logo
Hot Toys Unveils 'Fantastic Four' Collectibles Ahead of 'First Steps'

Hot Toys Unveils 'Fantastic Four' Collectibles Ahead of 'First Steps'

Hypebeast22-07-2025
Summary
WithFantastic Four: First Stepsshaping up to be one ofMarvel'smost stylistic reboots to date,Hot Toysis tapping into that 1960s sci-fi energy with a full lineup of 1/6th scale figures — plus a massiveGalactuscenterpiece that towers above the rest. The collection leans heavily into the film's retro-futurist aesthetic, bringing key characters to life with insane levels of detail, LED effects, andMCU-accurate sculpts.
The core team — Reed, Sue, Ben, and Johnny — are all getting the premium treatment, complete with tailored uniforms and dynamic power accessories.Pedro Pascal'sMister Fantastic comes with stretch-ability accessories and a Deluxe version that includes a fully poseable H.E.R.B.I.E. sidekick.Vanessa Kirby'sInvisible Woman brings force-field effects and a miniature Baby Franklin Richards cradle to the Deluxe set, emphasizing the family vibe of the reboot. Ben Grimm also known as The Thing arrives with textured rocky skin, swappable bearded and clean head sculpts, and multiple hands for action poses. Johnny Storm hasn't been fully revealed yet, but Hot Toys confirms a figure is on the way — and fans can expect fiery FX and flight-ready articulation.
But the real scene-stealer? The 70 cm Galactus Sofvi Masterpiece. Towering over the 1/6th figures, this soft vinyl behemoth is our best look yet at Ralph Ineson's take on the planet-eater. Designed with bumpy armor textures and LED-lit eyes, it captures the cosmic scale of the character. He even comes with five mini-figures — the full Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer — that magnetically attach to him, emphasizing just how massive he really is.
This collection isn't just about poseability — it's about storytelling. From the rolling eyeballs in the head sculpts to the foldable accessories and hand-stitched uniforms, it's clear Hot Toys is treatingFirst Stepsas more than a movie — it's a visual identity shift for Marvel's First Family.
Pre-orders for Mister Fantastic and Invisible Woman are already live viaSlideshows official site, with more figures expected to roll out leading up to the film's July 25 release in theaters.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Guillermo del Toro's ‘Frankenstein' Looks Absolutely Stunning
Guillermo del Toro's ‘Frankenstein' Looks Absolutely Stunning

Gizmodo

time17 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Guillermo del Toro's ‘Frankenstein' Looks Absolutely Stunning

When Guillermo del Toro finally got the chance to make his dream project, an adaptation of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, you just knew it was going to be beautiful. Del Toro's films are known for a lot of things, and sumptuous production design and costumes are right near the top of the list. So, it almost goes without saying that a group of new images from the film are stunning, but these almost go beyond that. First revealed in an article by Vanity Fair and then released by Netflix, 10 new images from Frankenstein show characters, scenes, and interpretations that were previously kept secret. Here they are, all at once, and we can discuss a few of them in more detail below. Clearly, we could write tomes on the beauty of each of these images. The costumes, the sets, the locations. Each one is also framed in an interesting way that helps tell a story. But, we won't do that. What we will do, though, is fill in a few questions about who's who in these photos. Del Toro himself is just in that first image, along with Oscar Isaac as Dr. Victor Frankenstein. We see Victor in his lab in a later photo, too. The photo on the steps is of Victor as a child with his mother, and a little later, you see Victor again (played at a younger age by Christian Convery) with his father, played by Charles Dance. The photo of someone holding a photo is, indeed, Elordi's monster, who we see covered in a cloak further down. Mia Goth plays Elizabeth, Victor's soon-to-be sister-in-law, who both he and the monster become infatuated with. The second photo of Goth is with her fiancé, Victor's brother William Frankenstein, played by Felix Kammerer. That leaves the man in the top hat, an arms dealer played by Christoph Waltz, and that mysterious photo among the flowers. That's Sofia Galasso and David Bradley as a little girl and a blind man who are in the original book. What does it all mean? We'll find out in November when Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein comes to Netflix. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.

'Superman' Blows Past Zack Snyder's 'Man of Steel'
'Superman' Blows Past Zack Snyder's 'Man of Steel'

Newsweek

time18 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

'Superman' Blows Past Zack Snyder's 'Man of Steel'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors Is "Superman" the better movie, or is 2013's "Man of Steel" superior? You don't have to look far to find plenty of heated and often unfriendly debate on the subject online. But while the answer to which film is better is subjective, on Tuesday Forbes reported on a purely objective fact: the domestic box office earnings for "Superman" have just passed those for "Man of Steel," making the former movie the highest domestic grossing solo Superman film ever. Read More: 'Eyes of Wakanda' - Everything We Know So Far Of course, as Forbes notes, there are some caveats. On one hand there is the matter of inflation. "Man of Steel" made $291 million in 2013 and while "Superman" has passed that number, that $291 million in 2013 would be $407 million today. David Corenswet in "Superman". David Corenswet in "Superman". Warner Bros And on the other hand while "Superman" may be leaping tall buildings domestically, internationally its numbers remain soft. While "Man of Steel" ended its theatrical run earning $379 million overseas, "Superman" is only at $214 million internationally. So while "Superman" may have defeated "Man of Steel" domestically, Forbes argues that it's unlikely James Gunn's film is going overtake Zack Snyder's overall box office once the current theatrical run ends. As far as why "Superman" is having a much weaker time overseas than its 2013 counterpart, Gunn has offered a couple of possible reasons. He's argued that Superman isn't as much of a "known commodity" across the globe, though that begs the question of why "Man of Steel" did so well. Read More: John Malkovich Cut From 'The Fantastic Four' The DC Studios co-head has also explained that he believes the global political situation is impacting ticket sales. "It also affects things that we have a certain amount of anti-American sentiment around the world right now," Gunn said. "It isn't really helping us." Regardless of how "Superman" plays out at the box office, critically it's been a hit with reviewers and fans. The film currently enjoys an 83% critics rating on Rotten Tomatoes, with a 91% audience score. "Superman" is currently playing in theaters. The film is written and directed by James Gunn. "Superman" stars David Corenswet, Rachel Brosnahan, Nicholas Hoult, Edi Gathegi, Anthony Carrigan, Nathan Fillion, and Isabela Merced. More Comics News: 'The Fantastic Four' Smashes 'Superman' Box Office Record 'Fantastic Four' Star Wants A Spider-Man Team-Up 'Fantastic Four' Early Reactions Are Overwhelmingly One-Sided

Kevin Feige Says ‘Captain America: Brave New World' Suffered From No Chris Evans
Kevin Feige Says ‘Captain America: Brave New World' Suffered From No Chris Evans

Forbes

time18 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Kevin Feige Says ‘Captain America: Brave New World' Suffered From No Chris Evans

Captain America: Brave New World A new quote from Marvel head Kevin Feige on the fate of one of the only not-great superhero movies of the year, Captain America: Brave New World, has sparked a whole lot of debate over the course of the past day. Feige, at a recent roundtable event, discussed the issues with Brave New World and said 'It was the first without Chris Evans' as a reason it struggled. Perhaps not the only reason, but the rationale is being described as 'blunt,' to day the least. He's not wrong. This is not to say that new star and new Captain America Anthony Mackie did anything wrong, but he had not been set-up to succeed in any capacity. First, he had his entire 'becoming Cap' journey shuffled into a Disney Plus series, The Falcon and the Winter Soldier, that far fewer people would watch compared to a film. And as it turned out, it was actually better than his actual debut film. Second, mantle passing is just…incredibly difficult, especially in this case. Yes, this is something that happens in the comics eventually, but in the context of the MCU it's important to consider that Chris Evans' Steve Rogers was Cap 11 times over nine years. Sam only appeared as supporting character Falcon during that time, and only managed two appearances as the new Cap across five years (certainly Marvel's fault there). Captain America This would have happened with any role. If Jane Foster stuck around to become the new Thor in her own film, that would have underperformed past Thor movies. If She-Hulk (as a Hulk replacement) was a film, that would not have done well. If Ironheart (as an Iron Man replacement) was a film, that would not have done well. We just saw Yelena more or less sub in as the new Black Widow leading the Thunderbolts and that…did not do well, and that time the movie was even good. And if they actually made John Walker the real Captain America leading a whole film, I doubt it would have done any better than Brave New World. Feige is right. The movie suffered from not having Chris Evans, though that should not be taken as a knock against Mackie's performance. There were also plenty of other, very clear reasons the movie was bad as mainly, after awful editing and big reworks, it ended up being a baffling sequel to The Incredible Hulk, complete with the 'surprise climax' of President Ross turning into Red Hulk being the full-on marketing campaign, giving the film literally no dramatic tension. As it stands, it seems that Mackie's Sam Wilson is poised to be the new leader of the not-yet-really-reassembled Avengers, but once we get past Doomsday and Secret Wars, which will be a massive ensemble featuring Thor, Thunderbolts, the Fantastic Four and a bunch of X-Men, I do wonder what his actual future holds. We may not see him much after this, just like we haven't the last five years. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store