American who was wrongfully detained in Iran urges US citizens not to travel to country
Emad Shargi was among five Americans freed in September 2023 as part of a wider deal between the US and Iran. He spent more than five years imprisoned there.
In a video posted by State Department accounts on X Thursday, Shargi cautioned all Americans, including Iranian-Americans, not to visit.
'Now is a particularly bad time to travel there. I know you may want to visit family and loved ones, but there is a very high risk of arrest and imprisonment by the Iranian regime,' he said. 'Trust me, nothing is worth being tortured for and spending years of your life in filthy, dark Iranian jail cell.'
'To anyone planning to travel to Iran, listen to me: cancel your trip,' he said.
Shargi noted that he traveled to Iran to visit family in 2018 and was then arrested on false espionage charges.
'I know this because it happened to me,' he said.
'Before I went to Iran, I thought, 'This surely won't happen to you. These things happen to people who have done something wrong, who have said things against the Iranian regime,'' Shargi said.
'I was wrong. Don't make my mistake. To fellow Iranian Americans, your Iranian background does not protect you. It makes you an even greater target for Iranian authorities to use you as a political pawn,' he said.
Shargi's warning came as part of a new campaign redoubling longstanding warnings against travel to Iran. It comes following the conflict between Israel and Iran and after unprecedented US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.
A State Department spokesperson said Tehran does not recognize dual nationality but may target dual nationals because of their affiliation with the US. The travel advisory cautions that 'Iranian authorities routinely delay consular access to detained U.S. nationals,' and 'in particular, Iranian authorities consistently deny consular access to dual U.S.-Iranian nationals.'
The US has no diplomatic presence in Iran and relies on Swiss officials to check on Americans detained there.
'The risk of wrongful detention, or State hostage-taking, may be even greater for Iranian Americans, including dual nationals, as they have been routinely taken and held unjustly by the Iranian regime in the past, held for years on false charges, subjected to psychological torture, even sentenced to death,' Special Envoy Adam Boehler said.
For those who still choose to visit, the State Department has some stark advice: 'leave DNA samples' in case your loved ones need them and 'draft a will.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Navigating headwinds: Nigeria's economic outlook for H2 2025
As the second half of 2025 begins, Nigeria finds itself at a critical economic crossroads. With mixed signals emerging from both global and local environments, policymakers, business leaders, and financial institutions must prepare for a delicate balancing act. From shifting geopolitical dynamics to domestic fiscal pressures, the outlook for H2 2025 is characterized by uncertainty but also opportunity. FSDH's latest macroeconomic update, titled 'Balancing on the Edge in a Fragile World,' provides timely insights into what lies ahead and how stakeholders can navigate this complex terrain. Globally, two major developments have reshaped the economic outlook: the return of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency and the escalation of the Israel-Iran conflict. Trump's reintroduction of import tariffs—10% across the board, with additional levies on selected countries—has renewed global trade tensions, undermined multilateralism, and triggered capital flow reversals to emerging markets. Meanwhile, the Middle East conflict has disrupted oil supply routes, increased freight costs, and spurred volatility in global commodity prices. These external shocks have led the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to revise its global GDP growth forecast downward to 2.8% in 2025, from an earlier 3.3%. Although Sub-Saharan Africa is expected to grow by 3.8%, driven by structural reforms and improved export performance; however the region remains vulnerable to external shocks, especially in energy markets and financial flows. Domestic Realities: Falling Short of Oil Expectations Nigeria, still heavily reliant on oil, has felt the weight of these developments. Despite commendable efforts to diversify her export base, oil remains the lifeblood of government revenue. The Federal Government's ₦54.99 trillion 2025 budget was benchmarked at US$75 per barrel and 2.06 million barrels per day in production. However, actual performance in H1 2025 has fallen short, with oil prices averaging US$72 per barrel and production consistently below target. This has created a growing fiscal gap and raised questions about Nigeria's ability to meet her ₦35 trillion revenue projection. Positive Signs: PMI Growth and Inflation Tapering Despite these challenges, there are positive signals in the local economy. The Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI), a reliable indicator of economic activity, remained above 50 points between January and May 2025, indicating expansion in key sectors such as agriculture, industry, and services. Inflation, while still high, has begun to decline—from 24.5% in January 2025 to 23% by May 2025—thanks to the combination of improved food supply, relative exchange rate stability, and methodological adjustments by the National Bureau of Statistics. Exchange Rate Stability: Progress or Pause? Exchange rate dynamics have also shown signs of stabilisation. The Naira stood at ₦1,539/US$ as of June 2025, reflecting only a marginal 0.2% depreciation year-to-date. The 'willing buyer, willing seller' FX policy has improved transparency and market confidence, although Nigeria's external reserves declined by 8.5% in H1—from US$40.9 billion to US$37.3 billion—due to rising import bills and debt repayments. FSDH projects that exchange rate stability will depend on continued FX inflows, investor confidence, and fiscal discipline. With oil prices expected to hover around US$75-US$78 per barrel, maintaining production and boosting non-oil exports will be critical. Analysts caution that a renewed slump in oil output or a further deterioration in global trade conditions could reignite currency volatility. Fiscal Reform in Focus: Tax Administration Shake-Up A major turning point in H1 2025 came in June, when President Tinubu signed four transformational tax reform bills into law. These include the Nigeria Tax Act, Nigeria Tax Administration Act, Joint Revenue Board Act, and Nigeria Revenue Service Act. Collectively, these reforms aim to harmonise tax administration, improve compliance, and empower a new, independent national revenue service. Highlights of the reforms include raising the Capital Gains Tax for corporates from 10% to 30%, introducing a Development Levy on large firms, zero-rating VAT for essential goods, and exempting small businesses with under ₦100 million turnover from filing taxes. The reforms are expected to grow Nigeria's tax-to-GDP ratio from 10% to 18% within three years. While implementation remains a hurdle—especially at state and local levels—this marks a significant shift in Nigeria's revenue strategy. In the capital markets, optimism is quietly building. The Nigerian Exchange (NGX) posted a 16.6% year-to-date return as of June 2025, outperforming many global indices. Banking and consumer goods stocks led gains, buoyed by strong corporate earnings and macro reforms. Treasury Bill yields and long-term bond rates have declined, signaling renewed investor appetite for Nigerian assets. Foreign Portfolio Investments (FPIs) flows have increased significantly, hitting US$5.46 billion in Q1—a 67% jump from the previous quarter. This resurgence has been fueled by FX reform, positive real interest rates, and improved clarity on policy direction. However, the risk of 'hot money' outflows remains, underscoring the need for deeper, longer-term capital investments. Strategic Priorities for H2 2025 Looking ahead, FSDH outlined several strategic imperatives for economic stakeholders in H2 2025. First, there is an urgent need to boost oil production, not just to meet budget benchmarks, but to enhance export earnings. Second, the country must deepen its non-oil export capabilities, especially in agriculture and manufacturing, to diversify FX sources. Third, unlocking private-sector credit by reducing the high Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) remains key to real sector growth. Fourth, leveraging ongoing tax reforms to enhance state-level revenue and improve the business climate is vital. Importantly, Nigeria's digital economy and financial technology space also hold promise. The integration of AI, open banking frameworks, and digital payment systems are transforming how financial services are delivered. FSDH notes that institutions that embed digital transformation into their service models will lead in agility, customer retention, and market expansion. Cautious Optimism: Nigeria's Path Forward While global risks remain—from U.S. monetary policy to geopolitical tensions and potential oil shocks—Nigeria has the tools to stay on a path of gradual stabilisation. The success of H2 2025 will depend on disciplined execution of reforms, coordinated fiscal and monetary policy, and institutional accountability. Nigeria's economic outlook for the rest of 2025 is cautiously optimistic. Inflation is expected to decline further which may allow for monetary easing later in the year. The Naira is likely to remain within the current range, while GDP growth will be modest, driven by agriculture, services, and rising investor interest. Structural reforms are beginning to take root, but the second half of the year will require political will, macroprudential discipline, and bold leadership. And as FSDH aptly notes in its report, 'Resilience is not just about surviving the storm; it's about building structures that thrive within it.' Nigeria has the opportunity to prove that in H2 2025.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Israel risks overplaying its hand in Syria amid Druze-Bedouin conflicts
The longer al-Sharaa acts on big issues and Israel intervenes in questionable matters not clearly threatening Israeli interests, the faster Israel may lose the key cards it holds in Syria. These are wild times between Israel and Syria. And in these wild times it is unclear whether Israel's attacks on Syrian regime forces on Monday and Tuesday - even if it is to protect some Syrian-Druze who the Jewish state has good relations with and even if the Syrian forces are in part of Israel's self-declared buffer zone – will stand unchallenged or lead to major strategic fallout. Only a few months ago, every top Israeli political official in public statements and pretty much all top Israeli defense officials in private statements, including some exclusive statements to the Jerusalem Post, were warning that Syrian leader Ahmed al-Sharaa is a "wolf in sheep's clothing." Their point was to caution that though he now wears suits and ties and speaks in measured tones about peace that the West loves to hear, that underneath it all, he remains the same dangerous al-Qaeda jihadist which he once openly was in the not-so-distant past. But then US President Donald Trump decided that al-Sharaa was a legitimate partner, repealed all American sanctions, and told Jerusalem to get with the program and make nice with him. Trump did this based on his own judgment of character, but also under pressure from the Saudis who want to strengthen al-Sharaa's rule so as to prevent any Alawite-Syrian or Iranian resurgence. There are also concerns about al-Sharaa's connections with Islamist Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and concerns about the massacre of as many as 1,500 ethnic minority Alawites (some of his security forces were also killed and are part of the tally), which he allowed to occur in Syria in the Latakia area in March. But Trump knew about these issues and gave al-Sharaa a clean slate anyway. Israel did eventually get on board, and Mossad Director David Barnea, the IDF, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, and National Security Council Chief Tzahi Hanegbi have communicated with Syria, with both sides talking about a possible new armistice deal and maybe eventual normalization. Several top American officials have met with al-Sharaa and declared their support for him as a reformed man who will bring about peace with Israel. All of this could mean Israel needing to withdraw, even if it might be gradual over an extended period, from its buffer security zone it created in southern Syria in December 2024 upon the fall of the Assad regime. One of the big questions is how long Israel can convince Trump to allow it to stay in the Syrian buffer zone. The question is relevant both as a matter of addressing security concerns with whether al-Sharaa can restrain some of his jihadists from invading Israel as well as using the bargaining chip of withdrawing from those areas to get normalization with Syria or at least promises of a large demilitarized zone. If in December 2024 and the early months of this year, the IDF could take almost any action it wanted to in Syria against perceived security threats because al-Sharaa was still in the sanctions dog-house, all of that has either already changed or could change soon. Imminently or in the medium term, Trump may bar Israel from such actions, or worse, such continued actions could eventually lead Trump to demand Israel leave its Syrian buffer zone sooner, undermining its strategic leverage. Part of how all of this will turn out depends on how one views the latest incident. From the outside, it seems like a minor incident of some Bedouin-Syrians kidnapping one Druze-Syrian led to rival tribes falling into a much larger multi-village conflict. However, all of this was still a local Syrian affair, which would not seem to implicate Israeli security or justify Jerusalem ordering an intervention. Unclear if IDF supports current intervention in Syria In fact, it is unclear whether the IDF supports the current intervention or may view it as an error strategically, but is following orders from the cabinet. What brought Israeli interest was when the government forces announced they would intervene in order to end the tribal gang fighting which has already led to between 30-100 deaths. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Israel Katz said they were worried that the government forces, with more serious weaponry like tanks, would overpower and start slaughtering the Druze-Syrians. They also said that Syrian forces could not enter the buffer zone. But if al-Sharaa is becoming accepted, how often can Israel prevent the current Syrian regime from intervening to resolve internal chaotic conflicts between tribes? Eighth months into his rule, there has been no hint that al-Sharaa would threaten Israel, let alone any concrete move to do so. Of course, all of this could be just because he has been too weak to do so to date, and given a few years to build his power, he could be a true threat down the line. But al-Sharaa and Trump may tire sooner of giving Israel a free hand in Syria on issues that really matter if it continues to intervene on so many gray issues, which could easily be reframed as an "occupying" power denying a legitimate government from restoring order in its territory. If al-Sharaa or his government forces really do start to oppress the Druze-Syrians or try to creep closer to the border with Israel, then Jerusalem might get a more sympathetic hearing in Washington. But the longer al-Sharaa behaves on the big issues and the more Israel intervenes on issues which could be framed as questionable and not clearly threatening Israeli interests, the quicker the Jewish state may lose the cards it holds in Syria, which really matter. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The man who knows everything about Netanyahu: If Urich falls, everything comes crashing down
Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara has recommended indicting Prime Minister Netanyahu's advisor, Yonatan Urich, for leaking information to a German newspaper. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday lashed out at Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara's decision to recommend charging his close advisor, Yonatan Urich, for the leak of sensitive documents to the German tabloid Bild. "The decision to prosecute Urich is disastrous and raises questions,' Netanyahu said. 'A disgraceful statement from the attorney-general. I know the details, and I say, he did not harm national security." Dozens of people have worked in Netanyahu's office over the cumulative 17 years he has served as prime minister. Advisors have come and gone. Some became state witnesses, including Nir Hefetz, Ari Harow, and Shlomo Filber (who signed as a state witness and later regretted it). Those who were not involved left the office in anger, but only a few left intact, without being indicted or harboring hard feelings. But of all those who came and went, Netanyahu, a man devoid of emotion, who believed that everyone was born to serve him, truly loved and valued only two: Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer and Yonatan Urich. 'Urich and Dermer are like the sons Netanyahu wanted to have,' said a source who worked in the Prime Minister's Office for many years. "He is a man who distrusts everyone and is paranoid that everyone wants to bring him down. But he trusts these two almost completely. They were exposed to nearly everything—they knew the secrets, the schemes, everything. Urich was aware of every political and media move. He was intimately familiar with every campaign, both official and unofficial, as well as every vendetta. Dermer is the de facto foreign minister, liaison to the US administration, and someone Netanyahu completely trusts on the most sensitive political and military matters." But as the cliché goes, Netanyahu is like the sun: when you get too close, you burn. Urich began working with Netanyahu in 2015. Yoav Ben-Tzur, who worked with Netanyahu at the time, convinced him to join after Topaz Luk, who knew Urich from their service in the IDF Spokesperson's Unit, recommended him. His skills quickly became apparent: a digital expert, Urich opened Netanyahu's eyes to the world of social networks. He charmed Netanyahu by giving him the ability to engage directly with the public on Facebook and later on Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok, without having to use the media, which Netanyahu despised, as an intermediary. Urich is a very talented man: creative, sharp, and up-to-date. However, he is also unrestrained. He doesn't see limitations. He initiated and navigated harsh campaigns against political rivals, with no red lines. Ask Benny Gantz: he could write a series of books about the nightmare he went through, especially during election periods when he was a real threat to Netanyahu's rule; the prime minister's propaganda machine - with Urich playing a central role - attacked Gantz, even below the belt. Yonatan Urich's involvement in Netanyahu's affairs Urich's entanglement didn't begin yesterday, with the potential indictment for the leak to the Bild. It started much earlier. On February 11, 2025, the prosecution decided to indict Urich, Ofer Golan, and Srulik Einhorn for harassing Shlomo Filber, the state witness in Cases 1000, 2000, and 4000. According to the indictment, in 2019, the three conspired to harass Filber regarding his testimony in Case 4000. They rented a car with a loudspeaker system and sent two of their people to Filber's home, where they were heard shouting things like: 'Momo, be a man, go and tell the truth! What did they do to you to get you to go against the prime minister? What did they promise you? The left is using you to bring down Likud!' and more. This, as mentioned, was Urish's first noted involvement. The second came last night. In a statement from the attorney-general's office, it was stated that 'the State Prosecutor's Office informed Yonatan Urich, the Prime Minister's close advisor, that the Attorney-General and State Prosecutor are considering indicting him for criminal charges, subject to a hearing, in the'Bild' case on the grounds of security violations, including leaking classified information with intent to harm national security, possessing classified information, and destroying evidence.' 'According to the allegations," continued the statement, "Urich, together with Eli Feldstein, took highly classified information from the IDF's systems that, if exposed by Urich, could have endangered national security and lives. The release of the classified information was intended, among other things, to influence public perception of the prime minister and skew the discourse regarding the murder of six hostages in August 2024.' Minutes after the statement, Urich's attorneys, Amit Hadad and Noa Milstein, responded: 'Yonatan Urich denies all allegations against him. He never possessed or leaked classified information and certainly did not harm national security. This is an absurd set of allegations arriving at an inconvenient time, and his innocence will be proven beyond any doubt.' However, the third, most severe case for Urich is still pending: the Qatargate case. Urich is suspected of receiving payment from a Qatar-funded company to act from within the Prime Minister's Office in order to advance Qatar's interests, such as portraying it as a peace-seeking and dominant country, in contrast to Egypt. According to a Haaretz exposé, Urich worked for the Qatari government prior to the World Cup to improve its image, which had been criticized internationally for being a dictatorial state. This is the biggest criminal case against Urich, and Netanyahu has gone to great lengths to help him. In a video released of Netanyahu, the prime minister is seen nearly exploding with rage, saying: "The police are conducting a political campaign against him. This is a political investigation, a political move. Other than that, there's nothing. They are trying to prevent the firing of the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) chief. The investigation is intended to bring down a right-wing prime minister." Urich's detention has been extended repeatedly. He was interrogated multiple times, placed under house arrest, and then returned to detention. The investigation has been ongoing for months. Netanyahu is angry. Beyond his personal concern and the lack of media presence, Netanyahu knows something else: Urich knows everything. Urich had been close to him for years, and it was not a good idea to anger him. To avoid angering him and to show him that he's not alone and that he has complete backing, senior staff from the PMO were sent to the detention extensions. Everyone showed up to ensure that Urich didn't become a state witness against the boss. In April, Nir Hefetz, Netanyahu's former communications advisor, said: "Urich is the man who knows everything about Netanyahu. If this brick crumbles, the whole wall will collapse. Urich is a weak man, and Netanyahu knows exactly what he says to their mutual lawyer, Amit Hadad." He added: "Qatargate is the reason for the acceleration of the judicial overhaul in recent weeks: firing Ronen Bar, the process of ousting the attorney-general, and changing the makeup of the committee for selecting judges. Netanyahu is trying to stop the Qatargate investigation, and he knows why." And Urich? He remained silent. Recently released from house arrest, he occasionally tweeted, as usual, singing Netanyahu's praises. He remains loyal, an admirer. From time to time, he sends media advice to the office, which is now left without him, professionally abandoned. So, what will happen to Urich after the second indictment, pending the hearing? The answer is: nothing. It doesn't bother Netanyahu. Urich is not a state employee; he is an independent contractor who submits invoices for his services. As long as Netanyahu remains in power, he will continue to employ him, regardless of whether there are two indictments or 10. Law violations? Indictments? That hasn't bothered Netanyahu in years. The only thing that matters to him is that Urich stays close, doesn't speak against him, and most importantly, continues helping him. Because in the months he has been absent, anyone who understands communications within the office, in the surrounding environment, and in the system understands how crucial Urich was to the media activities in the most important office in the country. Solve the daily Crossword
