That DOJ Lawyer Fired for Refusing to Give Mel Gibson His Guns Back Is on TikTok to Explain Trump's Pardons
Liz Oyer was fired from the U.S. Department of Justice in March after she refused to recommend that actor Mel Gibson be allowed to own firearms again after a domestic violence conviction. The Trump regime tried to pressure Oyer, who worked in the office that handles pardons, by noting that Gibson was a friend of the president. But she refused to budge and was escorted out of the building by security on the order of DOJ Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Oyer never received an official reason for her dismissal, but it was clear that it had everything to do with her refusal to recommend that Gibson get his gun rights back.
In an earlier era, the American public may not have heard much more about Oyer and her stand against corruption. But thanks to social media, she now has a direct channel to speak with the public and can help us understand the dirty deals that seem to be perpetrated by President Trump's government on a daily basis. Oyer has joined TikTok and Instagram to help explain how the pardons Trump has been issuing, often to wealthy donors, are corrupt as hell. And it's really enlightening to watch.
Oyer's most popular TikTok video so far is about restitution, the requirement that people who commit crimes pay back the money they stole, and she does a great job explaining how Trump's pardons of countless crooks have meant that roughly $1.2 billion in restitution (and counting) won't be paid back. Because those pardons don't just wipe the convictions, they also wipe out any money owed.
@lawyer.oyer
More on Donald Trump's $1 billion in pardons. Today, let's talk about Michele Fiore, pardoned for stealing from a memorial fund for fallen police officers.
♬ original sound – Liz Oyer
In the case of people like Trevor Milton, the founder of EV company Nikola, who was pardoned by Trump last month, the amount of money that's no longer owed in restitution is truly mind-boggling. Milton was convicted of defrauding investors, and the DOJ was seeking $675 million in restitution for his victims. But now that Milton has his pardon, he won't be paying a dime. As Oyer explains in her video about Milton, the billionaire donated $1.8 million to President Trump's campaign. Milton also hired an attorney named Brad Bondi, who's the brother of Attorney General Pam Bondi. Funny coincidence.
@lawyer.oyer
More on Trump's $1B in pardons. Talking today about the biggest single pardon: Trevor Milton, who committed a $675 million fraud.
♬ original sound – Liz Oyer
Hilariously, the President defended his pardon of Milton by insisting that the only thing the EV founder did wrong was support Trump, which isn't a crime. 'They say the thing that he did wrong was he was one of the first people that supported a gentleman named Donald Trump for president. He supported Trump. He liked Trump. I didn't know him, but he liked him,' Trump rambled incoherently. In reality, Milton staged a fake demonstration in 2016 of a semi-truck for his investors. That's what got him in trouble.
Oyer spoke to Gizmodo this week and calls herself a 'social media neophyte.' She had a private Instagram account but no other social media use to speak of—that is, until last week when a family member pushed her to try TikTok. Oyer had some important tips, including the suggestion to introduce yourself early in each video, something that's not obvious to first-time creators on platforms where people speak directly to the camera.
'A younger cousin of mine really encouraged me to take my story to TikTok because they believed that I would potentially reach a larger and different audience there. And it took some prodding,' Oyer told Gizmodo by phone.
'A couple of content creators with a lot of followers, including my cousin, were kind enough to sit me down and give me a 90-minute tutorial on how TikTok works. And after that, it still took me maybe about a week to actually work up the courage to make a video for TikTok,' said Oyer.
'So it was a process. And I have to admit that I was skeptical at first about whether it was something that I could even do,' said Oyer. 'But, you know, I actually feel like they were right. It's been a very effective way to reach a different and very engaged audience.'
Oyer started as a public defender and said that her work at the DOJ was striving to make sure that people who had been treated unfairly got a chance to receive clemency.
'My primary goal as pardon attorney was to really make the clemency process accessible to people who had been treated unfairly by the criminal justice system and to make the possibility of clemency a reality for those people who had faced sentences that were overly harsh,' said Oyer. 'And those people are not the type of people that we are seeing getting pardons under this administration.'
The people Trump has been pardoning have largely been wealthy individuals who donated money to his interests or people who have demonstrated loyalty. And in some cases, it's both. Aside from the money that will no longer be paid in restitution, the thing that makes Trump's pardons so egregious is the simple fact that many of the people he's letting off weren't even sentenced yet. That's not normal.
'The Justice Department has a whole set of guidelines that lay out the criteria for recommending pardons, and they say that someone should not even be considered for a pardon until they have completed their sentence and at least five years have passed since they finished serving their sentence,' said Oyer. 'So historically, pardons are generally viewed as something that go to people who have served their sentence, paid their debt, demonstrated rehabilitation and good conduct in the time that has elapsed. And those criteria are all absent in every one of the pardons that Trump has granted to date.'
Oyer tells the stories of people like Paul Walczak, the health care entrepreneur who was skimming money from his employees' paychecks, and Michele Fiore, the justice of the peace in Las Vegas who raised money for a police officer memorial and instead spent the money on plastic surgery. And each pardon is more enraging than the last for its obviously corrupt motives.
Oyer was asked to testify on Capitol Hill about Trump's attacks on the rule of law, and her former employer has tried to intimidate her over her desire to speak out. As Oyer told Democrats last month, two armed special deputy U.S. Marshals delivered a letter warning her not to testify. But she's speaking out anyway.
Oyer says that she's received some trolling from pro-Trump folks but has mostly had positive interactions on social media so far, with some people even asking good questions that have given her ideas for future videos. And Oyer tells Gizmodo she'll continue making videos for a while, as long as people are interested in what she has to say.
If you're not already following Oyer, she's one to check out as she helpfully breaks down Trump's corruption using expertise that provides unique insights into the horrors. And if we can't stop the horrors, at least we can be told that none of this is normal. The pardons, the exchange of money, none of it is normal. Being told that by someone who knows what they're talking about is at least something.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
3 minutes ago
- CNBC
The latest CPI report showed some softening in inflation. What investors are saying
Wall Street got a favorable inflation report on Wednesday, giving equities a boost. The consumer price index rose 0.1% in May , slightly less than the 0.2% increase economists polled by Dow Jones anticipated. So-called core CPI, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, increased by 0.1% — also less than expected. Stocks reacted positively, with S & P 500 futures erasing an earlier decline to trade about 0.2% higher. Some investors noted continued uncertainty around the Federal Reserve's interest rate outlook, despite the latest price report. Here's how some investors, economists and strategists reacted to the news: Chris Rupkey, chief economist at FWDBonds: "Net, net, the inflation shock wave from more costly imported goods has yet to arrive on American shores. Today's consumer inflation report is a real head-scratcher for economists as they ponder why the trade war hasn't set off another inflation outbreak yet with core goods prices sitting on store shelves seeing no change in May." Alexandra Wilson-Elizondo, global co-CIO of multi-asset Solutions at Goldman Sachs Asset Management: "Inflation in May was lower than anticipated, suggesting the tariffs aren't having a large immediate impact because companies have been using existing inventories or slowly adjusting prices due to uncertain demand. While we might see some price increases on goods later, service prices are expected to remain stable, suggesting any rise in inflation is likely to be temporary." Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rates at BMO Capital Markets: "CPI surprised on the downside across the board. … The yield curve is bull steepening as the slower trajectory of inflation has firmed rate cut expectations for later this year. On the margin, it is also supportive of next week's [Federal Reserve Summary of Economic Projections] signaling 50 bp of cuts in 2025." Ryan Weldon, investor director and portfolio manager at IFM Investments: "The softer services inflation lends itself to a slowing economy in the face of continued tariff anxiety and will support the Fed to come out of their wait-and-hold approach sooner. However, the Fed will still want to see several months of consistent inflation and jobs data and have more clarity on the Trump administration's tariff policy before resuming cuts." Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Northlight Asset Management: "With lower-than-expected numbers across the board (with the exception of headline YoY, which stayed constant), and a trade deal with China that was agreed to in London, the narrative around tariff-induced inflation should subside. However, CPI remains above 2% and even though the tariff rates are going to be less than originally feared, after they are implemented they will further increase the cost of goods." Skyler Weinand, chief investment officer at Regan Capital: "Wednesday's weaker-than-expected CPI opens the door to a Fed rate cut in September, since it's clear that the inflation data continues to move in the right direction even as we deal with tariff uncertainty. While employment is strong and the economic effects from tariffs are yet to be determined, the Fed would like to start easing again in the not too distant future to get in front of a possible recession in 2026" Peter Boockvar, chief investment officer at Bleakley Financial Group: "Bottom line, a sigh of relief on the lower than expected inflation stats just as we search for where tariffs will work its way through the supply chain and end customer."
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China ‘back to square one' after two days of trade talks
Talks between the US and China are 'back to square one' after two days of trade negotiations in London failed to secure a major deal. Howard Lutnick, Donald Trump's commerce secretary, said the two sides had agreed on a 'framework' to put their trading relations back on track and repair the truce initially agreed in Geneva last month. There was little market reaction to the announcement at Lancaster House shortly after midnight, with the dollar strengthening a little and stock markets opening marginally higher. The two sides have until Aug 10 to negotiate a more comprehensive agreement to ease trade tensions, or US tariffs on China will snap back from about 30pc to 145pc, with China's levies on America increasing from 10pc to 125pc. Josh Lipsky, of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center in Washington, said: 'They are back to square one but that's much better than square zero.' Jim Reid, a Deutsche Bank analyst, added: 'While the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19, when apparently constructive in-person meetings seemed to take a step back as the negotiating teams returned to their capitals. 'So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement, even though there's time to hear the full conclusions of the meeting.' Senior officials from Washington and Beijing had gathered in London after accusations from both sides that they had violated the terms of the deal made in Switzerland. Mr Trump and Xi Jinping held a call last week that Mr Lutnick said 'gave the fundamental foundation on which we were able to reach agreement'. Mr Lutnick said: 'We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus and the call between the two presidents. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. 'They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework.' In a separate briefing, Li Chenggang, China's vice commerce minister, said a trade framework had been reached in principle that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders. Mr Lutnick said China's restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US would be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement. He also said the agreement would remove some of the recent US export restrictions, but did not provide details. Kathleen Brooks, the research director at XTB, a trading platform, said: 'Overall, the US-China trade agreement is taking its time, and it could test the market's patience.' Meanwhile, the European Union reportedly believes it could extend its trade negotiations with the US beyond the initial deadline next month. The EU thinks there could be scope for further talks if it agrees a deal in principle by July 9, which is considered its best-case scenario, according to Bloomberg. The Trump administration is scheduled to enforce 50pc tariffs on EU goods beyond that date unless a deal is reached. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Inflation holds steady as data shows how prices are faring after Trump's ‘Liberation Day' tariffs
Inflation held steady last month, according to data that gives the first glimpse of how prices are faring since President Donald Trump's sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Consumer prices rose 0.1 percent on a monthly basis in May, while annual inflation stood at 2.4 percent, according to the Department of Labor's consumer price index. The report captures the period after Trump unveiled his global reciprocal tariffs in April and provides some insight as to whether businesses are bearing the brunt of the duties themselves or passing them on to customers. Analysts predicted to see a bigger increase, but some still warn the future is uncertain because tariffs keep changing. 'So far, inflation risks from higher tariffs are subdued,' Win Thin, global head of markets strategy at Brown Brothers Harriman, told Bloomberg. 'Nonetheless, US protectionist trade policy and uncertainty about the ultimate level of tariffs are downside risks to growth and upside risk to inflation. Bottom line: the fundamental USD downtrend is intact.' Since Trump announced his global reciprocal tariffs and the stock market was spooked, many of the duties were paused. However, 10 percent tariffs for most countries remain. Inflation has been slow to respond to the tariffs as most retailers are selling merchandise accumulated before the import duties took effect. Economists said that the reduction in the scale of some trade tariffs may have 'helped to restrain cost increases thus far,' Wells Fargo's Sarah House and Nicole Cervi said. 'That said, as the higher tariff regime persists, shielding consumers from the costs is likely to become more challenging,' the economists added. 'Only a few goods prices likely rose as a result of the new tariffs in May,' Pantheon Macroeconomics economists Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen said in a note, Bloomberg reports. 'June will be a different story — while some providers of discretionary services probably cut prices or kept them low to sustain demand.' Walmart warned customers last month that they could see price rises because of the trade tariffs. The retailer's chief financial officer John David Rainey said that the tariffs are 'still too high.' 'It's more than any supplier can absorb. And so I'm concerned that consumer is going to start seeing higher prices,' he said. 'You'll begin to see that, likely towards the tail end of this month, and then certainly much more in June.' Reuters contributed reporting
