Where Will Palantir (PLTR) Stock Be In 5 Years?
The Current State Of Palantir
Palantir was founded in 2003 by Peter Thiel and a group of co-founders including Alex Karp and Jon Lonscale to process and analyze data from U.S. intelligence agencies. After the company's direct listing in 2020, the stock experienced volatility, with 2025 serving as a turning point as Palantir soared over 100%. The firm has expanded to commercial sectors with an increasing library of products from AIP to Apollo.
With a current share price of $158, as of August 1st, 2025, Palantir is at an all-time high propelled by defense contracts and ambitious new initiatives in the commercial space. Palantir has secured major clients like the Department of Defense with Gotham, its intelligence and defense platform, and Morgan Stanley with Foundry, its analytics platform.
Palantir's Key Growth Considerations
Some of the largest factors fueling Palantir's growth over the next five years include the growth of AI, Palantir's ability to secure government defense contracts and regulation which could inhibit Palantir's dominance in the surveillance space.
One of Palantir's key growth areas is its application of AI with unique workflows through the AIP, or AI Platform. With AIP, Palantir has grown commercial revenue by 71% year over year with notable customers including Fannie Mae and Walgreens. This market is rapidly growing with the AI software market expected to reach over $1.8 trillion in the next five years, which could lead to more widespread Palantir adoption.
With Palantir securing a $10 billion U.S. Army deal in July 2025 on top of a $795 million contract for Maven Smart System software licenses in May 2025, the firm is solidifying its position as a major defense contractor. With rising U.S. defense budgets and the risk of global conflict, Palantir is well-positioned to provide key services in defense. This provision of services is helping to increase Palantir's revenues in 2025.
In 2025, Palantir worked on IRS databases and deportation programs which serve as growth areas in a friendly political environment. While this is a growth consideration, lawsuits or new regulatory developments could impede Palantir's government revenue. For the next few years, Palantir should be well positioned regulatorily but a new administration or new regulators could affect long-term revenue for the firm.
Future Risks And Challenges
Palantir is well-positioned now but new competition from other tech giants, macroeconomic storms or unfavorable regulatory environments could negatively affect the stock.
Rival tech firms like Microsoft, AWS, Google Cloud and Databricks could steal contracts or customers from Palantir, especially if there's public backlash against the firm. These would primarily affect Palantir's provision of commercial tools, but in the defense sector, firms like RTX or Northrop Grumman could overtake Palantir in the provision of AI tools to the government. With rising competition, Palantir's margins could be cut, causing slower revenue growth by 2030.
Outside of competition, macroeconomic pressure like an interest rate hike or even a full-blown recession could cause public-sector clients to cut their enterprise AI budgets with Palantir. As a public company and a volatile growth stock, the firm's price could also swing from inflation or a downturn, affecting investors in Palantir. Likewise, a pullback in tech spending could also cause a depression in stock price.
Investor Sentiment
Investor enthusiasm for Palantir is high especially among younger investors and those who see its long-term potential from an AI implementation perspective. Palantir boasts a visionary CEO, exciting contracts with the federal government and advanced technology that the public sector is implementing. Despite this public market bullishness, critics highlight that Palantir's high valuation is driven by excitement over AI potential and that investor sentiment could reverse if earnings fail to keep pace.
Analyst Forecasts And Price Targets
Analysts are split on the future price of Palantir, with a majority of 25 analysts proposing a 'hold' rating on Palantir, according to Yahoo Finance. Price targets from analysts range from $100.39 to $178, highlighting a split in expectations from professionals. Depending on factors like leadership in AI, high growth and seizing of new market opportunities, Palantir could soar or fall from its current high.
The Bull Case For Palantir Stock In The Next 5 Years
The bull case for Palantir follows that the firm's platforms like Gotham and Founder become leaders in their respective industries capturing key contracts from both the public and private sector. With new contracts and reliance by leading firms and agencies, Palantir's revenue would continue to rise leading to a capturing of new highs at $178. Palantir also continues to capture new markets in areas like security and data analytics with industries as broad as intelligence to healthcare. With continued expansion, the bull case for Palantir seems more likely.
The Bear Case For Palantir Stock In The Next 5 Years
In a bear case scenario, Palantir's growth could slow due to both competition and the rise of regulatory pressure leading to a fall to $100 per share. A risk area could include competitors like AWS and Google capturing more market share or the loss of government contracts, especially with a change in presidential administration or congress. Another risk is slowing growth in the economy which would negatively affect revenue and cause a drop in share price.
Another key factor is execution and sentiment risk. If the team can't follow through on their ambitious plans, the firm may not be able to scale effectively and collapse on its promises. If AI implementation doesn't follow through as expected or enthusiasm wanes, Palantir's share price could also be affected.
Bottom Line
Palantir is riding a wave as one of the best stocks of 2025, specifically from a growth perspective, with its stock price doubling in 2025. While the firm originated as a defense-oriented firm servicing the U.S. government's many agencies, the firm has diversified tremendously as a commercial powerhouse providing AI services as well as data analysis features. Based on previous performance and the savviness of its leadership team, it's more than likely that the stock will continue to rise in value, depending on key factors as discussed.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is Palantir Stock A Good Investment For The Next 5 Years?
Palantir has the potential to be a good investment over the next five years depending on whether it can execute on its aggressive plans to be implemented broadly in the private and public sector.
What Are Analysts Stating About Palantir's Long-term Outlook?
Analyst opinions range for Palantir's stock from more bullish analysts estimating $300 in the next five years to more bearish analysts estimating only up to $100.
How Much Will Palantir Stock Be In 5 Years?
Estimates for Palantir's stock in five years range from a decrease to $75 in a bear case to $500 in a bull case but most estimates range from $100 to $300.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ty J. Young Wealth Management Launches "The Official Guide to Selling Your Annuity Business" to Support Growing Acquisition Strategy
ATLANTA, Aug. 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Ty J. Young Wealth Management, a leading wealth management firm, today announced the release of its new ebook, "The Official Guide to Selling Your Annuity Business" This comprehensive guide is designed to provide financial advisory firms with essential insights for successfully navigating the sale of their business. As a rapidly growing wealth management practice, Ty J. Young Wealth Management has successfully acquired 41 businesses as its footprint has expanded across the United States. The new book leverages that extensive experience, offering a detailed roadmap for owners considering their exit strategy. "As a leading wealth management firm, we are continuously seeking opportunities to expand who we can serve," said Ty J. Young, CEO of Ty J. Young Wealth Management. "We developed 'The Official Guide to Selling Your Annuity Business' not only as a resource for the industry but also as a direct reflection of our commitment to actively acquiring more advisory companies. Our goal is to empower business owners with the knowledge they need, whether they choose to partner with us or pursue other paths." "The Official Guide to Selling Your Annuity Business" is available for immediate download at About Ty J. Young Wealth Management Ty J. Young Wealth Management, established in 1998, is a leading independent wealth management firm committed to providing comprehensive financial solutions. With over $1 billion in assets under management and serving clients nationwide, the firm is renowned for its expertise in investment management, retirement planning, and insurance. Ty Young and the firm's strategists are frequently sought after for their insights, appearing in prominent media outlets such as CNBC, Forbes, and Fox Business. Discover how Ty J. Young Wealth Management can help you achieve your financial goals at: View original content: SOURCE Ty J. Young Wealth Management
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AMD & Pfizer earnings, ISM services data: What to Watch
Market Domination Overtime host Josh Lipton takes a look at the top stories for investors to watch on Tuesday, Aug. 5. In the morning, Caterpillar (CAT) and Pfizer (PFE) will announce earnings results. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Amgen (AMGN), Snap (SNAP), and Rivian (RIVN) will announce results in the afternoon. In the morning, Institute for Supply Management (ISM) services data for July will be released. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. Time now for what to watch Tuesday, August 5th. Gonna start off on the earnings front. Big names reporting on Tuesday, including Pfizer and AMD. Pfizer announced results for the second quarter in the morning. Pharmaceutical company's drug pipeline in focus for investors with some key patents expiring in the coming years. Pfizer trying to offset that loss with a $7.2 billion cost cutting plan. The company says it has a pipeline of new drugs coming, but data on how effective those will be remains to be seen. And moving over to AMD, the semiconductor company reporting second quarter earnings after the market's closed on Tuesday, and was expecting the company to post strong results for Q2, driven by its ramp up of AI chips, which could significantly boost revenue, especially if export restrictions to China ease. And taking a look at the economy, monthly ISM services data for July coming out on Tuesday. Cons forecasting that number rise to 51.5, signaling that the service sector is growing and there's steady demand from consumers and businesses.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How reliable is the jobs data? Economists and Wall Street still trust it
WASHINGTON (AP) — The monthly jobs report is already closely-watched on Wall Street and in Washington but has taken on a new importance after President Donald Trump on Friday fired the official who oversees it. Trump claimed that June's employment figures were 'RIGGED' to make him and other Republicans 'look bad.' Yet he provided no evidence and even the official Trump had appointed in his first term to oversee the report, William Beach, condemned the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics appointed by former President Joe Biden. The firing followed Friday's jobs report that showed hiring was weak in July and had come to nearly a standstill in May and June, right after Trump rolled out sweeping tariffs. Economists and Wall Street investors have long considered the job figures reliable, with share prices and bond yields often reacting sharply when they are released. Yet Friday's revisions were unusually large — the largest, outside of a recession, in five decades. And the surveys used to compile the report are facing challenges from declining response rates, particularly since COVID, as fewer companies complete the surveys. Nonetheless, that hasn't led most economists to doubt them. 'The bottom line for me is, I wouldn't take the low collection rate as any evidence that the numbers are less reliable,' Omair Sharif, founder and chief economist at Inflation Insights, a consulting firm, said. Many academics, statisticians and economists have warned for some time that declining budgets were straining the government's ability to gather economic data. There were several government commissions studying ways to improve things like survey response rates, but the Trump administration disbanded them earlier this year. Heather Boushey, a top economic adviser in the Biden White House, noted that without Trump's firing of McEntarfer, there would be more focus on last week's data, which points to a slowing economy. 'We're having this conversation about made-up issues to distract us from what the data is showing," Boushey said. 'Revisions of this magnitude in a negative direction may indicate bad things to come for the labor market.' Here are some things to know about the jobs report: Economists and Wall Street trust the data Most economists say that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is a nonpolitical agency staffed by people obsessed with getting the numbers right. The only political appointee is the commissioner, who doesn't see the data until it's finalized, two days before it is issued to the public. Erica Groshen, the BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017, said she suggested different language in the report to "liven it up", but was shot down. She was told that if asked to describe a cup as half-empty or half-full, BLS says 'it is an eight ounce cup with four ounces of liquid.' The revised jobs data that has attracted Trump's ire is actually more in line with other figures than before the revision. For example, payroll processor ADP uses data from its millions of clients to calculate its own jobs report, and it showed a sharp hiring slowdown in May and June that is closer to the revised BLS data. Trump and his White House have a long track record of celebrating the jobs numbers — when they are good. These are the figures is Trump attacking Trump has focused on the revisions to the May and June data, which on Friday were revised lower, with job gains in May reduced to 19,000 from 144,000, and for June to just 14,000 from 147,000. Every month's jobs data is revised in the following two months. Trump also repeated a largely inaccurate attack from the campaign about an annual revision last August, which reduced total employment in the United States by 818,000, or about 0.5%. The government also revises employment figures every year. Trump charged the annual revision was released before the 2024 presidential election to 'boost' Vice President Kamala Harris's "chances of Victory," yet it was two months before the election and widely reported at the time that the revision lowered hiring during the Biden-Harris administration and pointed to a weaker economy. Here's why the government revises the data The monthly revisions occur because many companies that respond to the government's surveys send their data in late, or correct the figures they've already submitted. The proportion of companies sending in their data later has risen in the past decade. Every year, the BLS does an additional revision based on actual job counts that are derived from state unemployment insurance records. Those figures cover 95% of U.S. businesses and aren't derived from a survey but are not available in real time. These are the factors that cause revisions Figuring out how many new jobs have been added or lost each month is more complicated than it may sound. For example, if one person takes a second job, should you focus on the number of jobs, which has increased, or the number of employed people, which hasn't? (The government measures both: The unemployment rate is based on how many people either have or don't have jobs, while the number of jobs added or lost is counted separately). Each month, the government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies at over 630,000 locations — including multiple locations for the same business — covering about one-third of all workers. Still, the government also has to make estimates: What if a company goes out of business? It likely won't fill out any forms showing the jobs lost. And what about new businesses? They can take a while to get on the government's radar. The BLS seeks to capture these trends by estimating their impact on employment. Those estimates can be wrong, of course, until they are fixed by the annual revisions. The revisions are often larger around turning points in the economy. For example, when the economy is growing, there may be more startups than the government expects, so revisions will be higher. If the economy is slowing or slipping into a recession, the revisions may be larger on the downside. Here's why the May and June revisions may have been so large Ernie Tedeschi, an economic adviser to the Biden administration, points to the current dynamics of the labor market: Both hiring and firing have sharply declined, and fewer Americans are quitting their jobs to take other work. As a result, most of the job gains or losses each month are probably occurring at new companies, or those going out of business. And those are the ones the government uses models to estimate, which can make them more volatile. Groshen also points out that since the pandemic there has been a surge of new start-up companies, after many Americans lost their jobs or sought more independence. Yet they may not have created as many jobs as startups did pre-COVID, which throws off the government's models. Revisions seem to be getting bigger The revisions to May and June's job totals, which reduced hiring by a total of 258,000, were the largest — outside recessions — since 1967, according to economists at Goldman Sachs. Kevin Hassett, Trump's top economic adviser, went on NBC's 'Meet the Press' on Sunday and said, 'What we've seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers.' Hassett blamed a sharp drop in response rates to the government's surveys during and after the pandemic: 'When COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed.' Yet calculations by Tedeschi show that while revisions spiked after the pandemic, they have since declined and are much smaller than in the 1960s and 1970s. Other concerns about the government's data Many economists and statisticians have sounded the alarm about things like declining response rates for years. A decade ago, about 60% of companies surveyed by BLS responded. Now, only about 40% do. The decline has been an international phenomenon, particularly since COVID. The United Kingdom has even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of falling responses. And earlier this year the BLS said that it was cutting back on its collection of inflation data because of the Trump administration's hiring freeze, raising concerns about the robustness of price data just as economists are trying to gauge the impact of tariffs on inflation. U.S. government statistical agencies have seen an inflation-adjusted 16% drop in funding since 2009, according to a July report from the American Statistical Association. 'We are at an inflection point,' the report said. 'To meet current and future challenges requires thoughtful, well-planned investment ... In contrast, what we have observed is uncoordinated and unplanned reductions with no visible plan for the future. Christopher Rugaber, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
