logo
Armenia PM arrives in Turkey for 'historic' visit

Armenia PM arrives in Turkey for 'historic' visit

News.com.au20-06-2025
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan arrived in Istanbul Friday for a rare visit to arch-foe Turkey, in what Yerevan has described as a "historic" step toward regional peace.
Armenia and Turkey have never established formal diplomatic ties, and their shared border has been closed since the 1990s.
"Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has arrived in Turkey on a working visit," his spokeswoman Nazeli Baghdasaryan said on Facebook.
The visit follows an invitation from Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whom Pashinyan is scheduled to meet at Istanbul's Dolmabahce Palace at 1500 GMT, Erdogan's office said.
Relations between the two nations have been historically strained over the World War I-era mass killings of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire -- atrocities Yerevan says amount to genocide. Turkey rejects the label.
Ankara has also backed its close ally, Turkic-speaking Azerbaijan, in its long-running conflict with Armenia.
"This is a historic visit, as it will be the first time a head of the Republic of Armenia visits Turkey at this level. All regional issues will be discussed," Armenian parliament speaker Alen Simonyan told reporters.
"The risks of war (with Azerbaijan) are currently minimal, and we must work to neutralise them. Pashinyan's visit to Turkey is a step in that direction."
An Armenian foreign ministry official told AFP the pair will discuss efforts to sign a comprehensive peace treaty as well as the regional fallout from the Iran-Israel conflict.
On Thursday, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev was in Turkey for talks with Erdogan and praised the Turkish-Azerbaijani alliance as "a significant factor, not only regionally but also globally."
And Erdogan repeated his backing for "the establishment of peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia".
Baku and Yerevan agreed on the text of a peace deal in March, but Baku has since outlined a host of demands -- including changes to Armenia's constitution -- before it will sign the document.
- Normalisation -
Pashinyan has actively sought to normalise relations with both Baku and Ankara.
Earlier this year, he announced Armenia would halt its campaign for international recognition of the 1915 mass killings of Armenians as genocide -- a major concession to Turkey that sparked widespread criticism at home.
Pashinyan has visited Turkey only once before, for Erdogan's inauguration in 2023. At the time he was one of the first foreign leaders to congratulate the Turkish president on his re-election.
Ankara and Yerevan appointed special envoys in late 2021 to lead a normalisation process, a year after Armenia's defeat in a war with Azerbaijan over then then-disputed Karabakh region.
In 2022, Turkey and Armenia resumed commercial flights after a two-year pause.
A previous attempt to normalise relations -- a 2009 accord to open the border -- was never ratified by Armenia and was abandoned in 2018.
mkh-im/burs-hmw/ach
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will meet for peace talks in Alaska. Here's why that's significant
Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will meet for peace talks in Alaska. Here's why that's significant

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will meet for peace talks in Alaska. Here's why that's significant

This week will mark the first time Russian President Vladimir Putin has set foot on American soil in almost a decade. Mr Putin is set to meet with US President Donald Trump on Friday, local time, talking a potential peace deal which could see parts of Ukraine handed over to Russia. Mr Trump took to his Truth Social platform to announce the meeting's location — a former Russian territory. The pair will meet in the US state of Alaska, sold by Russia more than 158 years ago. Putin aide Yury Ushakov said the location was logical, stating the interests of both nations 'converged' in the northern state. "So it does make sense if our delegation simply crosses the Bering Strait and if such an important and expected meeting between the two leaders takes place specifically in Alaska," he said. "We expect this process will not be simple, but we will be engaged in it actively and consistently." Russian influence still endures in parts of the remote north-western state, which extends to just a few kilometres from the Russian border. The Russian empire sold the territory to Washington for $US7.2 million ($11.04 million) in 1867 — equal to about $US156.3 million ($239.64 million) in today's currency. One of the most famous statements about the proximity of Alaska and Russia was made in 2008 by Sarah Palin, the state's then-governor and at the time vice presidential nominee. "They're our next-door neighbours, and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska," Ms Palin said. While it is not actually possible to see Russia from the Alaskan mainland, two islands facing each other in the Bering Strait are separated by just 4 kilometres. Russia's Big Diomede island is just west of the American Little Diomede island, where a few dozen people live. Further south, two Russians landed on the remote St. Lawrence island — which is a few dozen miles from the Russian coast — to seek asylum in October 2022. They fled just weeks after Mr Putin ordered an unpopular mobilisation of citizens to boost his invasion of Ukraine. The state is a stronghold for the Russian Orthodox Church, which has more than 35 locations dotted across the coastline. Some Orthodox communities in the region still speak Russian. However Russia is ostensibly not interested in reclaiming the territory it once held, with Mr Putin saying in 2014 that Alaska is "too cold". Following Mr Trump's announcement, the Kremlin also confirmed the August 15 meeting. The summit has been in the works since Mr Trump's return to office seven months ago, and Mr Putin had been given an August 8 deadline to agree to a deal. Asked whether a peace deal would involve Ukraine ceding territory to Russia, Mr Trump said it was "very complicated". "But we're going to get some back, we're going to get some switched," he said. Russia has annexed the Crimean Peninsula for more than a decade, and its forces control much of Ukraine's Donbas region, made up of Donetsk and Luhansk. It also has some military control of Ukrainian regions of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia. In 2022 it formally annexed all four provinces — Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia — in a move condemned by the international community. The exact location of the Alaska meeting has not been announced. Mr Ushakov noted Russia "would naturally expect" any future meeting between both leaders would be held on Russian territory. He added "an invitation to that effect" had already been made. Mr Trump's announcement made no mention of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and it remains unclear whether he will be invited to peace talks. A White House official said Mr Trump was open to holding a trilateral summit the day after his meeting with Mr Putin. Mr Zelenskyy has since warned any deal without Kyiv at the table would be unable to bring an end to the war. "The answer to the Ukrainian territorial issue is already in the Constitution of Ukraine," he said in a statement. "No one will and cannot deviate from this. Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier. According to CBS, a senior White House official said it was still possible Mr Zelenskyy could be involved in some capacity for the Friday meeting. ABC/AFP

Western leaders offer no solutions about Israel-Gaza war
Western leaders offer no solutions about Israel-Gaza war

The Australian

time21 hours ago

  • The Australian

Western leaders offer no solutions about Israel-Gaza war

Politicians and commentators worldwide have lots of advice for Benjamin Netanyahu on his plan to temporarily administer Gaza in an effort to end the war and achieve peace for Israelis (and also Gazans), but none have come up with any seriously better ideas to rescue the hostages and remove Hamas from power. Are they suggesting that Israel simply capitulate to Hamas and walk away from these stated aims of the war imposed upon it on October 7? Or in addition to recognising a state of Palestine as a reward for terrorism, do they want Israel to release the hundreds of convicted criminals in an attempt to retrieve the hostages? If so, what happens when Hamas rearms, as it says it will, and launches further attacks on Israel? Pontificating from the luxury of comfortable lives in their own countries achieves nothing of value and is little more than virtue signalling for political gain. Alan Freedman, St Kilda East, Vic No reasonable person would attempt to justify nor underrate the horrific nature of Hamas's October 7 massacre of Israeli citizens, and nor would they contest Israel's right to respond vigorously to that episode. The question then arises as to what degree and extent of retaliation is considered reasonable and acceptable. It is interesting to note Greg Sheridan, along with a swath of ex-military and intelligence personnel and a growing number of humanitarian organisations within Israel itself, are saying that the limit of acceptability has now been reached. In simple terms, Benjamin Netanyahu's determination to continue military operations in Gaza is now becoming counter-productive from Israel's perspective. Israel is shedding friends and supporters among the global community and this is not a matter of anti-Semitism but more of compassionate, humanitarian values. Bill Pannell, Dalkeith, WA We should be doing all we can to get Qatar, Egypt and Turkey to pressure Hamas to agree to a ceasefire. But Western countries are backing Israel into a corner and making the situation worse. Even though this year Israel provided critical intelligence that thwarted an alleged Iranian-linked terrorist plot in London, Israel is so furious with the UK's decision to impose conditions on Israel (and only Israel), and recognise a Palestinian state next month, that it's considering withdrawing defence and security co-operation ('Israel's role in Western bloc should not be ruptured', 9-10/8). Israel cutting intelligence ties with Australia is possible, although unlikely at this point. But one of the main challenges our intelligence agencies face is working with fragments of information and trying to assemble a picture of what might happen. Israel gave us a tip-off a few years back that foiled a terrorist plot on an Etihad flight from Sydney to Abu Dhabi. That security information sharing was all about looking out for your mates. This masthead's editorial message is spot-on: diminution of democratic nations' intelligence sharing with Israel 'would be a detrimental rupture for the free world'. Anthony Bergin, Reid, ACT If a Palestinian state is recognised, together with a 'two-state solution', where one state is Palestinian and the other is Jewish, then no Palestinian refugee (or their descendants) can request settlement in the Jewish state where they have never been citizens. Can our politicians supporting this move please confirm this? Margaret Perlman, Randwick, NSW Brendan O'Neill's informative analysis of the unacceptable messages emanating from the Sydney Harbour Bridge march is precisely what the leader of our nation should have articulated ('Sydney Harbour Bridge March for Humanity shows protesters are not in favour of peace', 10/8). O'Neill explains that 'Death, death to the IDF' is a call for the annihilation of the IDF and for the annihilation of the Jewish homeland. Concluding that we need firm action to counter the slow sinking of our societies, O'Neill's wake-up call is in stark contrast to the nothing-to-see here attitude from Anthony Albanese. Asked about the march, the Prime Minister said it was 'a peaceful demonstration. In a democracy, it is important that people be able to express themselves'. A prime minister asleep at the wheel is a prime minister in name only. Mandy Macmillan, Singleton, NSW Read related topics: Israel

Vance says Ukraine-Russia peace deal would leave both sides 'unhappy'
Vance says Ukraine-Russia peace deal would leave both sides 'unhappy'

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

Vance says Ukraine-Russia peace deal would leave both sides 'unhappy'

US Vice-President JD Vance has said a negotiated settlement between Russia and Ukraine was unlikely to satisfy either side, and that any peace deal would likely leave both Moscow and Kyiv "unhappy". He said the US was aiming for a settlement both countries could accept. "It's not going to make anybody super happy. Both the Russians and the Ukrainians, probably, at the end of the day, are going to be unhappy with it," he said on Fox News. US President Donald Trump, who for weeks had been threatening new sanctions against Russia for failing to halt the war, announced on Friday he would meet Mr Putin on August 15 in Alaska to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Mr Trump said Russia and Ukraine were close to a ceasefire deal that could end the three-and-a-half-year conflict, possibly requiring Ukraine to surrender significant territory. A White House official said Mr Trump was open to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy attending but preparations were underway for only a bilateral meeting. Russian strikes injured at least 12 in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region, the country's foreign affairs ministry said on Sunday. "That is why sanctions are needed, pressure is needed," Mr Zelenskyy said after the strike. The Kremlin leader last week ruled out meeting Mr Zelenskyy, saying conditions for such an encounter were "unfortunately still far" from being met. Mr Trump said a potential deal would involve "some swapping of territories to the betterment of both [sides]", compounding Ukrainian fears that it may face pressure to surrender land. Mr Zelenskyy said on Saturday that Ukraine cannot violate its constitution on territorial issues, adding, "Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupiers." In the Fox News interview recorded on Friday, Mr Vance said the United States was working to schedule talks between Mr Putin, Mr Zelenskyy and Mr Trump, but he did not think it would be productive for Mr Putin to meet with Mr Zelenskyy before speaking with Mr Trump. On Saturday the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Finland and the European Commission said any diplomatic solution must protect the security interests of Ukraine and Europe. "The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said on Sunday. "Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security." EU foreign ministers will meet on Monday to discuss next steps, she said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte told US network ABC News that Friday's summit "will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end". He added: "It will be, of course, about security guarantees, but also about the absolute need to acknowledge that Ukraine decides on its own future, that Ukraine has to be a sovereign nation, deciding on its own geopolitical future." Russia holds nearly a fifth of the country. Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store