The SC governor's race has no official candidates yet, but who has the early edge?
None of the potential hopefuls in the South Carolina governor's race have jumped in, but two early polls released Tuesday ahead of the June 2026 GOP primary have early indications of who has an edge.
A Winthrop University poll showed U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, a Lowcountry congresswoman representing the Charleston-area, had the highest name recognition with 57% of self-identified South Carolina Republicans either familiar or somewhat familiar with her. The poll was taken between Feb. 21 and March 5 after Mace gained national attention with a House floor speech where she accused four men of rape and voyeurism.
The margin of error was 4.63 percentage points.
Attorney General Alan Wilson was familiar or somewhat familiar to 44% of Republicans.
Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette was familiar or somewhat familiar to 38%.
The poll found U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, R-Rock Hill, was at 35% familiarity, Upstate businessman John Warren at 30% familiarity, and state Sen. Josh Kimbrell, R-Spartanburg, at 26%
But in a head-to-head matchup between Evette, Mace and Wilson may be a different story, at least 15 months before ballots are cast in the GOP primary.
A Trafalgar Group poll of likely Republican voters conducted between Saturday and Monday, found Evette had an early lead if the GOP primary were held today.
Evette had 31.5% support, Mace was at 29.1% and Wilson was at 27.9%.
The poll had a 2.9% margin of error.
Both polls unsurprisingly found that President Donald Trump had a high approval rating among Republicans in the reliably red state, reinforcing why the three perceived front-runners continue to try to align themselves closely with the chief executive.
Trafalgar put Trump's approval rating at 73.7% among South Carolina Republicans. Winthrop had Trump's approval rating at 81% among the Palmetto State GOP.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP advances first 2026 funding bill out of committee
House Republicans early Wednesday morning advanced legislation that calls for more than $450 billion to fund the Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction and other programs for fiscal year 2026. The bill advanced out of the GOP-led House Appropriations Committee along party lines, as Democrats came out in strong opposition to the plan. It marks the first of the 12 annual funding bills House GOP appropriators are hoping to move out of committee before Congress leaves for its August recess. The bill calls for about $152 billion in discretionary funding for fiscal 2026, marking a 3 percent increase compared to current levels. Overall, the bill would provide about $453 billion for the VA, including $300 billion for mandatory programs. Among the increases Republicans have highlighted in the measure are boosts to the VA, military construction and family housing, and funding for a new homelessness program. In his opening remarks on Tuesday, Rep. John Carter (R-Texas), the head of the subcommittee that crafts the annual funding bill, said the bill ensures 'veterans get the benefits and care they've earned.' 'The bill does that while also addressing other issues affecting veterans, including homelessness, mental health services and taking care of our women veterans,' he said. 'The bill also makes crucial investments totaling nearly $18 billion in the infrastructure of our service members need to work on to live.' Democrats, however, have railed against the plan, needling Republicans for not including advanced funding for the Toxic Exposure Fund in the proposal, which they also said falls nearly $1 billion short of the funding needed for military construction. Democrats have also accused Republicans of seeking to privatize medical care for veterans. 'This bill hurdles us towards VA privatization, a top project 2025, priority that undercuts what veterans consistently ask for, which is the high quality medical care at VA, by transferring record funding from VA medical services to community care,' Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Fla.), the top Democrat on the veterans' funding subcommittee, said. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) has emphasized as the committee ramps up its funding work that the legislation currently being considered will look different when eventual bipartisan spending talks begin. Senior GOP appropriators have also acknowledged that further changes are possible during the annual process as they await more information from the Trump administration about the president's vision for government funding for fiscal 2026 and beyond. 'As this process moves forward and we receive further documentation on the OMB budget, we will take it under consideration, put forward a product that best addresses the needs of our service members and veterans,' Carter said during the meeting on Tuesday, referring to the Office of Management and Budget. The bill comes about a week after hardline conservatives urged top appropriators to write bills 'consistent' with President Trump's budget request and to 'include adjustments initiated' by his Department of Government Efficiency. In a slim budget request released earlier this year, Trump called for cutting funding for domestic programs by more than $160 billion for fiscal 2026. As appropriators await more details from the administration, the committee also approved interim subcommittee allocations for a third of the annual funding bills. 'These interim allocations will allow us to begin our work. As we move forward, this committee is prepared to do the hard work – line by line – to uphold fiscal discipline and effective governance,' Cole said. However, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, criticized Republicans over the process, saying negotiators are 'beginning the appropriations process without a total funding level.' 'We are flying blind and handcuffed into the critical work of providing discretionary funding for programs and services across the government that help to grow the middle class, protect the working class, support small businesses, and grow our economy – this is important business that cannot be done responsibly without a complete vision for how we plan to fund the government.'
CBS News
26 minutes ago
- CBS News
Speaker Mike Johnson to address Israeli parliament June 22
Washington — House Speaker Mike Johnson announced Wednesday he will travel to Israel later this month to address the Israel's parliament, known as the Knesset, in Jerusalem. "It will be one of the highest honors of my life to address the Israeli Knesset at this fateful moment," Johnson said in a statement announcing the June 22 address. "Our ties run deeper than military partnerships and trade agreements. We're bound by the same beliefs, the same psalms, and the same sacred pursuit of liberty." Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, has led House Republicans in their staunch support of Israel in the war in Gaza that began following Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack. Johnson's speakership began weeks later, after the ouster of his predecessor, Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy also addressed the Knesset during his speakership in May 2023. And for Johnson, the overseas trip marks one of a small number he's taken since becoming speaker. His first trip abroad since taking the gavel came in September when he attended the G7 summit in Italy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, left, and and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson address the media after a meeting in the U.S. Capitol on Friday, February 7, 2025. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images The visit comes 20 months after the conflict between Israel and Hamas began. The U.S. has long been engaged in ongoing negotiations to broker a ceasefire between the two, and President Trump has expressed optimism in recent weeks. Meanwhile, Israel has faced intense criticism in recent months for a blockade on aid deliveries into Gaza. Johnson met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Washington in February. The speaker reiterated Wednesday that "it is our moral imperative to stand by our sister democracy" amid "grave threats" to Israel and Jewish people. "As terror and vile antisemitic ideology threaten Western Civilization, Israel must know that when America said, 'Never Again,' we meant it," Johnson added.
Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump-y ad blitz launched to sway the president on energy credits
A new business-backed group with GOP ties just launched a $2 million, three-week ad blitz to preserve IRA tax credits — and the framing is very Trump-y. Why it matters: It comes during crunch time for hundreds of billions of dollars of tax incentives on the chopping block in the budget reconciliation fight. The big picture: Built for America is placing ads on Fox, Truth Social, Rumble, podcasts and beyond. "Unlike other efforts focused on Congress, Built for America is the only campaign speaking directly to the president and making the case that these energy tax credits are a cornerstone of his pro-worker, pro-growth agenda," the rollout states. State of play: It's not disclosing specific donors, but backers include players in nuclear, carbon capture, hydrogen, critical minerals, storage and more, it said. The executive director is Mitch Carmichael, a Republican who previously served as West Virginia's lieutenant governor and economic development secretary. Republican strategist and former Trump campaign adviser Bryan Lanza is advising the new effort. Driving the news: "Trump country is booming. We're building, hiring and winning in America, because energy tax credits put America first," one of the ads states, touting new jobs and manufacturing. "President Trump, keep what works," it states. Catch up quick: More business interests are pressing the Senate to soften House GOP budget plans that scuttle or restrict IRA energy tax credits. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a new post, is urging preservation of what it calls "pro-growth" credits around hydrogen and clean electricity production. The bottom line: Low-carbon energy industries are increasingly framing their message more around "energy dominance" and less — a lot less — around green goals.
