logo
US threatens Mexican airline flights over cargo, competition issues

US threatens Mexican airline flights over cargo, competition issues

Time of India19 hours ago
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The Trump administration said on Saturday it is taking a series of actions against Mexico over the Mexican government's decisions to rescind some flight slots for U.S. carriers and force U.S. cargo carriers to relocate operations in Mexico City.U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said in a statement the department could disapprove flight requests from Mexico if the government fails to address U.S. concerns over decisions made in 2022 and 2023. The department is also proposing to withdraw antitrust immunity from the Delta Air Lines joint venture with Aeromexico to address competitive issues in the market.Mexico is the most popular international destination among U.S. airline travelers.Delta said if the U.S. Department of Transportation withdraws approval it "would cause significant harm to consumers traveling between the U.S. and Mexico, as well as U.S. jobs, communities, and transborder competition."The Transportation Department said Mexico has not been in compliance with a bilateral air agreement since 2022 when it abruptly rescinded slots and then forced U.S. all-cargo carriers to relocate operations in 2023.Mexico's Transport Ministry and major Mexican airlines, including Aeromexico, could not be immediately reached for comment.Duffy said Mexico was expected to complete construction to alleviate congestion at Mexico City's Benito Juarez International Airport (MEX), but that has yet to materialize three years later."By restricting slots and mandating that all-cargo operations move out of MEX, Mexico has broken its promise, disrupted the market, and left American businesses holding the bag for millions in increased costs," the department said.The USDOT also said it could take action against European countries over limitations at airports. "We are monitoring European States to ensure that they apply the Balanced Approach process for noise abatement at their airports and do not implement unjustified operational restrictions," the department said.The Transportation Department issued a pair of orders requiring Mexican airlines to file schedules with the department for all their U.S. operations by July 29 and requiring prior U.S. approval before operating any large passenger or cargo aircraft charter flights to or from the United States."Mexico has altered the playing field significantly for airlines in ways that reduce competition and allow predominant competitors to gain an unfair advantage in the U.S.-Mexico market," the department said. "Mexico's actions harm airlines seeking to enter the market, existing competitor airlines, consumers of air travel and products relying on time-sensitive air cargo shipments traded between the two countries, and other stakeholders in the American economy."If the U.S. rescinds antitrust approval for Delta and Aeromexico, they would be required to discontinue cooperation on common pricing, capacity management, and revenue sharing, but Delta would also be able to retain its equity stake in Aeromexico, maintain all of its existing flying in the U.S.-Mexico market unimpeded and continue a partnership.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vijay L Bhambwani's Ticker: The reason why bulls aren't stepping out yet
Vijay L Bhambwani's Ticker: The reason why bulls aren't stepping out yet

Mint

time12 minutes ago

  • Mint

Vijay L Bhambwani's Ticker: The reason why bulls aren't stepping out yet

Ticker is a weekly newsletter by Vijay L Bhambwani. Subscribe to Mint's newsletters to get them directly in your email inbox. Dear reader, Last week, I wrote optimism was giving way to desolation. Bulls were showing a lack of conviction not seen for months. Traded volumes shrank sizeably, and take-home profits shrank significantly. It became a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts. Traded volumes were poor because profits were meagre, and profits were meagre because traded volumes took a hit. This vicious circle will be broken only after traded volumes rise significantly. Where yields on theta decay (collecting premiums) on option writing are concerned, the low-hanging fruit has been picked already. The road ahead seems to be mildly uphill. That means increased capital intensity and lower take-home profits. That means a small portion of present traders may exit the markets, atleast temporarily. US president Trump continued to threaten nations with additional tariffs and kept markets on the edge. Particularly noteworthy was the threat to impose sanctions on Russian oil exports and nations that bought Russian oil and gas. That includes India. Overseas institutional investors continued to press short sales on Indian markets inspite of announcements of a near breakthrough in India-US trade deal. That was an overhang of overhead supply for retail traders who were stuck with purchases at higher levels. This phenomena of overhead supply occurs when a sizeable number of traders are waiting in the wings to offload their open trades as soon as they reach break-even levels. This usually acts like a speed-breaker for a bull market. That means buyers must not only buy in large volumes but they must continue to buy in large volumes till all the overhead supply is absorbed and selling pressure subsides. That is a challenging task. It will show up on your trading terminal's screen on the snap quote window. If the bid/offer spreads (difference between the best buyer and best sellers limit orders) narrow to within 5-6 ticks, you know liquidity is improving. The value of a tick is 5 paise per share for stocks trading above ₹ 250. In the commodity markets, industrial metals may see month-end short-covering lifting prices. That can have a trickle-down effect on stock prices of some metal mining companies' stock prices. Much will depend on the overall market sentiment prevalent this week. If sentiments are cautious or weak, the rally in these stocks may be subdued as well. Public sector undertakings (PSUs) will continue to witness hectic activity in two-way trades as traders are heavily invested in this segment. Banks will attract greater attention among PSU stocks as this segment commands the heaviest weightage in the Nifty. Precious metals witnessed profit-taking at higher levels as the US dollar index gained strength. Safe-haven buying eased mildly. If you are a patient long-term investor, look beyond 2025 and the bullish story is still intact. In the energy space, the markets continue to remain adequately supplied, and rallies are proving to be seasonal and short-lived. Higher levels are running into a wall of selling. While geopolitical and/or natural events (June to October is the hurricane season in the US) can trigger short-covering, it is likely to be short-lived. Fixed income investors should continue to keep the powder dry as market indicators points towards little or no room for actual rates to fall. While headline (policy announcement) rates may fall, borrowers are unlikely to access availability of funds at those rates. Trade light as markets lack depth and bid/offer spreads are too wide for comfort. Maintain tail risk (Hacienda) hedges on your trades to protect your capital from sudden shocks. A tutorial video on tail risk (Hacienda) hedges is here - Rear View Mirror Let us assess what happened last week so we can guesstimate what to expect in the coming week. The fall was led by the Bank Nifty whereas the Nifty brought up the rear. The US dollar index (DXY) firmed up and exerted pressure on emerging markets including India. A strong dollar dragged bullion and oil prices lower too. The rupee fell against a firm dollar and that made banking stocks more volatile. Indian 10-year bond yields eased marginally, which cushioned declines in the Bank Nifty. The NSE's market capitalization rose mildly, which indicates mild optimism present in the markets even as headline indices remain under pressure. Market wide position limits (MWPL) rose routinely, but gains were marginal. US markets rose and provided tail winds to our markets and limited the downsides. Retail Risk Appetite I use a simple yet highly accurate yardstick for measuring the conviction levels of retail traders – where are they deploying money. I measure what percentage of the turnover was contributed by the lower and higher risk instruments. If they trade more of futures which require sizeable capital, their risk appetite is higher. Within the futures space, index futures are less volatile compared to stock futures. A higher footprint in stock futures shows higher aggression levels. Ditto for stock and index options. Last week, this is what their footprint looked like (the numbers are average of all trading days of the week): The high-risk and capital-intensive futures segment saw no change in turnover contribution for the week. In the relatively lower-risk options segment, turnover rose in the lowest-risk segment in the derivatives category – index options. These are also the least capital-intensive to trade. Overall, risk appetite fell off the cliff in the derivatives segment. Matryoshka Analysis Let us peel layer after layer of statistical data to arrive at the core message of the first chart I share is the NSE advance- decline ratio. After the price itself, this indicator is the fastest (leading) indicator of which way winds are blowing. This simple yet accurate indicator computes the ratio of number of the rising stocks compared to falling stocks. As long as gaining stocks outnumber the losers, bulls are dominant. This metric is a gauge of the risk appetite of 'one marshmallow' traders. These are pure intraday traders. The Nifty clocked smaller losses last week and the advance-decline ratio climbed marginally. At 1.11 (prior week 0.75) it shows 111 gainers for every 100 losers. That shows intraday traders shower improved optimism last week. As long as the reading stays above 1.0 sustainably, bulls still have a chance. A tutorial video on the marshmallow theory in trading is here - The second chart I share is the market wide position limits (MWPL). This measures the amount of exposure utilized by traders in the derivatives (F&O space as a component of the total exposure allowed by the regulator. This metric is a gauge of the risk appetite of 'two marshmallow' traders. These are deep-pocketed, high-conviction traders who roll over their trades to the next session/s. The MWPL reading edged higher mildly, but was lower than the reading in the comparable week last month. That tells us optimism, though present in the market, was lower as traders were cautious about enhancing their exposure levels. A dedicated tutorial video on how to interpret MWPL data in more ways than one is available here - The third chart I share is my in-house indicator 'impetus.' It measures the force in any price move. Last week both indices fell with rising impetus readings. That tells us the selling momentum was higher and traders willingly participated in the selling process. Ideally prices and impetus readings must rise together to indicate a sustainable bull market. The final chart I share is my in-house indicator 'LWTD.' It computes lift, weight, thrust and drag encountered by any security. These are four forces that any powered aircraft faces during flight; so, applying it to traded securities helps a trader estimate prevalent sentiments. The Nifty clocked smaller losses last week and the LWTD reading was flat. That tells me fresh buying support is unlikely to change radically this week. Short-covering can cushion declines but it takes aggressive fresh buying to overcome overhead supply and trigger a new high. A tutorial video on interpreting the LWTD indicator is here - Nifty's Verdict The Nifty's weekly candlestick chart shows a third consecutive week of declines. The magnitude of the fall was, however, smaller. The peak made three weeks ago was marginally lower than the previous peak in September 2024. The support I specified last week at the 24,800 mark held, and that tells me bulls still have a fighting chance as long as they can defend this threshold. The price is above the 25-week moving average, which is a proxy for the six-month average of an average investor. The medium-term outlook remains optimistic as long as this level holds. A fresh reliable upthrust is possible only after the 25,750 recent high is overcome forcefully. That will confirm that the overhead supply has been absorbed. Your Call to Action Watch the 24,800 level as a near-term support. Only a break out above the 25,750 level raises the possibility of the bull market resuming. Last week, I estimated ranges between 58,075 – 55,450 and 25,750 – 24,550 on the Bank Nifty and Nifty respectively. Both indices traded within their specified resistance levels. This week, I estimate ranges between 57,500 – 55,050 and 25,525 – 24,400 on the Bank Nifty and Nifty respectively. Trade light with strict stop losses. Avoid trading counters with spreads wider than 8 ticks. Have a profitable week. Vijay L Bhambwani Vijay is the CEO of a proprietary trading firm. He tweets at @vijaybhambwani

How to Clean Your Smart TV the RIGHT Way
How to Clean Your Smart TV the RIGHT Way

Time of India

time12 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How to Clean Your Smart TV the RIGHT Way

Internet Revives Katie Johnson's 2016 Lawsuit Vs Trump; Grok Asked To Fact Check A resurfaced tweet about Katie Johnson's 2016 lawsuit against Donald Trump has reignited outrage online, amassing over 7 million views. Johnson had alleged Trump raped her in 1994 when she was just 13 at a party hosted by Jeffrey Epstein. Although the case was dropped before the election, allegedly due to death threats, it included supporting affidavits and briefly resurfaced before being withdrawn again. Now, with Trump under scrutiny for past ties to Epstein and backlash from his own supporters demanding transparency, the debate over the 'Epstein Files' is back in full force. 7.3K views | 1 day ago

Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House
Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House

Economic Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Who dares to defy Trump? Why the world is haunted by this White House

Donald Trump is the 14th US president of my lifetime, and he claims a unique distinction. Through all the previous White House incumbencies, months went by when even educated, informed British, German, Indian, Brazilian, French or Australian people did not give a moment's thought to America's we noticed when a president visited our country or started a war or got impeached or had an incredibly beautiful wife who dressed wonderfully. We knew that the US was the richest and most influential nation on earth, and that on the big things we needed to play follow-my-leader. But even somebody like me, who lived in the US for a couple of years, and visited regularly until January 2025, did not lie awake nights wondering what our neighborhood superpower might do that has changed. We used to mock nervous nellies who went through life terrified that a plane might crash onto their house. Now, however, we know exactly how the plane-crash neurotics feel. We are mesmerized, haunted, by everything Trump says and does, because nobody can predict his next mood swing. This delights the man himself. All he wants from life is unimaginable wealth and the rest of us bowing to his every whim. He is the Sun King, the epicenter of global attention, because he has shown the willingness as well as the power to make rain or shine in accordance with should be allowed to pretend that this is normal. It is absolutely abnormal. It represents political climate change in some ways more bewildering than living on a planet that is getting hotter, because on some days our country — whichever that may be — finds itself microwaved by the White House, while on others it is suddenly exposed to permafrost. The latest example is Trump's announcement that the US will send new air-defense systems to Ukraine, purchased by NATO members, together with long-range missiles. This is unequivocally a good thing. Ukrainian city-dwellers have been enduring a nightly battering from Russian missiles and drones against which they have become almost defenseless, as the flow of US weapons has slowed. The big question is how serious is the president's change of heart after months of rubbishing Ukraine and its leader — and how long it will last. He himself says he is 'disappointed' by Vladimir Putin, but 'not done with him.' Since the inauguration, Russian oligarchs have been freer to do business in the US, and Washington agencies charged with monitoring their activities have been shut has renewed support for Ukraine mostly because he feels personally snubbed by Putin. If that changes, so once again could American policy. Then there is the global economy. Some of the smartest economists say they are unsure whether US business can survive the roller-coaster ride launched by Trump, most conspicuously through tariffs, or whether the economy will tank. Willful uncertainty about the future of Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve, with attacks renewed this week by Trump, further rocks confidence. The respected Martin Wolf of the Financial Times is among those who characterize the Trump tariffs as 'crazy,' an adjective he reprised this week. Mohamed El-Erian, formerly a Wall Street investment whiz and now a distinguished academic, is among those who admits that he has no idea how the Trump story will play out. We should never underestimate America's resilience and stupendous capacity for innovation. But he writes in the current Foreign Affairs that the only rational course for other nations is to build robust financial defenses and reduce their dependence on the US, while forging new relationships, because there is no early prospect, and perhaps no prospect even after Trump, that the US will resume its historic role as a reliable partner. El-Erian warns both nations and corporations against what behavioral scientists call 'active inertia' — 'when actors recognize that they need to behave differently but end up sticking to familiar patterns and approaches regardless.' The question almost every government in the world is asking itself is whether it dares to defy Trump. Two weeks ago, he warned Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva that he would impose 50% tariffs on the country's exports to the US unless criminal proceedings are dropped against former President Jair Bolsonaro, for his 2022 attempt to stage a coup, to retain power after losing the last election. There is no pretense that this threat is linked to trade balances. It is merely a component in what we can call Trump's dictator protection program. He was a warm supporter of Bolsonaro, widely considered an appalling as well as corrupt national leader. Bolsonaro's son Eduardo has close personal relations with the Trump clan. Lula responded with outrage to Trump's threat, saying 'no one is above the law.' His country's exports to the US amount to only 2% of its gross domestic product, but a 50% tariff will undoubtedly cause disruption. The European Union faces even more serious dilemmas in determining its response to lobbying by Trump, backed by tariff threats, on behalf of US Big Tech. There is an issue here that goes beyond mere commerce. The tech giants profit mightily from running almost open-house content policies, which some of us consider deeply corrupting, especially of the young. Brussels has been striving to regulate social media, and to punish companies that spread anti-social material. But Trump is batting for the tech giants to enjoy free rein — 'free speech' as he and his acolytes call it — and to be spared from EU retribution. So great is Europe's fear of a wider trade war, that its regulators may yet bow to Washington. It is highly debatable whether the EU will risk deploying its Anti-Coercion Instrument against America, even though tariff blackmail offers an obvious justification for it. Then there is Iran. Will the US attempt to parley with the mullahs about their nuclear program, or revert to bombing? My friends, including one very well-informed Israeli, say that Benjamin Netanyahu suckered Trump into joining his war; that the Iranians, though unquestionably a malign force, were not about to produce a nuclear weapon; and that force alone cannot resolve the problems and threats posed by Iranian regional aggression. But whether Trump will fall out of love with Netanyahu as he now professes to have fallen out of love with Putin, we cannot tell. The president himself does not know what he might do, or not do, next Tuesday. It is the not knowing that scares the world so much — and which makes us talk about Donald Trump almost every day.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store