Roberts-Smith's rabid band of supporters has an outspoken new member
Loading
Given many critics' apparent aversion to examining those pages, here is a distillation of key evidence.
On April 13, 2009, Ben Roberts-Smith kicked an old man to his knees and instructed a junior soldier, in an exercise of 'blooding', to shoot him in the head. Soon after, he frogmarched a second Afghan man fitted with a prosthetic leg, threw him to the ground, and killed him with a burst of machine gun fire.
On October 12, 2012, a third unarmed and detained man was executed by an Afghan partner force member upon Roberts-Smith's instruction.
And on November 11, 2012, Ali Jan, a father of three with no established links to the Taliban, was handcuffed and kicked over a small cliff by Roberts-Smith, who then ordered two comrades to drag him to cover, where he was shot dead.
At numerous speaking events, Age investigative journalist Nick McKenzie and I have argued the following:
It is morally wrong to kill or order the execution of captives.
It is strategically wrong because it turns the population further against your mission. All those Australian soldiers bravely patrolling the fields of Uruzgan as a protective force against the Taliban were placed at greater risk.
And it is wrong to force an act upon a fellow soldier so destructive of conscience and self-respect.
Soldiers who have earned the Special Air Service Regiment's sandy beret are rightly proud. When they returned to civilian life as psychological wrecks because of what they saw and did, as did occur, the damage was obvious.
From my own observation, the self-harm to the regiment was the main reason for a brave group of Special Air Service Regiment soldiers to speak up. Nick and I both know they did so with extreme reluctance, all under subpoena, because of a view within the ranks that dobbing in your mate was a worse sin than exposing a war crime.
That view was shared by members of the uber wealthy.
Billionaire Kerry Stokes has spent millions on Roberts-Smith's case. Multi-millionaire John Singleton funded a full-page newspaper advertisement describing attacks on the war hero as 'disgraceful'. And now Australia's richest person, Gina Rinehart, is quoted querying why this 'brave and patriotic man' should be 'under such attack'.
I can only wonder what is in their minds. Do they believe that in their real world, ruthlessness is a necessity that should be honoured?
Last December, my brother Roy and I spoke to a well-heeled audience of Aussie expats in Singapore. We were warned ahead of time that there would be a pro-Roberts-Smith sentiment and opposition expressed to our reporting.
Loading
The day before, Roy and I had walked the grounds of the Alexandra Hospital. We found a small plaque commemorating the massacre of 250 patients and staff by Japanese forces on February 14, 1942.
I spoke the next day of the shock that is still felt about those helpless victims being dragged into the garden and bayonetted to death. And I asked how we could condemn the Japanese while excusing our own.
There was no answer.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
30 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Record fine leaves Qantas with unwanted brand baggage
Qantas stands accused of betraying Australian values and undermining its reputation by illegally sacking baggage handlers. Experts warn the airline, which markets itself as the "Spirit of Australia", risks losing its place in the national psyche as a result of its recent indiscretions. Qantas was on Monday fined a record $90 million for outsourcing 1820 ground staff roles, a move the Federal Court ruled was designed to curb union bargaining power in wage negotiations. It added to a $100 million fine it received for selling tickets to flights that were already cancelled between 2021 and 2023, against the backdrop of executives pocketing seven-figure bonuses. Trading on being the "Spirit of Australia" could mean the flag carrier might be held to "exceptional, indeed unique" standards, Justice Michael Lee noted as he delivered the fine. RMIT associate professor of finance Angel Zhong agreed, saying the positioning invited scrutiny of the airline's ethics, not only its performance. "Illegally sacking workers is seen as a betrayal of the very values Qantas claims to represent: fairness, mateship and respect," she told AAP. "If Qantas is the 'Spirit of Australia', then the public expects it to act with a conscience, not just a balance sheet." Illegally sacked Qantas employee Don Dixon said the company meant everything to Australians, but needed to behave with that in mind. "It's an Australian company. You go overseas and see that red kangaroo, you know 'that's my country and I'm going home, I feel safe' ... that's been lost," he told AAP. The embattled airline unsuccessfully appealed against the decision to the High Court, paving the way for the penalty to be awarded. Justice Lee ordered Qantas to pay $90 million in penalties, with $50 million to be paid to the union that brought the proceedings and highlighted the illegal conduct. He cited the "sheer scale of the contraventions, being the largest of their type" as a reason to impose a penalty that would deter other businesses from similar conduct. Qantas will have to pay the hefty bill on top of a $120 million compensation payment it has made to the affected ground staff for their economic loss, pain and suffering following the outsourcing. Public frustration and disappointment with Qantas might have increased, Assoc Prof Zhong said, but it wouldn't necessarily change consumer behaviour with price, route availability and loyalty programs outweighing ethical concerns. "That said, sustained reputational damage can have long-term effects," she said. "If trust continues to decline, Qantas risks losing not just customers, but its privileged position in the national psyche."
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Wong slams Israel's "unjustified" visa repeal move
Foreign Minister Penny Wong says Israel's decision to revoke the visas of Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority is "unjustified". On Monday, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said the visas of Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority have been revoked over the nation's recognition of a Palestinian state and for refusing entry to Israeli figures. He has also instructed the Israeli Embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry into Israel. Senator Wong said the federal government had a right to safeguard communities and protect "all Australians from hate and harm". "At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution," Senator Wong said in an early morning statement on Tuesday. "This is an unjustified reaction, following Australia's decision to recognise Palestine." She said Australia will continue to work with partners to contribute to "international momentum to a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza and release of the hostages". "Australia welcomes different races, religions and views, united by respect for each other's humanity and for each other's right to live in peace," she said. The Australian government will always take decisive action against anti-semitism, she said. Earlier this month, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese confirmed Australia's intention to recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly meeting in September. An estimated 25,000 people marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge to protest the war in Gaza at the start of the month. Mr Sa'ar expressed his anger on social media on Monday as he announced the visa cancellations. "This follows Australia's decisions to recognise a "Palestinian state" and against the backdrop of Australia's unjustified refusal to grant visas to a number of Israeli figures, including former Minister Ayelet Shaked and the Chairman of the Knesset's Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, MK Simcha Rothman," Mr Sa'ar posted on social media platform X on Monday. "While anti-Semitism is raging in Australia, including manifestations of violence against Jews and Jewish institutions, the Australian government is choosing to fuel it by false accusations, as if the visit of Israeli figures will disrupt public order and harm Australia's Muslim population. It is shameful and unacceptable!" Mr Sa'ar's post comes after it was revealed on Monday that Australia denied far-right Israeli politician Simcha Rothman from entering the country for a speaking tour after provocative comments, including branding children in Gaza as enemies. Australia has also denied entry to former Israeli minister Ayelet Shaked, based on anti-Palestinian comments, and Israeli advocate Hillel Fuld. Canberra has further sanctioned two far-right Israeli ministers, including travel bans. The federal government has denied entry to people who have a history of anti-Semitism, including rapper Kanye West, after he released a song praising Hitler. Lifeline 13 11 14 beyondblue 1300 22 4636
Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Productivity symposium looks to find the 'secret sauce'
The next chapter of Australia's economic story is set to be written as the nation's top economic minds brainstorm answers to ailing productivity. After weeks of anticipation, the federal government's three-day economic roundtable will kick off on Tuesday in Canberra. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has already been bombarded with proposals ranging from winding back property investor tax breaks to environmental law reform and cutting red tape. But he has insisted all invited parties bring specific ideas and be willing to find common ground as the outcomes of the roundtable will help steer Australia's economic agenda. "Three days to inform three budgets - and beyond," Dr Chalmers will say in his opening remarks. "(The prime minister) has been clear that this is about writing the next chapter of economic reform and I want to acknowledge the leadership he's shown. "We are realistic about the impact of all this, but optimistic too. In this world of churn and change, we like Australia's chances." Even though the Australian economy has made significant progress on wages, inflation and employment, Dr Chalmers has acknowledged there is still more to do. The roundtable is aimed at lifting living standards primarily by boosting productivity, which has stagnated in Australia and other western countries. "Productivity is like a secret sauce," AMP chief economist Shane Oliver told AAP. "If you can get strong productivity, you can have strong profits, you can have strong wages growth and still keep inflation low." Improved productivity can help guard against future cost-of-living crises, which is particularly important during times of global uncertainty. The first day of the roundtable is expected to put a spotlight on ways to build resilience, with Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock set to headline Tuesday's proceedings through her presentation on productivity trends. Productivity reform will feature more prominently on the second day before budget sustainability and tax reform help close out the roundtable on Thursday. Environment groups, the business sector, unions and others have all proposed major ideas, but Dr Oliver is keeping his expectations in check and says a firm commitment to regulation, investment incentives and competition reform could likely be called a success. Former Productivity Commission chair Michael Brennan has urged Australians to be realistic about reforms but said he was optimistic. "The strictures that the government has put around contributions - that they be specific, budget neutral and focused on the national interest rather than the vested interest - have all improved the quality of the debate," the e61 Institute chief executive told AAP. "I'm hopeful that there will be positive outcomes but it's already had a positive impact."
