logo
Andrew Tate, the accused human trafficker with Trump's support, returns to the US

Andrew Tate, the accused human trafficker with Trump's support, returns to the US

Vox02-03-2025
Andrew Tate made his name as a misogynist podcast star, but has more recently been known as an alleged rapist and human trafficker as he awaits criminal trial in Romania with his brother Tristan. Last week, the Financial Times reported that the Trump administration, through special envoy Richard Grenell, had tried to pressure the Romanian government to lift travel restrictions on the brothers. On Thursday, the Associated Press reported that Romanian authorities had lifted the travel restrictions on the brothers and that the Tates had flown to the United States.
Andrew Tate, whose online course 'Hustler's University' morphed into a platform with nearly a million users, became a powder keg among far-right media influencers in the early 2020s due to his explicitly sexist worldview and its profound influence over millions of teen boys and young men.
This latest high-profile turn in Tate's ongoing legal saga has again brought the horrifying allegations against him to the forefront — this time with apparent approval from the US government. It's also a reminder of the cultural reach of the so-called manosphere that Tate helped popularize.
Tate's rise started with a successful kickboxing career, was followed by his removal from the British version of Big Brother , and culminated in a hugely popular podcast that anointed him the 'King of Toxic Masculinity.' As Rebecca Jennings explained for Vox in 2022, his 'inflammatory diatribes against women, whom he compares to property' became viral fodder on TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube. He was born in the US, raised in the UK, but now lives in Romania — first moving there in part because, he said, 'the rape laws are more lenient,' but has stayed since; following his arrest, he has largely not been allowed to leave the country.
Tate helped bring to mainstream concerns about the 'manosphere,' the term for the internet's loose network of right-wing male influencers and their associated communities. Early on, Tate seemed to be such an obviously extremist node of the manosphere that he should be, as Jennings wrote, easy to ignore.
But Tate's confident, blatant misogyny proved wildly popular: His dictums, which ranged from bragging about never having read a book to flaunting an aggressive emotional and physical dominance over women, seemed to enthrall boys and men who admired him for his flashy lifestyle, vaunted wealth, and commitment to the bit. Tate's maxims swept across teen culture, generating horror stories from parents and teachers about his seemingly pervasive and pernicious influence. Originally, Tate presented his schtick as pure fiction, a deliberately exaggerated regressive persona. It soon appeared that was far from the case, as allegations against Tate and his brother began mounting.
Romanian officials have pursued Andrew and Tristan Tate since April 2022, when they first raided one of the pair's mansions after receiving a tip that the Tates had allegedly abducted a woman and were holding her there against her will. The following year, the brothers and two Romanian accomplices were indicted on charges of rape, forming a criminal gang, and human trafficking. Authorities alleged that Andrew and Tristan Tate had trafficked seven women from the US and the UK to Romania by grooming them and subjecting them to physical, sexual, and psychological abuse. (The brothers promptly responded with a civil suit against two of their alleged victims.) In early 2024, the two faced new UK allegations of human trafficking, stemming from an investigation launched more than a decade prior.
Then, in August, the Tates faced additional charges of human trafficking after police raided their estate again and detained six people. The brothers have also faced multiple civil lawsuits filed by alleged victims. One such woman recently filed a suit against them in Florida, claiming they defamed her after she agreed to be a witness in the Romanian criminal trial.
Despite the severity and breadth of the charges against them, things have been going fairly well for the Tates. Last month, Andrew Tate was released from house arrest, though he and his brother are still not allowed to leave Romania and are under court supervision. This followed the return of their luxury assets in October, and a November appeals court ruling that major evidence in the first Romanian criminal case, including testimony from alleged victims, was inadmissible. A judge, citing flaws in the indictment, sent the case back to prosecutors for revision. This left the case on shaky ground — and that was before the American government came calling.
Romania's foreign minister, Emil Hurezeanu, dismissed his conversation last week with Grenell, which took place briefly during the Munich Security Conference, as 'just a repeat of a known stance.' Grenell's position as 'special missions envoy' seems to be an informal one based mainly on his status as a longtime Trump loyalist and his previous role as ambassador to Germany, but he's made his interest in the Tate brothers public — and explicitly political.
On February 3, before the trip to Munich, Grenell quote-tweeted a reply to Tristan Tate on X and alleged that Romania had used funds from the beleaguered USAID agency to target conservatives, saying the program was 'weaponized against people and politicians who weren't woke.' There appears to be no factual basis for this claim, but it bolsters the Tates' longtime argument that they are the victims of a political witch hunt.
'I support the Tate brothers as evident by my publicly available tweets,' Grenell told the Financial Times.
According to a statement issued by Romanian officials to the AP, the brothers remain under Romanian judicial control while they await trial. The American government's role in the lifted travel ban is unclear.
Andrew and Tristan Tate now face three different criminal cases and multiple civil lawsuits in different countries, most for extremely serious allegations of violence and sexual abuse against women. Their most expansive alleged crime, human trafficking, became part of Andrew Tate's online brand. He actually sold an online course to his followers on how to do it, what he called the 'Pimping Hoes Degree.'
Experts say that the techniques Tate taught in this course and elsewhere could be seen as a textbook for how to engage in literal, criminal human trafficking — and the messages Tate espouses across the manosphere are replete with boasting about violence towards women, sexual assault, grooming underage girls, and emotional abuse.
The 'Andrew Tate effect' on young men has been so profound that counteracting it has become a mission across multiple public service sectors, from education to public health. Researchers in Sweden found that boys exposed to manosphere influencers were more likely to dehumanize women, while researchers in Australia found 'widespread experience of sexual harassment, sexism, and misogyny perpetrated by boys towards women teachers, and the ominous presence of Andrew Tate shaping their behaviour.'
Concerns about Tate encompass real concerns about public safety, and whether boys who have prolonged exposure to him could become more aggressive toward the women around them. At the same time, Tate and others in the manosphere have been credited with helping swing the 2024 US election resoundingly for Trump among young men.
Tate is already a manifestation of extreme misogyny, the worst of what the manosphere has wrought — and his cultural, and now political, elevation is part of a larger, grimmer regression we are perhaps only just at the beginning of.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trump-Texas redistricting mess, briefly explained
The Trump-Texas redistricting mess, briefly explained

Vox

time2 hours ago

  • Vox

The Trump-Texas redistricting mess, briefly explained

is a senior politics reporter at Vox, where he covers the Democratic Party. He joined Vox in 2022 after reporting on national and international politics for the Atlantic's politics, global, and ideas teams, including the role of Latino voters in the 2020 election. If enough Democrats refused to participate in the special session, per parliamentary rules, the Texas House can't meet.A political showdown is unfolding in Texas, where state Republican lawmakers are trying to game the system to give their national party an advantage in next year's midterm elections. They've hit a temporary roadblock, for now. But the whole gambit has huge national implications. If you're just tuning in, a quick summary: In July, President Donald Trump told reporters that he wanted lawmakers in Texas to redraw the state's congressional districts to flip five currently Democratic-held seats in Republicans' favor. Redrawing congressional maps, known as redistricting, usually happens every decade across the country, after the US Census has collected the most recent demographic information in each state and maps can be drawn to better represent each state's population. Trump's middle-of-the-decade demand of Texas is brazenly political — a form of gerrymandering that has happened very rarely before (most recently in 2004). In Texas, where the state legislature has the power to draw congressional districts, Republicans control the governor's office and have majorities in both chambers of the legislature. An additional five seats would boost the current GOP majority, or offset losses during next year's elections. Currently, Republicans control the House 219-212, but when all vacancies are filled, that becomes 220-215. A party needs 218 seats for a majority, so these new seats would give Trump more leeway to pass legislation in the second half of his term. Late last month, Gov. Greg Abbott followed through on Trump's demand, calling the legislature back for a special session to vote on new maps. And just last week, the proposed map was released, revealing five new Republican-leaning seats in South Texas and the Austin, Dallas, and Houston metro areas. In response, Texas Democrats did all they could do: first rallying Democrats across the country to pay attention to the GOP's gerrymandering attempt, and ultimately fleeing the state entirely. If enough Democrats refused to participate in the special session, per parliamentary rules, the Texas House can't meet. Over the weekend, more than 50 Democratic state lawmakers flew to Illinois, Massachusetts, and New York to deny a quorum and halt the process temporarily. For now, the plan is for them to remain out of state for the next few weeks, when the special session is scheduled to end. Things become a little hazier then. The governor can technically call an unlimited number of special sessions, meaning Texas Democrats might have to repeat this process until the end of the year. And for every day that these lawmakers miss a vote, they're racking up a $500 fine per person. The latest development is that the Texas House has voted to issue 'civil warrants,' empowering law enforcement to detain the absent lawmakers and bring them to the state capitol. It's a largely symbolic act, since this authority only applies within Texas. At the same time, Abbott has threatened to expel and replace the lawmakers — but this threat doesn't seem to have a firm legal grounding, and would require overcoming tremendous practical challenges, like filing individual lawsuits against each missing lawmaker and holding new elections, according to the Texas Tribune. None of this has stopped Trump from pressuring other states to follow suit, including Missouri, Ohio, and, more recently, Indiana. Democrats, meanwhile, have responded with their own threats to further gerrymander states like California, Maryland, or New York. While Texas is at a standstill, the national implications are still unfolding.

Apple raises investment in US by $100bn after Trump pressure
Apple raises investment in US by $100bn after Trump pressure

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Apple raises investment in US by $100bn after Trump pressure

Apple has pledged a $100bn (£75bn) investment in American manufacturing after Donald Trump told Tim Cook, the chief executive, to stop making iPhones in India. The tech giant will announce a new 'American manufacturing programme' designed to bring more of Apple's supply chain to the US. Mr Cook is expected to confirm details of the deal at the White House on Wednesday alongside the president. It means Apple has now pledged to invest $600bn in the US since Mr Trump's return to the presidency, after committing to spend $500bn in February. Apple is among the biggest potential losers from Mr Trump's tariffs and the president has repeatedly exhorted Mr Cook to assemble iPhones in the US. Most of the phones the company sells in the US are now made in India after a years-long effort to move manufacturing away from China. But in May, Mr Trump said he had a 'little problem' with Mr Cook over Apple's manufacturing plans. 'We've treated you really good, we've put up with all the plants that you've built in China for years, now you got to build [for] us,' he said. 'We're not interested in you building in India, India can take care of themselves ... we want you to build here.' Mr Trump has threatened Apple with 25pc tariffs if its iPhones are not made in the US, an announcement that knocked tens of billions off the company's value. Also, in a fresh headache for Mr Cook, the White House announced new tariffs on India on Wednesday as a penalty for buying oil from Russia. Karoline Leavitt, the White House's assistant press secretary, said: 'President Trump's America-first economic agenda has secured trillions of dollars in investments that support American jobs and bolster American businesses. 'Today's announcement with Apple is another win for our manufacturing industry that will simultaneously help re-shore the production of critical components to protect America's economic and national security.' Shares in Apple rose more than 4pc following news of the investment plans. Mr Cook has repeatedly secured exemptions for Apple's phones, tablets and smartwatches from Mr Trump's tariffs, but the president's shifting policies have led to uncertainty from investors about whether the company will be stung in future. It still paid $800m in tariffs in the three months to June, and expects to pay $1.1bn in the next three months. It has flown planeloads of iPhones to the US in order to beat new levies. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Ghislaine Maxwell's move to ‘country club' prison smacks of special treatment, experts say
Ghislaine Maxwell's move to ‘country club' prison smacks of special treatment, experts say

Boston Globe

time3 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Ghislaine Maxwell's move to ‘country club' prison smacks of special treatment, experts say

Advertisement 'It's a country club,' Hood said 0f the camp about 100 miles northwest of Houston. 'Inmates, if they have a sex offense, are not going to a place like that, period. It's truly unheard of.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Federal Prison Camp, Bryan is seen in Bryan, Texas, on Saturday, Aug. 2, 2025. Meredith Seaver/Associated Press Long-standing policy from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) restricts inmates with certain elevated security classifications, known as 'public safety factors,' from serving in federal prison camps. Sex offenses are among the most severe. Maxwell was convicted in 2021 of helping Epstein groom, traffic and abuse dozens of underage girls. Inmates serving sentences of 10 years or more generally aren't eligible for transfer to minimum-security facilities. This, too, would have applied to Maxwell, who is not due for release until 2037. Exceptions can be made through what's known as a 'management variable.' In Maxwell's case, prison staff would have had to request this waiver to move her, and senior prison officials would have had to sign off on it, according to BOP policy. Advertisement While it's not uncommon for prison officials to allow inmates who cooperate with investigations to move to lower-security facilities, it's rare for sex offenders to receive such benefits, and they almost never get moved into prison camps like Bryan, experts said. 'It's enormously preferential treatment,' said Judi Garrett, a former BOP assistant director. 'Getting a public safety factor for a sex offender waived is monumental.' Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2005. Joe Schildhorn/Patrick McMullan But Maxwell could have been in a position to leverage special treatment. She has become a focal point of efforts by President Donald Trump's administration to calm a growing furor over its about-face decision last month to release no further information from the FBI's Epstein files. Epstein was indicted on sex trafficking and other charges in 2019 but died while awaiting trial in what has been ruled a suicide. Members of Trump's Republican base have led a continuing clamor for the full release of the files and whatever information Maxwell may have that could implicate some of the disgraced financier's rich and powerful friends. Maxwell's transfer from a low-security prison in Tallahassee came to light just a week after she sat for two days of interviews with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. David Oscar Markus, an attorney for Maxwell said she was asked about potentially '100 different people' and she 'answered those questions honestly, truthfully, to the best of her ability.' Blanche has said that he would release information about their interview at an appropriate time. Advertisement Neither Markus nor the Justice Department has commented on the reason for her transfer. A spokesperson for the prisons bureau didn't respond to a request for comment Tuesday. Some victims of Epstein and Maxwell decried the transfer in a joint statement, calling Maxwell a sexual predator and saying she should 'never be shown any leniency.' And while some have speculated that Maxwell's move could be the precursor to clemency, Trump has been noncommittal on the subject, though telling reporters he is 'allowed to give her a pardon.' But one aspect of Maxwell's housing is clear: Conditions at the Bryan prison camp are among the best in the corrections system and a significant improvement over even the low-security prison where the 63-year-old had been held. 'A low-security prison has a substantially higher ratio of staff to inmates than a camp. You're on a different planet,' said Larry Levine, founder of Pink Lady Prison Consultants, which helps women prisoners navigate the system. 'You're looking at double razor wire around the fence, trucks driving around it, cops with rifles. They're locking the doors of the housing units at night.' At the Bryan camp, located in a residential neighborhood, doors to dorms with bunk beds and suite housing remain unlocked, and the 635 khaki-clad inmates are generally free to roam the compound. A single layer of razor-wire fencing stretches around the back part of the perimeter, while the front entrance is lined with low, wrought-iron fencing. 'The token fence there is to keep the public and press out, really,' Hood said. 'It's not really keeping the inmates in.' Most inmates are serving time after being convicted of financial crimes or low-level drug offenses, and have less than 10 years left in their sentence. Advertisement Among the highest-profile inmates is Elizabeth Holmes, founder of the blood-testing company Theranos, who was convicted of defrauding investors. Another is Jennifer Shah, a 'Real Housewives of Salt Lake City' cast member serving time for wire fraud. Bryan also briefly housed Michelle Janavs, heiress to the Hot Pockets food empire who was sentenced for paying a fixer to help get her children into the University of Southern California. The camp offers recreational options, including an athletic field, library, and arts and crafts programs. Inmates can participate in vocational training or take on work assignments including landscaping, food service and cleaning. The camp also partners with Canine Companions for Independence, a program that allows inmates to raise and train service dogs. During the day, staff consists of a chaplain, department heads, facility workers, teachers and correctional officers - a few dozen people in total, experts said. When the camp shuts down at night, they said, fewer than a half-dozen correctional officers may remain on-site. Many inmates go to camps to prepare to leave the prison system, so conditions are less volatile and violence extremely rare. 'People are on their best behavior. They don't want to get transferred out,' said Sharon Dolovich, a prison system expert at the UCLA School of Law. 'The people inside are more relaxed. The staff are more relaxed. They're mostly just grateful.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store