Will Korea's new policy push follow Tesla, Waymo's lead in autonomous driving?
South Korea's autonomous vehicle industry is at a crossroads as the government prepares to unveil a new R&D roadmap to address regulatory challenges and embrace innovative technologies. With global competitors like Tesla and Waymo rapidly advancing, industry watchers suggest that the Korean government should adopt practical strategies to foster the growth of this key artificial intelligence innovation.
E2E becomes new trend
According to media reports on Sunday, the industry ministry plans to unveil an autonomous driving R&D roadmap later this year, aimed at overcoming the limitations of the current regulatory framework for 'rule-based or modular' self-driving technologies. The new policy is expected to adopt a hybrid approach, combining the adaptability of 'learning-based end-to-end (E2E)' technology with the safety and control advantages of rule-based modular components.
Rule-based systems determine driving maneuvers primarily through predefined rules and algorithms, guided by LiDAR equipment that delivers precise, real-time 3D mapping of the surrounding environment. But these systems face drawbacks such as high costs and poor performance in bad weather conditions. Korean regulators have prioritized these systems for their safety -- predictable and explainable vehicle operation.
In contrast, Tesla's recently unveiled robotaxi uses a camera-centric, learning-based E2E approach that directly translates visual data through a single neural network to control a vehicle, bypassing the 'perception' and 'planning' processes in the modular approach. While E2E systems excel in adaptability, as they are not limited by preprogrammed rules, they are often called 'black boxes' for their unexplainable decision processes, which complicates safety validation.
Waymo, which previously focused on the modular approach, is actively developing E2E technologies through its End-to-End Multimodal Model for Autonomous Driving project.
Limited road access, strong pushback
Hyundai Motor Group is also reportedly pursuing the E2E approach through its autonomous driving subsidiary, 42dot. However, industry insiders here call for more aggressive governmental support, as the auto giant faces hurdles in advancing these technologies in Korea due to policy limitations.
'Hyundai Motor has the capacity to develop E2E technology,' said a source familiar with the matter on condition of anonymity. 'But one of the major hurdles for companies developing autonomous driving technologies, including Hyundai Motor Group, is that there is little area available to collect enough real-world data necessary for substantial technological advancement.'
As of June, there were 42 government-designated areas for autonomous vehicles in Korea's 17 cities and provinces, and only 455 vehicles were approved for operation. Even after the designation of these sites, several local governments have either failed to operate AV services or have done so inefficiently, leading to low performance ratings.
By contrast, China is rapidly advancing in this field with dedicated highway lanes and extensive testing zones in major cities such as Beijing and Shanghai, supporting companies such as BYD in leveraging the E2E approach for autonomous driving. In the US, 38 states have authorized extensive public road testing, providing significantly larger areas for these vehicles as of last year.
'To develop and advance E2E tech like Tesla, the government needs to designate, for example, the entire Teheran-ro (in Gangnam, a 3.5-kilometer, 10-lane road) and deploy over 100 vehicles there,' the source suggested. 'To achieve Korea's goal of commercializing Level 4 self-driving technology (where vehicles can operate fully autonomously within specific areas), regulators should focus on establishing effective policy measures for the industry.'
Kim Pil-su, a car engineering professor at Daelim University, echoed that view and said, 'To spur the growth of Korea's AV industry, the government should also address and mitigate backlash from taxi and bus drivers, who view self-driving vehicles as a threat to their businesses. This pressure forces companies to conduct AV testing in less-populated areas with low demand for their vehicles, leading to inefficient data collection.'
Due to these restrictions in the domestic self-driving industry, Hyundai Motor has pushed for R&D overseas. In addition to its R&D center in Korea, 42dot has two centers in Poland and the US, and is reportedly opening two more in China and Australia.
Last year, 42dot completed its two-year autonomous shuttle service around the Cheonggyecheon stream area as part of a Seoul City pilot project. The city began the recruitment process for the next AV operators last month, after delaying the original schedule earlier this year due to low demand.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
23 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
KCCI chief suggests EU-style economic bloc between Korea, Japan
Chey Tae-won says tie-up between neighbors in AI, manufacturing could be key to weathering global economic storm Chey Tae-won, chairman of SK Group and the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, doubled down on his proposal for a Korea-Japan economic bloc that is akin to the EU, stressing that the two nations must strengthen cooperation in AI and manufacturing sectors as global economic uncertainties intensify. Envisioning a bloc that would unite the two neighbors — both grappling with stagnant domestic economies, aging population and rising global trade barriers — Chey has been advocating such a union would create a $6 trillion economic zone, making it the world's fourth-largest economy, one that would be better places to combat these shared challenges. "The question is: Is Korea okay the way it is? If not, we need to explore new options that we have never tried before," Chey told reporters during a press conference Thursday on the sidelines of the 48th KCCI summer forum held in Gyeongju, North Gyeongsang Province. 'A Korea-Japan economic bloc could be one of those options, and it can grow into a community like the EU,' he added. Chey acknowledged the proposal may meet with mixed public sentiment, but noted that many Japanese business and political leaders he met were not opposed to the idea. He met with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in May, advocating for deeper economic cooperation between the two countries. 'Japan thinks a lot more in terms of economic security and it is my understanding that Prime Minister Ishiba is also putting a lot of efforts and interest into it as well," he said. Chey pinpointed artificial intelligence and manufacturing as two critical areas where Korean and Japanese expertise could combine forces. 'To do AI well, we have to join hands with Japan and exchange data with each other,' he said, noting Korea's domestic industry, manufacturing scale and data alone are not big enough on their own. 'When Korea and Japan combine data together, we can even achieve at least some competitiveness," he said. 'There are many issues South Korea cannot resolve alone.' He believes AI could be the very key to tackle Korea's dwindling manufacturing industry. 'In this era of AI, if Korea fails to rebuild its manufacturing industry through AI, a large portion of Korea's manufacturing industry could be wiped out within a decade, he said. 'It's a grim scenario, but AI is our only hope at this point.' Chey raised alarm over China's rapid adoption of AI. "In AI, China is catching up and applying it faster than we are. Korea needs to catch up as soon as possible to stay competitive," he said. On the domestic front, Chey called for efforts to scale Korea's AI ecosystem, including the development of infrastructure, the cultivation of talent and the nurturing of a vibrant startup environment. 'What I want to ask the government is this: Create a market. We need public sector-led AI projects," he said. "Once these projects are launched, startups, mid-sized firms and large companies can all participate and make something. That's how we can increase the number of people with experience and training in AI." To that end, infrastructure is critical, he added. 'We need to make many applications for accessible AI, but more importantly, we need the infrastructure to support them, like AI data centers with GPU capacity," he added. Such resources should be publicly available for startups and SMEs to train AI models and develop practical product. Chey, who is hosting the upcoming APEC CEO Summit in October in Gyeongju, said he hoped the event would promote international cooperation not only in AI, but also in solving broader challenges such as trade issues. 'One thing I would like to see come out of APEC is a clear solution to the tariff issues,' he said but adding it would be ideal if the matter could be resolved before the summit. 'If tariff issues are resolved, it would be a strong signal that economic threats are easing. Beyond tariffs, Chey said he expressed home for new types of cooperation in AI, semiconductors, shipbuilding, steel and automobiles. Chey said he is putting all out efforts to invite many global business leaders to the upcoming meeting. "Our approach now is to ask the (leaders) who they want to meet when they come to Korea," he said. "If they believe they can meet someone important to them here, the likelihood of attendance will increase. Because ultimately, they need a clear reason to come."
Korea Herald
20 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Renowned human rights lawyer urges Korea to adopt forced labor import ban
No company is free from forced labor in global supply chain, stresses Vandenberg, founder of Human Trafficking Legal Center American human rights lawyer Martina Vandenberg has called on South Korea, an important economy in the global supply chain, to enact an import ban on goods made with forced labor during her recent visit to Seoul, saying such a measure would benefit not only exploited workers abroad but Korean workers as well. "Forced labor is ubiquitous, and it is so frequently found in global supply chains" said Vandenberg, president of Washington-based Human Trafficking Legal Center, in an interview with The Korea Herald. It is 'a feature, not a bug' in the global economic system, and 'it's systematic.' She visited Seoul earlier this month to speak at a forum on the forced labor issue, co-hosted by the National Assembly Labor Forum, the National Human Rights Commission and the Korean Bar Association. The Human Trafficking Legal Center, founded by Vandenberg, is a nonprofit that trains pro bono lawyers to seek restitution for human trafficking victims. She has trained more than 4,000 pro bono attorneys. 'At this point in the global economy, if you want a job and you're coming from a poor country, you have to buy that job,' she said. 'You pay recruitment fees, fees for medical tests, fees to travel. And when workers arrive at the job site, they discover they're not being paid the rate they were promised. Their debt back home keeps growing. They may be victims of deception, violence or even sexual violence.' "When so many workers across the globe are experiencing forced labor, we have to ask how the system is so broken," she added. She explained that many firms build layers of subcontractors — "subcontractors, and subcontractors and subcontractors" — to distance themselves from legal responsibility. 'They're trying to avoid liability, both criminal and civil.' But the real pressure, she emphasized, comes from the top. 'It's the companies in developed economies putting enormous pressure on supply chains to lower prices.' 'No company is free from this,' Vandenberg said. 'American companies are not free from this. South Korean companies are not free from this.' US import ban model To address the issue, the United States has enforced Section 307 of the Tariff Act, which prohibits the import of goods made with forced labor. Although the law has existed since 1930, it became enforceable only after loopholes were closed in 2016. 'This enforceability has had an enormous impact,' she said. 'Before, companies operated with total impunity. No one would prosecute them. No one would stop them. But now they realize someone is watching. Someone is investigating. And if their supply chain is tainted with forced labor, they may not be able to sell their goods in the US, the EU, Canada or Mexico.' Vandenberg said, 'We hope someday they won't be able to bring their goods into South Korea — when South Korea has an import ban.' 'South Korea is a very important economy, a key player in the global economy,' she added. According to a 2023 report by international human rights group Walk Free, South Korea imports up to $20 billion worth of goods each year that are at risk of being linked to forced labor. Many of these products originate from regions where Uyghur workers and others are forced into labor in the lowest tiers of global supply chains. While Korea has not yet proposed such a bill, The Korea Herald has learned that Rep. Kim Tae-seon of the ruling Democratic Party is preparing to introduce legislation following a series of public discussions. Import bans, she noted, do more than protect workers abroad. 'They also protect workers at home. There's no way a Korean or American worker can compete with someone earning almost nothing. A US steelworker, who testified in a hearing before the Senate Finance Committee several years ago, said 'There's no way I can compete with someone held in slavery.' So US and South Korean workers can't compete when other workers aren't being paid." Vandenberg suggested that import bans can be incorporated into bilateral trade agreements. Canada and Mexico, for example, adopted import bans as part of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, negotiated under the Trump administration in 2020. 'It's a very good way for countries to negotiate with the US — agree to adopt import bans and reach mutually beneficial trade deals,' she said. Korean sea salt under scrutiny The US has already taken action against a Korean company. In April, US Customs and Border Protection issued a withhold release order against products from Taepyung Salt Farm, one of Korea's largest sea salt producers, citing evidence of forced labor. The action followed a 2022 petition from Korean civic groups urging a ban on Korean sea salt allegedly produced under forced labor conditions. According to Vandenberg, the action against the Korean company is highly unusual. 'It's one of only three issued this year -- alongside actions against frankincense from Somaliland and seafood from a Chinese fishing vessel, Zhen Fa 7, which had Indonesian fishers onboard.' 'We don't believe any withhold release order should be modified or revoked until there is proof that workers have been compensated and that conditions have changed,' she said. 'The whole point is not just to block goods — but to change the reality for workers on the ground.' She added, 'There's still a long way to go. It will take attention and effort from the company and Korean authorities before any modification or revocation would be justified.' shinjh@
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Lee's special envoy delivers letter to Modi, pledges deeper Korea–India ties
President Lee Jae-myung's special envoy to India delivered his personal letter to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, reaffirming the South Korean leader's commitment to deepening the special strategic partnership between Seoul and New Delhi. Lee's special delegation to India, led by former Prime Minister Kim Boo-kyum, met with Modi as well as key figures from the Indian government and parliament on Thursday and Friday in New Delhi, the Foreign Ministry in Seoul said Friday. 'The special delegation paid a courtesy visit to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, personally delivering a letter from President (Lee) containing his message on strengthening Korea–India relations,' the Foreign Ministry in Seoul said. The delegation also 'expressed the firm commitment at the leadership level to advancing the Korea–India Special Strategic Partnership, which marks its 10th anniversary this year.' India is one of the few countries with which South Korea has established a 'special strategic partnership,' alongside Indonesia, the United Arab Emirates, and Uzbekistan. In response, Modi expressed his hope that President Lee would visit India, the Foreign Ministry in Seoul said. Lee and Modi held summit talks in Canada on the sidelines of the Group of Seven or G7 summit in mid-June, less than two weeks after Lee's inauguration. During the meeting, Lee's special delegation also 'called for India's special attention and support for the South Korean government's efforts to achieve substantive progress toward resolving the North Korean nuclear issue and establishing peace on the Korean Peninsula.' Lee's delegation also 'expressed hope that the two countries would continue to strengthen strategic cooperation in areas such as the defense industry and key technologies,' the Foreign Ministry in Seoul said. In return, Modi 'expressed strong interest in cooperation with Korea, particularly in the shipbuilding sector, where Korea leads the world,' underscoring that 'now is the ideal time for Korean companies to enter the Indian market, given India's rapid and stable development,' the ministry added. The Korean special delegation asked Prime Minister Modi for India's continued support for Korean companies operating in the country. Modi responded that India would do its utmost to resolve the challenges faced by Korean businesses, according to the Foreign Ministry in Seoul. During their trip to New Delhi, the delegation also held a luncheon meeting with Periasamy Kumaran, joint secretary at India's Ministry of External Affairs, on Thursday. On the same day, they met with Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar. On Friday, the delegation met with Om Birla, Speaker of the Lok Sabha. President Lee this week dispatched special envoys to several countries—including India, the European Union, France, and the United Kingdom—as part of the first batch of diplomatic missions abroad since his inauguration on June 4.
