Actor Vijay Raaz Acquitted In 2020 Sexual Harassment Case Due To Lack Of Evidence
Vijay Raaz is known for his roles in films like 'Stree', 'Delhi Belly' and 'Dedh Ishqiya.
A court in Maharashtra on Thursday acquitted Bollywood actor Vijay Raaz in a sexual harassment case filed by a colleague in 2020, holding that the 'prosecution failed to present sufficient evidence against him".
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Gondia) Mahendra Sorte dropped the charges under IPC sections 354-A (sexual Harassment) and 354-D (stalking) pressed against the actor.
A crew member had alleged that the actor sexually harassed her during the shoot of the movie 'Sherni' about five years ago.
As per the complaint filed at the Ramnagar police station in Gondia, the alleged offence was committed between the night of October 25, 2020, and the morning of October 29, 2020.
On November 4, 2020, Raaz was arrested in Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh, where the film crew was staying. He was released on bail the same day.
The complainant stated that the incident took place in a hotel, but the investigating officer did not visit the spot, the order said.
The judge said the complainant mentioned the names of two to three persons working at the hotel, but their statements were not recorded.
'The investigating officer did not conduct any further investigation. Therefore, the evidence presented by the prosecution appears weak and insufficient. Even the seized CCTV footage does not clearly show the accused committing the alleged act," the court said.
The prosecution has 'failed to conclusively prove the guilt of the accused", so the benefit of doubt goes to the accused, held the court.
The court said the oral evidence presented by the prosecution was not sufficient to convict the accused. Hence, he is acquitted, it added.
The actor's lawyer Saveena Bedi Sachar said that Raaz, who was shooting near Nagpur for 'Sherni', had to not only leave the film shoot midway but also lost work thereafter.
Since he has now been declared innocent, this case should serve as an example for people who declare every accused as guilty as soon as allegations are levied against him, the advocate added.
Raaz is known for his roles in films like 'Stree', 'Delhi Belly' and 'Dedh Ishqiya.
First Published:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
42 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Minor's sexual assault case: HC upholds charges against suspended Delhi govt official
The Delhi High Court has refused to quash the charges framed against suspended Delhi government official Premoday Khakha, who allegedly raped a minor girl several times. The High Court also upheld the charges of causing miscarriage of the minor girl and disappearance of evidence framed against the official's wife, Seema Rani. It further refused to set aside the charge against his two children and wife under Section 21 of the POCSO Act for failure to report the offence despite having knowledge. "This court is of the considered opinion that there is no perversity or legal infirmity in the order passed by the sessions court framing charges against petitioner Premoday Khakha for offences under Sections 376(2)(f), 376(3), 323, and 354 of the IPC, and Sections 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act," Justice Swarana Kana Sharma said in the judgment passed on July 15 and made available on July 28. Premoday was charged for the alleged offences of raping a girl while being a relative or in a position of trust or authority towards her, and raping a girl under 16 years of age and causing hurt. The court also rejected Premoday's contention that the charges against him should be quashed or that he should be discharged on the ground of his alleged inability to impregnate the prosecutrix due to his prior vasectomy. The accused had raised the argument that even if the girl's allegations are taken at face value, she could not have become pregnant since he had undergone a vasectomy procedure in 2005, rendering him allegedly incapable of reproduction. "In this regard, the sessions court has rightly observed that the mere fact of having undergone vasectomy does not conclusively establish that the accused was incapable of committing penetrative sexual assault or of impregnating the prosecutrix. "It has been correctly noted that vasectomy, as a medical procedure, is not infallible, and there are medically documented cases of conception occurring despite a male partner having undergone such a procedure," the High Court said. Premoday has been accused of allegedly raping a minor girl, the daughter of a person known to him, several times between November 2020 and January 2021. He is currently in judicial custody after his arrest in August 2023. The official's wife Seema Rani allegedly gave the girl medicines to terminate her pregnancy. She is also in judicial custody. The High Court passed the order while dismissing the pleas by Premoday, Seema, their son Harsh Prateek and daughter Prateeksha challenging framing of charges against them by the trial court. The High Court said the trial court order did not suffer from legal infirmity or perversity. While upholding the charges against Seema and their two children, the court said they failed to report the incident to the authorities despite having knowledge. "The material available on record, including the categorical statements of the prosecutrix and the surrounding circumstances, sufficiently indicate that the said accused persons were aware of the commission of the offence and failed to report the same to the concerned authorities," it said. The husband-wife duo was arrested in August 2023 after the survivor recorded her statement before a magistrate at a hospital. Their children were granted anticipatory bail by the Supreme Court in January 2024. The case was registered under provisions of the POCSO Act and Indian Penal Code.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Surrogacy racket accused sent to 5-day police custody
The Hyderabad police on Friday took Dr Athaluri Namratha (65), the owner of Universal Srushti Fertility Centre at Secunderabad, and the prime accused in the fake surrogacy racket into five-day custody for further questioning, officials familiar with the development said. Surrogacy racket accused sent to 5-day police custody Namratha, who was arrested along with seven others, by Gopalapuram police on July 27, were remanded to judicial custody by a Nampally criminal court on the same day. On Thursday, the court granted custody of the accused to the police for questioning for five days, starting Friday. After conducting the mandatory medical examination at Gandhi Hospital, the police shifted Namratha to the office of the deputy commissioner of police (north zone) in the afternoon. 'I did not commit any crime. It was a fabricated case based on false allegations made by an army guy. I shall disclose all the details shortly,' Namratha told reporters at Gandhi Hospital. However, investigations by the police revealed that this was not the first time that Namratha indulged in the business of illegal child trafficking and fake surrogacy. 'She is a habitual offender with several cases pending against her in different police stations across Telangana and Andhra Pradesh,' said the remand report submitted by the Hyderabad police before the court. HT has seen the report. Namratha was booked for cheating the patients with fake IVF procedure cases in 2010 and 2013 in Visakhapatnam and Guntur respectively. Between 2020 and 2023, she was booked in nine other cases, including five in Gopalapuram police station in Secunderabad and four in Visakhapatnam. 'She was charged with kidnapping (IPC Section 363), trafficking of persons (Section 370), forgery for the purpose of cheating (Section 468) and pretending fake documents to be genuine (Section 471). In two cases registered in the Maharanipeta police station in Visakhapatnam, she was also charged under Section 81 and 87 of Juvenile Justice Act, which deals with the sale and purchase of children,' the report said. The remand report explained in detail the modus operandi adopted by Namratha in the latest instance of buying a new born male child from an Assam couple and selling them to a Rajasthani couple, claiming that he was born through surrogacy at Visakhapatnam. The couple, who have been in Hyderabad since 2024, had approached Namratha at her Universal Srushti Fertility Centre, seeking the birth of a baby through IVF method. After conducting tests on the mother, Namratha told her that the IVF method would not work out for her and she could obtain a child through surrogacy. The couple were told that the doctors will use their sperm and eggs for surrogacy. The baby would be handed over after DNA confirmation by arranging a woman from the clinic and charged over ₹30 lakh from their service. However, the doctor used different sperm and eggs for surrogacy. After a woman conceived, she was shifted to Visakhapatnam where the woman delivered a baby boy in June this year. Later, the baby was handed over to the couple who left for Rajasthan. When the couple asked the doctor to conduct the DNA tests for the child, Namratha resisted first and later took the samples from husband for a DNA test. When there was no response from the fertility centre for several days, the couple got the tests conducted at a DNA forensic lab in Vasant Kunj in Delhi, whose reports indicated that the baby was not biologically connected to the father. When the couple tried to contact Namratha with the genuine DNA reports, she blocked their mobile numbers and started avoiding them over the phone. On June 23, 2025, the couple visited the clinic at Secunderabad and met Namratha 'Namratha admitted her mistake in handing over the wrong surrogacy child to the parents on pretext of fabricated IVF and surrogacy process. She deliberately cheated the couple by collecting huge amounts from the couple,' the remand report said. The report also pointed out that an anaesthetist from Gandhi Hospital was found to be hand in glove with Namratha in conducting the fertility tests at her centre. 'The anaesthetist Nargula Sadanandam, who was aware of the illegal operations at Universal Srushti Fertility Centre and was knowingly administering anaesthesia to patients who were undergoing tests. He was also among the arrested,' the report said. Namratha also engaged agents in Visakhapatnam, Hyderabad and Vijayawada, who would lure financially vulnerable women to act as surrogate donors, offering them money and introducing them to her. One of the agents Dhanasri Santoshi, a housewife, was also arrested along with Namratha. The police said Mohammed Ali Adik and Nasreen Begum, the child's biological parents are currently imprisoned in Chanchalguda jail. Their biological child, who was offered to the Rajasthani couple, was shifted to Sisu Vihar, belonging to the Telangana state women and child welfare department. A case has been registered against Namratha, the biological parents and others under sections 61 (criminal conspiracy), 316 (criminal breach of trust), 335 (making a false document), 336 (forgery), and 340 (forged document or electronic record and using it as genuine) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and sections 38, 39 and 40 of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021.
India.com
3 hours ago
- India.com
MP Prajwal Revanna To Be Sentenced In Rape Case Today
The court on Friday pronounced Revanna guilty in the obscene video and rape case. Judge Santhosh Gajanana Bhat delivered the verdict. The court is scheduled to announce the quantum of punishment on Saturday, after allowing the convict, Prajwal Revanna, and his counsel to make their final submissions on the conviction. Prajwal Revanna was produced before the court, and as soon as the verdict was pronounced, he was seen with tears in his eyes, wiping them while seated inside the courtroom. After stepping out of the court hall, he sat down in a chair in visible despair and broke down, unable to process the shock. The court deferred the judgment on July 30, citing the need for certain clarifications. After seeking inputs from both sides and issuing directions, the matter was adjourned until this day. He was arrested last year and has been in jail for 14 months. The case in question pertains to a rape complaint and other charges filed by a domestic worker from K.R. Nagar against Prajwal Revanna. The court has reviewed 26 pieces of evidence in connection with the case. Prajwal Revanna faces three other similar cases. Videos allegedly showing Prajwal Revanna sexually assaulting women and recording the acts surfaced during the 2024 Lok Sabha election period. Following this, Prajwal fled the country. A victim from Holenarasipura initially filed a police complaint against him. Upon his return to Bengaluru on May 31, 2024, he was arrested by the Bengaluru Police. His return came after public appeals from former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda and Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy. Prajwal was lodged in Bengaluru Central Jail, and his multiple bail pleas were outrightly rejected by all courts. One of the videos that caused widespread outrage during the election period shows the alleged sexual assault on an elderly domestic worker at a farmhouse in Holenarasipura. In the video, the woman is seen pleading with Prajwal to spare her, stating that she had served food to his father and other family elders. The Special Investigation Team (SIT) had filed cases under IPC Sections 376(2)(n) (repeated rape on the same woman), 506 (criminal intimidation), 354A(1) (unwelcome physical contact and advances, sexual demands), 354B (use of criminal force with intent to disrobe), 354C (voyeurism -- capturing images of a woman engaged in a private act without her consent), along with relevant sections of the Information Technology Act. Police had collected strong evidence in this particular case. They recorded the statement of the victim, collected the samples of semen of Prajwal Revanna from the clothes of the victim, and also obtained the video of the sexual assault.
