logo
Social giants lashed for child sex abuse fail

Social giants lashed for child sex abuse fail

Yahoo17 hours ago
E-Safety commissioner Julie Inman-Grant has lashed tech giants including Apple, Google, Meta and Microsoft for 'turning a blind eye' on rife child sexual exploitation and abuse circulating on its platforms.
Types of abuse include grooming and sexual extortion, and the proliferation of images and material.
None of the social media giants surveyed used tools to detect child sexual exploitation, the e-safety report found.
The first biannual report uses findings submitted by the tech giants themselves, and covers eight platforms including Apple, Discord, Google (the parent company of YouTube), Meta (which houses Facebook and Instagram), Microsoft, Skype, Snap and WhatsApp.
Apple, Discord, Google and Microsoft were singled out for not using hash matching, a kind of file comparison tool to detect the spread of harmful content on known abusive material, which has already been detected by child abuse hotlines and law enforcement.
The report also attacked Apple services and YouTube for not tracking the number of reports they received on child sexual abuse, or how long they took to respond to the complaints.
Both platforms also failed to disclose the number of trust and safety staff hired by the platform, according to the report.
It also found that despite warnings from the eSafety office dating back to 2022 and 2023, only Meta used tools to detect grooming, while only Meta and WhatsApp had tools to identify sexual extortion.
Ms Inman-Grant said that 'when left to their own devices' social media companies don't 'prioritising the protection of children and are seemingly turning a blind eye to crimes occurring on their services'.
She also urged the eight companies to make 'meaningful progress' to protect children.
'We need to keep the pressure on the tech industry as a whole to live up to their responsibility to protect society's most vulnerable members from the most egregious forms of harm and that's what these periodic notices are designed to encourage,' she said.
'No other consumer-facing industry would be given the licence to operate by enabling such heinous crimes against children on their premises, or services.'
This comes after Communications Minister Annika Wells confirmed YouTube would be included in the under-16s social media ban, with the video streaming giant already threatening the federal government with a High Court challenge.
However children and teens under 16 will still be able to access the platform in a logged out state or through an adult's account.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury finds Meta illegally collected data from women's health app Flo — what you need to know
Jury finds Meta illegally collected data from women's health app Flo — what you need to know

Tom's Guide

time28 minutes ago

  • Tom's Guide

Jury finds Meta illegally collected data from women's health app Flo — what you need to know

On Friday, a federal jury ruled that Meta – the last defendant in a lawsuit that initially also included Google, Flo Health and Flurry – had illegally collected user health data from period and pregnancy tracking app Flo. The jury found that Meta violated California's Invasion of Privacy Act by collecting data from Flo without user consent which violates the state's wiretap law. The lawsuit was filed in 2021 against Flo Health, the maker of the app which tracks periods, ovulation and pregnancy; later other defendants were added including Meta, Google and Flurry, which is an app analytics company. The plaintiff's trial brief stated that Flo's onboarding survey required users to select a goal: whether they were currently pregnant, wanted to be pregnant, wanted to track a period or input other information (about pregnancy or a menstrual cycle). While Flo said it would not disclose the information provided to it, it then gave access to both Google and Meta through CAEs (Custom App Events) in their respective SDKs (Software Development Kits) that were incorporated into the Flo App. The plaintiff's brief said that each company had its own purpose in collecting and using the user data from the Flo app: Flo used it to acquire new users through advertising and marketing and also sold access to the CAEs to other third parties for profit. Meanwhile Google and Meta each used the data for their own commercial purposes, including 'to feed their machine learning algorithms that power each of their respective advertising networks.' This activity occurred between November 2016 and February 2019. The plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of evidence that Meta had intentionally eavesdropped on and/or recorded conversations using an electronic device, and that the company did not have consent from all parties to do so. According to the verdict released by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the plaintiffs proved they had a reasonable expectation of privacy. Flo Health's trial brief, although it was filed before that company's settlement, stated the plaintiffs had consented to the very policies and practices they were now attacking and that 'every version of the Flo Privacy Policy explicitly permitted Flo to use third-party analytics to monitor and improve the App and permitted Flo to share de-identified information for any purpose.' The plaintiffs brief countered that Flo did not disclose it would share users' private health data with third parties, and that in fact, it promised the opposite. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The other defendants – Flo Health, Google and Flurry – all settled with the plaintiffs before the trial, though no details about two of those have been provided, the Flurry settlement is said to have been for $3.5 million and is still pending court approval. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Watch live: Trump announces $100B domestic manufacturing deal with Apple
Watch live: Trump announces $100B domestic manufacturing deal with Apple

The Hill

time28 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: Trump announces $100B domestic manufacturing deal with Apple

President Trump on Wednesday will formally announce a deal with Apple to invest $100 billion in manufacturing in the U.S., an effort to increase domestic production and avoid tariffs. The announcement is expected to include the launch of the American Manufacturing Program, which would be dedicated to bringing more of Apple's supply chain to the U.S. and involves the tech giant incentivizing other companies to manufacture more critical components domestically, a White House official told The Hill earlier Wednesday. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help reshore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security,' White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a statement. The event from the Oval Office is expected to begin at 4:30 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store