Ford halts shipments of vehicles to China amid tariffs
'We have adjusted exports from the US to China in light of the current tariffs,' Ford said in a statement.
The company this week halted shipments of its F-150 Raptors, Mustangs and Michigan-built Bronco SUVs as well as Kentucky-made Lincoln Navigators to China.
The development comes as US carmakers scramble to find ways to tackle President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs, which are expected to dent profits of carmakers and parts suppliers likewise.
The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the halt, citing people familiar with the matter.
Ford's exports of US-built engines and transmissions to China are expected to continue despite the pause on exports of assembled vehicles.
Its Lincoln Nautilus model, which is manufactured in China, is also expected to have continued shipments, despite heavy tariffs.
Ford is among the best-placed carmakers to weather tariffs, as it produces about 80% of its US-sold vehicles domestically.
Still, the carmaker is expected to raise prices of its new vehicles if tariffs continue, according to an internal memo sent to dealers that was seen by Reuters.
An analysis by the Center for Automotive Research published earlier this month said Trump's 25% tariffs on automotive imports will escalate costs for carmakers by about $108bn (R2.03-trillion) in 2025.
Trump earlier this week floated the idea that he was considering a modification to the car-related tariffs, indicating he might allow exemptions on existing levies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
America's Manufacturing Strategy and What It Means for the Global Economy
CEO Tim Cook (L) attends the 2025 Apple Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC25) in Cupertino, California, the United States, June 9, 2025. Image: Xinhua Over the past year, the United States (US) has accelerated efforts to reshore manufacturing, with former President Donald Trump at the forefront of a renewed drive to 'bring American industry home.' A wave of corporate investment, led by tech giants like Apple, Nvidia, Micron, and IBM, is shifting the global manufacturing map. Trump's latest announcement, alongside Apple CEO Tim Cook, revealed a historic $600 billion investment from Apple alone, focused on expanding American-based factories, rare earth recycling, chip fabrication, and data centres. America Brings Manufacturing Home This marks a major turning point in global supply chains. From Kentucky's smartphone glass plants to AI server hubs in Texas and rare earth facilities in California, the US is doubling down on high-tech and high-value manufacturing. The incentives include favourable tax legislation, fast-track construction approvals, and tariff waivers for companies building on US soil. A key policy shift is the proposed 100% tariff on imported chips and semiconductors, exempting only companies actively building production capacity in the US. The move, combined with secondary sanctions on nations purchasing Russian oil, signals a broader strategy to realign global trade and industry flows around American interests. This reshoring push signals trouble for traditional manufacturing hubs in East Asia, where lower labour costs once dominated decision-making. As US capital, jobs, and technology return home, countries like China, Taiwan, and Vietnam may face downward pressure on exports and foreign investment. Global Supply Chain Implications Real or None? The implications of the US' return to domestic manufacturing, underpinned by policy and security, are increasingly reshaping the global industrial landscape. 'Made in America' is no longer a nostalgic slogan; it is fast becoming a strategic imperative. However, reviving old-school manufacturing thinking in today's high-tech, globally integrated world is proving far from straightforward. While political rhetoric may champion a renaissance in domestic industry, the complexity of modern supply chains makes it difficult to simply 'reshore' production at scale. Advanced manufacturing today depends not just on factories and labour, but on access to globalised inputs: rare earth materials, high-tech semiconductors, specialised components, and digital integration. For instance, a single smartphone can involve over 200 suppliers across 40 countries. Apple's supply network spans Asia, Europe, and North America, highlighting how even with $600 billion in planned US investment, re-engineering entire ecosystems is a long-term and uneven process. Technological Interconnectedness Technological interdependence complicates reshoring efforts. Semiconductor fabrication, for example, is a prime target for American industrial policy, with companies like TSMC and Intel investing billions in US plants. Yet, building domestic chip capacity to meet even 70% of local demand would require over $350 billion and at least a decade. Similarly, retraining the workforce for AI-enabled manufacturing environments presents structural challenges. In the US alone, over 2.1 million manufacturing jobs are projected to go unfilled by 2030 due to a skills mismatch. For emerging markets, the consequences are equally complex. Many have developed export-led growth strategies by serving as manufacturing hubs for Western brands. As the US and others decouple from China or reduce dependency on foreign suppliers, countries like Vietnam, Mexico, and India may benefit from supply chain diversification, but only if they can meet new standards around cybersecurity, intellectual property, and sustainability.
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
USPS blocks shipping of illicit vapes in boost for Big Tobacco
The US Postal Service (USPS) has cracked down on distributors of unregulated vapes using its services for business shipments, letters reviewed by Reuters show, in a blow to a multibillion dollar industry that has dented Big Tobacco's sales. The letters, previously unreported, show the USPS wrote to major New York-based distributor Demand Vape, blocking it from using its services after New York City's (NYC) law department, which represents the city's government and officials in legal matters, provided evidence that its shipments broke laws. The USPS' action stands to benefit tobacco giants including Altria and British American Tobacco (BAT), which have for years battled against unregulated vapes, mostly from China. Unregulated vapes lack authorisation from the US Food and Drug Administration (DFA) required for them to be legally sold in the US, the world's largest market for smoking alternatives. The USPS revoked Demand Vape's mailing exception last month after it received evidence the company shipped vapes lacking FDA authorisation and that violated a local flavour ban, a letter from the USPS to the company, dated July 15, showed. 'Your local Buffalo business mail entry office will not accept any packages from Demand Vape that contain ENDS products,' the letter read, referring to electronic nicotine delivery systems, another term for vapes. Demand Vape said it complied with relevant laws and was contesting the revocation, adding the industry operates in a 'regulatory grey zone' with only a small number of FDA-authorised products that do not meet consumer demand. 'We reject any characterisation that paints Demand Vape as anything other than a transparent, lawful and reputable business,' it said. The USPS did not respond to a request for comment. So far, the FDA has authorised only 39 e-cigarette products. But unauthorised devices are widely available as authorities struggle to contain them. Under a 2021 law, the USPS is restricted from mailing vapes directly to consumers, internationally and in most other circumstances. The limited exceptions include domestic shipments between businesses, which need a 'mailing exception' and their shipments must comply with relevant laws. Some other large carriers, including FedEx, refuse to ship vapes. DHL only offers carriage for business shipments with prior approval. The USPS has provided NYC's law department with a list of other vape firms it has granted mailing exceptions so it can assess whether they should be challenged, in line with legal requirements, Eric Proshansky, deputy chief of the city's division of affirmative litigation, told Reuters. This could further limit the number of carriers available to the unauthorised vape industry. Other options, such as using smaller carriers or handling freight directly, tend to be more costly. BAT estimated the unauthorised vape market was worth about $8.05bn (R142.6bn) last year. It is, however, increasingly under pressure. This year's US import tariffs and seizures at ports have reduced unauthorised vape imports. The FDA also wrote letters to 24 US-based middlemen, including distributors crucial to the unauthorised vape market, as part of a crackdown in May. This has led to empty shelves in vape shops, said Tony Abboud, executive director of the Vapor Technology Association, which represents firms including Demand Vape. The USPS revocations will further damage US vape businesses, he said. One of the largest US e-cigarette distributors, Demand Vape sells to about 5,000 retailers in 49 states, according to 2024 filings in a NYC lawsuit against the company. The evidence city attorneys provided to the USPS included copies of invoices showing Demand Vape's sales of unauthorised e-cigarettes. Brands the FDA has specifically flagged as illegal to sell were among them, a separate letter reviewed by Reuters showed.
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
These are the MOST popular fast foods in South Africa
Fast foods in South Africa are a multi-billion-Rand business annually. However, following the introduction of 30% Trump tariffs this month, a major shake-up is on the cards. While this spells trouble for US-based brands, it does represent great strategic opportunities for other fast foods in South Africa. Interestingly, according to a report by Mordor Intelligence, fast foods in South Africa are a R177-billion industry annually. As of May 2025, there were an estimated 5 982 fast-food restaurants in the country. This accounts for nearly 80% of all food services, reports Daily Investor . Instead of sales, the report analysed the most visible and talked-about fast foods in South Africa. These included McDonald's, KFC, Chicken Licken, Nando's, Roman's Pizza, Debonairs, and Steers. Noteworthy is the fact that full-service, sit-down restaurants like Spur, Wimpy and Mugg & Bean were not included. As such, the most popular fast foods in South Africa are McDonald's and KFC, leading online share of search (SoS) rankings with more than 10% each. Interestingly, Data from Standard Bank customers also revealed how South Africans spend their money on fast foods every month. Pizza, burgers or chicken, which is South Africa's most popular? Image: File Research found that your average customer (earning R25 000 per month) spends roughly R775 monthly on fast foods in South Africa. This is over and above groceries and other food shopping. Interestingly, the higher the earnings, the higher the spending. Earners in excess of R50 000 spend R1 000 per month, and spending can peak at R1 300 per month over the holiday period. Moreover, Mordor says negative sentiment towards brands comes from late deliveries, poor service and/or small portion sizes. More than 70% of consumers say taste consistency and credibility was their strongest driver for fast foods in South Africa. The best-selling combo deals don't exceed the R100 mark. And the 80% of fast-food purchases take place on Fridays and Saturdays, in and around paydays and holidays. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
