Turkey blocks X's Grok content for alleged insults to Erdogan, religious values
Concerns over political bias, hate speech and factual inaccuracy in AI chatbots have mounted since the launch of OpenAI's ChatGPT in 2022, with Grok dropping content accused of antisemitic tropes and praise for Adolf Hitler.
Ankara chief prosecutor's office said it launched an investigation, and marked Turkey's first such ban on content from an artificial intelligence tool.
Authorities cited violations of laws that make such insults a criminal offence punishable by up to four years in prison.
Neither X, nor its owner Elon Musk could immediately be reached for comment. They have not referred to the decision on the platform.
Last month, Musk promised an upgrade to Grok, suggesting there was "far too much garbage in any foundation model trained on uncorrected data".
Grok, which is integrated into X, reportedly generated offensive content about Erdogan and Ataturk when asked certain questions in Turkish, media said.
The Information and Communication Technologies Authority (BTK) adopted the ban after the court order.
Transport and Infrastructure Minister Abdulkadir Uraloglu was later cited by broadcaster NTV as saying that Turkey had not yet imposed a total access ban on Grok but that it would do so if necessary, adding Turkish authorities would discuss the issue with X.
Yaman Akdeniz, a cyber law expert at Istanbul Bilgi University, said authorities had identified some 50 posts by Grok as the basis for the investigation, ruling on the access ban and removal of certain content to "protect public order".
"Turkey has become the first country to impose censorship on Grok," he said on X.
Turkey has in recent years significantly increased oversight on social media platforms and online streaming services, passing laws to give authorities more control over content, detaining or arresting individuals for posts, launching probes into companies and limiting or blocking access to certain sites.
Critics say the law is frequently used to stifle dissent, while the government maintains it is necessary to protect the dignity of the office.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
cove Launches "Real Estate Meets AI" Podcast Exploring How AI is Reshaping the Built Environment
Hosted by CEO Sandeep Ahuja, the series features candid conversations with industry leaders on the evolving intersection of real estate and AI. ATLANTA, July 17, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--cove, a full-service AI-powered architecture firm, announces the launch of Real Estate Meets AI, a new podcast hosted by co-founder and CEO Sandeep Ahuja. The series explores how artificial intelligence is reshaping the design, development, and delivery of buildings, featuring real-world perspectives from CTOs, Chief Data Officers, and digital transformation leaders from major real estate developers and REITs. "We created Real Estate Meets AI for those who are building the future—literally," said Ahuja. "Whether you're focused on investment, strategy, or operations, these conversations explore how AI is being put to work inside some of the most forward-thinking organizations in real estate." The premiere episode features Keats Ali, Chief Technology Officer at Lincoln Property Company, in a candid discussion on the evolution of data strategy, the role of AI in customer experience, and how to drive change management within legacy systems. Future episodes will follow regularly, offering a behind-the-scenes look at how large-scale organizations are implementing AI in real-world workflows. Episode 2, launching today, features Rukevbe Esi, SVP, Chief Digital Officer at AvalonBay Communities. Episodes are released regularly and run 20–30 minutes each. Real Estate Meets AI is available on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and YouTube. About cove cove is a full-service AI-powered architecture firm built for what's next. The firm partners with real estate leaders, combining deep architectural expertise with artificial intelligence to enable smarter decisions, reduce risk, and create long-term value. cove's architects leverage the firm's proprietary intelligence platform, to solve complex design challenges from early feasibility through final documentation, accelerating timelines, reducing rework, and improving decision-making across teams. With hundreds of successfully completed projects totaling more than half a billion square feet, cove brings clarity to complexity and consistently drives better outcomes for clients and communities. View source version on Contacts Krystl Blackpress@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Prediction Emerges Around Elon Musk's Next Big Move. Presentation Out Now.
Tech Expert James Altucher Connects the Dots Between Media Clues, Insider Meetings, and a Possible August Milestone for Starlink Austin, TX, July 20, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Could a private meeting featuring Elon Musk signal a major move for Starlink? According to a newly published briefing by bestselling author and entrepreneur James Altucher, the answer may be yes. The presentation outlines three overlooked clues—each pulled from publicly available sources—that Altucher believes are converging on August 13, 2025, as a potentially historic milestone. A Meeting That Sparked New Questions Altucher opens his briefing by citing a recent private gathering with Musk, and industry insiders. While details of the meeting have not been made public, Altucher suggests the takeaways coincide with a growing number of statements made by Musk and his executives in recent months. A Timeline That Can't Be Ignored In his presentation, Altucher highlights August 13, 2025, as a key date to watch. 'After this date, the window could slam shut—and you may never have this same chance again,' he writes. He calls it 'the moment Elon's been quietly preparing for—building toward it piece by piece over nearly two decades'. Altucher: 'Pay Attention Before the World Catches Up' Altucher concludes the presentation with a call to awareness—not speculation. 'You don't need to be an expert in satellites or data to understand what's happening here,' he writes. 'You just need to see the signs and act while most people are still asleep'. 'This is about recognizing a moment in history—before it becomes history,' he adds. About James Altucher James Altucher is a bestselling author, entrepreneur, and tech commentator. He's founded or co-founded more than 20 businesses, and his books—, , and —have sold over 1 million copies worldwide. Altucher's work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The Financial Times, Forbes, and Business Insider. He's also been featured on CNBC, Fox Business, and other major media outlets. Through his podcast and daily newsletter, Altucher helps readers stay ahead of cultural and technological trends. CONTACT: Derek Warren Public Relations Manager Paradigm Press Group Email: dwarren@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Experienced software developers assumed AI would save them a chunk of time. But in one experiment, their tasks took 20% longer
AI tools don't always boost productivity. A new study from Model Evaluation and Threat Research found that when 16 software developers were asked to perform tasks using AI tools, the they took longer than when they weren't using the technology, despite their expectations AI would boost productivity. The research challenges the dominant narrative of AI driving a workplace efficiency boost. It's like a new telling of the 'Tortoise and the Hare': A group of experienced software engineers entered into an experiment where they were tasked with completing some of their work with the help of AI tools. Thinking like the speedy hare, the developers expected AI to expedite their work and increase productivity. Instead, the technology slowed them down more. The AI-free tortoise approach, in the context of the experiment, would have been faster. The results of this experiment, published in a study this month, came as a surprise to the software developers tasked with using AI—and to the study's authors, Joel Becker and Nate Rush, technical staff members of nonprofit technology research organization Model Evaluation and Threat Research (METR). The researchers enlisted 16 software developers, who had an average of five years of experience, to conduct 246 tasks, each one a part of projects on which they were already working. For half the tasks, the developers were allowed to use AI tools—most of them selected code editor Cursor Pro or Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet—and for the other half, the developers conducted the tasks on their own. Believing the AI tools would make them more productive, the software developers predicted the technology would reduce their task completion time by an average of 24%. Instead, AI resulted in their task time ballooning to 19% greater than when they weren't using the technology. 'While I like to believe that my productivity didn't suffer while using AI for my tasks, it's not unlikely that it might not have helped me as much as I anticipated or maybe even hampered my efforts,' Philipp Burckhardt, a participant in the study, wrote in a blog post about his experience. Why AI is slowing some workers down So where did the hares veer off the path? The experienced developers, in the midst of their own projects, likely approached their work with plenty of additional context their AI assistants did not have, meaning they had to retrofit their own agenda and problem-solving strategies into the AI's outputs, which they also spent ample time debugging, according to the study. 'The majority of developers who participated in the study noted that even when they get AI outputs that are generally useful to them—and speak to the fact that AI generally can often do bits of very impressive work, or sort of very impressive work—these developers have to spend a lot of time cleaning up the resulting code to make it actually fit for the project,' study author Rush told Fortune. Other developers lost time writing prompts for the chatbots or waiting around for the AI to generate results. The results of the study contradict lofty promises about AI's ability to transform the economy and workforce, including a 15% boost to U.S. GDP by 2035 and eventually a 25% increase in productivity. But Rush and Becker have shied away from making sweeping claims about what the results of the study mean for the future of AI. For one, the study's sample was small and non-generalizable, including only a specialized group of people to whom these AI tools were brand new. The study also measures technology at a specific moment in time, the authors said, not ruling out the possibility that AI tools could be developed in the future that would indeed help developers enhance their workflow. The purpose of the study was, broadly speaking, to pump the brakes on the torrid implementation of AI in the workplace and elsewhere, acknowledging more data about AI's actual effects need to be made known and accessible before more decisions are made about its applications. 'Some of the decisions we're making right now around development and deployment of these systems are potentially very high consequence,' Rush said. 'If we're going to do that, let's not just take the obvious answer. Let's make high-quality measurements.' AI's broader impact on productivity Economists have already asserted that METR's research aligns with broader narratives on AI and productivity. While AI is beginning to chip away at entry-level positions, according to LinkedIn chief economic opportunity officer Aneesh Raman, it may offer diminishing returns for skilled workers such as experienced software developers. 'For those people who have already had 20 years, or in this specific example, five years of experience, maybe it's not their main task that we should look for and force them to start using these tools if they're already well functioning in the job with their existing work methods,' Anders Humlum, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business, told Fortune. Humlum has similarly conducted research on AI's impact on productivity. He found in a working study from May that among 25,000 workers in 7,000 workplaces in Denmark—a country with similar AI uptake as the U.S.—productivity improved a modest 3% among employees using the tools. Humlum's research supports MIT economist and Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu's assertion that markets have overestimated productivity gains from AI. Acemoglu argues only 4.6% of tasks within the U.S. economy will be made more efficient with AI. 'In a rush to automate everything, even the processes that shouldn't be automated, businesses will waste time and energy and will not get any of the productivity benefits that are promised,' Acemoglu previously wrote for Fortune. 'The hard truth is that getting productivity gains from any technology requires organizational adjustment, a range of complementary investments, and improvements in worker skills, via training and on-the-job learning.' The case of the software developers' hampered productivity points to this need for critical thought on when AI tools are implemented, Humlum said. While previous research on AI productivity has looked at self-reported data or specific and contained tasks, data on challenges from skilled workers using the technology complicate the picture. 'In the real world, many tasks are not as easy as just typing into ChatGPT,' Humlum said. 'Many experts have a lot of experience [they've] accumulated that is highly beneficial, and we should not just ignore that and give up on that valuable expertise that has been accumulated.' 'I would just take this as a good reminder to be very cautious about when to use these tools,' he added. This story was originally featured on Solve the daily Crossword
