Karnataka cabinet approves bill to criminalise engagements of minors
Briefing reporters after the meeting, Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said the Cabinet has cleared the proposal and the Bill will be introduced in the upcoming session of the legislature.
The cabinet took note of the fact that nearly 700 child marriages were reported across the state during 2023-24.
The decision follows a resolution passed at a high-level meeting chaired by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, where Deputy Commissioners of the districts and Chief Executive Officers (CEO) of Zilla Panchayats were directed to take stricter measures to prevent child marriages.
This Bill sends a strong message that not only child marriage, but even betrothing a minor is unacceptable and will attract legal consequences, the Minister said.
"We have brought radical changes socially. People who were escaping the legal action cannot get away. We are doing whatever best could be done to check child marriages," Patil said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
44 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Bars in Andhra Pradesh allowed to operate until 11 p.m. as Cabinet approves new policy
The Andhra Pradesh Cabinet approved the Bar Policy 2025–28, based on the recommendations made by the Cabinet Sub-Committee, on Wednesday. As part of the new policy, which will come into force after August 31, the bars in the State will remain open from 10 a.m. to 11 p.m. The Cabinet also cleared a proposal to allow permit rooms, which were disbanded during the previous YSR Congress Party's (YSRCP) tenure. Disclosing the details of the Cabinet meeting, Information and Public Relations (I&PR) Minister Kolusu Parthasaradhi said that the Cabinet Sub-Committee had studied the bar policies of other States and engaged with the stakeholders before finalising its recommendations. The Bar Policy 2022–25, which is set to expire on August 31, was based on an auction system and saw the issuance of licences to 840 bars. 'The current policy led to several operational difficulties. Hence, the government decided to introduce a new bar policy to address these challenges,' said Mr. Parthasaradhi. The new policy allows bars to operate from 10 a.m. to 11 p.m., offering greater flexibility for licence holders and consumers. It was noticed that more than 2.07 lakh law and order cases were registered due to open consumption of liquor. To address the issue, the Cabinet decided to allow permit rooms, with a maximum capacity of 1,000 sft, the Minister said. The newly approved policy also proposes a shift from the auction system to a lottery-based allocation, which will be implemented only in the areas where a minimum of four applications are received per bar licence available. Licensing fee The new licence period will be effective from September 1, 2025 to August 31, 2028. The application fee will be ₹5 lakh. The licence fee would be ₹35 lakh if the population is less than 50,000; ₹55 lakh if the population is between 50,000 and 5 lakh; and ₹75 lakh if the population is more than 5 lakh. At least four applications must be received for each bar. To ensure fairness and increased participation, the government is considering allocating bar licences through a lottery system, moving away from the auction method followed during the YSRCP's tenure. To promote social welfare and inclusivity, the government has reserved 10% of bar licences for toddy tappers (kallu geetha workers) at 50% of the standard fee. This measure is aimed at supporting the livelihoods of traditional workers within the excise ecosystem, the Minister added.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Now, pay more for affidavits; stamp duty rates revised
Bhopal: Agreements for leasing out property or affidavits from the notary for renewing firearms licence and other services is going to cost more. The Madhya Pradesh Assembly on Wednesday passed the Indian Stamp (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Bill, 2025 that proposes a steep hike in stamp duty for all judicial and non-judicial purposes. The passage of the bill is likely to help the state in mopping up an additional Rs 212 crore annually from the people. Opposition Congress MLAs strongly criticised the bill stating it would burden the common man. With the new Bill rates of affidavit, immovable property agreement, development, construction or bond agreements, consent deed, corrections in already registered documents, renewal of revolver and pistol licenses, partnership deed, power of attorney and for property of trusts the increase has been made from 100% to 400%. Allegations and counter allegations were witnessed between the govt and opposition during the debate on the bill with the opposition strongly demanding its withdrawal stating it will hit the ordinary man. The opposition alleged that the govt is taking frequent loans citing need for state's development, while on the other hand it is putting additional financial burden on the common man. Deputy chief minister Jagdish Devda who is also the finance minister stated these amendments are being proposed after approximately 11 years to rationalize the stamp duties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Your Current Make-Up Routine Might Be Aging You Learn More Undo He also maintained that the amendment would affect prices of only about 10% of documents. Stamp duties for the rest remain unchanged, the fiancé minister stated. The govt cleared eight bills by the end of the day. The assembly was adjourned sine die on Wednesday evening, two days earlier from the schedule of the monsoon session that was till August 8. In his closing remark the leader of opposition, Umang Singhar urged the govt to increase the MLA constituency development fund to Rs 5 crore so that MLAs can carry out development works in their constituencies. Currently, the MLA fund in MP is Rs 2.5 cr. The CM assured the LoP that the govt would seriously consider the proposal.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
New clause could leave BCCI out of RTI ambit
New Delhi: A proposed amendment to the newly-introduced National Sports Governance Bill 2025 being circulated among Members of Parliament could put the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) outside the purview of the Right to Information Act since it doesn't receive grants or financial assistance from the central or state governments. BCCI will have to be registered as a National Sports Federation and follow the provisions of the Bill. (Hindustan Times via Getty Images) The bill, which seeks to bring in reforms in governance of Indian sports bodies, was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 23 by Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and is yet to be taken up for discussion in the House, amid a continuing stand-off over the Opposition's demand over a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The clause 15 (2) of the bill states, 'A recognised sports organisation shall be considered as a public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 with respect to the exercise of its functions, duties and powers under this Act.' A new clause that is being inserted into the bill clarifies what constitutes a public authority. 'A recognised sports organisation, receiving grants or any other financial assistance from the Central Government under sub-section (1) or from a State Government, shall be considered as a public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005, with respect to utilisation of such grants or any other financial assistance.' HT has seen a copy of the bill. Under the RTI Act, a public authority is a body 'established, constituted, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the Central Government or the Union Territory administration, the Central Government; or by the State Government.' According to people aware of the development, 'The amendment was done just to bring the bill in line with the RTI Act, 2005. BCCI might not take financial grants from the government but they do take government assistance such as infrastructure, subsidised land, state facilities, etc.' The cash rich BCCI has long resisted being brought under the RTI Act. The powerful sports body never required government recognition as a National Sports Federation as BCCI manages its own finances. However, with cricket is now an Olympic sport as part of the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Games and the Bill is seen as part of preparatyions for making a bid to host the 2036 Games. In 2018, Chief Information Commission (CIC) held the BCCI as the public authority under RTI Act, and put in place a system of online and offline mechanisms to receive applications for information under RTI Act. The Ministry of Youth And Sports Affairs was directed to take necessary steps to ensure implementation of this order. However, BCCI filed a writ petition in the Madras high court which granted a stay order. BCCI will still have to be registered as a National Sports Federation and follow the provisions of the Bill. If the Bill becomes law, it will be the first time that BCCI will become a designated 'NSF.' BCCI will have to seek recognition from the National Sports Board (NSB) and refer its legal cases to the National Sports Tribunal, both proposed in the sports Bill. According to the Bill, the National Sports Board shall have the power to grant recognition to any sports organisation as 'National Sports Body.' The NSB can suspend or cancel recognition of the sports body or its affiliate units if the provisions of the act are violated or in case it 'failed to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed' or there were 'gross irregularities in the election procedures.' It can also act if the federation 'failed to publish annual audited accounts or misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds.' The NSB shall consult the respective global governing body before taking any such decision, stated the Bill. There is another proposed amendment that states a person shall not be qualified to contest for election in a federation or seek nomination to the posts of the president, secretary general or treasurer unless previously served as a member for 'at least one full term in the executive committee of the national sports body or as the president, or the secretary general or the treasurer in its affiliate unit.' In the original Bill, the duration a person needed to serve for the top three posts was two full terms as member of the executive committee. This restrictive clause, however, doesn't apply for the Sportsperson of Outstanding Merit (SOM), according to the proposed amendment.
