Report outlines how New Mexico could counter federal food benefits cuts
As the U.S. government considers cutting funding for the nation's most prominent food benefits program, advocates in New Mexico recommend the state government step in to protect and expand it.
Nonprofit child advocacy organization New Mexico Voices for Children on Friday released a report outlining five recommendations for New Mexico to improve its Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps.
The U.S. House Committee on Agriculture is expected on Tuesday to hold a 'markup' hearing to discuss how Republicans plan to cut federal funding for SNAP.
The report, written by NM Voices Senior Research and Policy Analyst Emily Wildau, notes that while the U.S. Department of Agriculture administers SNAP, state governments manage applications, certify households and issue monthly benefits to participants' Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) cards.
The proposed Republican cuts to SNAP, Medicaid and other programs 'will mean less food assistance for families and lead directly to higher costs for groceries, increased hunger, and significant harm for both local economies and state spending priorities over time,' the report continues.
In New Mexico, one quarter the population receives SNAP benefits, the highest rate of any state in the U.S., according to the report, and out of all SNAP recipients in New Mexico, 38% are children and 62% are working. Overall, between 2015 and 2019, SNAP lifted an average of 60,000 New Mexicans, including 25,000 children, above the poverty line each yea,
'It is critical that advocates work to protect SNAP benefits and enact important reforms at the state level that can counter these federal attacks,' the report states.
Wildau's report contains five recommendations on how the state of New Mexico should support the SNAP program. First among them: codify the state's SNAP Outreach Plan into state law, which would require the state Health Care Authority to submit an annual outreach plan to the federal government.
This would allow nonprofits working with the state government to use federal matching funds to distribute food to SNAP recipients, the report says.
Both chambers of the New Mexico Legislature unanimously passed this proposal in the most recent legislative session but Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham vetoed it.
The governor wrote that the legislation is unnecessary because 90% of New Mexicans who are eligible for the benefits already receive them. 'We continue to invite collaboration with advocacy groups to discuss ways to make meaningful improvements to our programs,' the governor wrote.
NM Voices also recommends that New Mexico streamline the SNAP application process so eligible New Mexicans have lower barriers to benefits. Currently, someone can initially apply for SNAP online but cannot report changes in income or renew their benefits online, the report says.
Last fall, New Mexico extended the SNAP exit threshold to 200% of the federal poverty level, up from 165% last year. This means people can continue to receive SNAP even if their income is twice the federal poverty line.
Paige Knight, research director at NM Voices, told Source NM in an interview that the group's recommendations could change as the proposed federal cuts become reality.
'Whatever happens federally, we may need to update some of those recommendations based on what's feasible, what changed federally, and make adjustments,' she said.
The report's third recommendation is for New Mexico to continue softening the SNAP benefit cliff, which is when someone loses eligibility for benefits when their income exceeds the program's income eligibility limit. The state government could create its own SNAP benefit for households that have recently lost eligibility after increasing their incomes above 200% of the federal poverty lines, and provide an extended benefit for several months to allow families to continue saving money as they transition out of SNAP, Wildau wrote.
New Mexico could also expand the program to reach more people by treating child support payments as an income exclusion rather than a tax deduction, which would lower a household's taxable income, the report notes.
Finally, the report recommends New Mexico provide SNAP to immigrant households with children who are ineligible for the benefits under federal regulations, and provide protections and education to immigrant families who can receive SNAP but may fear repercussions 'due to the changing federal landscape.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Proposed congressional maps in California could help Democrats flip 5 seats
Proposed new congressional maps in California that are expected to be put to voters in a special election this fall indicate the redrawn district lines could help Democrats flip five Republican seats and bolster around five Democratic incumbents in toss-up districts. The new maps, posted on the California State Assembly website on Friday evening, are draft proposals and are subject to be changed or reworked by the state legislature, which is set to start working next week. The legislative action follows California Gov. Gavin Newsom's call on Thursday for a special election on new maps, in an attempt to counter mid-decade redistricting being pushed by Republicans in Texas. MORE: California will move forward with redistricting vote to counter Texas, Newsom says The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the campaign arm of House Democrats, took credit Friday for submitting the maps to the California legislature, saying in a statement they believe they will have widespread support among California legislators and voters. "We anticipate this proposal will have widespread support both among California office holders and various stakeholders across the state," DCCC Executive Director Julie Merz said in a statement. "We will not stand by as Republicans attempt to rig the election in their favor and choose their voters. It's increasingly clear that Republicans will do anything to protect their narrow majority because they know they can't win on their disastrous legislative record which has raised costs and rips away health care for millions, all to give the ultra-wealthy a tax break." Paul Mitchell, a redistricting and data expert who drew the maps, told ABC News San Francisco station KGO-TV in an interview on Friday afternoon before the draft maps were posted online that eight of the proposed redrawn districts are unchanged; another 20 are changed very little, and that overall the goal was "pushing back on Texas without doing something that would radically disrupt the congressional district lines." MORE: Texas Democrats to return after governor ends special session that included redistricting, sources say Mitchell added that beyond making five Republican-held seats favor Democrats -- as a counter to the proposed congressional maps in Texas that could flip five seats to favor Republicans -- the proposal also strengthens the districts of around five Democratic "frontline candidates" who face more difficult challenges from Republicans. "[The legislature has] got some time next week to put it together, along with all the other language for a statewide ballot measure. And I think the point for voters is, this is a way to push back on what Texas Republicans are doing, on what Trump is doing," Mitchell told KGO-TV. Republicans continue to cry foul, saying that Newsom's gambit for new maps is politically motivated. NRCC chair Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.) wrote in a statement before the proposed maps were posted: "Gavin Newsom failed to solve the homelessness, crime, drug, and cost epidemics plaguing the Golden State. Now he is shredding California's Constitution and disenfranchising voters to prop up his Presidential ambitions. "Californians oppose Newsom's stunt because they won't let a self-serving politician rig the system to further his career. The NRCC is prepared to fight this illegal power grab in the courts and at the ballot box to stop Newsom in his tracks."
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump tax law could cause Medicare cuts if Congress doesn't act, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficits caused by President Trump's tax and spending law could trigger automatic cuts to Medicare if Congress does not act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Friday. The CBO estimates that Medicare, the federal health insurance program for Americans over age 65, could potentially see as much as $491 billion in cuts from 2027 to 2034 if Congress does not act to mitigate a 2010 law that forces across-the-board cuts to many federal programs once legislation increases the federal deficit. The latest report from CBO showed how Trump's signature tax and spending law could put new pressure on federal programs that are bedrocks of the American social safety net. Trump and Republicans pledged not to cut Medicare as part of the legislation, but the estimated $3.4 trillion that the law adds to the federal deficit over the next decade means that many Medicare programs could see cuts. In the past, Congress has always acted to mitigate cuts to Medicare and other programs, but it would take some bipartisan cooperation to do so. Democrats, who requested the analysis from CBO, jumped on the potential cuts. 'Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway,' Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said in a statement. 'American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump's attacks on Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare.' Hospitals in rural parts of the country are already grappling with cuts to Medicaid, which is available to people with low incomes, and cuts to Medicare could exacerbate their shortfalls. As Republicans muscled the bill through Congress and are now selling it to voters back home, they have been critical of how the CBO has analyzed the bill. They have also argued that the tax cuts will spur economic growth and pointed to $50 billion in funding for rural hospitals that was included in the package. Groves writes for the Associated Press.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
CEO of paid protest company says it works with both sides of the aisle
(NewsNation) — President Trump alleged Friday that Democrats are paying protesters to fight his Washington, D.C., crime policies. But how do paid protests actually work? NewsNation spoke with Adam Swart, the CEO of Crowds on Demand, about his company that provides services 'for impactful advocacy campaigns, demonstrations, PR stunts, crowds for hire and corporate events,' according to its website. 'All of our protesters are sincere advocates for the cause at hand. We've been in business 13 years, so we have a large roster of people we know and have networks of others we can call upon to be compensated for expressing their sincere points of view,' Swart said. Swart said compensation for protests is typically in the low hundreds of dollars, depending on the assignment. He said organizing a protest 'is like buying an ad.' He said his company receives requests for both conservative and liberal causes. 'We have been clear that we work with both liberals and conservatives on causes that align with common-sense values. Democrats are hiring our company, and so are Republicans,' he said. He did not disclose what protests his company has been asked to be a part of. Swart previously told NewsNation that he turned down $20 million to provide protesters for ' Good Trouble Lives On ' protests in July. 'I'm rejecting it not because I don't want to take the business, but because frankly, this is going to be ineffective; it's going to make us all look bad,' Swart said of the anti-Trump protests at the time.
