Wrexham MP addresses concerns around asylum seekers
I receive communication from constituents about a wide range of issues.
One of the concerns expressed is around asylum seekers.
This is also a topic which sees substantial disinformation and misinformation across media and social media.
Language and terminology is really important and I want to address some of the common questions that I receive on this subject.
'Asylum' means 'protection given by a country to someone fleeing from persecution in their own country' (House of Commons Library).
A person seeking asylum is often awaiting refugee status.
If they do not qualify for refugee status, they may still be granted leave to remain in the UK for humanitarian or other reasons.
'Why are hotels and luxury apartments being used to house immigrants when there is a housing crisis in the UK?'
This is an example of a question I have received from a constituent recently.
It is worth noting that there are 3,253 asylum seekers in Wales and 107 in Wrexham according to figures as of March this year.
Where hotels are used, the accommodation is dormitory style, all facilities are closed and not available, food is provided but not choice of menu.
To be clear, there are no asylum hotels in Wrexham and those seeking asylum are in dispersed accommodation.
This means the Home Office gives contracts to the private sector not councils to find accommodation.
This accommodation is a flat or room in an HMO for example.
Asylum seekers do not have access to the welfare system or any benefits.
They receive a weekly subsistence payment rate of £49.18 per person for people living in self-catered accommodation or £8.86 a week for those in full-board accommodation like a hotel.
The weekly amount is credited to a pre-paid debit card which can use be to pay for goods or withdraw cash.
According to the House of Commons Library, in 2024, asylum seekers and refugees made up around 16% of immigrants to the UK.
It is important to understand that most people who migrate to the UK do so legally for work or family reasons.
There is a shortage of skilled workers in the UK, as we have seen in the NHS. Work is ongoing to address this.
The small boat crossings must be addressed along with the problems in the asylum system where the backlog is unacceptable.
The UK Government has recently made an agreement with France and this new pilot scheme will see small boat arrivals being detained and returned to France.
An equal number of migrants will then be able to come to the UK from France through a new legal route.
Those coming into the UK must be fully documented and go through a stringent security check as opposed to uncontrolled entry such as small boats.
In addition to the asylum process, the UK has operated various routes for people seeking humanitarian protection in the past.
The three recent examples of this are the Afghan, Syrian and Ukrainian resettlement programmes.
Like other countries, the UK follows the 1951 Refugee Convention that a refugee should not be returned to a country where they face serious threats to their life or freedom and that there are minimum standards for how refugees should be treated including a right to housing, work and education.
As ever, if you have any queries or concerns or you have an issue that you would like me to try and assist you with, please do not hesitate to contact me on 01978 788854 or Andrew.Ranger.mp@parliament.uk
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
32 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Police chief calls for urgent guidance for forces after cover-up accusations
Warwickshire police and crime commissioner Philip Seccombe is calling for fresh national guidance to be issued after the charging of two men – reported to be Afghan asylum seekers – prompted accusations that the force withheld information about their immigration status. The pair are accused of raping of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. Mr Seccombe said: 'Like all forces, Warwickshire Police finds itself in a difficult position of trying to carefully balance the legal safeguards which protect the integrity of the judicial process, while maintaining public order and simultaneously ensuring that public confidence is maintained through transparency and honesty. 'Currently police forces are in an invidious position when deciding what can and should be disclosed in sensitive cases, given that the national guidance is silent on both the ethnicity and immigration status of suspects. 'It is very easy to criticise and suggest that the balance of disclosure hasn't been correct, but it is much harder to take these decisions on the ground.' On Wednesday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said police should reveal more information about suspects, and that guidance to police was already being looked at. But she added it was an 'operational decision' for forces and the Crown Prosecution Service over what information to release. She said: 'However, we do think that the guidance needs to change, the College of Policing is already looking at this, and Home Office officials are working with the College of Policing.' The Nuneaton case has led to fresh pressure on police over the information they make public. The Southport atrocity committed by Axel Rudakubana in July last year was marked by a focus on the suspect's ethnicity and immigration status, with false rumours spreading online that he was a Muslim asylum seeker, fuelling riots after the stabbings. Mr Seccombe added: 'It is imperative that police forces have revised guidance as soon as possible, so everyone has the clarity needed on what information will be released, when it will be released and by whom, for any incidents going forward.'
Channel 4
an hour ago
- Channel 4
‘Sanctions won't stop the war'
We spoke to Kira Rudyk in Kyiv who is a Ukrainian politician and leader of the opposition Holos Party.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Minister contradicts terms of Labour's migrant returns deal
Labour's migrant returns deal with France has descended into farce as a minister appeared to contradict the terms of a new treaty. Cabinet minister Lisa Nandy said small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France. However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place. Asked whether human rights challenges amounted to a loophole in the plan, Culture Secretary Ms Nandy said: 'That's not the case at all. 'The deal that we've struck will allow… us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. 'Those claims will be heard in France.' She told Sky News: 'I know that the Conservative Party has been saying that this is a loophole. It isn't and we're really confident about that.' However, the treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim'. The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full. It was a narrower interpretation of the circumstances than those set out by Ms Nandy, and legal proceedings could take months or even years to wrap up. The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda scheme. Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed. The Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, has published an analysis of the new measures which says: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France. 'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.' Meanwhile, the French interior ministry led by Bruno Retailleau - who signed the treaty alongside Home Secretary Yvette Cooper - declined to answer questions about the deal. Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement. But earlier today – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel. He said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'. 'On the very day Labour's flagship Channel deal was meant to kick in, I watched French ships escort illegal migrants straight into British waters,' Mr Philp said. 'Labour's migrant surrender deal with France is in shambles and today has proven that it will have no deterrent effect whatsoever.' It is unclear whether the Home Office had detained any of the new arrivals for possible removal to France. Officials had previously described how migrants would be taken to the Home Office's processing centre at Manston, near Ramsgate in Kent, for initial screening. Those selected would be sent to short-term detention facilities for further screening, and then on to an immigration removal centre.
