logo
Can Eli Lilly Stock Withstand the Threat of President Trump's New Sweeping Tariffs?

Can Eli Lilly Stock Withstand the Threat of President Trump's New Sweeping Tariffs?

Globe and Mail2 days ago
Key Points
President Trump has threatened to levy tariffs of up to 200% on pharmaceutical imports.
Lilly's margins could be negatively affected if the company absorbs the higher costs.
However, any effect on Lilly should only be temporary.
10 stocks we like better than Eli Lilly ›
The active ingredients of roughly 80% of prescription drugs sold in the U.S. are made in other countries. President Trump wants that to change.
Instead of a carrot-and-stick approach, the president plans to rely solely on a stick -- tariffs. Trump recently threatened to levy steep tariffs on all pharmaceutical imports to the United States.
As you might expect, the pharmaceutical industry doesn't like the idea. But can a top pharma stock such as Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) withstand the threat of Trump's new sweeping tariffs?
About the president's threatened pharmaceutical tariffs
First of all, firm details about Trump's pharmaceutical tariffs have not been released yet. However, the president said that tariffs on pharmaceutical imports will come "very soon." We do know, though, that Trump wants steep tariff levels. He said during a Cabinet meeting earlier this month, "They're going to be tariffs at [a] very high rate, like 200%."
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick provided further clarification in an interview with CNBC. He said that the details on pharmaceutical tariffs will be announced at the end of July. Lutnick noted that a Section 232 investigation related to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors will be completed at the end of this month. Once that investigation is finished, Trump will establish his tariff policies. Section 232 investigations are intended to assess the effect of imports on national security.
Trump doesn't plan for pharmaceutical tariffs to take effect immediately, though. He said, "We'll give them [drugmakers] a certain period of time to get their act together." He suggested that pharmaceutical companies would have "about a year, year and a half" to move manufacturing to the U.S. to avoid the tariffs.
How Lilly could be affected
Lilly CEO Dave Ricks addressed the issue of tariffs head-on in his company's first-quarter earnings call on May 1, 2025. Ricks stated, "We support the U.S. government's goals to increase domestic investment. However, we don't believe tariffs are the right mechanism." He suggested tax incentives as a better way to promote U.S. manufacturing of prescription drugs.
But Ricks acknowledged the possibility that pharmaceutical tariffs could be imposed. He predicted that they "would have a negative effect on Lilly and for our industry." Wall Street agrees with that view.
Analysts at Barclays wrote to investors, "A 200% tariff would inflate production costs, compress profit margins, and risk supply chain disruptions, leading to drug shortages and higher prices for U.S. consumers." UBS analysts agreed, stating that tariffs could significantly hurt drugmakers' margins on products manufactured outside the U.S.
Lilly has three options in light of the steep pharmaceutical tariffs Trump has threatened. The option the president hopes drugmakers take is to relocate manufacturing to the Unites States. Lilly is already planning to build up its U.S. operations so that it can supply all products sold in the U.S. entirely from U.S. manufacturing facilities. However, it's doubtful that the company will complete this effort within the 12 to 18 months Trump mentioned. UBS said in a note to investors that four to five years is more reasonable for relocating manufacturing operations.
The second option for Lilly is to pass higher prices along to customers. The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) estimates that a pharmaceutical import tariff of only 25% would increase prices by as much as 12.9%.
Lilly's third option is to absorb the higher costs. Pharmaceutical tariffs of up to 200% could hurt the company's margins considerably.
Evaluating the threat
Let's return to our original question: Can Eli Lilly withstand the threat of Trump's new sweeping tariffs? I think the answer is "yes," albeit with a major caveat. The devil is in the details. Lilly's ability to navigate high tariffs depends on exactly what the Trump administration plans to do.
Ricks said in Lilly's Q1 earnings call that tariffs would "have a transient effect for Lilly, but probably not a long-term one." I suspect he's right.
The company already manufactures many of the products it sells in the U.S. inside the country. Those products wouldn't be affected. As Ricks mentioned, Lilly is already boosting U.S. production, which will also help.
Finally, don't discount legal challenges to the president's tariffs. An argument could be made that pharmaceutical products made in Ireland, the primary overseas source for Lilly, don't present a national security threat to the U.S., since Ireland is a staunch ally.
Granted, Lilly could face a bumpy ride for a while. But I don't think the threat of tariffs undermines the long-term investment thesis for this top pharma stock.
Should you invest $1,000 in Eli Lilly right now?
Before you buy stock in Eli Lilly, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Eli Lilly wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,281!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,050,415!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,058% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk
Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk

Winnipeg Free Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Texas Republicans aim to redraw House districts at Trump's urging, but there's a risk

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — U.S. Rep. Vicente Gonzalez, a Texas Democrat who represents a slice of the Rio Grande Valley along the border with Mexico, won his last congressional election by just over 5,000 votes. That makes him a tempting target for Republicans, who are poised to redraw the state's congressional maps this coming week and devise five new winnable seats for the GOP that would help the party avoid losing House control in the 2026 elections. Adjusting the lines of Gonzalez's district to bring in a few thousand more Republican voters, while shifting some Democratic ones out, could flip his seat. Gonzalez said he is not worried. Those Democratic voters will have to end up in one of the Republican districts that flank Gonzalez's current one, making those districts more competitive — possibly enough so it could flip the seats to Democrats. 'Get ready for some pickup opportunities,' Gonzalez said, adding that his party is already recruiting challengers to Republicans whose districts they expect to be destabilized by the process. 'We're talking to some veterans, we're talking to some former law enforcement.' Texas has 38 seats in the House. Republicans now hold 25 and Democrats 12, with one seat vacant after Democrat Sylvester Turner, a former Houston mayor, died in March. Gonzalez's district — and what happens to the neighboring GOP-held ones — is at the crux of President Donald Trump's high-risk, high-reward push to get Texas Republicans to redraw their political map. Trump is seeking to avoid the traditional midterm letdown that most incumbent presidents endure and hold onto the House, which the GOP narrowly controls. Trump's push comes as there are numerous political danger signs for his presidency, both in the recent turmoil over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case and in new polling. Surveys from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research show most U.S. adults think his policies have not helped them and that his tax cut and spending bill will help the wealthy. Republicans risk putting their own seats in jeopardy The fear of accidentally creating unsafe seats is one reason Texas Republicans drew their lines cautiously in 2021, when the constitutionally mandated redistricting process kicked off in all 50 states. Mapmakers — in most states, it's the party that controls the legislature — must adjust congressional and state legislative lines after every 10-year census to ensure that districts have about the same number of residents. That is a golden opportunity for one party to rig the map against the other, a tactic known as gerrymandering. But there is a term, too, for so aggressively redrawing a map that it puts that party's own seats at risk: a 'dummymander.' The Texas GOP knows the risk. In the 2010s, the Republican-controlled Legislature drew political lines that helped pad the GOP's House majority. That lasted until 2018, when a backlash against Trump in his first term led Democrats to flip two seats in Texas that Republicans had thought safe. In 2021, with Republicans still comfortably in charge of the Texas Statehouse, the party was cautious, opting for a map that mainly shored up their incumbents rather than targeted Democrats. Still, plenty of Republicans believe their Texas counterparts can safely go on offense. 'Smart map-drawing can yield pickup opportunities while not putting our incumbents in jeopardy,' said Adam Kincaid, executive director of the National Republican Redistricting Trust, which helps coordinate mapmaking for the party nationally.. Democrats contemplate a walkout Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called a special session of the Legislature, which starts Monday, to comply with Trump's request to redraw the congressional maps and to address the flooding in Texas Hill Country that killed at least 135 people this month. Democratic state lawmakers are talking about staying away from the Capitol to deny the Legislature the minimum number needed to convene. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton posted that any Democrats who did that should be arrested. Lawmakers can be fined up to $500 a day for breaking a quorum after the House changed its rules when Democrats initiated a walkout in 2021. Despite the new penalties, state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, who led the walkout in 2021, left open the possibility of another. 'I don't think anybody should underestimate the will of Texas Democrats,' he said. Texas is not the only Republican state engaged in mid-decade redistricting. After staving off a ballot measure to expand the power of a mapmaking commission last election, Ohio Republicans hope to redraw their congressional map from a 10-5 one favoring the GOP to one as lopsided as 13-2, in a state Trump won last year with 55% of the vote. GOP sees momentum after 2024 presidential election Democrats have fewer options. More of the states the party controls do not allow elected partisans to draw maps and entrust independent commissions to draw fair lines. Some party leaders, such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, are maneuvering to try to find ways around their commissions to counter Texas, but they have few options. The few Democrat-controlled states that do allow elected officials to draw the lines, such as Illinois, have already seen Democrats max out their advantages. Trump and his allies have been rallying Texas Republicans to ignore whatever fears they may and to go big. On Tuesday, the president posted on his social media site a reminder of his record in the state last November: 'Won by one and a half million Votes, and almost 14%. Also, won all of the Border Counties along Mexico, something which has never happened before. I keep hearing about Texas 'going Blue,' but it is just another Democrat LIE.' Texas has long been eyed as a state trending Democratic because of its growing nonwhite population. But those communities swung right last year and helped Trump expand his margin to 14 percentage points, a significant improvement on his 6-point win in 2020. Michael Li, a Texas native and longtime watcher of the state at the Brennan Center for Justice in New York, said there's no way to know whether that trend will continue in next year's elections or whether the state will return to its blue-trending ways. 'Anyone who can tell you what the politics of Texas looks like for the balance of the decade has a better crystal ball than I do,' Li said. Aggressive redistricting also carries legal risks One region of the state where Republican gains have been steady is the Rio Grande Valley, which runs from the Gulf of Mexico along much of the state's southern border. The heavily Hispanic region, where many Border Patrol officers live, has rallied around Trump's tough-on-immigration, populist message. As a result, Gonzalez and the area's other Democratic congressman, Henry Cuellar, have seen their reelection campaigns get steadily tighter. They are widely speculated to be the two top targets of the new map. The GOP is expected to look to the state's three biggest cities to find its other Democratic targets. If mapmakers scatter Democratic voters from districts in the Houston, Dallas and Austin areas, they could get to five additional seats. But in doing so, Republicans face a legal risk on top of their electoral one: that they break up districts required by the Voting Rights Act to have a critical amount of certain minority groups. The goal of the federal law is to enable those communities to elect representatives of their choosing. The Texas GOP already is facing a lawsuit from civil rights groups alleging its initial 2021 map did this. If this year's redistricting is too aggressive, it could trigger a second complaint. 'It's politically and legally risky,' Li said of the redistricting strategy. 'It's throwing caution to the winds.' ___ Riccardi reported from Denver.

Here's Why This $50 Healthcare Stock Could Be the Next $200 Winner
Here's Why This $50 Healthcare Stock Could Be the Next $200 Winner

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Here's Why This $50 Healthcare Stock Could Be the Next $200 Winner

Key Points Exelixis' most important product should continue driving strong financial results through the end of the decade. The oncology specialist is working on a next-gen medicine that could be even better than its crown jewel. The midcap biotech looks well-positioned to deliver market-beating returns over the long run. 10 stocks we like better than Exelixis › A decade ago, shares of Exelixis (NASDAQ: EXEL), a biotech company specializing in oncology, were trading for under $10 per share. Today, the drugmaker's shares are changing hands for about $45 apiece. In other words, Exelixis has crushed the market since 2015. Some might think there is little upside left for the stock after this run, but that's not the case. Read on to find out why Exelixis still has plenty of growth fuel left in the tank. EXEL Total Return Level data by YCharts. Cabometyx is still doing the heavy lifting Exelixis is best known for its cancer medicine, Cabometyx. First approved in the U.S. in 2016 for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC, a form of kidney cancer), it was a bit of a breakthrough as the first therapy to show significant improvements for RCC patients in three important measures: overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate (the percentage of patients who respond to treatment). Cabometyx has since earned numerous label expansions, and it continues to help drive solid top- and bottom-line growth for Exelixis. In the first quarter, the company's revenue jumped by 30.6% year over year to $555.4 million. The company's adjusted earnings per share (EPS) more than tripled to $0.62. Cabometyx has proven to be a successful pipeline drug, becoming the most prescribed tyrosine kinase inhibitor (a type of cancer drug that targets and kills cancer cells) among RCC patients, while making headway in hepatocellular carcinoma (liver cancer) and other markets. Despite Cabometyx's success, though, Exelixis will need more to continue delivering above-average returns over the long run. Generic competition for the medicine is expected to enter the U.S. market by 2030. Thankfully, Exelixis is already preparing for that eventuality. The next stage of growth Exelixis aims to apply the same blueprint that has made it successful over the past decade: developing a cancer medicine that can become a standard of care in a niche with a high unmet need, while earning label expansions in many other markets. The company appears to have already discovered its next gem. Exelixis recently reported positive top-line phase 3 results for zanzalintinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite having a high 5-year survival rate when caught early, CRC is the second-leading cause of cancer death worldwide partly because, once it has metastasized, there are few effective treatment options. Exelixis is looking to change that with zanzalintinib, and the company's apparent phase 3 success suggests it might be able to pull it off. Furthermore, zanzalintinib is being investigated across other indications, including those where Cabometyx is dominant, such as RCC. The former seems to have a better safety profile than its predecessor, among several other advantages. Beyond RCC and CRC, Exelixis plans to start several other late-stage studies for its next crown jewel this year, all of which will test it against current standards of care. As they say, to be the best, you have to beat the best. That's what Exelixis aims to do with zanzalintinib. Exelixis expects zanzalintinib to generate about $5 billion in sales eventually, far exceeding Cabometyx's current total or, for that matter, Exelixis' annual revenue. There is still some work to be done to get there, but early signs suggest that zanzalintinib is an excellent candidate. Exelixis' recent clinical progress also reinforces its leadership in oncology. The biotech company has several other early-stage candidates in development that could help it move beyond Cabometyx once it starts facing generic competition. Can Exelixis get to $200? From its current stock price of approximately $45, Exelixis needs a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of at least 16.1% to reach $200 within the next decade and 10.5% to achieve this in 15 years. The former goal is ambitious, but the stock has delivered even better returns than that over the past decade. Although the past is no guarantee of future success, Exelixis' MO has remained the same and could, once again, allow it to generate monster returns over the long run as it makes significant clinical and regulatory progress with zanzalintinib and other pipeline candidates. Even if it falls short of this goal, though, my view is that Exelixis is well-positioned to deliver market-beating returns to patient investors -- the 15-year path to $200 would still be impressive. Either way, the stock looks like a buy. Should you invest $1,000 in Exelixis right now? Before you buy stock in Exelixis, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Exelixis wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025

Is Nvidia Stock Too Expensive to Buy Now?
Is Nvidia Stock Too Expensive to Buy Now?

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Is Nvidia Stock Too Expensive to Buy Now?

Key Points Data center growth is slated to continue for some time. Nvidia's GPUs are unrivaled in the AI space. Many stocks trade at the same price tag as Nvidia with far less growth. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has been the top artificial intelligence (AI) stock to own for some time now, but with its latest rise, many investors are concerned that Nvidia's stock is too expensive to buy more shares at the current price. While I understand the hesitation, I think there is a compelling argument that Nvidia isn't expensive when you take a longer view than just a single year. If you can commit to owning Nvidia stock for three to five years, I think there's a good reason to buy the stock right now. However, if you're only looking at a single year, the stock may appear somewhat pricey. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Data center expansion will continue to be a massive source of growth Nvidia is the global leader in graphics processing units (GPUs), and it has established this position through superior hardware and unmatched software that allow users to optimize GPUs for various workloads. One estimate pegs Nvidia's data center market share for GPUs at 90%, which underscores just how widely used Nvidia's products are. GPUs aren't just popular for AI workloads; they're used whenever an arduous computing task is involved. Whether it's drug discovery, cryptocurrency mining, engineering simulations, or their original purpose, gaming graphics, GPUs excel at the task because of their ability to process multiple calculations in parallel. Combine that with the ability to connect GPUs in clusters, and their computing power can be quickly amplified. As more data centers are built, the demand for GPUs is expected to rise, which will likely benefit Nvidia's stock over the long term. For 2025, the AI hyperscalers all announced record capital expenditures, with most of the funds going toward data center construction. While this is impressive, the records are likely to be shattered again in 2026, as data center construction spans multiple years. This supports a third-party projection that Nvidia cited during its 2025 GTC conference, stating that 2024 global data center capital expenditures totaled $400 billion but are expected to rise to $1 trillion by 2028. Should that occur, Nvidia's stock has plenty of room to run, as it captures a large portion of that spending. In the company's fiscal-year 2025 (which encompasses most of 2024), its data center revenue totaled $115 billion, which means Nvidia captures nearly 30% of total data center spending. If it can maintain that market share, it has the potential to generate $300 billion from data centers alone, provided the projection comes true. That's a significant upside from today's totals, making today's stock price appear less expensive than it initially seems. Nvidia's stock appears expensive, but so do many others in the market Currently, Nvidia's stock trades at about 40 times forward earnings. NVDA PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts That's historically quite expensive, but few companies have been able to sustainably grow as quickly as Nvidia. For Q2, Nvidia expects 50% revenue growth, which is far more than the majority of companies in the market. Furthermore, if you're going to call Nvidia expensive, then there are countless other stocks investors must be cautious with. Stocks like Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) (36 times forward earnings), Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY) (35 times forward earnings), and Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ: COST) (53 times forward earnings) are just as expensive as Nvidia, yet don't have near the growth rate or upside. NVDA PE Ratio (Forward) data by YCharts I think it's safe to say that the broader market is rather expensive as a whole, but with how rapidly Nvidia is growing and how bright its long-term prospects are, I think investors are still safe to pick up shares here, as long as they have the mindset that they're holding for three to five years. If you can keep that time frame in mind, Nvidia is still a compelling investment. Should you invest $1,000 in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $652,133!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,056,790!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 15, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store