Migration: Germany seeks 'safe countries of origin' – DW – 08/06/2025
Safe countries of origin are those whose citizens do not have to fear state persecution, according to assessments by the German government or the European Union. Whether such assessments are accurate is a matter for debate that often ends up in court.
Last week, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that EU countries are allowed to designate safe countries of origin to fast-track asylum procedures if authorities disclose the sources for their assessment. The court also found that for a country to be designated as safe, it must offer adequate protection to the entire population, including minorities.
The Luxembourg-based court also said that while having a fast-track procedure does not violate EU law, the designation of safe countries must be subject to judicial scrutiny so migrants can challenge decisions made on their asylum claims.
Germany has its own list of safe countries of origin. Asylum seekers from these countries hardly stand a chance of being granted asylum in Germany. Currently, eight European and two African countries are on this list.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The new German coalition government of center-right Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) had agreed to add more countries to the list. "We are continuously assessing whether more countries meet the requirements. In particular, a country will be classified as safe if fewer than 5% of asylum seekers from that country have been accepted over at least a five-year period."
It remains to be seen whether these plans will be as easy to implement as it sounds in the coalition agreement following the ECJ ruling. A spokesperson for the interior ministry, which is responsible for asylum policy, said that the ruling will be reviewed.
Yet the German government still intends to reform the process for determining whether a country of origin is safe. In the future, safe countries of origin are to be determined by decree. This would mean that neither the Bundestag nor the Bundesrat (the upper house of parliament representing the 16 federal states) would have a say in the matter.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The coalition has already submitted a draft bill on this issue, which is to be voted on after the parliament's summer recess. The first debate already took place last July. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt took that opportunity to criticize what he sees as an insufficient number of deportations of rejected asylum seekers: "Our goal now is to remove the obstacles to effectively limiting illegal migration," he said.
One such obstacle that the CSU politician highlighted was the fact that, under current law, people who have been ordered to leave the country are entitled to legal representation before their planned deportation can be enforced. This is one of the regulations that is to be abolished. Dobrindt hopes that this will also speed up deportations to countries already listed as safe.
Within the European Union, there are already discussions about setting up joint centers for the repatriation of rejected asylum seekers. The interior ministers of EU member states discussed this at their meeting in Copenhagen last July.
This is an idea that Dobrindt is in favor of. He pointed out that it can be difficult for individual member states to reach deals with non-EU countries, while it could be more expedient when several EU countries work together. Several countries already have concrete plans in place. "I wouldn't rule this out for Germany either," said the German interior minister.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
In Dobrindt's view, many of the people who came to Germany in the past were not eligible for asylum. He hopes that the planned reform will send a clear message: "People who come from a safe country of origin should not make the journey. Those who cannot stay should not come in the first place."
Some members of the political opposition in Germany hope that the European Court of Justice's ruling will force the federal government to change its course on asylum policy.
"The ECJ ruling on safe countries of origin is a major success for human rights and the individual right to asylum in Europe," said Green Party MP Filiz Polat. She added that the plan to classify safe countries of origin by means of a legal directive without oversight by the Bundestag and Bundesrat is not possible.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Clara Bünger of the Left Party has also called on the governing coalition to carry out a comprehensive review of the list of safe countries of origin. "Georgia and Moldova should be removed from this list immediately. This ruling also represents a clear repudiation of the federal government's plans to classify other countries, such as Tunisia and Algeria, as safe."
Same-sex sexual relations are punishable by law in both Tunisia and Algeria. Classifying these countries as safe would conflict with a key criterion established by the European Court of Justice's ruling: countries deemed safe third countries must ensure the safety of their entire population.While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
US to set up migrant detention center at Texas military base – DW – 08/08/2025
The Pentagon said the planned migrant detention center at Fort Bliss in Texas would be the largest ever built. The United States is planning to build its largest ever migrant detention facility on a military base in Texas. The initial plan is to hold 1,000 migrants at the Fort Bliss base near the Mexican border starting this month, the Pentagon said on Thursday. The facility, named Camp East Montana, would then be expanded to provide 5,000 beds for migrants in "the weeks and months ahead," according to the Department of Defense. When completed, it would be the largest federal detention center in the US, the Pentagon added. The Defense Department is funding the detention center, which will consist of short-term tent-like housing, according to US media reports citing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Although the facility is being built on a military base, the Department of Homeland Security is expected to be responsible for the people held there, according to Reuters news agency. US President Donald Trump has made the arrest and rapid deportation of undocumented migrants a key focus of his second term and masked, armed ICE agents have taken people into custody in raids at factories and farms around the country. Nationwide, 59,000 people are being held in detention, according to the nonpartisan American Immigration Council. ICE figures show the vast majority of those taken into custody have no conviction, despite the president's campaign promises to go after hardened criminals. Trump administration using military amid migrant crackdowns During Trump's first term, the Pentagon balked at building facilities to house detained migrants and the idea was dropped. His decision to activate the military in his second term is meeting with more success. In July, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth approved the use of two other military bases — in New Jersey and Indiana — to house migrants before their deportation. Earlier this year, Trump ordered the preparation of a 30,000-person "migrant facility" at the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba earlier this year, though it has not held anywhere close to that number of people. Trump's second term has also seen thousands of active-duty troops sent to the US-Mexico border. Some migrants have also been deported using military aircraft, although this has reportedly been stopped on cost grounds. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The number of migrants detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, hit record levels in recent weeks. Some 57,000 migrants were detained as of July 27, according to ICE data. Congress approved $45 billion (€38.6 billion) for building new immigration detention centers in July.
Int'l Business Times
5 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
US Judge Orders Temporary Halt To New 'Alligator Alcatraz' Construction
A US federal judge ordered a temporary pause on Thursday to further construction of the migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades known as "Alligator Alcatraz" in a case filed by conservation groups. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the temporary restraining order in a lawsuit filed against the Trump administration by Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity. The detention center, built on the site of an abandoned airfield in the Big Cypress National Preserve, can continue to house immigration detainees, but the Miami-based judge ordered an immediate two-week halt to new construction while the suit proceeds. Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity are arguing that the detention center threatens the sensitive Everglades ecosystem and was hastily built without conducting the required environmental impact studies. President Donald Trump, who has vowed to deport millions of undocumented migrants, visited the center last month, boasting about the harsh conditions and joking that the reptilian predators will serve as guards. The name "Alligator Alcatraz" is a reference to Alcatraz Island, the former prison on an island in San Franciso Bay that Trump recently said he wanted to reopen. The conservation groups that filed the lawsuit welcomed the judge's ruling. "We're pleased that the judge saw the urgent need to put a pause on additional construction, and we look forward to advancing our ultimate goal of protecting the unique and imperiled Everglades ecosystem from further damage caused by this mass detention facility," Eve Samples, executive director at Friends of the Everglades, said in a statement. Elise Bennett, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, said it was a "relief that the court has stepped in to protect the Everglades' sensitive waters, starry skies and vulnerable creatures from further harm while we continue our case." "We're ready to press forward and put a stop to this despicable plan for good," Bennett said. The ruling was also welcomed by the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, which joined the case. "The detention facility threatens land that is not only environmentally sensitive but sacred to our people," tribal chairman Talbert Cypress said. "While this order is temporary, it is an important step in asserting our rights and protecting our homeland." The detention center is also the subject of a lawsuit filed in another federal court claiming that detainees are not being given access to attorneys and are being held without charges.
DW
8 hours ago
- DW
A Sudanese city is starving: What can be done to help? – DW – 08/07/2025
The eastern Sudanese city of El Fasher has been under siege for almost a year. Fighters in the country's civil war have blocked all roads, putting around 300,000 inhabitants at risk of famine. Warnings have been coming for months. Last December, the global hunger monitor Integrated Food Security Phase Classification reported famine in two camps near the north-western Sudanese city of El Fasher, home to hundreds of thousands of displaced people. Even then, they warned Sudan's ongoing civil war could see famine spread into the city by May. The warning was prescient. El Fasher, the capital of the state of North Darfur, has now been under siege for over a year now. This week, the United Nations and a number of its agencies warned that approximately 300,000 people trapped inside the city face starvation. "WFP [the World Food Program] has not been able to deliver food assistance to El Fasher by road for over a year as all roads leading there are blocked," the UN aid program said in a statement. "The city is cut off from humanitarian access leaving the remaining population with little choice but to fend for survival with whatever limited supplies are left." Many residents are resorting to eating hay or animal fodder. Food that is available in the city costs significantly more than elsewhere in Sudan, making it unaffordable for most people. "What we really need now is for a humanitarian pause to be agreed upon so that we can safely transport urgent food and nutrition supplies into the city," Leni Kinzli, a WFP spokesperson based in Sudan, told DW. Sudan's civil war began in early 2023 when two rival military groups — the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) — started fighting for control. The SAF, with about 200,000 personnel and led by the country's de facto leader Abdel-Fattah Burhan, operates like a regular army. Burhan's government, based in Port Sudan on the Red Sea, is recognized as Sudan's government by the UN. The RSF, estimated to have 70,000 to 100,000 fighters and headed by Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, better known as Hemedti. It functions more like a guerrilla force and includes the infamous Janjaweed militias, notorious for their brutality in Darfur in the early 2000s. Both sides have been accused of war crimes. El Fasher remains the only urban center in the Darfur region not controlled by the RSF. If the RSF wins here, they would control almost all of western Sudan. The SAF-aligned militias inside El Fasher, known as the Joint Forces, prevent a complete RSF victory. This is why the RSF has laid siege to the city since April 2024, digging trenches and regularly launching attacks on it. The situation worsened in April when the RSF attacked two camps near El Fasher sheltering over 500,000 displaced people. Many fled into the city or nearby towns. As the Joint Forces inside El Fasher lose ground, the RSF has tightened the siege in recent moments, said Shayna Lewis, senior adviser on Sudan for the US-based group PAEMA (Preventing and Ending Mass Atrocities). "The Rapid Support Forces have besieged the city for over a year at this point," she told DW in a televised interview. "But it's particularly in the past few months that they've tightened that blockade. Nothing is coming in and out. We used to have donkey carts that carried food into the city but now barely anything is able to even be smuggled in." Locals say the RSF aims to starve out SAF-allied forces. There are also reports that some of the forces inside the city are preventing civilians from leaving, using them as a protective buffer. "They attacked us; it was exhausting," Enaam Mohammed, a Sudanese woman who fled El Fasher for the nearby town of Tawila, told journalists this week. Tawila, around 40 kilometers (25 miles) away, has seen a massive influx of around 400,000 displaced people since April. Diseases like cholera and measles are now spreading there. "[They asked us] 'Where are the weapons? Where are the men?'" Mohammed continued, describing her experience with the RSF. "If they find someone with a mobile phone, they take it. If you have money, they take it. If you have a good, strong donkey, they take it." Mohammed says she also saw the RSF killing people and raping women. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Currently the conflict is at what analysts have described as a "strategic stalemate." Alongside other smaller groups, the RSF controls much of western Sudan, while the SAF controls the east. Earlier in July, the RSF set up their own civilian government, effectively splitting Sudan in two. There is no credible peace process and heavy fighting is ongoing in other parts of Sudan too. "Both parties view the conflict through a zero-sum lens," analysts at the Italian Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI) wrote earlier this year. "The victory of one side is entirely dependent on the defeat of the other." Neither side wants to negotiate, observers say. Exacerbating that is foreign backing for the different fighting groups. In July, the US postponed a meeting about Sudan that would have brought together Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. The Saudis and Egyptians are thought to support the SAF and the UAE, the RSF — all deny providing military aid to Sudanese groups. The meeting is now planned for September. This week, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called SAF leader Burhan to ask for a week-long ceasefire that would allow aid into El Fasher. Burhan agreed but the RSF has yet to consent. The impact of the war also goes well beyond the besieged city of El Fasher, the WFP's Kinzli pointed out. The UN regularly calls what is happening in Sudan the world's largest humanitarian crisis. Aid agencies estimate that around 12 million people of Sudan's 46-million-strong population have been displaced by the conflict and that around 150,000 people have died as a result of it. There are famine conditions and infectious diseases in other parts of the country too. "What we need from the international community is two things," Kinzli said. "One, of course, is funding — because the scale of needs in Sudan is just so high. We're looking at 25 million people who face acute hunger and that's a moderate estimate. The resources we have available are just not able to meet that level of need." The second thing aid agencies like the WFP would like to see is "increased attention and engagement" with Sudan from the international community, she argues. "Primarily to help bring an end to this conflict by bringing all parties to the table, but also to join us in our calls for unfettered humanitarian access," she says. "What needs to happen in Sudan is that the flow of aid needs to be larger than the flow of weapons," Kinzli concluded. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
