
If You Use Venmo Or PayPal, Thank African Fintech
In 2007, Kenya introduced M-PESA, a groundbreaking mobile money service that revolutionized how people store, send, and use money without access to traditional banking. What started as a local solution to an infrastructure problem has since become one of Africa's most valuable exports: a blueprint for mobile finance innovation across the world.
Today, mobile money is one of the continent's greatest contributions to the global financial system. And while much of the world is just catching up, Africa continues to lead—with lessons we'd be wise to learn.
Innovation Born from Necessity
Africa's fintech boom isn't just a story of flashy apps or hype-driven crypto ventures. It's rooted in necessity.
Traditional banking systems are inaccessible to millions across the continent. In their place, mobile money and decentralized finance (DeFi) have emerged as essential tools for survival, savings, and resilience. According to a 2024 study by Ecofin Agency, 73% of Nigerians and 68% of South Africans have owned or transacted in cryptocurrency. This staggering figure is not driven by speculation, but by the need for more inclusive financial alternatives.
When formal systems fall short, people innovate. Africa is proving that ingenuity and impact can thrive even in the absence of infrastructure.
Africa Isn't Catching Up, It's Leading
In April, I attended the Africa Fintech Summit in Washington, D.C.: a gathering of some of the most dynamic and visionary minds in global finance. If there's one thing that was immediately clear, it was that African fintech is no longer trying to catch up, it's defining the future.
In countries like Nigeria, Senegal, South Africa, and Kenya, fintech isn't about convenience. Instead, it's about creating inclusive financial systems that serve the continent's young, entrepreneurial, and often underbanked population.
Throughout the summit, I witnessed conversations about inclusive financial services that tackle inequality at its roots, and strategic partnerships being made to strengthen global investment corridors. Every person in the room had a laser focus on how fintech can meet the needs of a rising generation that is hungry for opportunity.
What I learned is that these innovators aren't just coding; they're solving complex, real-world problems at scale.
But There's a Missing Piece: Women
Despite this promising future, there's a blind spot in African fintech—and global fintech, for that matter.
Most fintech founders and developers are men. And while gender diversity in leadership is crucial, what's often overlooked is the role of women as consumers of financial technology. Women manage household budgets, lead community savings groups, and support extended families. Yet fintech products are rarely designed with women's financial behaviors, risk tolerance, or digital access in mind.
Without intentional, gender-inclusive design, we risk building tools that multiply the very inequities we're trying to solve.
We need a fintech revolution that reflects how women save, spend, and invest, and accounts for the systemic barriers they face in accessing and using digital tools. This isn't just good design, it's smart economics.
Where Are the NGOs?
One thing that struck me at the summit was the absence of NGOs in the room. If NGOs want to stay relevant in the fight for financial inclusion, we must stop viewing fintech as someone else's domain. Innovation is happening with or without us. Our role is to ensure that this innovation works for the people we serve, not against them.
NGOs have a front-row seat to the challenges and the creativity of low-income communities. We bring hard-earned insights about what real inclusion looks like. But unless we show up, partner, and participate, those insights won't make it into the next wave of financial tools, and many people will be left behind.
A Call to Action
African fintech is moving fast. If we're not careful, it will race ahead without addressing the needs of the poorest and most excluded, particularly women.
The development sector can't afford to be passive. We must build intentional partnerships with fintech leaders, advocate for inclusive product design, and push for systems that create economic agency and dignity.
When fintech is designed to serve everyone, it doesn't just transform individual lives; it reshapes the future of finance itself.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Technical Program Manager Interview Prep Course Launch - Interview Kickstart's FAANG TPM Experts Share Interview Preparation Secrets
Santa Clara, Aug. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- As the world moves deeper into 2025, the role of Technical Program Managers has evolved from simple project coordinators to strategic leaders who drive innovation and ensure the successful delivery of complex technical initiatives. In today's rapidly changing tech landscape, companies are dealing with increasingly sophisticated projects that involve multiple teams, cutting-edge technologies, and tight deadlines. This complexity has made Technical Program Managers more valuable than ever before, as they serve as the crucial bridge between technical teams and business objectives. Recognizing this growing demand and the specialized skills required, Interview Kickstart has developed a comprehensive Technical Program Manager Course that prepares professionals for these strategic leadership roles at top technology companies. To learn more about the course, visit: The modern Technical Program Manager needs to understand not just project management principles, but also the technical details of the systems they're managing. They work closely with engineering teams to design scalable architectures, coordinate releases across multiple products, and ensure that technical decisions align with business goals. This dual expertise in both technical and management domains makes them essential for companies trying to move fast while maintaining quality and reliability. In 2025, Technical Program Managers are expected to have a deep understanding of system design principles, especially when it comes to building scalable solutions. They need to know how different components of a system work together, understand the trade-offs between different architectural choices, and be able to communicate these concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders. This technical depth allows them to make informed decisions about project priorities, resource allocation, and timeline planning. Given these evolving requirements, traditional project management training is no longer sufficient for aspiring Technical Program Managers. They need comprehensive preparation that combines technical knowledge with program management skills, which is exactly what Interview Kickstart's Technical Program Manager Course provides. The course is specifically designed to prepare professionals for the demands of modern TPM roles at top technology companies. The course spans 15 to 17 weeks and provides a thorough foundation in both technical concepts and program management principles. Students dive deep into data structures and algorithms, which helps them understand the technical challenges their engineering teams face. This knowledge is crucial when making decisions about project scope, timeline estimation, and resource planning. The scalable system design modules teach students how to think about building systems that can handle growth, which is essential knowledge for any TPM working on products that need to scale. What makes this course particularly valuable is its industry-relevant curriculum that includes 4 to 6 weeks of training on specific technical domains. Students can choose to focus on areas like data engineering, machine learning, data science, frontend development, backend systems, site reliability engineering, test engineering, Android development, iOS development, and more. This specialization allows future TPMs to develop deeper expertise in the areas most relevant to their career goals, making them more effective in their roles. The course requires a significant commitment of 10 to 12 hours per week, which includes live sessions where students interact with instructors and peers, practice solving coding problems, and participate in live doubt-solving sessions. This hands-on approach ensures that students don't just learn theory but also develop practical skills they can apply immediately in their work. The 1:1 personalized coaching from FAANG professionals provides invaluable guidance from people who have successfully navigated TPM roles at the world's most demanding tech companies. One of the most valuable aspects of the program is the 15 mock interviews with FAANG+ interviewers. These practice sessions simulate real interview conditions and help students understand what top companies are looking for in Technical Program Manager candidates. The feedback from these sessions is incredibly detailed and helps students identify areas for improvement before they face actual interviews. In a job market where Technical Program Managers are in high demand but companies have very specific requirements, having comprehensive preparation makes all the difference between landing the target role and continuing to search. For more information, visit: About Interview Kickstart Interview Kickstart, founded in 2014, is a trusted upskilling platform designed to help tech professionals secure roles at FAANG and other leading tech companies. With over 20,000 success stories, it has become a go-to resource for career advancement in the tech industry. The platform offers a flexible learning experience with live classes and over 100,000 hours of on-demand video lessons. This ensures learners have the tools they need to dive deep into technical concepts and refine their skills on their own schedule. Additionally, 1:1 coaching sessions provide personalized support in areas like resume building and LinkedIn optimization, enhancing each learner's professional profile. ### For more information about Interview Kickstart, contact the company here:Interview KickstartBurhanuddin Pithawala+1 (209) 899-1463aiml@ Patrick Henry Dr Bldg 25, Santa Clara, CA 95054, United States CONTACT: Burhanuddin Pithawala
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI in Africa to Top $16.5B by 2030: Mastercard Explores Path for Continued Digital Transformation
Key insights from Kenya, South Africa, Nigeria and Morocco demonstrate AI's potential to drive financial inclusion, job creation and innovation. Up to 230 million digital jobs projected in Sub-Saharan Africa by 2030 – but infrastructure, regulation and local talent remain critical gaps. NAIROBI, Kenya, August 06, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Mastercard has today released its latest whitepaper, Harnessing the transformative power of AI in Africa, a pan-African study of the continent's readiness, opportunity and roadmap for responsible artificial intelligence (AI) adoption. The whitepaper provides detailed insights into how AI—if deployed responsibly and inclusively—can unlock transformative outcomes across the continent's major industries, including agriculture, healthcare, education, energy and finance. With Africa's AI market projected to grow from USD 4.5 billion in 2025 to USD 16.5 billion by 2030 according to a recent report from Statista, the paper presents a clear case for multi-stakeholder collaboration and investment. It highlights how Africa's unique demographics, mobile-first infrastructure and entrepreneurial spirit position it as an active architect of the future. Mark Elliott, division president, Africa at Mastercard, commented: "Africa's engagement with AI is already reshaping lives — not just in labs, but in farms, clinics and classrooms. To unlock its full potential, we need investment in infrastructure, data, talent, and policy. At Mastercard, we believe responsible, locally rooted AI can drive inclusive growth and connect more people to opportunity." The whitepaper outlines the potential positive impact of AI on digital infrastructure, policy and governance, research and development, local language processing and investment into Africa. It also explores how AI can accelerate job creation, with up to 230 million digital jobs projected by 2030, and increase access to formal finance through AI-enabled credit scoring and fraud prevention. Greg Ulrich, chief AI and data officer, Mastercard, said: "AI is only as powerful as the trust behind it. At Mastercard, we're committed to building AI that's responsible, inclusive, and built to bring value to our customers, partners and employees. This isn't just innovation—it's innovation with integrity." Regional highlights covered in the whitepaper include: South Africa: South Africa attracted USD 610 million in AI-focused venture capital in 2023, with total AI investment expected to reach USD 3.7 billion by 2030. With the highest data and infrastructure readiness in Africa, the country is solidifying its role as a continental leader in AI research and application. It is home to the Artificial Intelligence Institute of South Africa which serves as a gateway for students and professionals to access world-class education, research and industry news. National plans aim to develop up to 300 AI start-ups and train 5,000 AI professionals by 2030, creating the foundation for a vibrant, homegrown AI ecosystem. Kenya: An emerging leader in AI innovation, Kenya has leveraged its "Silicon Savannah" status to securely deploy AI across sectors. Platforms like Tala use mobile data for credit scoring, while Jacaranda Health's UlizaLlama, an AI-powered chatbot, provides maternal health support in five local languages. The newly launched National AI Strategy (2025–2030) outlines the government's commitment to positioning Kenya as a regional leader in AI research and development, innovation and commercialization for socioeconomic development. Nigeria: Nigeria ranks second in the number of AI startups in Africa and secured USD 218 million in VC investment in 2023. As one of Africa's most dynamic AI ecosystems, Nigeria is using AI to personalize learning (Rising Academies), deliver microfinance via and strengthen governance with AI tools that monitor public fund allocation. With a $1.4 billion projected AI market size by 2025, the government's proactive approach, combined with growing private-sector innovation, suggests promising growth in AI applications. Morocco: An emerging AI hub in North Africa, Morocco is advancing AI adoption across healthcare, energy, agriculture, and finance. Institutions such as Mohammed VI Polytechnic University and DeepEcho are driving local innovation, while the MoroccoAI Annual Conference is shaping national dialogue on the future of AI. Under its Digital 2030 strategy, Morocco aims to attract USD 1.1 billion in investment and create 240,000 digital jobs by 2030. Despite this progress, the whitepaper warns that data fragmentation, language exclusion and regulatory inconsistency could deepen the digital divide. Harnessing the potential of AI in Africa will be instrumental in accelerating financial inclusion and driving the continent's digital and economic growth. Strategic collaborations between governments, fintechs, and global partners will be key to unlocking AI's full impact. Mastercard's whitepaper draws on insights from leading African technologists, policymakers, academics and entrepreneurs, including interviews with UNESCO, the African Center for Economic Transformation, and fintech leaders across the region. To download the full whitepaper, click Editor's Note 'Harnessing the transformative power of AI in Africa' has been written by White Paper Media Consulting (WPM) in partnership with the Mastercard EEMEA team. The findings and outcomes presented in this paper are based on interviews of various key stakeholders named in the report. These were put into perspective with contextual research by WPM. Markets covered include Kenya, Morocco, Nigeria and South Africa. Infographic and report design is by WPM. About Mastercard Mastercard powers economies and empowers people in 200+ countries and territories worldwide. Together with our customers, we're building a resilient economy where everyone can prosper. We support a wide range of digital payments choices, making transactions secure, simple, smart and accessible. Our technology and innovation, partnerships and networks combine to deliver a unique set of products and services that help people, businesses and governments realize their greatest potential. *Source: AETOSWire View source version on Contacts Kanyi Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
How Smart Leaders Use Constraints to Drive Strategic Innovation
Recently, reports began circulating that Nvidia was developing a detuned version of its next-generation Blackwell chip for China. The new chip would be slower on paper, lower priced, and engineered to comply with U.S. export limits. This wasn't a retreat—it was a redesign. Rather than waiting for the wall to move, the company chose to build right up to the wall. Nvidia's decision captures something essential about leadership under pressure. When reality draws a hard line, the instinct is to negotiate for more room. Another quarter. Another budget cycle. Another exemption. The alternative is to treat the line itself as part of the brief. Nvidia's response is less about salvaging a market than about reframing the problem: take the rule, freeze it, and optimize around it faster than anyone else can respond. The limit becomes an input. The boundary becomes an edge to cut against. Most organizations don't work this way. Most teams treat constraints as temporary inconveniences. They lobby around them, litigate them, or wait them out. Yet the firms that keep outmaneuvering their peers treat constraint as a forcing function for clarity, speed, and differentiation. Leadership is difficult even in the best of times. And these aren't the best of times. Markets are unsettled, geopolitics shows up inside product roadmaps, and investors ask for discipline and outsized growth at the same time. Teams are stretched. Wanting more room is understandable. The task is to find clarity inside the room that actually exists. The Power of Constraints Psychologists and designers have long understood the power of limits. If you were asked to name as many white objects as you could, many of us would stop after five or six: clouds, snow, paper, teeth... But narrow the frame to white objects in the refrigerator and people's lists grow quickly: milk, eggs, yogurt, cauliflower, sour cream, leftover rice... The boundary doesn't reduce imagination; it directs attention and sharpens perception. Amazon's two‑pizza team rule was introduced as that kind of structural discipline. Teams were capped at the size that could be fed with two pizzas, not as a gimmick but as a principle. It was a deliberate constraint on group size that encouraged accountability, clear ownership, and speed. With a small enough team, there's little room for ambiguity. Decisions are made closer to the work. Apple, often discussed as a company of boundless ambition, operates with an unusual level of internal constraint. Consider the number of SKUs and the narrowness of the design language. With artificial intelligence, privacy is prioritized, on-device processing is preferred, and partnerships are introduced cautiously and selectively. A peculiar paradox now defines strategy work. Many leaders face too much of everything: too many tools, data, priorities, and meetings to align too many stakeholders. In that context, additional resources often slow the system down. The surface area of indecision expands, and momentum leaks away. Seen through that lens, Nvidia's move is instructive. Instead of lamenting what can't be built or sold, the question shifts to what must be built to win inside the boundary. Constraint ceases to be the bottleneck. It becomes the clarifier. Reacting to Constraints Most businesses face three kinds of constraints. There are imposed constraints: regulators, geopolitics, macro shocks, activist boards. Nvidia's China strategy sits here. The boundary is hard, public, and rarely negotiable on the timelines that matter to product and go‑to‑market teams. There are structural constraints: legacy tech stacks, capital availability, brittle supply chains, outdated incentive systems, operating‑model debt, and talent gaps. These constraints are rarely acknowledged because they feel like the water the organization swims in every day. But there are chosen constraints, too: limits leaders set deliberately to produce sharper strategy and faster execution. Amazon's team size rule and Apple's SKU discipline fall into this category. The distinction matters. An imposed constraint demands adaptation. A structural constraint demands redesign. A chosen constraint demands leadership. When it's no longer plausible that more is the answer, it becomes easier to see that less often can be. Operating Inside a Boundary Many companies have intricate criteria for funding projects and almost none for killing them. Under a constraint, the kill criteria are built into the brief from the outset. The team knows what would cause them to stop. That clarity accelerates learning. Of course, constraints amplify accountability only if it's obvious who holds the pen. If a project has five sponsors and ten reviewers, the constraint turns into politics. If it has one owner, it turns into progress. And make no mistake: the narrative matters. There's a psychological cost when constraint is framed as austerity. People feel punished and hide their ambitions. Framed as concentration, the same constraint invites professionalism rather than martyrdom. Trust builds when leaders say no to expansion, but then protect the teams working inside the smaller mandate. Constraints work best when people understand the game they're playing. Telling an organization to do more with less generates anxiety. Explaining where the line sits, why it exists, and how the team intends to win inside it generates focus. Budget becomes a design instrument when it's fixed early and defended. Teams turn time into a forcing function when they announce a release date before work begins. When Netflix decided to start developing its own content, it didn't launch into it with a sprawling studio and Game of Thrones budgets. It began with House of Cards, a show free of expensive CGI dragons. Still, the company had a focused, data‑informed thesis of what would appeal to its audience. Working inside limitations led to sharper choices and a stronger debut. Getting Started with Constraints Leadership under constraint tends to follow a recognizable sequence. The boundary conditions are frozen. The rule, the regulator, the budget, or the headcount is treated as an input rather than a grievance. The design brief then makes explicit what must be true to win inside that line, what has to ship, and what will be deliberately cut. Ownership is concentrated in a small, fast team rather than diluted across a large coalition. Decisions are time‑boxed so that momentum is protected. The constraint is narrated so the organization understands why the wall exists, what it's teaching, and how the team intends to win inside it. One initiative that truly matters can be selected and treated with the same clarity Nvidia is applying to its China strategy. The central constraint can be written in a single sentence—regulation, budget, timeline, talent, compute, attention—and held fixed. That constraint can then be translated into a specification: what has to be true to succeed inside it, and what will be cut. A small team can be appointed, given no more than sixty days, and asked to deliver something concrete rather than something perfect. To be sure, not every constraint produces clarity. Some are arbitrary, performative, or so severe that they starve the work rather than focus it. The task is to decide which boundaries are worth accepting, which must be redesigned, and which should be chosen on purpose—and to move faster once that difference is clear. The Deeper Challenge for Leaders In a zero-interest-rate environment, conversations tended to revolve around removing limits: more funding, more hiring, more time. All of that signaled ambition, yet it often spread attention thinner. But there's another way to view the game. A small, focused mission signals that the work matters and that the organization trusts the team to move with speed and clarity. Constraint, in this reading, isn't a penalty. It's a commitment to coherence. When leaders embrace constraint, they force prioritization. They grant permission to be decisive. They encourage a kind of moral clarity: this is the thing being built, for these people, at this moment. Everything else is noise. That clarity shows up in shorter feedback loops, in smaller teams making bigger calls, and in an organization that tells a consistent story about what matters. So the brief can be frozen. The timebox can be set. The constraint can be named. The final step is to help the team see that the work isn't about operating with less, but about discovering what's essential and executing against it with speed and care. The future won't be won by the company with the most room to run. It will be won by the companies that know how to find the wall and run up against it. To use it not as a limit, but as