Nate's killer named as unexpected Emmerdale character
Well, it is John, as well we know, but he's not the one who gets named by the police.
John had previously made the allegation that Owen – the man who drugged Robert Sugden (Ryan Hawley) – had confessed to killing the farm hand. But while outwardly John is an upstanding member of the community, this still wasn't enough to get Owen to take the blame.
When Liam (Jonny McPherson) makes a house call to Owen, he's worried when he doesn't get a response.
He calls the police, who make the shocking discovery that Owen is dead, and there's a confession to murder on his laptop. Now that's enough to assign blame.
DS Walsh relays this to Cain (Jeff Hordley) and Tracy (Amy Walsh) – for all intents and purposes, they have their killer. More Trending
They both struggle with this development, and John's performance is Oscar-worthy when he is also told. When Robert gets wind of it, he's at first shaken by his close brush with a murderer but then becomes concerned when he sees DC Cole at the surgery trying to get information on Owen's medical history.
Claudette lets slip to Robert that John was at Owen's house right before he died and the puzzle pieces are starting to fit together.
Robert makes a huge step in his war against John – he arranges to meet with Owen's brother who divulges that Owen had an iron-cast alibi for the day Nate died.
View More »
Robert knows he has struck gold and legs it straight to the police station. Is justice about to catch up with John?
MORE: Emmerdale character dies in early ITVX release – and John is to blame
MORE: Unexpected Emmerdale exit story for Kim Tate as Robert's suspicions are piqued
MORE: Emmerdale's Cain vows to kill Nate's killer as John reels
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
You have razor-sharp vision if you can spot Queen's corgi in just 6 seconds
Sharpen your attention to detail and pop your Specs on, it's time to put your visual skills to the ultimate test with this royal-themed brainteaser that's leaving most Brits scratching their heads Discover whether you've got the eyes of a sniper or desperately need a Specsavers appointment with this devilishly difficult brainteaser. Solving puzzles and riddles is a great way to keep the little ones entertained, or can even help pass the time on your gruelling morning commute. But research has also suggested that they can also positively impact the central nervous system, resulting in a slew of cognitive benefits such as better attention span and concentration levels. However, this royal-themed brainteaser may just leave you utterly stumped and frustrated. Seriously, you'll need razor-sharp vision, meticulous attention to detail, and rapid reaction times to solve this one... READ MORE: You'll need lightning sharp reactions to spot rogue food item in 17 seconds The above image - created by - depicts a vibrant royal garden party at Buckingham Palace in a Where's Wally? style illustration. There are over 100 tiny, comical characters in the picture - from fainting palace guards to aristocrats. However, hiding in plain sight is one of the Queen's beloved corgis - which takes the average person seven seconds to find. So, if you can find the pooch in just six seconds or less, you've proven you've got some serious 20/20 vision. We're not giving away any clues for this one, but zooming in on the picture may help you find the corgi quicker. Giving up, or think you've finally cracked it? Scroll down to the bottom of the article to find the answer. If that regal puzzle didn't even make you break a sweat, it's time to ramp things up to the next level. Below are five seemingly normal questions that look like something you'd see at your local boozer. However, each one of these Qs has been strategically designed to trick you - so don't get too ahead of yourself and rush through. Still, you only have three seconds on each question before you need to move on to the next... Oh, and to prove you're the genius you constantly claim you are - you need to score five out of five. Once you're done, you can check your answers here. How many pairs of animals did Moses take on the Ark? You're in a race and pass the person in 3rd place. So, what place are you in now? John's father had three sons: Snap, Crackle, and...? If a plane crashes right in between France and Spain. Where do you bury the survivors? If it takes seven people seven minutes to eat seven burgers, how long will it take 30 people to eat 30 burgers? Up for another mental workout? Check out our full collection of tricky brainteasers, riddles, and puzzles here - or, learn more about your hidden personality traits with these mind-boggling optical illusions.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fury as secret identities of SAS troops are leaked online by army association magazine in fresh data blunder that could have put lives at risk
An urgent probe has been launched after the identities of SAS troops from one of its most senior regiments were published online. The fresh data blunder came last year when a Grenadier Guards' in-house publication included a rollcall of the names and deployments of its most senior officers. Ten men were listed next to the codename MAB - which is shorthand for MoD A block - the site of the UK special forces headquarters, The Sunday Times has reported. The codename has been widely publicised online - in turn allowing any terrorist group or enemy state to work out that the troops were part of the SAS. The document containing the information about the soldiers' identities was produced by the Grenadier Guards Regimental Association. The group is a charitable association made up of former service members - with such organisations routinely handed information about active army personnel. Defence secretary John Healey is understood to be furious at the data breach which comes just days after the Afghan superinjunction was exposed. Head of the army General Sir Roly Walker has ordered an investigation into why the details of the SAS soldiers were so widely available. He said according to The Sunday Times: 'The security of our people is of the utmost importance and we take any breach extremely seriously.' 'As a result of this incident, I have directed an immediate review into our data-sharing arrangements with our regimental and corps associations to ensure appropriate guidance and safeguards are in place to best support the vital work they do,' he added. Meanwhile, SAS legend Chris Ryan was also concerned at the leak, and told MailOnline last night: 'There are serious questions to be answered here. 'Why is this data readily available and to who? 'This is an information management issue. Malicious or accidental insider, a breach has consequences. 'What classification is the in-house magazine and who signed it off? 'When these breaches happen, there's needs to be accountability or they will keep happening.' The former military hardman-turned acclaimed author added: 'This is a "MABulous" blunder by the Guards - that's why they have their own squadron.' It comes after the Mail revealed earlier this week that special forces, MI6 spies and government officials were among more than 100 Britons on the lost Afghan dataset. It emerged that a secret operation smuggling migrants to Britain was being run by ministers after a military blunder put 100,000 'at risk of death' from the Taliban. Ministers fought for two years to hush-up the data blunder with an unprecedented super-injunction that silenced this newspaper and other media. The High Court was told the draconian gagging order was necessary to protect 100,000 Afghans the UK had put 'at risk of death'. But after we were able to get access to the database and analyse it, it became clear that dozens of senior British military officers including a brigadier and government officials were also exposed. The Mail's investigation triggered a massive secrecy row yesterday as security-cleared parliamentarians erupted in fury at being kept in the dark. Lord Beamish, chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee, said: 'I am astounded at this. 'The idea that members of MI6 are on this get quarterly reports from the security agencies and we have heard nothing at all. Why?' The MOD said: 'It's longstanding policy of successive governments to not comment on Special Forces. 'We take the security of our personnel very seriously and personnel, particularly those in sensitive positions, always have appropriate measures in place to protect their security.' A spokesman added: 'The government strongly welcomes the Intelligence and Security Committee's scrutiny of the Afghan data incident. 'Defence Intelligence and the wider department have been instructed by the Defence Secretary to give their full support to the ISC and all parliamentary committees. 'If ministers and officials are asked to account and give evidence, they will. 'We have restored proper parliamentary accountability and scrutiny for the decisions that the department takes and the spending that we commit on behalf of the taxpayer.'
Metro
5 hours ago
- Metro
Yellowstone star, 54, marries weather presenter fiancée, 34, in Vatican wedding
Yellowstone star Josh Lucas, 54, has tied the knot with his 34-year-old fiancée Brianna Ruffalo in the Vatican. The actor, known for his roles in films including Sweet Home Alabama and Ford v Ferrari, and weather presenter Brianna Ruffalo announced on Friday that they had said their vows at the official residence of the Pope in Rome, Italy. Brianna, who works for ABC7 in Los Angeles, captioned an Instagram carousel from their special day: 'Mr and Mrs Incredibly blessed to receive this sacrament together inside the heart of the Catholic Church and holy city.' She shared a selection of snaps from their ceremony inside one of the chapels, which showed Josh planting a kiss on her inside the church and photos of them posing outside the famous St Peter's Basilica. 'I love you! Easily one of the greatest days of my life. I am so so grateful,' Josh wrote in the comments section as others rushed to share their congratulations, including Brianna's ABC7 colleagues. He also shared photos on his account as he thanked people for who helped 'make the dream of wedding in the Vatican come true'. 'Congratulations my friend. This is the good stuff,' commented White Lotus star Walton Goggins while Oscar and Emmy-winning actress Alison Janney shared her good wishes and House of Cards' Michael Kelly added: 'Perfect!!! Congratulations yall!!!' Brianna gave a hint at what it entails to get married in the holy location – something only open to Catholic couples – in a follow-up post on Saturday evening, where she shared a gorgeous portrait of her and her husband posing on a balcony outside together in their wedding finery, heads together. 'We are grateful to the many people who helped us get to this moment in the Catholic Church,' she began. 'I am so thankful for Father Winters at the parish I grew up in, and Sister Angelica at the archdiocese of Los Angeles – as well as several others within the archdiocese. 'We also absolutely couldn't have done this without our stellar wedding planning team who coordinated with the Vatican. Thank you for making our wedding day so beautiful and easy.' Upon announcing their engagement last July, the American Psycho actor – who has recently delighted fans by portraying the young version of Kevin Costner's character John Dutton on smash-hit cowboy show Yellowstone – shared that he was 'grateful and thrilled' that Brianna had agreed to be his wife after he popped the question during a romantic Italian holiday. The happy couple, who had been together for almost two years, shared their news on Instagram, with a tearful Brianna laughing as she showed off her diamond ring while musicians played Elvis Presley's Can't Help Falling in Love. Josh captioned his post: 'For the last 2 years in every way and every day this beautiful soul has made me and my life better, deeper, and more whole. 'I am so grateful and thrilled she said 'Yes'. I WAY love you Brianna. Thank you to our families and all the people and places that made this come true. I am absolutely aware I got crazy lucky.' Meanwhile, Brianna said that accepting Josh's proposal was the 'easiest and best question' she'd ever answered. She wrote on her own page: 'Almost 2 years ago this fall, and with no expectations, Josh walked into my life… and we knew almost immediately we had each found our person in a way we've never experienced – on every level. This was the easiest and best question I've ever answered. So, here's to forever with my love, my best friend. I can't wait to keep living this life with you.' Josh was previously married to ex-wife Jessica Ciencin Henriquez, with whom he shares 13-year-old son Noah. The former couple were engaged six weeks after meeting in 2011, marrying in 2012 and then divorcing in 2014. More Trending He previously joked that Brianna is 'fully' on the side of Patrick Dempsey's character Andrew Hennings in his classic 2002 rom-com Sweet Home Alabama. The movie sees Reese Witherspoon's Melanie Smooter leave her fiancé Andrew for Josh's character Jake Perry at the end of the film. He told Entertainment Tonight: 'In [Brianna's] mind, she's like, 'But you're the guy that kind of ruined their relationship!' 'The funny thing is once she said that, all these people have come up to me and been like, 'Yeah, I was Team Patrick too.'' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: Stranger Things fans 'figure out who's going to die' after season 5 trailer MORE: Emily Atack announces engagement to boyfriend Dr Alistair Garner with romantic holiday snap MORE: WWE star, 55, gets leg amputated after over 30 surgeries to save limb
