logo
Los Angeles To Give Cash Assistance To Immigrants Impacted By Trump Raids

Los Angeles To Give Cash Assistance To Immigrants Impacted By Trump Raids

Newsweek6 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass announced a new initiative to provide direct cash assistance to immigrants impacted by the Trump administration's ongoing immigration raids.
The funds will be distributed as cash cards valued at "a couple hundred" dollars each and is expected to become available within the next week, Bass said
Newsweek has contacted Bass' office for comment via email outside of office hours.
Why It Matters
President Donald Trump has vowed to carry out the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history to address illegal immigration and border security. However, the policy has sparked concerns about its potential effects on the economy. The GOP's flagship immigration policy under Trump is causing people to avoid going to work amid fears over workplace raids.
California has become one of the key battleground states for immigration enforcement after President Trump directed ICE to increase operations in sanctuary states.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass stands in front of a Border Patrol federal agent at MacArthur Park Monday, July 7, 2025, in Los Angeles.
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass stands in front of a Border Patrol federal agent at MacArthur Park Monday, July 7, 2025, in Los Angeles.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
What To Know
The cash assistance is intended for families directly impacted by the immigration raids. Mayor Bass highlighted the example of a family that faced potential eviction after one of its primary earners was detained by immigration authorities.
The program will be funded through private donations rather than city funds. Immigrant rights organizations, including the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, will handle the distribution of the cash cards.
According to the mayor's office, the city will coordinate efforts between donors and distribution partners, though specific eligibility criteria have not yet been announced.
Bass likened the initiative to the Angeleno Cards program launched during the COVID-19 pandemic, which provided emergency financial assistance to vulnerable residents in Los Angeles.
The cash cards announcement coincided with a new executive order signed Friday by Bass, directing all city departments to strengthen training and policies ensuring compliance with Los Angeles' sanctuary city law. This law prohibits using city employees or resources for civil immigration enforcement, except in cases of serious crime.
City departments have two weeks to outline updated protocols, Bass said.
The executive order also creates a working group to review the Los Angeles Police Department's approach to federal immigration enforcement and directs city staff to seek records from Immigration and Customs Enforcement on recent raids. The measures are part of a series of responses from city leaders and the mayor to a federal crackdown that has entered its second month in Los Angeles.
The American Immigration Council projects that the mass removal policy could carry a one-time cost of $315 billion. Furthermore, deporting 1 million individuals each year could lead to annual expenses reaching up to $88 billion.
What People Are Saying
Bass said at a press conference on Friday: "You have people who don't want to leave their homes, who are not going to work, and they are in need of cash."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Curtis Sliwa is staying in the mayoral race — and in a 4-way battle, he has unique appeal
Curtis Sliwa is staying in the mayoral race — and in a 4-way battle, he has unique appeal

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Curtis Sliwa is staying in the mayoral race — and in a 4-way battle, he has unique appeal

For much of New York City's business community, it's hard to take Curtis Sliwa seriously. He seems to sleep in his trademark red Guardian Angels beret. His high-octane rants in a heavily accented outer-borough brogue can be distracting. The largest sources of campaign cash barely know he's running for mayor as the fat cat class courts Eric Adams, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and even the Marxist Zohran Mamdani, who upended the race by winning the Democratic primary. Yet the last I checked, most Big Apple voters aren't fat cats. Sliwa, red beret and all, is within striking distance of frontrunners Mamdani and Cuomo, at 22%, and beating Adams handily in a four-man race, according to a recent Harris poll. 'You guys always say follow the numbers. In a four-way race, I have a path to victory because people actually like me and they have problems with the others,' Sliwa told me in an interview. Suffice to say, it's been an uneven trajectory to Sliwa's current role as the GOP mayoral candidate in a decidedly Democratic city. I have covered Sliwa's rise since I was a reporter for the Pace University newspaper back in the mid-1980s, following him and his crime-prevention troops, the aforementioned Guardian Angels. We have mutual friends and have broken bread over dinner. And yes, he was wearing his beret throughout our meals. Ever the showman, he once staged his own kidnapping to drum up publicity. He was once really kidnapped and shot three times, allegedly as payback for repeatedly attacking the mob for drug dealing. The shooting nearly took Sliwa's life, but it didn't slow him down. He kept trudging away on TV, as a radio-show host and with the Angels. He remained relevant as violent crime came back to the city during the Bill de Blasio years and then under Adams, whom Sliwa ran against and lost to by a wide margin. Money deficit He's back at it again and, according to the latest polls, has a shot. While Sliwa trails in raising money — by a lot (having pulled in just $169,000 compared with $1.5 million for Adams in the latest reporting period), his style of in-person campaigning, not in the Hamptons like Cuomo but on subways and around the five boroughs, seems to be working. In other words, he's earned the business community's attention. He says that he hasn't registered with Kathy Wylde of the NYC Partnership, the city's largest business group, who has been meeting with every candidate except Sliwa — even spending the past week listening to Mamdani's weird explanations of past socialist ravings about seizing the means of production, defunding the police and refusing to disavow globalizing the intifada. Sliwa tells me the city's power brokers are making a big mistake snubbing him because he's the only true business candidate. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters (Wylde says Sliwa, unlike the others, has yet to ask for a meeting.) He plans to return Midtown to a true business mecca through enhanced crime prevention and by ditching congestion pricing that is reducing retail foot traffic and hurting property values. He will cut taxes and eliminate swaths of government, like the city's education bureaucracy that does a horrible job educating kids and does a good job employing loads of bureaucrats. 'Big business is hedging its bets and moving to Florida, Texas, even Tennessee,' Sliwa said. 'It's impossible to keep them from diversifying but you have to convince them to keep what they have by getting rid of the homeless and making sure women are safe from pervs in the subway when going to work.' Brooklyn native Sliwa is a real New Yorker, a Brooklyn native who has never lived outside the city, unlike Adams or Cuomo, the son of former Gov. Mario Cuomo. He comes from a working-class family in Canarsie, which is far different from the privileged Manhattan upbringing of the silver-spooned Mamdani. Sliwa's pro-business policies are why he insists it 'behooves' the fat cats in Wylde's group 'to treat me with a modicum of respect. I am here to support small- and medium-sized businesses, as well as the Fortune 500 guys and gals who pay the bulk of our taxes.' One way to do just that is to address rising crime and keep Adams' very capable police commissioner, Jessica Tisch, in her job, he says. 'She's a saint in a cauldron of corruption,' Sliwa said, referring to the scandals that engulfed the Adams administration. 'Zohran would never exist if Adams had been a halfway decent mayor, and I'm the only person standing in the way of a complete socialist takeover of New York.' Cuomo, in Sliwa's view, is just as bad, having lost badly to Mamdani in the Democratic primary because of his own skeletons, his handling of COVID chief among them, the Republican candidate said. 'Cuomo's approvals are as bad as Adams'. People don't like them. But they like me,' he said. Mandami might be superficially likable, but he will turn the Big Apple into 'a sea of socialism and destroy the city,' according to Sliwa. More than anything, Sliwa wanted to make clear he isn't dropping out despite reports he might get a job in the Trump administration to narrow the field and prevent a Mamdani mayoralty. 'No one is going to bribe me from leaving the race,' he said. In fact, he's so committed, he pledged to put away his trademark red beret if elected. 'We realize that the beret is a recurring question,' he said. 'When elected mayor, I will retire it.'

Trump officials ‘discussing' release of ‘some sort' of additional Epstein material: Haberman
Trump officials ‘discussing' release of ‘some sort' of additional Epstein material: Haberman

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump officials ‘discussing' release of ‘some sort' of additional Epstein material: Haberman

CNN political analyst Maggie Haberman said late Tuesday that Trump administration officials are considering the release of 'some sort of additional material' tied to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 'There is a discussion about releasing some sort of additional material. We will see what that looks like,' said Haberman, a New York Times political correspondent, during an appearance on CNN's 'AC360.' 'The problem they've created for themselves … is whatever partial information they release, it will never be seen as enough. It will never be believed,' she added. The battle over releasing the Epstein files has roiled President Trump's MAGA base and divided GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill. In July, the Justice Department and FBI said in a joint memo that Epstein did not keep a client list, and evidence supports the suicide ruling in the disgraced financier's death. 'I think this has been a real lesson to top officials in this government that if you say something over and over again, your own followers are not necessarily going to stick with you if you say something different later,' Haberman said. Her remarks come as conservative voices have begun urging Trump's MAGA base to stop focusing on the controversy. 'I think that right now it seems pretty clear we're not going to get more information out of the government. They have closed the case,' right-wing podcaster Dinesh D'Souza said on the matter. 'Unless Ghislaine Maxwell, who's in prison, speaks out, and she's free to speak out.' He encouraged the public to 'move on' from the controversy and accept the information published after the official investigation. 'How can people be expected to have faith in Trump if he won't release the Epstein files?' Elon Musk asked last week in a post on social platform X, which the billionaire former White House aide owns. Another former White House aide, Steve Bannon, said the controversy could cost the GOP approximately 40 House seats in the midterm elections and potentially the White House in 2028. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republicans eye efforts to quiet Epstein uproar but can't quash it
Republicans eye efforts to quiet Epstein uproar but can't quash it

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Republicans eye efforts to quiet Epstein uproar but can't quash it

House Republicans who were at odds all week over the Trump administration's handling of Jeffrey Epstein disclosures are holding their breaths to see if the tsunami of criticism from their base over the matter is finally subsiding. GOP members on the House Rules Committee voted in favor of a resolution directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to release more materials relating to the late wealthy and connected sex offender. President Trump relented and directed Bondi to request grand jury testimony from the Epstein case be unsealed. And Republicans are banding together to dismiss and criticize the Wall Street Journal's report about a 'bawdy' birthday letter Trump sent more than two decades ago. But none of those developments have the weight to fully put the Epstein matter to rest. The Rules Committee resolution, for starters, does not have any legal weight to force the Trump administration to release any materials. Instead, it calls for the disclosure of some information while giving Bondi the ability to withhold some portions. Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), one of the Rules panel members who voted to advance the resolution, dismissed that criticism — arguing that a binding bill would go nowhere in the Senate and do little to force release of materials even if Trump did sign it. It is better, he said, to have at least a unified statement from Republicans, and set the stage for other potential oversight. 'If they don't' release the Epstein materials, Roy said, 'then we have the powers [in] Congress to then do whatever Congress can do, which is what — hold hearings, have people come testify, have oversight, power of the purse. Those are our actual powers.' But it is unclear if Republicans will even make that unified statement. House GOP leaders have not committed to bring hold a floor vote on the resolution and refusing to do so could spark outcry from GOP lawmakers who are most incensed by the Epstein saga and are pushing to see the information. 'We'll determine what happens with all that,' Johnson said when asked by The Hill if he will put the resolution on the floor. 'There's a lot developing. The president made his statements this afternoon, he's asked the attorney general to release the information, I'm certain that she will, and everybody can make their own decisions about that.' Pressed on the matter, he similarly demurred, saying: 'We will see how all this develops.' 'We're in line with the White House, there's no daylight between us,' he added. 'We want transparency, and I think that will be delivered for the people.' It's possible, then, that the resolution serves as little else but political cover for the Republican members of the Rules Committee, who were lambasted for days after voting down a Democratic amendment in support of releasing more Epstein material earlier in the week. The panel's members delayed final passage on the first Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid as they negotiated a committee vote on the GOP Epstein resolution. Another Epstein-release effort threatens to keep the issue alive in Congress, though. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) have promised to file a discharge petition to try to circumvent GOP leadership and force a vote on their Epstein disclosures bill. They would need to reach 218 signatures — and already have 14 other cosponsors on the measure, including 10 other Republicans. The petition can open as soon as next week, but there is a waiting period before it could force floor action — meaning the matter that has sharply split Trump's base could still be a live issue weeks from now, when Congress returns from the upcoming August recess. While the discharge petition lingers, some who have called for more disclosures are praising Trump's move to direct Bondi to request that courts unseal testimony from the Epstein case. 'This is the right course of action. Thank you @AGPamBondi and @realDonaldTrump,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) wrote on X in response to Trump's announcement. But others note that testimony transcripts are just a fraction of the materials that could give new insights into other rich and powerful people accused of participating in the abuse of young girls, as Epstein did. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), a former federal prosecutor, made that case on X late Thursday night, shortly after Trump's announcement, telling Bondi: 'Nice try.' 'What about videos, photographs and other recordings? What about FBI 302's (witness interviews)? What about texts and emails? That's where the evidence about Trump and others will be,' Goldman wrote. 'Grand jury testimony will only relate to Epstein and Maxwell.' But as the Epstein outrage saga dragged on, Trump got a boost — albeit a counterintuitive one — with the release of a Wall Street Journal article outlining his past connections to Epstein, complete with a description of a 'bawdy' 50th birthday letter that had a doodle of a naked woman. 'Enigmas never age,' Trump's birthday message to Epstein reportedly said, ending: 'May every day be another wonderful secret.' The report clearly infuriated the president, who vigorously denied the report and asserted he 'never wrote a picture in my life.' He threatened to sue the Wall Street Journal and its owner, Rupert Murdoch. But the report also had the effect of unifying Republicans in bashing the report — even those who had broken with Trump over releasing more Epstein material. Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) called the report 'nonsense.' 'If President Trump had committed real crimes, Democrats wouldn't have needed to make up stuff for their lawfare schemes. If this were true, it would have been used,' Davison posted on X Thursday night. Even Elon Musk — who helped turbocharge the Epstein saga last month when he said Trump was mentioned in the files — came to the president's defense, declaring that 'the letter sounds bogus.' Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) said that with the week's developments, the public outrage will 'eventually' die down. 'But I don't think totally,' Burchett added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store