Kilmar Abrego Garcia was ‘tortured' in El Salvador prison, his lawyers say
The alleged abuse was detailed in court documents filed in Abrego Garcia's civil lawsuit against the Trump administration on Wednesday, providing an account of his experiences following his deportation for the first time.
Abrego Garcia's case has become a flashpoint in the US government's controversial immigration crackdown since he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March, despite an earlier order by an immigration judge barring such a move.
According to his lawyers, Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador as a teenager to avoid gang violence, arriving in the United States around 2011. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children.
He was returned to the US last month and is currently locked in a legal battle with the US government, which has indicted him on charges of migrant smuggling and says it plans to deport him to a third country.
'Plaintiff Abrego Garcia reports that he was subjected to severe mistreatment upon arrival at CECOT, including but not limited to severe beatings, severe sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture,' his lawyers said in the filing, referring to the Salvadoran mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Centre, or CECOT.
Severe beatings, threats
The filings, made in a civil suit in federal court against the US government brought by Abrego Garcia's wife in Maryland, said her husband was hit and kicked so frequently upon his arrival at the prison that the next day his body was covered in lumps and bruises.
The filings also said he and other inmates were forced to kneel for nine hours straight throughout the night, or were hit by guards, in a cruel exercise of sleep deprivation.
It said prison staff repeatedly threatened to transfer Abrego Garcia to cells with gang members who would 'tear' him apart, and claimed that he lost 31 pounds (14kg) in his first two weeks in jail as a result of the abuse.
'Administrative error'
Abrego Garcia was detained by immigration officials and deported to El Salvador on March 15. Trump and US officials have accused him of belonging to the notorious MS-13 gang, which he denies.
The deportation took place despite an order from a US immigration judge in 2019, which barred Abrego Garcia from being sent back to El Salvador because he likely faced persecution there from gangs.
Abrego Garcia's treatment gained worldwide attention, with critics of Trump's aggressive immigration policy saying it demonstrated how officials were ignoring due process in their zeal to deport migrants. The Trump administration later described the deportation as an 'administrative error'.
Last month, the US government complied with a directive from the court to return Abrego Garcia to the US, but only after having secured an indictment charging him with working with coconspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the US illegally.
He is currently being detained in Nashville, Tennessee, while his criminal case is pending, having pleaded not guilty to illegally transporting undocumented immigrants.
The US government is arguing that the new civil suit is now moot, as Abrego Garcia has been returned from El Salvador. It has said it plans to deport him to a third country after he is released from custody.
Abrego Garcia a 'criminal' for DHS
In the wake of the latest court filings, the Trump administration doubled down on its attacks on Abrego Garcia as a dangerous illegal immigrant.
In a post on the social media platform X, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said the 'media's sympathetic narrative about this criminal illegal gang member has completely fallen apart'.
'Once again the media is falling all over themselves to defend Kilmar Abrego Garcia,' it said.
'This illegal alien is an MS-13 gang member, alleged human trafficker, and a domestic abuser,' DHS claimed, without providing any evidence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
14 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' passes the US House of Representatives
After nearly 29 hours of debate, the United States House of Representatives have passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', an enormous tax cut and spending package that represents a pillar of President Donald Trump's agenda. The lower house of the US Congress voted by a margin of 218 to 214 in favour of the bill on Thursday. All 212 Democratic members of the House opposed the bill. They were joined by Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, who broke from the Republican majority. After the bill's passage, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, the top Republican, applauded his fellow party members. 'I believed in this vision. I believed in the group. I believe in America,' Johnson said to applause. The bill now heads to the White House for Trump to sign it into law. The Republican president had called on his fellow party members to pass the legislation before July 4, the country's Independence Day. As a result of the new legislation, the US will lift its debt ceiling — the amount the federal government is allowed to borrow — by $5 trillion. The bill also pours tens of billions of dollars into immigration enforcement, one of Trump's top priorities, and it will also cement the 2017 tax cuts that Trump championed during his first term as president. To pay for those expenditures, the bill scales back social initiatives like Medicaid — government health insurance for low-income households — and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), otherwise known as food stamps. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill will increase the number of people without health insurance by 17 million over the next 10 years. It also projected that the country's deficit — the amount of money the US owes — would climb by about $3.3 trillion over the same period. Democratic lawmakers had slammed the bill as a massive redistribution of wealth from the poor to the rich, noting that the tax cuts will mainly benefit the wealthiest earners. Republican supporters like Trump have countered that the bill will fuel growth and cut waste and fraud in programmes like Medicaid. Yet, not all conservatives initially backed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' as it wound its way through the chambers of Congress. There were several Republican holdouts who feared how the Medicaid cuts would impact low-income and rural communities, and some fiscal conservatives objected to the increase in the national debt. 'FOR REPUBLICANS, THIS SHOULD BE AN EASY YES VOTE,' Trump said in a social media post on Wednesday night. 'RIDICULOUS!!!' Even Trump's erstwhile ally, billionaire Elon Musk, has publicly opposed the bill over provisions he described as 'pork'. A record-breaking speech In the lead-up to Thursday's vote, Democrats attempted to stall, with the stated aim of allowing voters more time to contact their local representatives in protest. The face of that effort was Democratic Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, who exercised a privilege known as the 'magic minute' that allows party leaders to speak as long as they want from the House floor. Jeffries stretched that privilege into an hours-long appeal to Republicans to stand up against what he described as Trump's harmful policies. He started at around 4:53am local time (8:53 GMT) and ended past 1:39pm (17:39 GMT). It was the longest speech ever delivered on the House floor, approximately eight hours and 44 minutes. 'I'm here to take my sweet time on behalf of the American people,' Jeffries told the House, his voice wavering at points during the speech. He directed his remarks to the speaker of the House, a leadership role normally occupied by Johnson. 'Donald Trump's deadline may be Independence Day. That ain't my deadline,' Jeffries said. 'You know why, Mr Speaker? We don't work for Donald Trump. We work for the American people.' Jeffries warned that the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', which he dubbed the 'One Big Ugly Bill', 'hurts everyday Americans and rewards billionaires with massive tax breaks'. The legislation, he added, was simply reckless. He called his colleagues across the aisle to 'show John McCain-level courage', dropping a reference to the late Republican senator from Arizona, known for standing up to Trump on the question of healthcare. McCain has often been cited as a symbol of bipartisanship in Congress, and Jeffries urged his Republican colleagues to reach across the aisle. 'We acknowledged the election of President Donald Trump, offered to work with our colleagues on the other side of the aisle whenever and wherever possible in order to make life better for the American people,' Jeffries said. 'But the route, Mr Speaker, that has been taken by House Republicans is to go it alone and to try to jam this One Big Ugly Bill — filled with extreme right-wing policy priorities — down the throats of the American people.' In a poll last week from Quinnipiac University, for example, just 29 percent of respondents indicated they were in favour of the legislation, while 55 percent were against it. Jeffries later added, 'We're not here to bend the knee to any wannabe king,' comparing resistance to Trump to the US's revolutionary war era. When he finally said he would yield back the floor, Democrats exploded into applause, chanting his name: 'Hakeem! Hakeem! Hakeem!' Republicans rally in final stretch In order to reach Thursday's vote, the House had remained in session overnight, as part of a marathon session. But in the minutes before the dramatic vote took place, Speaker Johnson himself briefly spoke to the House, rallying Republicans to show a unified front. He also took a jab at Jeffries's record-breaking speech, 'It takes a lot longer to build a lie than to tell the simple truth.' 'We've waited long enough. Some of us have literally been up for days now,' Johnson continued. 'With this One Big Beautiful Bill, we are going to make this country stronger, safer and more prosperous than ever before, and every American is going to benefit from that.' He added that the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' would make programmes like Medicaid 'stronger with our reforms'. Still, at the final hurdle, two Republicans did break away from their party caucus to vote against the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. One of the nay-votes, Representative Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, released a statement saying he had previously voted to 'strengthen Medicaid'. The Senate version of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', he argued, did the opposite. 'The original House language was written in a way that protected our community; the Senate amendments fell short of our standard,' Fitzpatrick wrote. 'I believe in, and will always fight for, policies that are thoughtful, compassionate, and good for our community.' Massie, meanwhile, had been a consistent holdout from the start. His sticking point, he said on social media, was the increase to the national debt. 'I voted No on final passage because it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates,' he wrote. A months-long process It has been a long road for Republicans to reach Thursday's vote, stretching back months. The House first passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' on May 22, in another overnight vote. In that May vote, the legislation passed by the narrowest of margins, with 215 voting in favour and 214 against. Representatives Massie and Warren Davidson of Ohio joined a unified Democratic front in voting against the bill at that time, and Maryland's Andy Harris voted 'present'. Two more Republicans missed the vote entirely. That propelled the bill to the Senate, where it faced another uphill battle. The 100-seat chamber has 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats and left-leaning independents. To avoid facing a Democratic filibuster, Republicans subjected the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' to the Byrd Rule, which allows legislation to pass with a simple majority. But in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, Republicans had to strike provisions that had little to no budget impact or increased the deficit outside of a 10-year window. Still, the revised Senate version of the bill faced a nail-biter of a vote. On July 1, after another all-nighter, the vote was 50 to 50, with three Republicans siding with the Democrats. Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaker to advance the bill. Democrats did, however, notch a small symbolic victory, with Senator Chuck Schumer knocking the name 'One Big Beautiful Bill' off the final piece of legislation. It was the Senate's version of the bill that the House voted on Thursday. At least one Republican senator, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, has expressed distaste for the legislation since voting for its passage. 'It is the people of Alaska that I worry about the most, especially when it comes to the potential loss of social safety net programs — Medicaid coverage and SNAP benefits — that our most vulnerable populations rely on,' she wrote in a statement earlier this week. 'Let's not kid ourselves. This has been an awful process — a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline that has tested every limit of this institution.' The bill is expected to be signed into law on July 4 at 5pm US Eastern time (21:00 GMT) at a White House ceremony.
Al Jazeera
22 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Four killed, 14 injured in mass shooting outside downtown Chicago lounge
Four people in the United States have been killed and at least 14 others wounded when gunmen opened fire on a crowd outside a lounge in downtown Chicago, according to police. According to authorities, the mass shooting took place around 11:00pm (04:00 GMT) on Wednesday, when shots were fired from a vehicle travelling along Chicago Avenue in the city's River North neighbourhood. Chicago police reported that 13 women and five men, all between the ages of 21 and 32, were struck by the gunfire. Among the dead were two men and two women. As of Thursday, at least three victims remained in critical condition. The injured were transported to local hospitals. Police said the driver fled the scene immediately, and no arrests have been made. Chicago Police Superintendent Larry Snelling urged the public to submit anonymous tips to help detectives identify the suspects. Local media reported that rapper Mello Buckzz, also known as Melanie Doyle, was hosting a private event at the lounge Wednesday evening to celebrate the release of her new album. Snelling said police were trying to determine a motive and that the venue, Artis Lounge, is closed 'until we get to the bottom of this'. He did not identify the number of attackers involved in the incident but said police found two different calibres of casings and were still reviewing footage. 'Clearly, there was some target in some way,' Snelling said. 'This wasn't some random shooting.' Artis Lounge confirmed they were working with authorities as the investigation continued. A post shared by Ärt-is Restaurant and Lounge (@artischicago) 'I can only describe it as a warzone' In the hours after the shooting, Buckzz asked for prayers and expressed her anger and sadness on social media. 'My heart broke into so many pieces,' the artist wrote on Instagram Stories. In her posts, the rapper revealed that many of those injured were her friends, and that she had been in a relationship with one of the men who was killed. 'Prayers up for all my sisters god please wrap yo arms around every last one of them,' Buckzz wrote across several Instagram Story slides. 'Feel like everything just weighing down on me … all I can do is talk to god and pray.' Chicago pastor Donovan Price, who works with communities affected by violence, described the scene as a 'warzone'. 'Just mayhem and blood and screaming and confusion as people tried to find their friends and phones. It was a horrendous, tragic, dramatic scene,' he told The Associated Press. The shooting took place days before the Fourth of July weekend, when Chicago and other major cities often see a surge in gun crimes. In recent years, however, Chicago has seen an overall decrease in gun violence. During the last Fourth of July weekend in Chicago, more than 100 people were shot, resulting in at least 19 deaths. Mayor Brandon Johnson said at the time that the violence 'has left our city in a state of grief'.
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US issues first wave of Iran sanctions after ceasefire in 12-day war
Washington, DC – The United States has issued a new wave of sanctions against Iranian oil exports, the first penalties against Tehran's energy sector since a Washington-backed ceasefire between Israel and Iran came into effect last month. Among those targeted by the sanctions announced on Thursday are Iraqi businessman Salim Ahmed Said and his United Arab Emirates-based company, which the US accused of smuggling Iranian oil by blending it with Iraqi oil. 'Iran's behavior has left it decimated. While it has had every opportunity to choose peace, its leaders have chosen extremism,' US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a statement. 'Treasury will continue to target Tehran's revenue sources and intensify economic pressure to disrupt the regime's access to the financial resources that fuel its destabilizing activities.' After the ceasefire was reached on June 24, US President Donald Trump said China could buy Iranian oil, suggesting the US might lift its sanctions on Tehran's energy exports. But the promise was short-lived. Trump wrote in a social media post last week that he 'immediately dropped all work on sanction relief' in response to statements by Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei claiming victory over Israel. The US president also said he stopped Israel from assassinating Khamenei, saving him from a 'VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH'. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz had said Israel sought to kill Khamenei but there was 'no operational opportunity' for the assassination. Israel launched air strikes against Iran without direct provocation on June 13, killing hundreds of Iranians, including civilians and top military officials. The US joined the Israeli campaign and attacked three Iranian nuclear sites. Iran responded with missile strikes against Israel and an attack on an airbase housing US soldiers in Qatar. Trump claimed the US air raids 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities. On Wednesday, the Pentagon said the US bombing operation set back Iran's nuclear programme by one to two years. But it is not clear where Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium are. The country passed a law last month to suspend cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), over the agency's failure to condemn the US and Israeli attacks. The move has sparked rebukes by the US and several European countries. On Thursday, Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei suggested Iran is in indirect contact with the US – through Oman and Qatar – to find a diplomatic solution to the crisis. 'Diplomacy must not be abused or used as a tool for deception or for simply a sort of psychological warfare against their adversaries,' Baghaei told Sky News. He added that Tehran feels its diplomatic efforts have been 'betrayed'. Hours before Israel started the war last month, Trump reiterated a US commitment to diplomacy. And days before the US attacks, he said he would make a decision on joining the war within two weeks to allow talks between Iran and European powers.
