When cricket comes under State oversight
But there is the unanswered question of how this will impact the workings of the world's richest cricket body, which unlike all the other National Sports Federations (NSFs) in the country, doesn't depend on government grants. Sure, BCCI will remain an autonomous body like all other NSFs but disputes, if any, will also come to the proposed National Sports Tribunal, which will become the dispute resolution body for sports matters ranging from elections to selection. Selection, for example, is always a subjective issue. In the past, people had no option but to buckle down and do better. Now, some might choose to go to the tribunal.
Will government oversight interfere with the processes that have allowed the BCCI to dominate world cricket? Sporting federations have often been at loggerheads with the government and while the law is expected to help streamline things, it remains to be seen how the right balance between autonomy of BCCI and State oversight can be achieved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
14 minutes ago
- Economic Times
2028 Olympics bombshell: Donald Trump demands gender tests for all female competitors
Donald Trump suggests gender testing for female athletes at the Los Angeles Olympics. This follows controversy at the Paris Games involving boxers. Trump wants strict testing to ensure fairness. He cites concerns about athletes gaining unfair advantages. The proposal sparks debate about gender verification in sports. World Athletics already uses genetic testing. The IOC's policies face scrutiny. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why did Donald Trump want gender testing at the Olympics? What was the reason for the Imane Khelif scandal? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Will the rules for gender testing in World Athletics also apply to the Olympics? What will happen next for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics? FAQs US President Donald Trump is upending Olympic planning with a contentious new proposal. In a fiery press conference, he stated that all female athletes competing in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics should be subjected to, a move prompted by the controversy surrounding two female boxing champions from the 2024 Paris Games, who previously failed gender eligibility tests. He also announced a White House task force to oversee Olympic has made people more worried about fairness in women's sports and how governing bodies are dealing with issues of gender answered a reporter's direct question about transgender athletes in women's combat sports at a press event for the upcoming Los Angeles Olympics. He didn't beat around the bush when he said, "There will be a very strict way to test." And if the test results aren't right, they won't be able to compete in the Olympics, as per a report by the US president didn't say exactly how the testing would be done, but he was clear that he supports stricter eligibility rules for female two boxers, Algeria's Imane Khelif and Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, won gold medals at the Paris 2024 Olympics by dominating their weight classes, gender testing is once again being looked at there was a lot of talk when it came out that both had been disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Championships in India for failing gender eligibility International Boxing Association (IBA), which was later stripped of Olympic governance by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), claimed the two athletes were ruled ineligible after confidential tests revealed they did not meet the "necessary eligibility criteria,' as per a report by the US IOC defended the policy at the time, saying that the athletes could compete in Paris based on their took advantage of the inconsistency. He stressed how important it is to keep American athletes safe and said that his administration would think about taking legal action against any male athletes who "masquerade as women" to gain an unfair advantage in a he left it up to the Department of Justice to decide what charges to bring, as per a report by the US Khelif and Lin Yu-ting made the news for their great performances at the Paris Games. But their history of failing previous eligibility tests has brought up the global debate about how to classify gender in elite sports IBA disqualified both athletes in 2023 because they were worried about biological advantages. Even though they could compete in the Paris Olympics under the IOC's rules, their past disqualifications made people worry about inconsistent policy enforcement. Critics say that the IOC's use of passports to determine gender doesn't do enough to make women's events fair, especially in combat testing is already common in sports other than boxing. World Athletics, the organization that runs track and field around the world, has announced new rules that will go into effect in September. These rules say that all female athletes who want to compete in big events like the World Championships must take a genetic test for the SRY gene, which tells you what biological sex you rule applies to famous athletes like Keely Hodgkinson and Georgia Hunter Bell from Britain, who are expected to follow it before the Tokyo World Championships start on September 13. The tests, which can be done with a cheek swab or a blood test, are not invasive and are meant to give a clear rules aren't in place for all Olympic events yet, but Trump's comments suggest that a similar system could be put in place for the LA 2028 Games, which he is in charge of. He even said he would lead a task force at the White House to oversee important parts of the Games, which could put him at the center of this heated rules about gender, eligibility, and fairness in women's sports are changing quickly as the Los Angeles Games get closer. There may be legal and moral problems with Trump's plan to make sex testing mandatory, but it has started a debate that is unlikely to go proposal follows a backlash from the Paris 2024 Games, where two female boxing gold medalists were previously disqualified due to gender eligibility isn't official yet. Trump has proposed "strong testing," but the specific procedures and legal approval are unclear.
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
2028 Olympics bombshell: Donald Trump demands gender tests for all female competitors
Donald Trump demands gender tests for all female competitors : US President Donald Trump is upending Olympic planning with a contentious new proposal. In a fiery press conference, he stated that all female athletes competing in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics should be subjected to gender testing , a move prompted by the controversy surrounding two female boxing champions from the 2024 Paris Games, who previously failed gender eligibility tests. He also announced a White House task force to oversee Olympic preparations. This has made people more worried about fairness in women's sports and how governing bodies are dealing with issues of gender identity. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program ALSO READ: Iran executes top nuclear scientist Rouzbeh Vadi accused of spying for Mossad — shocking details emerge Trump answered a reporter's direct question about transgender athletes in women's combat sports at a press event for the upcoming Los Angeles Olympics. He didn't beat around the bush when he said, "There will be a very strict way to test." And if the test results aren't right, they won't be able to compete in the Olympics, as per a report by the US Sun. The president didn't say exactly how the testing would be done, but he was clear that he supports stricter eligibility rules for female athletes. Live Events Why did Donald Trump want gender testing at the Olympics? After two boxers, Algeria's Imane Khelif and Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting, won gold medals at the Paris 2024 Olympics by dominating their weight classes, gender testing is once again being looked at closely. But there was a lot of talk when it came out that both had been disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Championships in India for failing gender eligibility tests. ALSO READ: iPhone 17 launch date leaked and here's when the phone will be available in shelves The International Boxing Association (IBA), which was later stripped of Olympic governance by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), claimed the two athletes were ruled ineligible after confidential tests revealed they did not meet the "necessary eligibility criteria,' as per a report by the US Sun. The IOC defended the policy at the time, saying that the athletes could compete in Paris based on their passports. Trump took advantage of the inconsistency. He stressed how important it is to keep American athletes safe and said that his administration would think about taking legal action against any male athletes who "masquerade as women" to gain an unfair advantage in a competition. However, he left it up to the Department of Justice to decide what charges to bring, as per a report by the US Sun. What was the reason for the Imane Khelif scandal? Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting made the news for their great performances at the Paris Games. But their history of failing previous eligibility tests has brought up the global debate about how to classify gender in elite sports again. The IBA disqualified both athletes in 2023 because they were worried about biological advantages. Even though they could compete in the Paris Olympics under the IOC's rules, their past disqualifications made people worry about inconsistent policy enforcement. Critics say that the IOC's use of passports to determine gender doesn't do enough to make women's events fair, especially in combat sports. Will the rules for gender testing in World Athletics also apply to the Olympics? Gender testing is already common in sports other than boxing. World Athletics, the organization that runs track and field around the world, has announced new rules that will go into effect in September. These rules say that all female athletes who want to compete in big events like the World Championships must take a genetic test for the SRY gene, which tells you what biological sex you are. This rule applies to famous athletes like Keely Hodgkinson and Georgia Hunter Bell from Britain, who are expected to follow it before the Tokyo World Championships start on September 13. The tests, which can be done with a cheek swab or a blood test, are not invasive and are meant to give a clear answer. These rules aren't in place for all Olympic events yet, but Trump's comments suggest that a similar system could be put in place for the LA 2028 Games, which he is in charge of. He even said he would lead a task force at the White House to oversee important parts of the Games, which could put him at the center of this heated debate. What will happen next for the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics? The rules about gender, eligibility, and fairness in women's sports are changing quickly as the Los Angeles Games get closer. There may be legal and moral problems with Trump's plan to make sex testing mandatory, but it has started a debate that is unlikely to go away. FAQs Why is Trump promoting gender testing at the 2028 Olympics? Trump's proposal follows a backlash from the Paris 2024 Games, where two female boxing gold medalists were previously disqualified due to gender eligibility concerns. Will there be gender tests in Los Angeles by 2028? It isn't official yet. Trump has proposed "strong testing," but the specific procedures and legal approval are unclear.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
New clause could leave BCCI out of RTI ambit
New Delhi: A proposed amendment to the newly-introduced National Sports Governance Bill 2025 being circulated among Members of Parliament could put the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) outside the purview of the Right to Information Act since it doesn't receive grants or financial assistance from the central or state governments. BCCI will have to be registered as a National Sports Federation and follow the provisions of the Bill. (Hindustan Times via Getty Images) The bill, which seeks to bring in reforms in governance of Indian sports bodies, was introduced in Lok Sabha on July 23 by Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya and is yet to be taken up for discussion in the House, amid a continuing stand-off over the Opposition's demand over a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. The clause 15 (2) of the bill states, 'A recognised sports organisation shall be considered as a public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 with respect to the exercise of its functions, duties and powers under this Act.' A new clause that is being inserted into the bill clarifies what constitutes a public authority. 'A recognised sports organisation, receiving grants or any other financial assistance from the Central Government under sub-section (1) or from a State Government, shall be considered as a public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005, with respect to utilisation of such grants or any other financial assistance.' HT has seen a copy of the bill. Under the RTI Act, a public authority is a body 'established, constituted, owned, controlled or substantially financed by funds provided directly or indirectly by the Central Government or the Union Territory administration, the Central Government; or by the State Government.' According to people aware of the development, 'The amendment was done just to bring the bill in line with the RTI Act, 2005. BCCI might not take financial grants from the government but they do take government assistance such as infrastructure, subsidised land, state facilities, etc.' The cash rich BCCI has long resisted being brought under the RTI Act. The powerful sports body never required government recognition as a National Sports Federation as BCCI manages its own finances. However, with cricket is now an Olympic sport as part of the 2028 Los Angeles Summer Games and the Bill is seen as part of preparatyions for making a bid to host the 2036 Games. In 2018, Chief Information Commission (CIC) held the BCCI as the public authority under RTI Act, and put in place a system of online and offline mechanisms to receive applications for information under RTI Act. The Ministry of Youth And Sports Affairs was directed to take necessary steps to ensure implementation of this order. However, BCCI filed a writ petition in the Madras high court which granted a stay order. BCCI will still have to be registered as a National Sports Federation and follow the provisions of the Bill. If the Bill becomes law, it will be the first time that BCCI will become a designated 'NSF.' BCCI will have to seek recognition from the National Sports Board (NSB) and refer its legal cases to the National Sports Tribunal, both proposed in the sports Bill. According to the Bill, the National Sports Board shall have the power to grant recognition to any sports organisation as 'National Sports Body.' The NSB can suspend or cancel recognition of the sports body or its affiliate units if the provisions of the act are violated or in case it 'failed to hold elections for its Executive Committee or has committed' or there were 'gross irregularities in the election procedures.' It can also act if the federation 'failed to publish annual audited accounts or misused, misapplied or misappropriated public funds.' The NSB shall consult the respective global governing body before taking any such decision, stated the Bill. There is another proposed amendment that states a person shall not be qualified to contest for election in a federation or seek nomination to the posts of the president, secretary general or treasurer unless previously served as a member for 'at least one full term in the executive committee of the national sports body or as the president, or the secretary general or the treasurer in its affiliate unit.' In the original Bill, the duration a person needed to serve for the top three posts was two full terms as member of the executive committee. This restrictive clause, however, doesn't apply for the Sportsperson of Outstanding Merit (SOM), according to the proposed amendment.
