Selena Gomez Scores Big, Both With New Songs And Old Favorites
Selena Gomez lands four singles on the U.K. charts and debuts her new album I Said I Love You in the ... More top five across five different tallies. BEVERLY HILLS, CALIFORNIA - JANUARY 10: Selena Gomez Celebrates the Launch of Rare Beauty's Find Comfort Body Collection on January 10, 2024 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo byfor Rare Beauty)
Selena Gomez is enjoying one of her best weeks of her career on the U.K. charts in recent memory. Impressively, it's not only due to a new release. Yes, her latest full-length I Said I Love You is out now, and it's performing well, but some of the pop star's older cuts are also back in action — rising, returning, and keeping her presence alive across a number of important tallies.
Gomez's name appears across multiple charts in the U.K. this frame. Four of her tracks place somewhere on various tallies. Two of them are brand new, taken from I Said I Love You, while the other two are hits from eras past. This shows that while there's plenty of excitement around her latest offering, the pop star's older tunes are still hugely popular.
Among her reappearances, 'Bad Liar' is performing especially well. The single returns to two U.K. charts this week, each of which is focused on physical formats. It reenters the Official Vinyl Singles ranking at No. 27, and also manages to come back to the Official Physical Singles list at No. 33. The catchy tune gives Gomez a top 40 win on both rosters, years after the track was originally released.
One of Gomez's more popular collaborations is also a winner again this frame. 'Fetish,' which features Gucci Mane, finds space on the Official Vinyl Singles chart at No. 34. Over on the Official Physical Singles list, the same title lands at No. 42, just a couple of spots shy of becoming a top 40 seller across the rankings once more.
Of course, the focus at the moment when it comes to the singer is on her new work. Two tracks from Gomez and Benny Blanco's I Said I Love You debut on several rosters in the U.K.
'How Does It Feel To Be Forgotten' makes the bigger splash between the two, starting its run at No. 83 on the Official Singles Sales chart. It also appears on the main singles ranking, entering the Official Singles roster at No. 86.
Another new track, 'Sunset Boulevard,' doesn't reach quite as high. The tune manages to break onto the Official Singles chart at No. 100, squeaking onto the list in last place.
The album itself is a major success in the U.K., debuting on a dozen rankings. I Said I Love You launches inside the top five on just as many charts. It performs best on the Official Album Downloads list, where it begins its journey at No. 3. It also enters at No. 4 on the Official Albums chart — the most competitive in the nation — while also opening in the same position on the Official Vinyl Albums, Official Physical Albums, and Official Album Sales tallies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
For Sharon Van Etten, making her latest album was both spiritual and psychological
LOS ANGELES (AP) — As she was putting together her seventh and most recent record, Sharon Van Etten came up with a tongue-in-cheek idea for its title. 'Sharon Van Etten & The Attachment Theory,' she wanted to call it — a reference to both her interest in psychology and a play on the familial dynamics that often exist within a band. Although most of Van Etten's bandmates have been with her for several years, this was her first time writing songs with them, so playing with that relationship felt apt. But when the indie musician approached her collaborators with the idea for the title and band name, there was one stipulation: 'They said, 'I don't mind you calling it 'The Attachment Theory,' as long as we don't have to talk about our attachment styles,'' Van Etten laughed. As they gear up for a fall tour, announced Monday, Van Etten spoke with The Associated Press about her stream-of-consciousness style of writing and how being a mom has made her more cognizant of how much time she spends on her phone. The interview has been edited for clarity and brevity. AP: What prompted the change in how this record was made? VAN ETTEN: Writing as a band was a complete accident. We were rehearsing in 2022 for the 'We've Been Going About This All Wrong' tour and figuring out how to take this album, which we recorded piecemeal during the pandemic because we couldn't all be in the same room together. I thought the best way to reconnect after recording the album from afar was to rent a house and a studio in the desert and have it be more like a literal band camp, instead of doing one of those sterile rehearsal environments, just to have a way for us to reconnect as people as well as musicians. As we got to the end of the week, we realized we had gone through the whole set that we were planning for that tour, and I asked the band if they would want to jam. I was so tired of hearing myself. I was very inspired by the sonic palette that we had created together, and I wanted to see what would happen. And in an hour or two, we wrote two songs without really trying. And we laughed it off, we packed our bags and we left the next day. But my engineer recorded those jam sessions, and I remember playing them for my partner at home, saying, 'I think creatively this is the next thing I want to do.' And so, after we did that first tour for the previous record, I booked a writing session right away and we returned to that same studio and worked for a week with the intention of writing. And it was a very prolific week. AP: Did you have the lyrics written beforehand? VAN ETTEN: All of the writing in the desert was from the ground up. I didn't have anything going into it, which I've never done before either. My process from being solo is something that I brought into the session with the band, where I find the melodies first and I sing stream of consciousness. AP: Singing stream of consciousness sounds very spiritual, almost like speaking in tongues. VAN ETTEN: It very much is. There's something about it that, if I'm going through something emotionally that I don't have the words to express yet and I can sit at an instrument and just sing, I get something out of me and release something in a way that I still don't really know how to describe to people. Even if it's something I end up writing about later, it's more of like, I get the emotion out, but then I turn the song into something else that hopefully is more healing than the moment that I'm trying to get over. AP: How did you come up with the album name? VAN ETTEN: The name The Attachment Theory at first was a bit tongue-in-cheek because I am interested in psychology and I am from a big family. I think being in a family and being in a band are very similar because you become a family, you become each other's chosen family, and you go through a lot together. So from rehearsing to touring to making a record together, you create these dynamics with each other, and you also become each other's support systems. And I know attachment theory is mostly about your connection with your parents but it's also a little bit about how you connect as a unit. AP: I'm sure your attachment styles came up in the desert. VAN ETTEN: Yes, and they will remain unnamed. AP: I love your song, 'Idiot Box.' I wondered, as an artist, how you think about our addiction to entertainment. VAN ETTEN: Oh my gosh, well that's a can of worms right there. I mean, we're all addicted to our phones. We all have screens. I'm also a mom, and I tell my kid not to do the things that I do. And I think now more than ever, I have to be way more mindful about when I choose to interact. But I don't really have an answer. It's more of an acknowledgment that we need to check in with each other when we feel like we're getting lost in that scrolling zone and I just feel like it's a constant battle.
Indianapolis Star
9 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Selena Gomez Oreo cookies are available starting June 9: Where to get them
The Selena Gomez-inspired Oreos have officially hit stores. The Limited Edition Selena Gomez Oreo Cookies are inspired by her love of horchata, according to Oreo, and include a layer of chocolate and cinnamon flavor creme atop a layer of sweetened condensed milk flavor creme with cinnamon sugar inclusions, sandwiched between two chocolate cinnamon flavored wafers. According to the cookie brand, the new flavor "brings together Selena's passions and fandom into one deliciously dunkable bite." In addition to the cookie, Gomez also created six unique embossments designed with her fans in mind, including one that spells out "Selenators." There's also one exclusive cookie, found in approximately every three packs, that features Gomez's signature, marking the first time Oreo has ever put an autograph on a cookie, the company said in May. "Making my own OREO cookie was a lot of fun. I grew up loving them, so being able to be a part of the process was a full-circle moment," Gomez said in a news release. "I wanted to find a way for it to feel comforting and have a bit of nostalgia from my childhood. The cinnamon flavor gives it this horchata feel, and I'm excited for my fans to try it." It's a wrap: McDonald's, Popeye's kick off latest fast food battle The limited edition cookies have been available for presale in the U.S. since June 2 at They will begin rolling out at retailers nationwide starting June 9 and will be available only for a limited time, while supplies last. The cookies will also be available in Canada and Brazil on June 9, and fans in Australia and New Zealand can get them on June 17. "Tapping into Selena's world—her cultural roots, her loyal fan base, her musical journey— propels the OREO brand's cultural relevance and playful personality to new heights," said Michelle Deignan, Vice President, OREO, US, in a news release. "This collaboration embodies our commitment to delighting our consumers in unexpected ways and further establishes our footprint in the music industry."
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Toxic truth? The cookware craze redefining ‘ceramic' and ‘nontoxic'
The cookware industry has entered a golden age, largely driven by the wild success of a new generation of 'nontoxic' and 'nonstick' designer ceramic pans backed by stars including Selena Gomez, Stanley Tucci and Oprah Winfrey. But the pans are likely not 'nontoxic' some independent testing and research suggests. Nor are they even 'ceramic' – at least not in the way the public broadly thinks of ceramics. Now, regulators are investigating some of the pan sellers' claims. On Instagram, TikTok and their marketing materials, the social media-savvy cookware brands promise 'enchantment', and 'non-toxic materials and thoughtful design' that 'prioritizes the health and safety of you and your family'. In fact, no legal definition for 'nontoxic' or 'ceramic' exists, and the marketing has drawn greenwashing accusations exacerbated by the companies concealing their pans' ingredients. And the blockbuster sellers like Our Place's Always Pan, Caraway and GreenPan are typically made with a material that thinly coats an aluminum substrate and is characterized in one study as 'quasi-ceramic'. Meanwhile, independent testing and research suggests quasi-ceramics may contain toxins like titanium dioxide, siloxanes, lead and mercury. Related: The best pans for every type of cooking – chosen by chefs The claims are eliciting regulatory scrutiny. The state of Washington recently ordered quasi-ceramic producers to submit their nonstick ingredients to the state's ecology department as it attempts to learn which chemicals cookware companies are using to replace Teflon or other toxic Pfas, or 'forever chemicals'. The order is about 'transparency', said Marissa Smith, a senior toxicologist with the Washington department of ecology. 'It's challenging for regulators to know when we're moving to safe alternatives, but it's also hard for families who want to buy safer products,' Smith said. 'There's this fundamental challenge of figuring out what's in our products and having the data to make those decisions.' The nonstick, quasi-ceramics have in part quickly blown up because, their producers claim, they cracked the 'nontoxic/nonstick' code. Prior to 2019, nonstick pans largely used toxic Pfas, a class of chemicals that are among the most toxic man-made substances, and linked to cancer and a range of other serious health problems. The quasi-ceramic, design-forward pans with color palettes like 'spice' and a millennial aesthetic burst onto a market ripe for an alternative. Their launches coincided with the rise of wellness culture and the pandemic's outset. With people forced to cook at home and on social media, the cookware became Instagram sensations – Caraway's monthly ecommerce sales jumped 390% between January and May 2020. Celebrity involvement also fueled the quick ascents: Selena Gomez, Tan France, Gwyneth Paltrow, Stanley Tucci and Drew Barrymore now have their own quasi-ceramic pan lines. Gigi Hadid and Kate Hudson promoted their Caraways in the media. Always Pan's order backlog hit 30,000 early on. GreenPan made Oprah's 2024 Favorite Things list, and Caraway's profits grew over 500% between 2020 and 2023. Throughout, the companies have relentlessly touted their products as 'nontoxic'. Ceramic cookware dates back at least 15,000 years. The concept evolved across cultures – the medieval British pipkin, the ancient Roman testum and the Wampanoag Native American decorated pots. Throughout the ages, the basic formula remained the same: some mix of clay, silica and minerals fired at a high heat to create a solid piece. The new quasi-ceramics are something else. The producers use some variation of a material called 'sol-gel' developed in the 1970s, a mix of silica, metals and chemicals. The material is sprayed onto an aluminum substrate – the pan is not quasi-ceramic all the way through. The companies won't tell the public what else is in the pans, and their formulas are shielded by confidential business information laws, making it very difficult to verify their claims. The uncertainty alone raises suspicions among some public health advocates, but sleuthing of peer-reviewed research, legal documents, patents and regulatory documents around the pans raises more questions than answers, and points toward the use of toxic chemicals. Still, Caraway states: 'We believe in full transparency with regard to our products, so we're happy to share testing reports with anyone via email to prove just how safe our products are.' In an email to the Guardian, it declined to share the formula: 'The formulation of Caraway's ceramic cooking surfaces is proprietary.' Responding in 2022 to I Read Labels For You, a consumer protection site that questioned the pan producers' non-toxicity claims, Always Pan maker Our Place conceded the products are not ceramic, but a 'ceramic precursor' with a different formula. 'We are heating it at a lower temperature, it never gets to that ceramic state,' Always Pan wrote. 'Ceramic is totally inorganic whereas our sol-gel has organic and inorganic substances. The inorganic material is glass/silica. The organic material is an organic polymer.' In an email to the Guardian, Our Place said its pans' materials are 'similar in feel to traditional ceramics', and are made with 'a sand-based material, which is why it's commonly referred to as 'ceramic''. It did not immediately respond to a question about why it's marketed as ceramic if it's admittedly not ceramic. The distinction is in part important because the surfaces can potentially melt at heat above 260C (500F), increasing the risk of chemicals leaching into food. The pans have also been reported to wear down and lose their nonstick coating sometimes within months of purchase. True ceramic can withstand much higher heat and is far more durable. Other quasi-ceramic producers use a similar material, all of which include polymers. Polymers may mean any of tens of thousands of chemicals, including Pfas, which the sol-gel patent even details. Applying nonstick organic polymers may also create toxic monomer byproducts, Smith noted, but it's impossible to know without having the pan makers' ingredients. Nonstick can linings can create toxic bisphenol-A, for example. A 2019 lawsuit alleged GreenPan's '0% toxins' claim represented false advertising. Citing GreenPan's patent, the suit alleged the pans contained silane, aluminum oxide, tetraethoxysilane, methyltrimethoxysilane, and potassium titanate. Regulators classify some of these as hazardous, but the suit was dismissed, though the settlement's terms are unclear. GreenPan has denied using aluminum oxide. It did not respond to a request for comment. Smith said the state of Washington is concerned companies may be using siloxane, a chemical family often used to replace Pfas in consumer goods, but which sometimes pose similar risks. One industry study compared the performance of nonstick properties of siloxanes to Pfas in quasi-ceramic pans, finding Pfas worked better. Independent testing by the consumer protection site Lead Safe Mama detected high levels of titanium in GreenPan, Always Pan and Caraway, pointing to the use of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. A 2016 study also identified titanium dioxide in quasi-ceramic pans, and showed how it can migrate into food. The toxic substance is banned in the European Union for use in food, but not cookware. It's a potential carcinogen that accumulates in organs and is linked to neurotoxicity, intestinal inflammation and other health impacts. Caraway in 2024 acknowledged using nanoparticles, though they didn't say which. But, it claimed without supporting evidence, that the levels it uses doesn't cause health risks. All told, there's evidence that the pans could contain such ingredients as titanium dioxide, lead, mercury, cadmium, siloxanes, potentially toxic monomer byproducts and other unknown substances. Even if the levels of individual toxins are low, there's no research into the health effects of all the toxins combined migrating into food, which raises a whole new set of questions. Caraway in a statement to the Guardian said the company could not 'speak to the conduct or quality of any testing that is not its own'. 'Caraway is proud of the products we have developed and the progress made towards a cleaner home for our customers, there is still much to be done,' the statement added. Public health advocates say the uncertainty is a red flag, and forcing consumers to 'go through tests and patents' to know what they're buying is 'absolutely ridiculous,' said Laurie Valeriano, executive director of the Toxic Free Future non-profit, which has raised concerns about quasi-ceramics. 'It shouldn't be up to consumers to sleuth and try to figure out the ingredients in pans so they can protect the health of themselves and their families,' Valeriano added. Maryland-based Xtrema is one of very few companies producing ceramic pans as they have been traditionally made. Production takes up to 25 days, said owner Rich Bergstrom and produces a solid ceramic piece that can withstand high levels of heat. Companies passing off a softer sol-gel coating as true ceramic 'irks me – it drives me crazy', Bergstrom said. He called it a 'false term', and said it's being 'manipulated from a marketing standpoint to give you the impression that it's ceramic'. Some of the pans also contain lead, testing Lead Safe Mama's Tamara Rubin found. The lids and cooking surfaces of the Always Pan and Caraway showed some of the toxin, which she said suggests aluminum substrates and pieces are to blame. Rubin also found mercury in the Caraway and antimony throughout GreenPan. Caraway still advertises 'metals free', and GreenPan states its products 'lack harmful chemicals and toxins'. Rubin is a polarizing figure for her generally absolutist positions on lead – if a product contains the substance, she recommends against it. This is the most protective approach, but companies and regulators point out that lead is naturally occurring and widespread in the environment, often found at low levels in ceramics' clay, as well as foods. They claim 'trace' levels of lead are OK, especially if it's not in a food contact surface. But there's no definition for 'trace'. No federal limits for lead in ceramic cookware exist. If lead in a ceramic piece isn't leaching at the time a consumer buys it, then there isn't a problem, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told the Guardian in 2022. However, there's no testing or oversight program, or assurance it doesn't leach once it's scratched, chipped or worn. The FDA has done little to scrutinize cookware materials throughout the decades because it's chronically underfunded and understaffed, said Tom Neltner, director of the Unleaded Kids no-nprofit, who has legally pressured the FDA to act on leaded food materials: 'With all the things coming into the agency, they have not looked at all these lead issues, and there's no public scrutiny of their priorities.' However, the state of Washington is implementing the nation's first limits directly addressing cookware – 90 parts per million (ppm) next year, and 10ppm by 2028. Rubin found levels as high as 70ppm in the Always Pan. Rubin in 2018 also found lead, cadmium and other metals like cobalt in Xtrema pieces, and advises against them for that reason. Bergstrom said he eliminated the highest sources of lead, like the logo on the pan's bottom. He also noted Rubin's testing looks for the presence of lead, but not whether it leaches into food. True ceramic pans are less of a leach risk because the material is more solid than quasi-ceramic, Bergstrom claims. His pans have passed California's Proposition 65 leach tests of new products, and he also pointed to testing that showed no lead leaching from an Xtrema pan that had been used for several years.
