logo
Field Museum shows 300 million-plus-year-old fossils from Mazon Creek not far from Chicago

Field Museum shows 300 million-plus-year-old fossils from Mazon Creek not far from Chicago

CBS News21 hours ago
Those who know a lot about fossils are likely already familiar with the Mazon Creek fossil just outside Chicago.
Those who don't know a lot about fossils and the Mazon Creek site? They soon will, thanks to the Field Museum of Natural History.
You might remember years ago, the Field Museum had an interactive room called the Place for Wonder, where young kids could touch a taxidermy polar bear and listen to seashells. The Place for Wonder is not around anymore as you may remember it, but today's kids are still full of wide-eyed wonder at the Field Museum — particularly as they learn about the discoveries made at Mazon Creek.
Joseph Goldfarb, 7, has a perfectly appropriate word to express his wonder. He repeatedly said, "Whoa!" as he saw the fossils from Mazon Creek.
But what else can you say when you see something older than the dinosaurs — predating them by something on the order of 130 million years?
Joseph was watching as Dr. Arjan Mann, the assistant curator for fossil fishes and early tetrapods at the Field Museum's Negaunee Integrative Research Center, held up an old, round rock called a concretion.
Inside that rock was a fossil nearly 309 million years old.
"An early amphibian relative called a temnospondyl. It is a new species from Mazon Creek," explained Mann. "If you were to just, you know, even as like an amateur, look at it, you would think that this is a little salamander in the rock."
That temnospondyl is just one of many fossils found not far from home.
"One of the greatest fossil localities in the world, right outside the Chicago area," said Mann.
The Mazon Creek fossil site is less than two hours southwest of Chicago.
The fossils were discovered in piles of rock and dirt left over from coal mining, and have become a treasure trove for fossil hunters.
Mazon Creek is a tributary of the Illinois River. Strictly speaking, sources explain, Mazon Creek itself is one of several localities where fossils have been found called the Francis Creek Shale — with parts located in Grundy, Kankakee, LaSalle, Livingston, and Will counties. But the entire site is commonly called the Mazon Creek area, the Field Museum explained.
Large-scale mining operations began in Mazon Creek in the mid-19th century, and event at that time, it became clear that there was more of interest at the site than coal, the Field Museum explained in a news release.
The fossils at the site are so abundant and so well-preserved that researchers can reconstruct a detailed impression of the prehistoric ecosystem of which they were a part, the museum said.
In addition to the aforementioned relative of the salamander, the fossils also preserve creatures such as squid-like cephalopods, sea scorpions, and a soft-bodied creature with a long snout and primitive eyes called the Tully monster, the Field Museum explained.
"You go about just to every museum collection in the world, you can find Mazon Creek fossils," Mann said. "They're that abundant."
Every spring and summer, amateur fossil hunters at Mazon Creek work alongside professional paleontologists like Dr. Mann and his team.
"I mean, it's one of most fun things you can do, in my opinion, is go fossil collecting and dig in the dirt — and yeah, have fun," said Mann.
Every ancient concretion the paleontologists crack open can teach us something new.
"This is one of the more exciting things because it might be one of the missing links between what we know are modern amphibians like frogs, caecilians and salamanders and their Paleozoic relatives," said Mann. "That's a long paleontological evolutionary mystery."
What else can you say to all that but, "Whoa?"
Dr. Mann and his team have made about a dozen trips to Mazon Creek this summer.
He says that ancient relative of the salamander, the temnospondyl, will be named for the people who found its fossil — a husband and wife who own a rock shop in Evanston.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move
‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘Going To Cost Lives': Former Surgeon General Shocked By RFK's Latest Move

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s shock decision to cancel nearly half a billion dollars' worth of research projects because they're based on mRNA technology horrified vaccine experts Tuesday, among them President Donald Trump's own former surgeon general. Jerome Adams, who served as the nation's 20th surgeon general during Trump's first term, warned on social media that the decision will have very real negative consequences. 'I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives,' he wrote. 'mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions.' Adams ended the missive with the 'head exploding' emoji. I've tried to be objective & non-alarmist in response to current HHS actions – but quite frankly this move is going to cost lives. mRNA technology has uses that go far beyond vaccines… and the vaccine they helped develop in record time is credited with saving millions. 🤯 — Jerome Adams (@JeromeAdamsMD) August 6, 2025 In another thread, Adams blamed politicized messaging around vaccination during the coronavirus pandemic for leading to a widespread public misunderstanding of what vaccines actually accomplish. People believed that 'if you get this vaccine you won't get COVID,' said Adams, when the real aim was to prevent severe cases of the disease. Messenger RNA, or mRNA, technology has potential far beyond COVID. At Emory University, for instance, researchers are looking into using mRNA technology to train the immune system to cure cancer and chronic infections, thanks to a $24.8 million federal grant. The three-year program was funded by the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health, or ARPA-H, which Kennedy merged with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA, in March — only to announce Tuesday he'd be pulling the funding for BARDA's mRNA investments. The inaugural director of ARPA-H, Dr. Renee Wegrzyn, was fired by the Trump administration in February amid mass layoffs at the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tiba Biotech, another research company that saw its HHS contracts terminated Tuesday, is investigating using mRNA to combat tick-borne diseases. Thanks to climate change, more ticks are surviving through warmer winters, leading to a sharp increase in tick-borne illnesses. Mike Osterholm, a University of Minnesota expert on infectious diseases and pandemic preparations, told The Associated Press the decision on mRNA research is a historically bad one. 'I don't think I've seen a more dangerous decision in public health in my 50 years in the business,' he said. Related... RFK Jr. Cancels $500 Million In Funding For Vaccine Development 800,000 Vaccine Doses The U.S. Pledged To Send To Africa Are About To Expire Instead RFK Jr.'s Stunning Claim About Black People And Vaccines Sparks Concern From Medical Experts RFK Jr. Keeps Telling A Flat-Out Lie About Childhood Vaccines — And Doctors Are Sick Of It

‘Battle of the Big Bang' Review: A Question of Origins
‘Battle of the Big Bang' Review: A Question of Origins

Wall Street Journal

time27 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

‘Battle of the Big Bang' Review: A Question of Origins

In the 1920s, scientists discovered that the universe was not static in size, as had previously been assumed, but was expanding in all directions. Galaxies were rushing away from one another as the very space between them was stretching. It was tempting, therefore, to imagine running the film backward into the past. The expansion, it seemed, must have started somewhere: at an infinitely hot, infinitely small and infinitely dense point from which everything exploded some 13.8 billion years ago. This origin became known as the big bang, and that infinitely small point at which it all began was called a singularity: a place where all the known laws of physics break down. Time was purportedly created only at the moment of banging, so it made no sense to ask what came before the big bang, just as it makes no sense to ask what is north of the North Pole. Why it happened at all remained an awkward question, but the existence of such an inscrutable singularity at the birth of all things became the mainstream view. It might be surprising, then, to learn that few experts in the field hold this view anymore. The traditional picture of the big bang is actually two separate ideas, explain Niayesh Afshordi and Phil Halper in 'Battle of the Big Bang: The New Tales of Our Cosmic Origins.' Researchers continue to endorse the hot big bang, the idea of a primordial explosion of energy, but most do not think it goes back to 'a state of infinite density where time stands still and the answers to all our origin questions meet their demise.' Mr. Afshordi is a professor of physics and astronomy at the University of Waterloo in Canada; Mr. Halper is a fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society and the creator of the YouTube series 'Before the Big Bang.' Their excellent book promises to map the 'quiet revolution' of 21st-century cosmology and introduce us to the revolutionaries. In very different ways, these rebels are all addressing questions left unanswered by the old theory. One is the origin-of-structure problem: The big bang ought to have spread energy homogeneously throughout space, but we observe clumps of galaxies with vast spaces between them, and measurements of the cosmic microwave background—the fossil radiation from when the universe was only 380,000 years old—reveal an unpredictable pattern of warm and cold spots. Nor have we ever seen an inflaton, a hypothetical particle that is supposed to have driven a period of enormous growth in the size of the early universe.

CBS host frets Trump admin plans for moon base could usher in new 'age of colonialism' in space
CBS host frets Trump admin plans for moon base could usher in new 'age of colonialism' in space

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

CBS host frets Trump admin plans for moon base could usher in new 'age of colonialism' in space

CBS News host Vladimir Duthiers questioned the Trump administration's plan to establish a base on the moon and drew parallels to Earth's history of colonialism. On "CBS Mornings Plus" on Wednesday, Duthiers and co-host Adriana Diaz discussed the White House calling for more human space exploration and administration plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon to precede an eventual U.S. lunar base with astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. Diaz asked if it was "inevitable that we're going to have to go to the moon and try to colonize the Moon?" Tyson said that the United States is being "reactive" in a race to the moon with China, and stated, to the laughter of the panel, that he does not want to "live on the moon." But Duthiers questioned if colonizing the moon was a good idea. "We know how the age of colonialism worked on this planet," the host said. "Should we be trying to colonize and saying that there's a keep-out zone that no other countries can participate in having?" Tyson replied by pointing out that it would be difficult to colonize an area that does not have people. "Well, the — the real problem with the colonization history in Western civilization is that there were people already there," Tyson said. Duthiers and Diaz agreed, and Tyson added that "there are no moon beings that were displaced as far as we know." Tyson later criticized administration plans to decrease funding to NASA. "What's not on brand is to cut science programs, not only in NASA, but across the board, and then say, we want to excel in this one spot," Tyson said. "Well, in the 1960s, science was a major investment profile of the United States," he continued. "And by the way, it's not on brand even for Republicans, because Republican administrations since the Second World War have had a higher annual increase, average annual increase, in the science budget than even the Democrats." "So Trump's decision to cut science is not on brand for even being a Republican," Tyson added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store