logo
Rich kids like Benedict Cumberbatch killed off working class heroes

Rich kids like Benedict Cumberbatch killed off working class heroes

Covering pretty much all components of culture bar popular music, there are the International, Book, Film, Fringe, and Television festivals.
On this occasion, band of 'low-brow' culture, Oasis, play during them at Murrayfield for three nights. Of course, that has nothing to do with the festivals themselves. As many – over 200,000 people – will watch Oasis as attend the festivals.
Read More:
To perform in Edinburgh has become a major financial undertaking, costing thousands, with venues and promoters taking their cuts while performers incur most of the costs without knowing how much revenue they will generate in ticket sales.
Quite a few performers are not coming as the costs are prohibitive while quite a few will leave Edinburgh in serious debt. Those that do not leave in debt are already successful or are bailed out by the 'bank of mum and dad'.
Even to partake has become very expensive, whether in terms of ticket prices, travel, food, drink and accommodation.
None of this is the griping of a gallus Glaswegian, having a go at the Burghers for being the bohemian bourgeoise. The ordinary Burghers are themselves priced out of performing and partaking.
But it does speak to the exclusion of working-class people from the arts and culture in two ways.
The first is that the working-class is not much represented in the arts and culture. Popular culture does not really like the proles. The work of the likes of Ken Currie, James Kelman, Peter Howson and Irvine Welsh are not exactly commanding presences in this world.
Despite all the changes of social composition under neo-liberal capitalism, the working-class is still the biggest social class in society and the class that does the work to physically produce the wealth created by goods and services we consume. This means there's an almighty imbalance going on.
The second is that working-class people are routinely excluded from working within the creative industries that produce the arts and culture. The barriers are economic and cultural. The most recent data - for 2024 - shows that only 8% of those working in the creative industries are from working-class backgrounds. This is down from 10% a decade before that. Meantime, some 60% were from middle-class and upper-class backgrounds. The barriers are economic and cultural.
All this is graphically – if not also cinematically - illustrated in no better way than in film and television. Benedict Cumberbatch, Tom Hiddleston, Colin Firth, Hugh Grant, Tom Hardy, and Eddie Redmayne lead the roll call of middle-class (or even higher class) male actors. 'Posh poops' is the popular put down of them.
Meantime, for the women, we have the likes of Kate Beckinsale, Helena Bonham Carter, Rosamund Pike, Emma Thompson, Emma Watson, and Kate Winslet.
Helena Bonham Carter (Image: PA)
Most went to private schools and then drama school or university with parents more than able to sufficiently subsidise them until they became very rich celebrities in their own right.
Coming from such social backgrounds, they have excelled in playing characters from those class backgrounds, pre-occupied with their class issues (which do not commonly concern managing the cost-of-living crisis, debt, unemployment, access to decent housing etcetera etcetera).
Those roll calls of male and female actors were English, so let's turn to the situation of comparable world-famous Scots. After all, many might have an expectation that our 'ain folk' are not only distinctly different but also bedazzlingly better.
We have the likes of Gerard Butler, Robert Carlyle, Martin Compston, Sean Connery, Brian Cox, Alan Cumming, Karen Gillan, Shirley Henderson, Sam Heughan, James McAvoy, Ewan McGregor, Kelly McDonald, Dougray Scott, Tilda Swinton, and David Tennant amongst others.
Some of them can credibly claim to have come from working-class families and then had working-class jobs before hitting the big time. Connery delivered milk, McAvoy worked in a bakery, and Carlyle was a painter and decorator. Some of the others were from the respectable middle-class.
But can it credibly be argued that the likes of Connery, Carlyle and McAvoy have convincingly and sympathetically portrayed working-class lives any more or better than their fellow middle-class thespians?
In some senses, this is a bit of a daft question to even ask as not even those from working-class backgrounds portrayed working-class lives, sympathetically or otherwise.
That said, the answer is still a sad and salutary 'no'. Some of this is because of the parts they were offered and needed to take in order to get on and get ahead - as well as the existing culture and power structures of the world of film and television which they entered into - precluded this.
But some of this is also due to the social mobility and the personal politics that come with that.
The few working-class actors that make it and become big stars on the silver screen cease to be working-class no matter their protestations about not forgetting where they came from. Class is a matter of economic position.
Cossetted by a lifestyle of luxury and celebrity, they end up becoming the opposite of what they were. There's no jealousy involved here. They often have had to work very hard to get there and make many sacrifices along the way.
If they get to the point where they can pick and choose the roles to play or even write and direct their own material, whether they convincingly and sympathetically portray and represent the working-class will then be down to their own personal politics.
There's nothing mechanical or automatic that says they will or should do so. Take the case of Tilda Swinton.
Born in London to upper-class parents and privately educated, she studied at social and political sciences at University of Cambridge. She identifies as Scottish due to her family heritage. Whilst at Cambridge, she joined the Communist Party and then later the Scottish Socialist Party.
It's hard to find examples of where she has chosen to portray working-class lives in well-known productions. But she has had a fairly consistent run of playing politically progressive characters.
So, someone born with a silver spoon in her mouth has consciously chosen to depart from playing posh poops in period dramas like Downtown Abbey. Hugh Bonneville, also privately educated and a Cambridge graduate, did not.
Professor Gregor Gall is a Research Associate at the University of Glasgow
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ScotRail adds extra services for Oasis dates at Murrayfield
ScotRail adds extra services for Oasis dates at Murrayfield

South Wales Argus

time17 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

ScotRail adds extra services for Oasis dates at Murrayfield

ScotRail urged fans to make use of its enhanced timetable on August 8, 9 and 12 as the Mancunian rockers prepare to take over Murrayfield Stadium. The firm is also offering late-night services and increased capacity on its trains. Murrayfield Stadium (Lynne Cameron/PA) The late-night services will operate from Edinburgh to many of Scotland's cities, including Glasgow and Dundee, and other services will go to Perth and Dunblane. When the concert ends, fans are encouraged to make their way promptly to Haymarket station, where a holding area will be in place on Haymarket Terrace to manage crowds. Customers will then be directed to the appropriate queue for their train home. Additional ScotRail staff will be on hand to assist customers and help ensure everything runs smoothly. Phil Campbell, ScotRail customer operations director, said: 'With just a few days to go until the highly anticipated Oasis gigs at Murrayfield, we're really looking forward to helping fans travel to what promises to be an unforgettable series of shows. 'We've got more trains running throughout the Edinburgh Festivals, and we're adding late-night services for the gigs themselves to help fans make the most of the occasion. 'We're encouraging everyone to plan their journey in advance, make the most of the extra services, and soak up the atmosphere of a great night in the capital.'

Extra Edinburgh trains for Oasis fans as thousands ready for Murrayfield reunion
Extra Edinburgh trains for Oasis fans as thousands ready for Murrayfield reunion

Daily Record

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Extra Edinburgh trains for Oasis fans as thousands ready for Murrayfield reunion

"We're encouraging everyone to plan their journey in advance, make the most of the extra services, and soak up the atmosphere of a great night in the capital." Scotland's railway operator has added extra train services on the dates of Oasis's three shows in Edinburgh this week. ‌ ScotRail urged fans to make use of its enhanced timetable on Friday August 8, Saturday 9 and Tuesday 12. ‌ The rocking Mancunian brothers prepare to take over Murrayfield Stadium on those dates. ‌ The rail firm is also offering late-night services and increased capacity on its trains. The late-night services will operate from Edinburgh to many of Scotland's cities, including Glasgow and Dundee. Other services on the nights brothers Liam and Noel Gallagher take to the stage will go to Perth and Dunblane. ‌ When the concert ends, fans are encouraged to make their way promptly to Haymarket station. A holding area will be in place on Haymarket Terrace to manage crowds. ‌ Customers will then be directed to the appropriate queue for their train home. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. ‌ Phil Campbell, ScotRail customer operations director, said: "With just a few days to go until the highly anticipated Oasis gigs at Murrayfield, we're really looking forward to helping fans travel to what promises to be an unforgettable series of shows. 'We've got more trains running throughout the Edinburgh Festivals, and we're adding late-night services for the gigs themselves to help fans make the most of the occasion. 'We're encouraging everyone to plan their journey in advance, make the most of the extra services, and soak up the atmosphere of a great night in the capital."

Harry's response to charity row is typically him – blame others and then flounce off instead of trying to fix things
Harry's response to charity row is typically him – blame others and then flounce off instead of trying to fix things

Scottish Sun

time17 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Harry's response to charity row is typically him – blame others and then flounce off instead of trying to fix things

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) PRINCE Harry has flounced out – yet again. This time, not from the monarchy. Not from a podcast deal. Not from the Army, that many believe he quit too soon. 6 Prince Harry's response to the Sentebale row is typically him Credit: PA:Press Association 6 Harry exited the charity following an ugly row with the chair of trustees, Dr Sophie Chandauka Credit: PA 6 Harry co-founded the charity in memory of his mother, Princess Diana Credit: PA:Press Association This time, from Sentebale – the worthy African children's charity he co-founded in memory of his mother, Princess Diana. Once a passion project. Now just another scorched bridge. The exit wasn't quiet or dignified. It followed an ugly row with the chair of trustees, Dr Sophie Chandauka, a punchy Zimbabwean-born lawyer and major donor. Several trustees stepped down, too. What followed was familiar: leaked emails, bullying allegations, duelling statements and headlines Harry tried — and failed — to control. Now comes the Charity Commission's verdict: No laws broken. But the rebuke was clear: governance failures, damaging behaviour and a serious lack of leadership. Harry insists he was forced out. That the chair was impossible to work with. That the environment had turned toxic. What else could he do? Harry always throws toys out of pram - latest charity move is childish But leadership isn't about walking away when the mood turns. In any serious institution — royalty, the boardroom or charity — you don't storm out. You stay in the room. You resolve the problem for the greater good. Instead, Harry bailed. Same old story. And like so many of his recent exits, this one fits the pattern. When pressure mounts and compromise is needed, he withdraws. Rather than engage, Harry flushed red and scarpered back to the luxury of Montecito, and Megs to mop his furrowed brow Robert It's a shame. Because Sentebale mattered. Founded in 2006, it provides long-term support to children in Lesotho and Botswana affected by HIV and poverty. It wasn't a vanity project. It was purposeful — touching the lives of 100,000 youngsters — and at one point, so was Harry. I travelled to Lesotho with him twice. I saw the work up close. Those children in need of help didn't see him as a prince. They saw someone who listened, who cared, somebody who came back. His presence wasn't performative. It was real. His royal rank and media profile opened doors. His conviction helped break stigma of HIV/AIDS, just as his late mother had done right at the outset of the fight. For years, he gave Sentebale visibility and momentum. It was, without question, his most meaningful contribution. But cracks appeared. His decision to quit royal life was costly. In 2023, Dr Chandauka initiated a financial review. She flagged a sharp drop in donations following Harry's withdrawal from royal duties; income fell to £2.39million in 2020, though later rebounded. She reportedly labelled his image a 'reputational risk' and raised questions about whether he was now more liability than asset. Rather than engage, Harry flushed red and scarpered back to the luxury of Montecito, and Megs to mop his furrowed brow. No formal rebuttal. No quiet diplomacy. No attempt to repair. He threw his toys out of the pram. He could have shown resolve, offered solutions, and strengthened the structure. Instead, he vanished. And that's what makes this so frustrating. Harry had no shortage of templates to help lead through turbulence. His grandfather, Prince Philip, oversaw the Duke of Edinburgh's Award for more than six decades — often in silence, always with rigour. His son Edward, the new Duke, is its leader. His father, King Charles, spent years building The Prince's Trust — now the King's Trust — from a niche programme into a national institution. 6 Harry listens to American PR consultants and is guided, above all, by his Duchess, Meghan Markle Credit: Instagram His sister-in-law, Catherine, champions important causes such as early years development with longevity, consistency and focus. His brother, William, leads Earthshot, a well-structured mission with financial backing. None of them walked out mid-crisis. They worked through it. Harry could have done the same. He could have stayed on the board in a non-executive role. Helped recruit new trustees. Brought in independent mediators. Stabilised the organisation rather than adding to the unrest. But that would have required discipline — and a willingness to listen. 'Squandered legacy' Instead, he defaulted to the same script: leave, blame, reposition. And this time, the people most affected weren't palace courtiers or out-of-pocket podcast executives. They were the children of Lesotho — many living with HIV, others orphaned, some still stigmatised. Those were the ones who stood to lose most. The pattern goes back further. His early exit from the Army — ten solid years of exemplary service, but he chose not to be a career soldier and go on, to rise further through the ranks and gain his braided uniforms on merit rather than royal birthright. His abrupt departure from working royal life. His mudslinging. His family ties frayed. Promises to reinvent himself in California have mostly yielded media spats, stalled projects and carefully lit documentaries. What's missing is institutional maturity. And staying power. This isn't about empathy or charisma; Harry has plenty of both. But he's never learned to sit with discomfort, to fix what's failing. Instead, he blames. Then bails. Since relocating to Montecito, his inner circle of advisers has narrowed. 6 The Prince defaulted to the same script: leave, blame, reposition, pictured with charity leaders and Dr Chandauka far right Credit: Getty He listens to American PR consultants and is guided, above all, by his Duchess, Meghan Markle — who built her brand around control and survival, not compromise or tradition. The problem is that leadership — particularly in the charitable sector — requires grit, continuity and people willing to challenge you, not flatter you. It's not that Dr Chandauka is beyond reproach. Under her tenure, annual accounts remain unpublished, and the next set is delayed until 2025. She may face valid questions. But here's the telling detail: the Commission didn't ask her to go. She stayed. Harry didn't. Now his team says Harry will support African kids 'in new ways.' In practice, that means nothing. His seat at the Sentebale table is empty. His voice, once essential, is absent. It's the institutional equivalent of ghosting. And this wasn't just another cause. This was personal. A living tribute to his mother. One of the few initiatives he helped build from the ground up. He could have pushed for reform. Brought in fresh trustees. Set a better standard. The Harry I saw in Lesotho back in 2006 –- he had a purpose. A spark. A sense of something larger than himself. Now, all we're left with is another clean break, and another promise unkept Robert The options were there. What they didn't need was drama. What they couldn't survive was abandonment. This isn't scandal. It's waste. A squandered legacy. A cautionary tale. Another institution left to sweep up the debris of brand-driven burnout. The headlines will fade. The charity may recover. But something has shifted. The Harry I saw in Lesotho back in 2006 –- he had a purpose. A spark. A sense of something larger than himself. Now, all we're left with is another clean break, and another promise unkept. When Harry chose the name Sentebale, it meant forget-me-not — a tribute to Diana and her favourite flowers. It was a promise never to let her memory fade. Well, sadly, it looks like he's done just that. Robert Jobson is a royal editor and the No1 bestselling author of Catherine, The Princess of Wales – The Biography

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store