J&K High Court Junior Assistant exam results 2025 declared at jkhighcourt.nic.in, interview schedule released: Download result PDF here
J&K High Court result 2025:
In a significant development, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has officially declared the results of the OMR-based written examination for the posts of Junior Assistant in the District Judiciary of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.
The written exams were held on March 16, 2025 for candidates from the Kashmir Division and on March 23, 2025 for those from the Jammu Division.
As per the official notification issued by the Chief Justice's Secretariat, hundreds of aspirants appeared in the competitive recruitment examination held pursuant to Advertisement Notification No. 06 of 2024/Psy dated August 28, 2024. The candidates who have secured top positions in the merit list have been shortlisted for interviews scheduled to commence on June 23, 2025.
These interviews will be conducted at the High Court Complex, Janipur, Jammu for the Jammu Division, and at the High Court Complex, Srinagar for the Kashmir Division.
Top scorers emerge in competitive field
Among the hundreds who appeared, a few outstanding candidates from both divisions have emerged as toppers. These candidates demonstrated exceptional merit and consistency in their preparation for the highly competitive OMR-based written test.
From the Kashmir Division, Aaliya Bhat secured the highest score, earning top place in the merit list. A resident of Srinagar, Aaliya attributed her success to daily preparation and guidance from mentors. In the Jammu Division, Amanpreet Singh, hailing from Udhampur, topped the list. His strategic focus on time-bound practice papers and conceptual clarity made a remarkable difference.
Many other top-performing candidates across the regions hailed from diverse academic backgrounds, demonstrating that success in such competitive exams is attainable through dedication and disciplined study.
Interview dates and document requirements
The interviews will begin on June 23, 2025. All shortlisted candidates are required to report by 9:00 AM on their respective interview dates, as mentioned in Annexure-A (Jammu Division) and Annexure-B (Kashmir Division) of the official notification.
Candidates must carry a valid proof of identity such as Aadhar card, PAN card, driving licence, or passport. Additionally, they are required to present all original documents and certificates (submitted during the online form filling) along with self-attested photocopies.
Failure to produce original documents may lead to disqualification from the selection process.
Steps to download the J&K High Court result 2025 PDF online
Candidates can follow the steps below to access and download the official result PDF:
Step 1: Visit the official website at https://jkhighcourt.nic.in.
Step 2: On the homepage, navigate to the 'Latest Notifications' or 'Recruitment' section.
Step 3: Look for the notification titled 'Shortlisted candidates for Junior Assistant interviews – Notification No.
06 of 2024/Psy.'
Step 4: Click on the link to open the PDF containing Annexure-A and Annexure-B.
Step 5: Download or save the document for future reference.
Direct link to download the J&K High Court result 2025 PDF
Guidelines for ex-servicemen and special cases
Candidates under the Ex-Servicemen (ESM) category must adhere to provisions of S.O. 361 dated October 20, 2021, as per the Jammu and Kashmir Ex-Servicemen (Re-employment in Public Services and Posts) Rules, 2021.
They must submit relevant certificates issued by the respective Zila Sainik Welfare Officer, and an affidavit confirming that they have not availed the ESM benefit previously.
Candidates listed for interviews on the same date in both divisions can write to the Chief Justice's Secretariat at cjsec.highcourt@gmail.com for rescheduling. No travel or daily allowance (TA/DA) shall be paid for attending the interviews.
The High Court's recruitment process remains transparent, competitive, and strictly merit-based, offering a promising opportunity to serve in the judicial system of the UT of J&K.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
Donald Trump's sanctions working? SBI bans transactions of Nayara Energy with Russian connection due to...
Donald Trump- File image New Delhi: In a significant development amid the US's increasing pressure on India over economic and trade relations with India, the State Bank of India (SBI) has stopped handling Nayara Energy's trade and foreign exchange transactions due to concerns over US and EU sanctions following a recent US tariff hike. Notably, Nayara, formerly Essar Oil, was acquired in 2017 by a Rosneft-led group and operates India's second-largest refinery (20 MTPA) with 8% of national refining capacity and over 6,500 petrol pumps. Why SBI has banned transactions of Nayara Energy? The Russian company Nayara Energy imports crude, refines it into fuels, and sells domestically and overseas. The trade with troubles escalated after the EU's July sanctions package capped Russian crude prices at $47.6 per barrel, making transactions more difficult amid the increasing threats of tariffs from US. Microsoft restores services to Russian oil firm Nayara Energy In another significant update, Tech giant Microsoft informed that services were restored to the Russia-backed oil exploration and marketing company Nayara Energy, two days after Nayara alleged that Microsoft had abruptly cut off access to its data and services. In a statement, the company said it is 'committed to supporting all its customers in India and worldwide and has restored services for Nayara Energy'. 'We are engaged in ongoing discussions with the European Union towards service continuity for the organisation,' said a company. How is Nayara Energy related to Russia? Nayara Energy, which operates fuel retail outlets in India, is primarily owned by Russia's Rosneft, which owns nearly 49 per cent of the company. Trafigura and UCP Investment Group, both foreign companies, jointly own the majority of the remaining stake via an Indian consortium. Earlier this week, Nayara Energy filed a petition in the Delhi High Court, alleging that the US-based technology firm abruptly and unilaterally suspended essential services without notice. (With inputs from agencies)
The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The Elders group of global leaders warns of Gaza 'genocide'
The Elders group of international stateswomen and statesmen, for the first time on Tuesday (August 12, 2025), called the situation in Gaza an "unfolding genocide", saying that Israel's obstruction of aid was causing a "famine". "Today we express our shock and outrage at Israel's deliberate obstruction of the entry of life-saving humanitarian aid into Gaza," the non-governmental group of public figures, founded by former South Africa President Nelson Mandela in 2007, said in a statement after delegates visited border crossings in Egypt. "What we saw and heard underlines our personal conviction that there is not only an unfolding, human-caused famine in Gaza. There is an unfolding genocide," it added. Helen Clark, former Prime Minister of New Zealand, called on Israel to open the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza so aid could be delivered, after visiting the site. "Many new mothers are unable to feed themselves or their newborn babies adequately, and the health system is collapsing," she said. "All of this threatens the very survival of an entire generation." Ms. Clark was joined by Mary Robinson, former president of Ireland and former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, on the visit. She said that international leaders "have the power and the legal obligation to apply measures to pressure this Israeli government to end its atrocity crimes". Call for ceasefire, hostage release The delegation "saw evidence of food and medical aid denied entry, and heard witness accounts of the killing of Palestinian civilians, including children, while trying to access aid inside Gaza," said the statement. They urged Israel and Hamas to agree a ceasefire and for the immediate release of remaining Israeli hostages being held in Gaza. The London-based group also called for the "recognition of the State of Palestine", but added "this will not halt the unfolding genocide and famine in Gaza". "Transfers of arms and weapons components to Israel must be suspended immediately," it added, saying Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should be sanctioned. Israel has faced mounting criticism over the 22-month-long war with Hamas, with United Nations-backed experts warning of widespread famine unfolding in besieged Gaza. Mr. Netanyahu is under mounting pressure to secure the release of the remaining hostages, as well as over his plans to expand the war, which he has vowed to do with or without the backing of Israel's allies. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the war, resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. Israel's offensive has killed at least 61,499 Palestinians, according to the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza, whose toll the UN considers reliable.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka High Court refuses to interfere with State's decision to have its own education policy instead of NEP-2020
Observing that courts do not interfere in policy decisions of governments unless they are violative of constitutional or statutory rights, the High Court of Karnataka on Tuesday declined to interfere in the State government's decision to come out with its own education policy by ignoring the National Educational Policy (NEP)-2020. A Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Ramachandra D. Huddar, passed the order while dismissing a PIL petition filed by two Bengaluru-based advocates, Girish Bharadwaj and Ananda Murthy. What petition said It was pointed out in the petition that though NEP-2020 was implemented in Karnataka from the academic year 2021-22, the new political regime decided to withdraw NEP-2020 and frame its own policy. It was contended in the petition that the discontinuation of NEP-2020 was not in the interest of the students, faculty members, and the education system in the State, as the objective of NEP-2020 is to have a uniform education system across the country. While declining to entertain the petition, the Bench said that courts cannot compel the State to adopt a particular policy while pointing out that the role of courts in interfering with policy decisions is minimal.
