MSPs pass legislation to scrap SQA for new Scottish exams body
Both Labour and the Conservatives voted against the Bill, which will dissolve the Scottish Qualifications Authority, and set up a new organisation, to be called Qualifications Scotland to take its place.
This is expected to be up and running in the autumn of 2025 – after this year's exams results come out.
It comes almost five years after the 2020 exams scandal, where marks for more than 124,000 youngsters were downgraded after exams had to be scrapped as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.
But Labour education spokesperson Pam Duncan-Glancy said: 'Instead of abolishing the SQA today the Bill allows the current leadership to transfer wholesale.'
She insisted that 'on reform this is a job unfinished'.
Similarly, Scottish Conservative education spokesperson said the changes, in the Education (Scotland) Bill would not deliver the 'meaningful reform for Scotland's education system which is urgently needed'.
He argued that the new exams body was 'little more than a rebrand of the SQA'.
Briggs said: 'The SQA needed an overhaul, not a cosmetic makeover, and the changes proposed fall way short of what is required to ensure the organisation can operate effectively and is properly accountable.'
But speaking as the legislation was passed by 69 votes to 47, eeducation secretary Jenny Gilruth rejected those claims.
Instead, she said, the Bill would 'fundamentally create a new and a different type of organisation which works with the teaching profession differently'.
In addition it will establish a new chief inspector of education, who will be tasked with inspecting nurseries, schools and colleges across Scotland.
Here she said there was a 'cast-iron guarantee' that the person who takes up this post would have 'suitable teaching and educational leadership experience'.
The education secretary said: 'Through the creation of a new qualifications body and an independent inspectorate, the Bill enables a more responsive, trusted and effective national education infrastructure.'
The legislation, passed after two nights of late sittings at Holyrood, will provide 'the scaffolding which supports the wider range of education reform', she added.
Briggs, however, said: 'It does feel like the Bill has been rushed through Parliament in the last week of term.'
He added that 'this Bill has not been the opportunity many of us had hoped it would be', claiming it was 'clear SNP ministers' policies and half-baked reforms are not delivering for our young people'.
Duncan-Glancy was also critical, saying: 'We needed a qualifications system fit for the future, one that respects the efforts of learners, supports the judgment of teachers, and earns the trust of employers and universities.
'We needed a curriculum that is broad and inclusive, we needed an inspectorate that can challenge where necessary but also celebrate excellence. But on reform this is a job unfinished.'
Gilrtuh said afterwards: 'The successful passage of this legislation shows this Government is serious about implementing the changes needed to drive improvement across Scotland's education and skills system.
'The creation of a new, national qualifications body is about building the right conditions for reform to flourish – the new body will ensure that knowledge and experience of pupils and teachers are at the heart of our national qualifications offering.
'The new inspectorate body will also have greater independence and the power to set the frequency and focus of inspections, moving this function away from ministers, to His Majesty's Chief Inspector.'
She added: 'Taken together, our major programme of education and skills reform will bring about the changes needed to meet the needs of future generations of young people.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Scrap Tory two-child benefit limit to lift kids out poverty' Neil Kinnock says
In an interview with The Mirror, the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said the Tories had left the country in a state that would 'make Charles Dickens furious' with 'intolerable' hardship Neil Kinnock has said the controversial two-child benefit limit should be scrapped to lift hundreds of thousands of kids out of poverty. In an interview with The Mirror, the former Labour leader blamed the Tories for undoing Gordon Brown's proud legacy of cutting child poverty. He said after 14 years the Conservatives left the country in a state that would "make Charles Dickens furious" with "intolerable" hardship. Getting rid of the two-child benefit limit - one of the most severe cuts to the welfare state by austerity Chancellor George Osborne - would be the "immediate and direct way of trying to correct the conditions the government inherited," he said. It comes after Mr Brown hit out at the return of 'poverty of 60 years ago'. READ MORE: KEVIN MAGUIRE: 'Labour must find engaging story for the UK - or face election wipeout' The policy, which restricts Universal Credit and Child Tax Credits to the first two children, has been blamed by charities for trapping kids in poverty. Labour MPs are calling on Keir Starmer and Chancellor Rachel Reeves to axe the policy at the Budget in the autumn, or as part of an ongoing child poverty review. Asked whether the government should now scrap the two child benefit-limit, Lord Kinnock, who led Labour between 1983 and 1992, said: "I would want them to do it. They may not be able to do it all at once, but I really want them to move in that direction because the figures are that if that did occur it would mean that about 600,000 kids, fewer, are in poverty." He later added: "Yes, I would say that. It might have to be done in a phased fashion - simply because of the revenue implications - but heading strongly and evidently in that direction is the way to go." The former Labour leader said tackling child poverty - among other issues facing the country - could be paid for by a tax on the assets of the super-rich or a hike in levies on the top 1%. He told The Mirror: "I think people would see the justification of increasing taxes on assets and the very, very highly paid - I'm talking about the top 1% - in order to make the transfer directly to reduce child poverty. "I know it's the economics of Robin Hood, but I don't think there is anything terribly bad about that." Lord Kinnock has previously said a 2% levy on asset values over £10million - a "very big fortune" - could bring in around £11billion for the Treasury. He added: "The thing is we live in a fair country where the instincts are fair, so people approve of the idea of the broadest backs bearing the heaviest burden. "Of course the very rich do make a substantial contribution. It's not enough. And it hasn't kept pace with the increase in their asset wealth. Simple and straightforward as that." Earlier this year official figures showed a record 4.5million children living in poverty. Pressed on what this said about the state of the nation, Lord Kinnock said: "All you've got to do is reflect where we were under Gordon Brown's government when they cut child poverty gigantically by millions. "In 15 years, starting from a position where beneficial change was taking place, we've got to the place that would make Charles Dickens furious. It's been allowed to happen because the kids are voiceless and their parents feel powerless. I defy anybody to see a child in need and not want to help." Keir Starmer has previously vowed to slash the number of kids living in poverty. And Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who is leading the child poverty task force alongside Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, has suggested ending the two-child benefit limit remains on the table. Asked what he would like to see from the taskforce, Lord Kinnock said: "Recognise the basic thing that poverty exists because people haven't got enough money. That's so obvious you almost feel foolish saying it. But unless and until it's recognised in operational policy then it's going to continue." Lord Kinnock made clear he wants to see a reform of the "unjust" tax system. He told The Mirror: "To do it in the name of equity, fairness. "People need to see a demonstration of the fact that things really are changing for the better. We live in a country now where lots of people are utterly fed up. When the encountered reality that whatever happens in the world, whatever happens in Britain, the same people come out on top, always, untouched." Ahead of the autumn Budget, Lord Kinnock also praised the "smart" and "gutsy" Chancellor Ms Reeves. He added: "She's got a very, very difficult task. Last July they [Labour] inherited a phenomenal mess, a gigantic mess, almost of a post-war scale and we haven't had a war. "What we have had is 14 years of continual and chronic underinvestment in crucial areas. Not just the health service and education system, but the care system... virtually eradicated. The support for young families, really smashed to pieces. "The [defence] forces, so underinvested, that we've got a smaller army than we had at the time of the Napoleonic wars. All of that is cumulative and just as in every other sphere in life, demolition is easy. Reconstruction is difficult. "They've got this huge task of reconstruction. It is fundamental. I would actually like them to treat it not only as a terrible challenge, which it is, but also an opportunity that the mess that the Tories left is so big, so wide, that it could be used as an invitation for radical change. "My gut tells me, my brain tells me, that our country needs that."
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer under new pressure over migrants after 700 protestors stage angry demo at Scots asylum hotel that housed rapist
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer faced mounting pressure over the housing of illegal immigrants last night after 700 people were involved in angry clashes outside a migrant hotel in a Scots town. Police had to call in reinforcements as local residents and anti-racism groups hurled bottles and insults at each other outside the hotel in Falkirk which can hold more than 50 asylum seekers. Community tensions had reached fever pitch after Afghan asylum seeker Sadeq Nikzad, 29, – a former resident in the hotel – was jailed in June for raping a local 15-year-old schoolgirl. Yesterday, one of Sir Keir's own Labour MPs said he believed that migrants should be removed from Falkirk's Cladhan Hotel. Euan Stainbank, the MP for Falkirk, said: 'These hotels don't work for host communities or those who stay there and their use will be ended by this government.' And a senior Tory MSP demanded Sir Keir's government find an alternative way to house migrants as soon as possible – and said locals had 'legitimate safety concerns for themselves and for their children'. Yesterday's demo is the first large-scale asylum hotel protest in Scotland following similar demonstrations in England, notably outside The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex. On Friday, Epping Forest District Council managed to secure a temporary block on The Bell accepting any further asylum seekers due to an increase in community tensions. If a judge rules in the council's favour on Tuesday it could open the door to a flurry of similar applications to the courts to dismantle asylum hotels at a community level, including from Falkirk. But last night Scottish Conservative Community Safety spokeswoman Sharon Dowey called for Labour to intervene as a priority. She said: 'Robust action is needed from Labour ministers if they're serious about keeping Scots safe. 'They can start by heeding the concerns of local communities and look into closing these hotels by delivering an alternative solution to housing asylum seekers.' Recent Norstat polling suggests the vast majoity of voters in Scotland, 77 per cent, want immigration to either decrease or remain at current levels. The survey published in February 2025 appeared to mirror a UK-wide trend in voters seeing immigrantion as an issue of concern. Ms Dowey believes this weekend's protests 'reflects the widespread outrage felt by those in the community' following the rape conviction of Nikzad. The migrant, who had entered the UK illegally on a small boat, subjected a vunerable 15-year-old to an 'appalling, opportunistic attack' in Falkirk in October 2023. He was later handed a 12-year extended sentence at the High Court in Livingston. The Afghani claimed he'd not been educated on 'cultural' differences and repeatedly shouted 'liar' at judge John Morris, KC. Nikzad – who had uploaded a picture of himself onto his Facebook posing in one of the chairs inside the Cladhan Hotel – is due to be deported after serving his prison term. Hundreds of people turned out to protest alongside Save Our Future and Our Kids' Future outside the hotel yesterday, including Darren, a local father, who claimed he feared for the children's safety in the area. He said: 'There are kids getting followed home and it all leads back to here. And it's not just young lassies, it's boys as well.' Father-of-two Connor Graham took to a megaphone to tell protesters: 'Here's my message: We are not going away. We are not going to be intimidated into silence. And we are certainly not going to be written off as extremists. 'We want a safer Falkirk... we want answers and we want action and we want the same thing every decent person should want, a community where our children can grow up safe.' On the opposite side of the protests was Claire Love, a 42-year-old social worker from Bonnybridge, who joined Stand Up to Racism counter-protestors. She told The Mail she feared there had been an 'increase in racism, homophobia and xenophobia in recent times'. Falkirk MP Mr Stainbank said the former Conservative Government was to blame for a 'broken asylum system' and insisted his party will get to grips with the issue. Referencing the Tory scheme that aimed to send failed asylum seekers to Rwanda which Labour scrapped when it won power last year, he said: 'We must fix the broken asylum system for communities such as Falkirk and those fleeing conflict across the world. 'Refocusing resources away from Rwanda and onto processing will allow us to end the use of asylum hotels, which were set up by the Tories and many of their rebranded Reform colleagues. 'This approach has already seen the asylum backlog reduced by over 59,000 by the start of 2025 compared to if we had kept the Tories broken system. 'These hotels don't work for host communities or those who stay there and their use will be ended by this government.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'Since taking office, we have taken immediate action to fix the asylum system and have started closing down hotels and returning more than 35,000 people with no right to be here. 'From over 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023, costing almost £9 million a day, there are now fewer than 210, and we want them all closed by the end of this Parliament. 'We will continue to work closely with community partners across the country, and discuss any concerns they have, as we look to fix this broken system together.'
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Eco-hypocrite' Miliband refuses to reveal his number of domestic flights
Ed Miliband has been branded an eco 'hypocrite' after refusing to reveal how many domestic flights he has taken. Ministers insisted the Energy Secretary would not disclose any details about his air travel within the UK since he entered office last July. Claire Coutinho, shadow energy secretary, said the refusal represented 'one rule for him and another for everyone else' given that the Left-wing frontbencher has been a vociferous opponent of domestic air travel. Labour has also forced through significant increases to air passenger duty that have added hundreds of pounds to some family holidays. The accusation came after a Conservative MP challenged the Energy Secretary to publish details of the internal UK flights he has taken since the last election. Answering on Mr Miliband's behalf, Michael Shanks, the energy minister, replied: 'Details of internal domestic flights are not published.' Claire Coutinho, the Tory shadow energy secretary, said: 'As Ed Miliband sticks a holiday tax of up to £400 on a family of four, it does seem the height of hypocrisy that he won't reveal his own flights, which are funded by the taxpayer. 'People expect transparency and fairness from their politicians, but when it comes to the most stringent net zero costs, it's one rule for him and another for everyone else.' Mr Miliband's stance is in line with other Whitehall departments, which also do not release details of ministers' domestic flights. The Government said it was 'the practice of successive administrations', including Tory ones, not to 'publish granular information' about their movements. Mr Miliband, who is in charge of net zero policies, has previously said Britons should cut down on such flights 'as much as we possibly can'. But he was embarrassed earlier this year when it emerged his department is spending more on internal flights under his watch than the Tories. Figures released in April revealed it spent £44,000 on domestic flights for ministers and officials between July and December last year. That was more than the £40,000 spent in the first half of 2024 by the Tories, when Ms Coutinho was in charge of the net zero ministry. Mr Miliband has previously suggested that the Government should encourage ordinary voters to take trains and buses rather than flying. Asked when he was shadow business secretary whether domestic flights should be banned, he said: 'Not completely, but as much as we possibly can.' Speaking to the BBC in 2021, he added: 'Fairness and giving people alternatives is an absolutely key part of making this transition happen.' Labour repeatedly criticised the Conservatives for taking flights and pledged before the election to clamp down on ministers' use of jets. But since taking office, Mr Miliband has been heavily criticised for jet-setting, which has seen him spend 10 times more on foreign trips than Ms Coutinho. The Energy Secretary spent £62,712 on overseas travel in his first six months in office, according to Taxpayers' Alliance analysis, In contrast, his Tory predecessor spent just £6,155 during her first half-year in the role.
