or platforms,' analysts at New York-based Chainalysis said. 'A failure of a major stablecoin could trigger cascading liquidations across interconnected protocols, potentially freezing large portions of the DeFi [decentralised finance] ecosystem.'