No 10 defends Healey amid accusations he misled Commons over Afghan data leak
Opposition critics have demanded the minister 'correct the record' after it emerged days later that MI6 spies and members of the SAS were among those named in a list emailed out 'in error' in February 2022.
Asked whether Mr Healey had misled MPs, a Number 10 spokesman said: 'I believe it was an accurate statement.'
He said the Government is 'committed to transparency' and 'in terms of security of our personnel, we take take that extremely seriously, particularly those in sensitive positions.'
On Thursday, it emerged that details of more than 100 Britons, including those working for MI6 and in special forces, were included in the spreadsheet sent outside authorised government systems by a defence official.
Defence sources have said information relating to personnel was included in the dataset after they had endorsed Afghans who had applied to be brought to the country.
An injunction over the breach was sought by then defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace, and a wider-ranging superinjunction, which prohibits disclosure not just of the information but of the order itself, was granted in 2023.
The initial breach saw a dataset of 18,714 people who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) scheme released. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) only becoming aware of the blunder when excerpts were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023.
The leak also led to the creation of the secret Afghanistan Response Route, which is understood to have cost about £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million.
The gagging order was granted by the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban finding out about the breach, and lifted on Tuesday.
Speaking to the Commons following the revelations on Tuesday, Mr Healey said: 'To the best of my knowledge and belief, no serving member of our armed forces is put at risk by the data loss.'
It is understood the names of a small number of personnel were included in the list, but no contact details or addresses.
Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said: 'Three days ago John Healey claimed no-one serving in the armed forces was put at risk by the data breach. Today we found out that appears to be false.
'We need to know if any serving members of the armed forces were impacted – and the Defence Secretary must urgently come before Parliament to answer the question of whether he knowingly misled MPs and the public.'
Lib Dem MP Ian Roome said: 'It is really important to restore public trust that he now clarifies his remarks. It is the least that our brave armed forces personnel along with the thousands of Afghans impacted deserve.'
The Lib Dems said Mr Healey should 'urgently come to Parliament and correct the record.'
Meanwhile, Tory ex-ministers have sought to distance themselves from the handling of the breach after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said members of the previous government had 'serious questions to answer' over the episode.
Former immigration minister Robert Jenrick said he and former home secretary Suella Braverman had 'strongly opposed' plans for the Afghan Response Route in 'internal meetings'.
Ex-defence secretary Sir Grant Shapps said he had kept the superinjunction in place in order to 'save lives' and err 'on the side of extreme caution'.
But speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Friday, the ex-MP for Welwyn Hatfield said: 'I would do the same thing all over again. I would walk over hot coals to save those lives.'
Asked whether he supported calls from the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) for the publication of an intelligence assessment which formed the basis of the superinjunction, he said: 'Yes, I would.'
He added he knew the committee 'won't like' the fact the incident had been kept secret but 'it was just so sensitive that if anything had got out at all, it would put those lives at risk'.
Despite having kept the order in place during his tenure as defence secretary, which lasted just under a year, Sir Grant said he was 'surprised' it had remained for 'so long'.
He added: 'I don't think it should have carried on as long as it had. I'm surprised that it has. Those questions are for others.
'But I came in, the problem was there, I dealt with it, and as a result I think that we saved lives.'
Meanwhile, the chairman of the ISC said the previous government had ignored the usual process whereby the committee is able to see sensitive information to ensure there is scrutiny.
Lord Beamish told BBC Radio Scotland: 'I think there are serious constitutional issues here.'
A total of about 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the relocation scheme.
The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked.
The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments, before it was lifted on Tuesday.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch has apologised on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak, telling LBC: 'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there … and we are sorry for that.'
Former armed forces minister James Heappey, himself an ex-Army officer who served in Afghanistan, said ministerial colleagues offered no 'fierce opposition' to the relocation scheme.
Mr Heappey also said claims he had backed a 'new entitlement' for people affected by the breach but not eligible for other schemes were 'untrue'.
Ms Braverman has said there is 'much more that needs to be said about the conduct of the MoD, both ministers and officials'.
Former veterans minister Johnny Mercer claimed he had 'receipts' regarding the previous government's actions in relation to Kabul, and has described the handling of the breach as 'farcical'.
Sir Ben has said he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction because the decision was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk.
A Ministry of Defence spokesman said: 'It's longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on special forces.
'We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
8 hours ago
- Reuters
Ghana defence minister among eight killed in helicopter crash
ACCRA, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Ghana's Defence Minister Edward Omane Boamah died in a military helicopter crash on Wednesday along with four other officials and three airforce crew, the government said. Julius Debrah, President John Mahama's chief of staff, told a press conference that the crash in which Boamah, Environment, Science and Technology Minister Ibrahim Murtala Muhammed and others were killed was a national tragedy. "The president and government extend our condolences and sympathies to the families of our comrades and the servicemen who died in service to the country," Debrah said. Authorities did not immediately give an explanation for what might have caused the crash. Earlier Ghana's armed forces said radar contact had been lost with a Z9 airforce helicopter. Boamah, a former communications minister, was tapped to serve as defence minister in January after Mahama returned to power. His replacement will take on a complex security file that includes both external and internal threats. Like other coastal West African countries, Ghana faces threats from Islamist groups active in the Sahel that have tried to push south from landlocked Burkina Faso and Mali where they stage frequent deadly attacks. A spokesperson for Mahama said last month that Ghana had deployed more soldiers to a northeastern region where a long-running conflict over chieftancy has fuelled recent violence, including attacks on schools.
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reeves could unlock £30bn with defence loophole in fiscal rules
Rachel Reeves could give herself an extra £30bn headroom next year if she follows Gordon Brown's advice to take increased defence spending outside the fiscal rules. The former prime minister said the Chancellor should follow Germany and declare that 'exceptional' increases in defence spending can be paid for by borrowing more. This is currently banned under Ms Reeves's fiscal rules, which say borrowing should never pay for day-to-day spending, and that debt should fall as a share of the economy by 2030. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) says the defence spending change could give the Government another £30bn next year. However, the economic think tank warned it would increase borrowing costs for households with mortgages. It comes as Ms Reeves comes under huge pressure to figure out how to fill a £50bn hole in the public finances, with tax rises seemingly increasingly likely. Mr Brown told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that he would like the Chancellor to scrap the two-child benefit cap, raising the money to do so by increasing taxes on the gambling industry. He said another option was to treat a commitment to ramping up defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by the 2030s as 'exceptional' and as 'outside the fiscal rules'. 'When you come to the fiscal position, there is one thing that has happened over the last few months which has been quite unprecedented: to spend 5 per cent on defence expenditure as we want to spend by 2030,' said the former prime minister. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative, we should be doing this jointly, we should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund and we should be sharing the cost across the Continent. 'That should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules and that would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Ben Zaranko, associate director of the IFS, said that if defence spending increased from 2.5 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent, this would be equivalent to around £30bn. He said: 'If the UK needs to spend a lot more on defence, and it needs to do so quickly, there could be a case for borrowing more in the short term to make that happen, and to smooth the path towards the new higher spending equilibrium. 'Some sort of one-off joint bond issuance with Europe or Nato could be part of that. 'But that extra borrowing wouldn't be free: we would expect it to push up borrowing costs for the Government and households with mortgages. 'And, importantly, more borrowing cannot be a permanent solution. Ultimately, if we need to spend more on defence on a recurring, permanent basis, we will need to either raise more in tax or spend less on something else.'
Daily Mirror
11 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Italians call the British embassy after two controversial ingredients added to pasta recipe
A recipe for cacio e pepe, a dish made up of pasta, black pepper, and pecorino cheese, was posted on the Good Food website, a popular place for Britons to discover new recipes. A row over pasta has escalated into a minor international diplomatic spat after a British website published a recipe for a beloved Italian dish. A recipe for cacio e pepe, a traditional dish comprising pasta, black pepper, and pecorino cheese, appeared on the Good Food website, sparking a dispute with Italy. The website is a go-to destination for Britons seeking fresh recipes and was previously under BBC ownership. Alongside suggesting the authentic core ingredients, the site also advised home cooks to incorporate butter and parmesan while preparing the dish. The revelation caused outrage in Rome. In fact, the backlash was so severe that the British embassy received an irate letter from a section of the restaurant association Fiepet-Confesercenti, sparking the international row, reports the Express. The episode occurs less than a year after Britain and Italy pledged "long and warm of promise and opportunity" following Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer 's discussions with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Fiepet-Confesercenti President Claudio Pica revealed they were "astonished" to discover the recipe on Good Food's platform and demanded its correction. Furthermore, Mr Pica told the Times that the move by Immediate Media was so outrageous it was comparable to Italians taking whisky and mixing it with a popular fizzy drink of their choosing. He told the publication: "That's like us coming to Britain and demanding the finest double malt whisky mixed with lemonade. We demand the recipe, as published, is changed at once." While Good Food was previously owned by the BBC, the corporation no longer holds ownership after selling it to Immediate Media in 2018. Additionally, the BBC branding was dropped in April 2024. What consequences might follow should the alterations not be implemented remains unclear, but this latest culinary controversy emerges after Heinz chose to market their take on spaghetti carbonara in a tin. This marks not the first occasion of an international dispute between Britain and another allied nation. In January 2024, tensions nearly erupted between the UK and the USA following an American academic's assertion that salt should be added to tea. The recommendation came from Professor Michell Francl at Bryn Mawr College who made the declaration based on her examination of historical documents and research spanning over 1,000 years. Thankfully, during the then Biden presidency, the UK and USA found common ground in their shared conviction that salt shouldn't feature in a modern cup of tea, with the US Embassy in London issuing a response. On X (formerly Twitter), they posted: "Tea is the elixir of camaraderie, a sacred bond that unites our nations, we cannot stand idly by as such an outrageous proposal threatens the very foundation of our Special Relationship. "We want to ensure the good people of the UK that the unthinkable notion of adding salt to Britain's national drink is not official United States policy. And never will be. "Let us unite in our steeped solidarity and show the world that when it comes to tea, we stand as one. The US Embassy will continue to make tea in the proper way - by microwaving it." It remains unclear whether this policy has been maintained under the Trump administration.
