
The world's biggest passenger plane keeps breaking down
Two decades after its maiden flight, regulatory bulletins ordering repairs, inspections or replacement parts for the massive four-engined plane are piling up. While some are procedural, such as a demand for timely equipment checks, others are more serious.
Leaking escape slides, cracked seals and a ruptured landing-gear axle feature among 95 airworthiness directives for the A380 listed by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) since January 2020.
That's about double the number of directives for large Boeing aircraft in the same period.
With newer, more fuel-efficient jets in short supply, airlines committed to the twin-deck A380 have little choice but to keep flying it. In its youth, the A380 was a triumph of international collaboration, with 4 million parts made by 1,500 companies worldwide. Now, in old age, the aircraft's complexity is testing aviation's fractured supply chains in the post-COVID era.
A Rolls Royce Trent 900 engine for the A380 is seen at the Airbus factory in Toulouse, France. |
Bloomberg
"The A380 is a complex aeroplane whose scale does make it more demanding to maintain compared to other aircraft,' EASA said in a statement. "It is very important for safety that there is no stigma attached to publishing an airworthiness directive — safety must come first.'
The agency said such directives, which mandate actions to make an aircraft safe, "can vary hugely in scope and urgency.' The volume of airworthiness directives for different planes "is not a good basis for comparison,' EASA said.
Stranded passengers
However, with the capacity to carry 485 passengers or more, delays caused by mechanical failures can be costly and create a cascade of scheduling headaches. A Qantas Airways A380 on the flagship Sydney-London route broke down in Singapore on May 7 with fuel-pump problems. The onward flight to London was pushed back more than 24 hours and passengers accommodated in hotels.
That was at least the second fuel-pump issue to delay Flight QF1 in Singapore since Qantas reactivated its A380s. More recently, Qantas passengers who were due to depart Singapore on July 14 for Sydney on an A380 were delayed for days because of technical difficulties. Plans to retrieve them sooner were complicated by damage to another A380 at Sydney airport, when an aerobridge slammed into one of the engines.
The A380 has its share of fans who love its cavernous interiors and audacious scale. |
Getty Images / via Bloomberg
A British Airways A380 recently spent more than 100 days in Manila. After returning to London Heathrow in mid-June, the plane flew just seven days of the next 30, according to Flightradar24. Still, IAG-owned British Airways from next year will embark on an interior upgrade program, including overhauling A380 cabins, suggesting the airline will keep flying the plane for years.
For airlines using the A380, large-capacity alternatives are scarce. Boeing's new 777X is years behind schedule and Airbus can't make long-haul A350s fast enough. Meanwhile, A380 operators are left with an out-of-production superjumbo that will only become more needy and more expensive to run. In online aviation forums, some services are gaining a name for breakdowns, cancellations or overnight delays.
In a statement, Airbus said the A380 "continues to operate scheduled services with a high level of operational reliability, standing at 99% for the global fleet over the past 12 months. Airbus is committed to providing full technical support to customers to ensure that they can optimize operations with their A380 fleets, and this will continue as long as the aircraft remains in service.'
60,000 hours
Meanwhile, A380s are taking up space and manpower in workshops around the world, exacerbating a shortage of repair facilities for the wider commercial fleet. A comprehensive check of the massive plane can consume 60,000 hours of labor, according to aircraft repairer Lufthansa Technik.
Qantas is sending some double-deckers to Dresden in Germany to be overhauled; British Airways flies its to Manila for repairs; and Emirates, the world's biggest operator of A380s, maintains some in China.
Some of the aircraft's recent faults stem from prolonged periods on the ground during the pandemic, when airlines parked their A380s in the Californian desert, central Spain or the Australian outback.
The cabin of an A380 operated by Emirates. The airline, the world's biggest operator of A380s, plans to keep flying the aircraft until the end of next decade. |
Bloomberg
An airworthiness directive from the EASA on May 16 ordered emergency inflatable escape slides to be replaced. Glued seams had split, probably due to exposure to moisture and heat during storage. The fault could have fatal consequences, the agency said.
On April 7, EASA ordered inspections on A380s after cracked sealant was found on fittings attaching the landing gear to the wings. A directive in April last year required some landing gear axles to be replaced after a rupture on a plane that had been in storage since 2020.
The future of the A380 was already in doubt when COVID-19 halted global travel in early 2020. The year before, Airbus had killed off production after underwhelming sales.
When COVID-19 receded and borders reopened, the A380 suddenly found new purpose. Travel boomed and carriers including Singapore Airlines, Deutsche Lufthansa and Qantas once again embraced the plane's unrivaled carrying power.
In a statement, British Airways called the A380 "a vital part of our long-haul fleet. Through working closely with Airbus, we've seen consistent year-on-year improvements in its reliability.'
Qantas said the plane "is a key part of our international network, and we'll continue to fly them for years to come. All Qantas A380s have gone through a scheduled major maintenance overhaul in recent years, as well as significant upgrades to the cabin interiors.'
An A380 in storage in the Northern Territory, Australia, in 2020. Some of the aircraft's recent faults stem from prolonged periods on the ground during the pandemic, when airlines parked their A380s in the Californian desert, central Spain or the Australian outback. |
Bloomberg
Other A380 operators were reluctant to provide specific details. Asiana Airlines said "issues related to aircraft operations and maintenance are difficult to disclose externally.' Korean Air Lines said it "maintains its A380 fleet to the highest safety standards, in strict accordance with all regulatory requirements and manufacturer guidelines.'
Singapore Airlines said its 12 A380s are important to operations but it was "unable to comment on specifics.' The company said it works closely with "Airbus and our suppliers to ensure the ongoing reliability and serviceability of our A380 fleet.'
To be sure, the A380 still has fans. Emirates, which has cannibalized some A380s for spare parts, plans to keep flying the aircraft until the end of next decade. The airline's president, Tim Clark, has likened the jet to a huge vacuum cleaner capable of gobbling up passengers like no other plane.
Reliability issues are the latest twist for a superjumbo that has almost always been divisive. Passengers still love the A380's cavernous interiors and audacious scale. Airlines wrestle with its logistics needs — from longer runways to extra-large hangars — as well as the mechanical dramas.
Supply chain constraints have increased the price of parts, servicing and engine repairs on all major aircraft, said Eddy Pieniazek, head of advisory of aviation finance data provider Ishka.
"With the A380 being of its size and having four engines, this escalation in maintenance costs has become even more noticeable,' said Pieniazek.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nikkei Asia
12 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Japan negotiator to ask US to implement 15% auto tariff deal
Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's minister of state for economic and fiscal policy, will leave for Washington on Aug. 5 to push the U.S. for quick implementation of the auto tariff deal. © Kyodo TOKYO (Reuters) -- Japan's top tariff negotiator Ryosei Akazawa said he would leave for Washington on Tuesday, seeking to press for President Donald Trump's signing of an executive order that would bring an agreed cut to tariffs on Japanese auto imports into effect. The U.S. last month agreed in a trade deal to lower existing tariffs on Japanese car imports to 15% from levies totaling 27.5% previously, but a timeframe for the change to go into effect was not announced. Duties on other Japanese goods will be cut to 15% from 25% from Thursday. "We will push the United States to make sure that an executive order be signed on the agreed tariff on automobiles and automotive components as soon as possible," Akazawa told parliament. Referring to the problem of "stacking" where goods can be affected by multiple tariffs, Akazawa also said Japan wants to make sure goods that are already levied at more than 15% would be exempt from the additional 15% rate. A table attached to Trump's July 31 executive order that addressed tariff rates for many trading partners showed a "no stacking" condition applies to the European Union, while no such clarification was given for Japan. Akazawa told parliament Japan has received reassurances from the U.S. that it would be treated the same way as the European Union regarding the condition. He stressed that there was no misunderstanding with the United States about Japan's $550 billion investment package agreed in the tariff deal. "We have repeatedly explained to the U.S. that Japan will invest up to $550 billion in the form of equity, loans and guarantees" through state-owned financial institutions to jointly build supply chains critical for national security, Akazawa said. "This is what we believe is our consensus." Akazawa has said equity investment would account for just about 1-2% of the $550 billion.


The Mainichi
13 hours ago
- The Mainichi
US guidance does not mention additional tariff exemption for Japan
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- U.S. customs guidance released Monday does not include a stipulation that imports from Japan already subject to tariffs of 15 percent or higher will not face an additional "reciprocal" duty, as stated by Tokyo following a recent bilateral trade deal. But the U.S. Customs and Border Protection guidance states that goods from the European Union, which struck a similar trade deal with the United States on July 27, a few days after Japan, will not be subject to additional tariffs. An executive order signed by U.S. President Donald Trump last week modifying his administration's so-called reciprocal tariff rates, effective Thursday, also mentioned that imports from the EU would not face duties in addition to a 15 percent tariff rate, but it made no reference to Japan. Under the deal with the Trump administration, beef imports from Japan, for example, will continue to be taxed at 26.4 percent, so the new 15 percent tariff rate will not be added on top, according to Japanese officials. It remains unclear whether the terms of the agreement are being interpreted differently, something denied by Japanese officials. Given there is no written agreement between Japan and the United States, some Japanese opposition lawmakers have criticized the government for failing to minimize the risk of misunderstandings with the Trump administration over the implementation of tariffs. During a parliamentary panel session in Tokyo on Tuesday, Ryosei Akazawa, Japan's chief tariff negotiator, repeatedly stressed, "There is no discrepancy."


The Diplomat
18 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Bangladesh's Post-Hasina Foreign Policy Reset
Following Sheikh Hasina's exit from power in August 2024, Bangladesh began reshaping its foreign policy, gradually moving away from its India-centric posture and pursuing a more diversified diplomatic approach. The interim government has sought to deepen engagement with China, Pakistan, and Western powers such as the United States and the European Union. India, long considered a supporter of Hasina's regime, now faces criticism from Bangladeshis who accuse it of meddling. A major milestone came during Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus' visit to China in March 2025. The trip underscored Beijing's emergence as a key economic partner. Bangladesh secured $2.1 billion in loans, investments, and grants, including $400 million for the modernization of Mongla Port and $350 million for the Chinese Industrial Economic Zone in Chattogram. Eight MoUs were signed, covering areas such as infrastructure, healthcare, manufacturing, and hydrological data sharing related to the Yarlung Tsangpo-Yamuna River. Notably, China's renewed interest in the Teesta River project – long stalled due to tensions with India – illustrates Dhaka's strategic pivot toward Beijing as a counterweight to Indian influence. Other outcomes included an extension of duty-free access for 99 percent of Bangladeshi exports until 2028, discussions to reduce interest rates on Chinese loans, and talks on setting up Chinese factories in textiles, pharmaceuticals, and renewable energy. Moreover, the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency recently warned that China is considering establishing a military presence in several countries, including Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Myanmar. However, Chinese Ambassador to Bangladesh Yao Wen has dismissed the report, denying that China has any such intentions regarding Bangladesh. The potential launch of a direct Chittagong-Kunming flight and a boost in cultural exchanges further solidified this evolving partnership. China also reiterated support for Bangladesh on the Rohingya issue, aligning with Dhaka's push for international cooperation. China has also engaged with Bangladesh's political actors. In June and July 2025, both the BNP and JI sent delegations to China at the invitation of the Chinese Communist Party. The BNP team, led by Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, held high-level meetings with CCP Politburo member Li Hongzhong, who extended an invitation to the BNP's acting chairman, Tarique Rahman. Around the same time, a high level JI delegation focused on party-to-party governance exchanges and future development projects. These visits reflect Beijing's effort to build ties across Bangladesh's political spectrum as the BNP and JI gain momentum in the post-Hasina landscape. At the same time, Bangladesh has rekindled relations with Pakistan, which were strained under Hasina due to historical baggage from the 1971 Liberation War. Since August 2024, bilateral trade has grown, with new cooperation in construction, food, pharmaceuticals, and IT. The formation of a joint business council and Pakistan's offer of 300 fully funded scholarships signal growing warmth. Defense ties have also progressed, with January 2025 talks on joint exercises and potential procurement of JF-17 Thunder jets as part of Bangladesh's Forces Goal 2030 modernization plan. In a further sign of shifting regional dynamics, a trilateral meeting took place in Kunming in June, involving representatives from China, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Although Dhaka declined to join any alliance, the timing suggests growing coordination. These developments point to Beijing's broader ambition to reshape the strategic landscape in South Asia through Pakistan and Bangladesh, leveraging its economic and political clout to challenge India's traditional dominance. This recent activity of China's strategic presence has not gone unnoticed in New Delhi. Yunus' earlier remarks in China, describing Bangladesh as a gateway to India's Northeast and an extension of China's economy, have only amplified Indian anxieties. In Bangladesh, the perception that India supported Hasina's regime has deepened public mistrust. Bangladesh's relations with India have thus sharply deteriorated. Tensions were exacerbated by Dhaka's demand for Hasina's extradition. The interim government wants her returned to Bangladesh to face charges related to corruption and human rights abuses during her tenure. India's reluctance to comply, citing legal and diplomatic complexities, has fueled accusations in Bangladesh that it is shielding a discredited leader. This standoff has deepened anti-India sentiment, with many Bangladeshis viewing New Delhi's stance as evidence of continued interference in their country's affairs. Efforts to stabilize bilateral ties have been hampered by mutual distrust and competing narratives. India has expressed unease over Bangladesh's warming relations with China and Pakistan, particularly the trilateral Kunming meeting, which New Delhi may perceive as a deliberate attempt to counterbalance its influence. In response, India has doubled down on its narrative of protecting minority rights in Bangladesh, particularly for Hindus, which Dhaka dismisses as a pretext for meddling. Critics in Bangladesh, however, view India's focus on minority rights as hypocritical, given its own internal record. The attack on Bangladesh's diplomatic compound in Agartala in December last year, where protesters from Indian far-right organizations burned the national flag of Bangladesh, served as a warning signal for the trajectory of relations. The attack triggered outrage in Dhaka. Bangladesh's Foreign Ministry condemned the Agartala attack as a breach of the Vienna Convention, signaling a more assertive diplomatic posture. The interim government's push for accountability regarding Hasina's regime, coupled with India's strategic imperative to maintain a foothold in Bangladesh, suggests that relations will remain turbulent unless a framework can address the extradition issue and broader geopolitical concerns. Bangladesh's foreign policy has clearly changed in the year since Hasina's exit. The country is moving away from its heavy reliance on India and building stronger ties with China, Pakistan, and Western nations. As Bangladesh becomes more confident on the global stage, relations with India have become tense. Unless both sides find a common ground this mistrust is likely to continue.