BlackRock Stock (BLK) Drops as China Threatens to Scupper $22.8B Panama Ports Deal
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
According to the Wall Street Journal, China wants state-owned shipping giant Cosco to be an equal partner and shareholder in the ports alongside BlackRock and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC). The proposed sale includes two ports at either end of the Panama Canal and more than 40 others around the world.
Floodgates are Open
BlackRock and MSC, which reached a preliminary agreement to buy the ports from Hong Kong conglomerate CK back in March, are reportedly open to Cosco taking a stake.
However, it is understood that a deal with Cosco will not be reached before the agreed-upon July 27 deadline for exclusive talks between BlackRock, MSC and CK.
Chinese officials have told BlackRock, MSC and Hutchison that if Cosco is left out of the deal, Beijing would take steps to block Hutchison's proposed sale.
This won't be too much of a surprise for BlackRock given that legal and regulatory hurdles are a key risk for the group.
Chinese Doubts
Bringing Cosco into the fold would not sit well with President Trump who has put a lot of political capital into ensuring that U.S. dominance over the Panama Canal is reasserted.
There is also the current trade and tariff spat between the two nations, as well as wider geopolitical concerns.
The Chinese government has also repeatedly expressed concerns about the deal since March. This has included slamming CK for betraying the Chinese people and being 'spineless.'
It was concerned, and presumably still is, that the deal could hit China's shipping and trade interests.
Its view will carry a lot of weight with the parties involved in the deal. That's because BlackRock and Hutchison have business interests in China, and MSC is one of the biggest movers of Chinese products around the world.
Is BLK a Good Stock to Buy Now?
On TipRanks, BLK has a Strong Buy consensus based on 13 Buy and 1 Hold ratings. Its highest price target is $1,224. BLK stock's consensus price target is $1,168.79, implying an 8% upside.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump comes for American lore with pop agenda
In his second term, President Trump is making a habit of taking action on topics plucked from America's popular imagination that had previously been non-existent in Washington's policy playbook. Why it matters: Trump's voracious appetite for generating attention and marketing his policies has bred ideas that inject the power of the presidency into deep recesses of American life and culture. Driving the news: This past week, Trump announced that Coca-Cola had agreed to use real cane sugar in Coke. For decades, high-fructose corn syrup has sweetened the drink. (The company hasn't confirmed his claim.) The topic has been steadily gaining attention in the U.S., with interest in Mexican Coke — which uses cane sugar — rising for years, according to Google Trends. The big picture: We all know "kitchen-table issues," the topics shaped by decades of campaign trail debates. But these are "group-chat issues" — stuff you'd text your friends about that doesn't usually get picked apart by policy wonks. Alcatraz: Trump stunned the country by announcing this spring that the notorious prison island — closed for more than 60 years — would be reopened. The move is inspired "more by symbolism than necessity," Axios' Marc Caputo reported. The penny: The administration took action on the ultimate pocketbook issue by announcing plans to discontinue the 1-cent coin. While the move makes economic cents — pennies now cost more to make than they're worth — the bigger impact could the cultural ripple of an extinct piece of American iconography. Gulf of America: Trump caught Americans off guard when he edited U.S. maps on his first week in office. The seemingly superficial move led to profound fallout over press freedom and geopolitics. JFK files: He indulged a decades-long national fascination about the JFK assassination by releasing 63,000 pages of records — a topic that had largely been left to amateur sleuths and conspiracy theorists. While the records added color to the understanding of the event, there were no bombshells. Reality check: Trump finds himself on the other side of a group-chat issue with his posture on the Jeffrey Epstein case. He is fighting against the populist current demanding more information and transparency around Epstein's sex trafficking operation, while disavowing his supporters who continue to press him. Zoom in: On some lesser-noticed, Seinfeldian issues, Trump addressed everyman gripes with the stroke of a pen.
CNBC
11 minutes ago
- CNBC
If Apple makes a foldable phone, analysts say this stock will benefit
Even if Apple's long-awaited foldable may still be months or years away, buyers are lining up for a potential major supplier: Chinese glass maker Lens Technology . It's "one of the key beneficiaries of [the] foldable iOS smartphone supply chain," Citi analysts led by Kyna Wong said in a July 14 report about Lens Tech. They estimate the device could contribute to 5% of the Chinese company's revenue next year, and 12% in 2027. In a report last week, reputable Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo kept up expectations that the iPhone maker will begin making a foldable next year. Apple has not made any announcements, and did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether Lens Tech would provide the "ultra thin glass" that covers the phone display panel. The Citi report initiated coverage of Lens Tech after its stand out Hong Kong public offering on July 9 — raising 4.77 billion HKD ($610 million) on the exchange's busiest day ever for listings — five IPOs at once. Bank of America Securities was one of the underwriters. The Citi analysts rate Lens Tech a buy, with a price target of 26 HKD ($3.13), or nearly 25% upside from Friday's close. "We believe the H-share listing is positive for the company," the analysts said, "as it should provide more cash for potential R & D initiatives and overseas capacity expansion, and expand the overseas institutional investor base." U.S. hedge fund magnate Steve Cohen has jumped in, with multiple purchases over three days that brought his stake in Lens Tech to 8.41% of issued voting shares, according to filings with the Hong Kong stock exchange. About 30% of proceeds raised from the Hong Kong offering will go towards developing foldable screens, Lens Tech said in its prospectus. "By increasing our production capacity in China, we aim to ensure robust support for the mass production of middle and high-end foldable smartphones for our customers and improve our market share in foldable screens," the company said. Lens Tech did not name Apple, but disclosed that its largest customer has been a Nasdaq-listed U.S. multinational founded in 1976 — and said the business relationship started "almost two decades ago when Customer/Supplier A was developing the industry's first touch-enabled smartphone with full-sized screen." Lens Tech's latest listing follows a trend this year of more mainland Chinese companies going public in Hong Kong, which is easier for international investors to access. The company already trades on the Shenzhen Exchange. "We expect Lens to benefit from the foldable iPhone launch [and] AI glasses & robotics" that drive earnings growth of at least 20% a year in 2026 and 2027, UBS analyst Zoe Xu and a team said in a separate July 14 report. They resumed coverage of the mainland China-traded shares with a buy rating and a new price target of 26.20 yuan, up from 16 yuan previously. The Citi analysts also raised their price target on Lens Tech's mainland-traded shares to 32 yuan ($4.45) from 25 yuan. Lens Tech has been reducing its reliance on Apple revenue, and states in its prospectus that "Customer B" is a "Nasdaq-listed American company founded in 2003 that designs and sells smart vehicles." Other listed customers include South Korean, French and Chinese companies. The UBS analysts pointed out that Lens Tech shares remain depressed after a 30% tumble in the week following U.S. "Liberation Day" tariffs in early April. But they expect the company can benefit from selling to Chinese startups such as smart glasses company Rokid and Zhiyuan Robotics. And even without a potential foldable iPhone, Lens Tech can likely benefit from selling cover glass for this year's iPhone 17 which is expected to offer a slimmer design. Lens Tech noted in its prospectus that its direct exports to the U.S. are limited and that it plans to use Hong Kong listing proceeds to expand production overseas in Vietnam and Thailand. In addition to China, the company said it already has factories in Vietnam and Mexico. — CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed to this report.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - 4 reasons why Trump should reject China's invitation to its military parade
Beijing's Kyodo News reported June 29 that China is planning to invite President Trump to attend a military parade at Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3. The event marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II under the banner of the 'Commemoration of the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.' However, behind this seemingly historical commemoration lies a calculated political agenda by Beijing: the distortion of history and an ambition to challenge the free world. Every international visit by a U.S. president carries deep symbolic meaning. This event touches on the core of U.S.-China relations, America's position on historical truth and the international order the U.S. upholds. I therefore earnestly urge President Trump to weigh the following four considerations before making any final decision should Beijing extend an official invitation. First, this parade is not a symbol of peace, but a strategic challenge to U.S.-Led Global Order. The Chinese Communist Party is not holding this parade merely to commemorate a historic victory. It is a deliberate display of military strength, aimed at projecting the narrative of Communist Party superiority and signaling strategic rivalry with the U.S. Since 2015, the party has increasingly normalized large-scale military parades. Domestically, they glorify one-party rule; internationally, they serve as a geopolitical tool to intimidate neighbors. By showcasing hypersonic missiles, fifth-generation fighter jets and long-range nuclear strike capabilities, these parades are clearly targeted at undermining the leadership of the U.S. and the free world. The Xi regime's invitation to Trump is a calculated effort to present China as America's equal on the global stage — conveying a vision of 'co-governance of the world.' Should Trump attend, his presence may be exploited as an implicit endorsement of China's military rise, thereby weakening America's global standing and eroding the confidence of regional allies. As President Ronald Reagan said in his 1981 inaugural address, 'Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women.' True strength lies not in weaponry, but in the spirit and conviction of free people. America's greatness stems from its values — not from military displays. Moreover, the essence of a military parade should be to honor those who gave their lives in service. Just last month, Trump presided over the 250th anniversary celebration of the U.S. Army in Washington, fulfilling that solemn duty with dignity and honor. This would not be like that. Second, the Chinese communists have falsified history and stolen the Nationalist government's wartime legacy. There is no historical ambiguity regarding who bore the brunt of Japan's invasion during World War II. Following the outbreak of the Pacific War in 1941, China became the principal theater of war in Asia. The Republic of China under Chiang Kai-shek's leadership conducted over 90 percent of the major battles and suffered the bulk of casualties. In contrast, the Communist Party operated largely in guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines, focused more on consolidating its own strength than on resisting Japan strategically. It was the Nationalist government's sacrifices that initially earned the Republic of China a permanent seat on the U.N. Security Council. Even after its retreat to Taiwan in 1949 following the civil war, the U.N. continued to recognize the Republic of China for nearly two more decades — underscoring its historical legitimacy. After consolidating power, the Chinese Communist Party eliminated many of the generals and troops who had genuinely resisted Japan. Now, Beijing stages military parades as if it had been the actual victor, mocking the true heroes of World War II and engaging in historical theft of valor. If Trump were to attend, it would risk signaling U.S. endorsement of this manipulated narrative, creating the impression that America has accepted the Chinese Communist Party's version of history. Third, this parade dishonors fallen American soldiers from the Korean War. During World War II, the U.S. provided significant aid to China's anti-Japanese efforts. Yet less than five years later, the Chinese communists sent over 1 million troops across the Yalu River to directly engage U.S.-led United Nations forces in the Korean War. The Chinese Communist Party's support for the Kim regime in North Korea was part of its strategy to establish regional dominance in East Asia. More than 36,000 American soldiers died in the Korean War, and over 100,000 were wounded. Even today, many American families continue to grieve the loss of loved ones. The U.S. has always deeply honored its veterans and war dead — building monuments, museums and preserving their legacy in public memory. For a U.S. president to attend this parade would amount to public recognition of the very military that opened fire on American troops. Trump understands the profound sacrifice of military service. He must also be made to understand that attending this parade could deeply wound the families and descendants of the fallen. Finally, sharing a platform with Putin and Xi could send the wrong signal to the free world. Reports suggest that, because Xi attended Russia's 80th anniversary parade for the Great Patriotic War in Moscow this last May, Russian President Vladimir Putin will return the favor by attending China's parade in September. Both men are now seen across the free world as symbols of authoritarian expansionism. Putin has invaded Ukraine and constantly threatens Europe. Xi, meanwhile, has escalated provocations in the South China Sea and around Taiwan, suppressed freedoms in Hong Kong and continues the persecution of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet. His regime that is both militaristic and repressive. Even if Trump does not share their goals, his standing alongside these two dictators at a military parade would be heavily exploited by Chinese and Russian media to depict an image of unity among the three powers. Such an image could damage global perceptions of the U.S. and undermine America's moral standing as the beacon of freedom. It risks shaking allies' trust in the values the U.S. represents. Trump is unquestionably one of the most influential American presidents and global leaders of our time. He has firmly defended American interests and values, taken strong action against the Iranian regime, and shown deep respect for America's military — earning widespread admiration at home and abroad. Yes, diplomacy involves difficult trade-offs. But China's invitation is not a normal diplomatic event. It is a stage crafted by an authoritarian regime to whitewash history and showcase military might — not in the pursuit of peace, but to control the global narrative. By declining to attend, President Trump would send a powerful signal: that America stands for historical truth, democratic values and the shared honor of defending freedom with its allies. Moreover, the Chinese Communist Party is currently under significant pressure from U.S. tariffs and technological sanctions. Its economy is more dependent on global markets than ever. This is not the time to offer Beijing symbolic concessions or legitimacy. A wiser, stronger strategy would be to reserve a presidential visit to China for when Beijing demonstrates genuine reform, keeps its promises, curbs its aggression and halts its theft of American technology and commerce. Only then should a U.S. president visit — with moral authority and strategic advantage. Trump, for the honor of the United States and in the name of historical responsibility, should firmly and respectfully decline this invitation. Vincent C. Chen is a senior executive in Taiwan's information and communications technology industry who serves as an advisory board member for Taiwan Thinktank and Foundation for Future Generations, Taiwan. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
