'Sanskrit Going Extinct, Only Census Can Save It!': Truth Behind Viral Claim
Social media warns Sanskrit faces extinction without census support. But with ongoing use in rituals and education, the language remains alive and actively preserved
A message circulating on social media warns of the possible extinction of the Sanskrit language, urging citizens to declare Sanskrit as their first language in the upcoming national census. The claim suggests that failure to do so may result in Sanskrit being labelled as 'extinct', which could subsequently lead to the withdrawal of government grants, educational assistance, and preservation efforts.
While it is accurate that Sanskrit is spoken by a relatively small number of people today, this limited usage does not imply the language is extinct.
The Census Push
Social media posts claim that the census will be concluded by March 2027, and encourage people to select 'Sanskrit' when asked about their mother tongue and languages known. Although Sanskrit is not widely spoken in everyday conversation, it is still regularly used in daily worship, chanting, the recitation of shlokas, and during religious rituals.
According to the 2011 Census of India, 24,821 people reported Sanskrit as their first language, a significant rise from 14,135 in the 2001 census. In certain villages such as Dimmar in Uttarakhand, Mattur in Karnataka, and Jhiri in Madhya Pradesh, Sanskrit remains in active daily use.
Sanskrit, regarded as India's oldest and original language, holds deep cultural and religious significance. Various efforts continue to support its preservation. Numerous universities across India and abroad offer courses in Sanskrit, and some Indian states include the language as a compulsory or optional subject in schools.
Educational institutions like Utkal University and the National Sanskrit University are dedicated to the teaching and research of Sanskrit. Furthermore, government bodies, including the Ministry of Education, have specific budget allocations for Sanskrit's promotion, and separate grants are provided to institutions engaged in its study and preservation.
Census And Language Policy: Understanding The Link
The census is a key instrument in collecting data related to population, socio-economic indicators, education levels, and languages spoken. This information assists in the creation of government policies and development plans. Data concerning the number of speakers of a language can help indicate whether targeted support or special schemes are necessary for its preservation.
However, government grants and support for a language are not determined solely by the number of speakers. Factors such as a language's historical, cultural, and constitutional status also play a significant role. Sanskrit, for instance, is included in the Eighth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, which formally recognises its official importance.
What Constitutes Language Extinction? A Closer Look
The decision to classify a language as 'extinct' is not made lightly. It involves defined criteria established by international organisations such as UNESCO. A language is considered extinct when no person speaks it as their mother tongue and no younger generation is learning it.
While several Indian languages are indeed endangered and at risk of extinction, the suggestion that Sanskrit will lose government support unless listed as a first language in the census is inaccurate and overstated.
Sanskrit's Enduring Significance And Future Outlook
Despite a decline in its everyday use, Sanskrit continues to be preserved through religious, educational, and scholarly practices. The language's historical, cultural, and religious value ensures that it remains eligible for ongoing government and institutional support, backed by dedicated budget allocations and national recognition.
In conclusion, while raising awareness about Sanskrit's role and encouraging its learning is important, the claim that it faces extinction or funding loss unless declared as a first language in the census lacks factual basis. The language remains a living cultural treasure, supported by a broad network of public and academic institutions.
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 17, 2025, 10:17 IST
News explainers 'Sanskrit Going Extinct, Only Census Can Save It!': Truth Behind Viral Claim | Fact Check
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Man's Reddit post asking ‘Why do Indians abroad look down on their own' sparks debate
A man who has lived in the United States for over a decade shared a candid post on Reddit about an encounter with a fellow Indian in New York City that left him feeling disheartened. His post sparked discussion on how Indians abroad treat each his post on Reddit's 'r/India' thread titled 'Is It Just Me or Do Indians Abroad Look Down on Their Own? Here's My Personal Experience,' the man explained how a casual interaction turned lived in the US for over 10 years and picked up the habit of smiling at strangers, making small talk, just being friendly, you know? Feels normal here. But something odd happened recently in NYC that made me think,' he wrote. He continued, 'Saw a guy who looked Indian at a coffee shop, so I smiled and said hi. Instead of being chill, he gave me this 'who the hell are you' look and responded pretty arrogantly, talking about his startup and how much he's raised. Honestly, he acted like I was below him.'The situation took an unexpected turn when the man revealed, 'Here's the best part turned out his last funding came from a VC firm where I'm actually an LP/angel investor, and the partner is a good friend. When he realised, his energy immediately changed. Awkward doesn't even cover it.'The man concluded his experience by saying, 'Why is it that a lot of Indians abroad act like this with each other? Like, would it kill us to just be nice or at least not look down on someone? But put the same guy in front of a white person, and he'd probably be all smiles and manners. Not sure what it is - ego, insecurity, or just a bad habit. But honestly, it sucks. Anyone else experience this? Is it just me?'Take a look at the viral Reddit post here: Reddit users had a lot to say about the viral post. 'I always smile, but other Indians don't care, so I stopped as well. This is too much in Germany compared to the UK,' a user said. Sharing a similar view, another user said, 'Hot take as someone living in Germany for six years: Germans are more friendly and welcoming than they seem. Indians—it's like a lottery, you'd never know what you'd get. Drawing parallels from your experience, most Indians I've met are absolute show-offs. I've had countless second-hand embarrassing moments.'Others offered a balanced perspective. 'I see both sides of the coin. I'm in a city in the UK, and I too smile and make small talk with people I meet. However, I've noticed something in my student-facing service job. If I become friendly with another Indian, they expect favours or favourable behaviour from me. At the same time, I have also met fellow Indians who are just nice human beings. So, I'd say those who look down are pre-empting a judgement. The benefit of the doubt should be given. Be kind,' said a users linked this behaviour to insecurity. 'Yup. I live in Vancouver and I've often seen this. It's nothing but insecurity. Forget about random Indian guys, even my colleagues give this look of 'how did this company sponsor a visa for you?' Like, stop judging me based on skills and start treating me like a human first,' one user user attempted to explain, 'I'm probably going to get downvoted for this, but here I go. First, what happened with you, that I am not condoning. As someone else wrote above, it's because they're a douche, not because they're Indian. But I'm going to say there are a small percentage of Indians who choose not to associate with other Indians. They try to remain cordial, though. The reason is that (especially here in Europe) a lot of people from India, BD, and Pakistan behave in the most disrespectful manner. From aggressively hitting on teaching assistants to playing loud music in public to misbehaving with women in bars. And the worst part is, even if you try to explain, they don't seem to care. That's why people like me avoid other Indians in public unless we know them personally.'advertisementWhile several users admitted to mixed feelings, others simply disagreed. 'I'm an Indian in the US, and I am always happy at the prospect of finding another Indian around,' said one user added, 'While I'm having coffee on the street and minding my own business, if someone randomly approaches me right there, it does seem justified to be annoyed at first. I'm aware it's an American thing to do, but it's a weird thing honestly. I dislike only poorly-mannered, loud, misogynistic idiots. You don't need to be Indian to be that. But if they're Indian, it's easy to spot them from afar since I'm also an Indian.'The Reddit post triggered discussion about how stereotypes can be harmful and why they should not be generalised. For several users, the takeaway was simple: kindness shouldn't come with conditions.- Ends advertisement
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why UP's proposed ‘One District, One Cuisine' initiative risks flattening India's rich food heritage
The first time I went to Lucknow, in 2013, I followed the usual script handed out by friends, family, and the internet. I sampled the famous galawat ke kebab at Tunday Kababi, biryani from Idrees, kachoris from Durga Khasta Corner, chaat from Royal Café, and, of course, a steaming kulhad of chai from Sharma Ji ki Chai. Lucknow's food felt like a neatly curated checklist; one dish, one shop, one picture for each craving. But moving and living in Lucknow has changed how I taste the city. Kebabs, chai, kachori, or even chutney — there are dozens of variations, each with its own loyal following and story. Chowk's tangy khasta is nothing like Hazratganj's buttery one, and the tea that fuels conversations in Aminabad tastes and feels different from the chai in Gomti Nagar. When people ask me for food recommendations today, my goal is simple: To make them see Lucknow beyond galawati kebabs and Instagram-famous shops. That's why the Uttar Pradesh government's proposed 'One District, One Cuisine' initiative, which got a boost after Lucknow's nomination for 'UNESCO's Creative City of Gastronomy' got accepted, and through which the government intends to popularise one cuisine from each district, worries me. It sounds neat on paper — who wouldn't want to link every district to a proud local delicacy? But food doesn't work like that. A city's culinary identity is not a single dish on a pedestal. It's a messy, fragrant, indefinable table where stories, communities, and forgotten recipes coexist. How do you pick one dish to represent Lucknow when its foodscape includes street-side kachoris, temple prasads, majlis tabarruk, and home-cooked aloo gosht with a side of faith, migration, caste, and family history? Food is part of our intangible cultural heritage, a way of life passed down through generations. Recipes, cooking techniques, and even the etiquette of dining are reflections of values, belief systems, and social identities. As Harvard anthropologist Theodore Bestor said, 'the culinary imagination is the way a culture conceptualises and imagines food'. Reducing an entire district to one state-approved 'representative' dish risks flattening that imagination, turning living traditions into branded commodities. Just as there is no one 'Indian' language, there is no one 'Indian' food. India's culinary heritage is enormous, shaped by local ingredients, caste-based cooking methods, and regional beliefs. For the longest time, the West thought Indian food meant butter chicken. Now, chefs like Vijay Kumar are changing that narrative; Semma, which serves South Indian food, has won Michelin stars three years in a row in New York. That's what happens when you let food speak for itself instead of forcing it into a simplified box. India's diversity cannot be captured in a single dish. What we eat, how we eat and why we eat what we do are key to understanding India's social landscape. It is a work of caste, class, religion, region and kinship. Consider Lucknow again. During Muharram, some distribute roti, others sharbat or khichda; during Shravan, some cook sabudana khichdi, others make makhana kheer or khamang kakdi. These are not just recipes but expressions of belief and community, woven into social interactions and rituals. Which one of these would you choose to represent 'Lucknow's cuisine'? And more importantly, who gets to decide? Colleen Taylor Sen, in Feasts and Fasts (2014), describes Indian cuisine as 'an active, ever-changing product of 5,000 years of political upheavals, migrations and conquests, revelries and lamentation'. How then can a policy like 'One District, One Cuisine' hope to do justice to this dynamism? Social media already promotes homogeneity by amplifying the most photogenic or viral dishes. The algorithm favours popularity, not cultural nuance. When state policy mirrors that behaviour, we risk celebrating virality instead of vitality. Food scholar Lucy M Long defines culinary tourism as 'the intentional, exploratory participation in the foodways of another — participation including the consumption, preparation, and presentation of a food item, cuisine, meal system, or eating style considered to belong to a culinary system not one's own.' Culinary adventuring, whether through street food in a far-off country or at an immigrant-run eatery in your own city, promotes diversity and understanding. A plate of kebabs in a Hazratganj restaurant might tell a story of aristocratic Awadhi refinement, while the same kebab in a Chowk stall speaks of street-side hustle and working-class ingenuity. A one-cuisine policy stands to kill curiosity by presenting a single, state-sanctioned narrative of what a place 'tastes like'. Which story would 'One District, One Cuisine' choose to erase? Food is not just about consumption; it is about belonging. A humble plate of food can be a profound communicator of identity: both a representation offered by those who cook it and an experience for those who taste it. In multicultural societies, culture is constantly recreated and reconstructed through interactions, and food often crosses ethnic and religious boundaries. Khamiri rotis, for example, are shared between Hindus and Muslims in Old Delhi; sharbat is as much a community beverage in Muharram as it is during a langar or bhandara during festivals. When policies are imposed from the top down, they risk silencing these organic cultural exchanges. Promoting food democratically, from the bottom up by listening to the people who cook, sell, and eat these dishes every day would be a different matter altogether. But if it comes through government committees and hashtags, it feels less like a celebration and more like appropriation. To truly celebrate Uttar Pradesh's food, we need to listen to its kitchens, not its hashtags. The writer is a chef and author
Deccan Herald
4 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
How Bengaluru handles dry waste differently from India's mega cities
Bengaluru generates over 6,000 tonnes of waste every day, a combination of wet, dry, and sanitary waste. Unlike many other Indian cities, the dry waste here is handled through a decentralised system. Watch the video to know what happens to your waste once it leaves your doorstep.
