
Taxpayers urged to check HMRC deadline to avoid fines
The warning is particularly relevant for those who pay tax through the self-assessment system.
Read more: Children First seeks 'vital' safeguarders to champion children's rights
Many self-assessment taxpayers will have already made a first payment on account in January when settling their 2023/24 tax bill.
However, a second instalment – known as a "payment on account" – is also due at the end of July.
These payments are based on the previous year's tax bill and are designed to spread the cost more evenly throughout the year.
Missing the deadline can result in financial penalties, which increase depending on the amount owed and the length of the delay.
Taxpayers are advised to log in to their HMRC online account to check their self-assessment statement and confirm whether a payment is due.
If they expect their tax bill for 2024/25 to be lower than the previous year, they can request a reduction in the payment on account through HMRC's online services or by post.
Andrew Bartlett, chief executive of Advice Direct Scotland, said: "Paying a tax bill is a long way from most people's minds during the height of the summer, which is why it is so easy to miss this particular HMRC deadline.
"However, late payment fines will start to accrue if you forget about it, so make sure you log in to your online account now and check if you need to act.
"If your situation has changed and you think you will be liable to pay less tax than previously, make sure to ask for a reduction, which will keep the money in your pocket."
Advice Direct Scotland operates a free tax helpline and website – taxadvice. scot – supported by HMRC to help taxpayers understand their obligations.
The service offers guidance on various topics, including self-assessment, PAYE, National Insurance, pensions, inheritance tax, capital gains tax, marriage allowance, child benefit, and tax credits.
Those who need help can call a specialist adviser on 0800 756 3381.
Mr Bartlett said: "If you find the whole thing confusing, don't worry – the taxadvice.scot team is here to help Scots with self-assessment queries, completely free of charge.
"The service is backed by HMRC and provides an alternative to calling them directly."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
9 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Women nearing retirement to get £5,000 a year less in private pension income than men, experts warn
Four in ten workers are under-saving for their golden years PENSION INEQUALITY Women nearing retirement to get £5,000 a year less in private pension income than men, experts warn Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WOMEN nearing retirement can expect to get £5,000 a year less in private pension income than men, experts say. Fresh analysis shows they will typically receive around £100 per week compared to a little over £200 a week for blokes. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 People deserve to know they'll have a decent income in retirement — but the truth is that is not the reality facing many, said Liz Kendall The greater likelihood of a history of part-time jobs and caring responsibilities may contribute to women getting less. Resulting lower National Insurance contributions could also curtail their state pension. The introduction of automatic pension enrolment from 2012 has helped women and men, the experts insist. But retirees in 2050 are predicted to have £800 — eight per cent — less private pension income than those today. Meanwhile, four in ten workers — nearly 15million — are under-saving for their golden years, with low earners and the self-employed hit the hardest, research shows. The Government will today revive the Pension Commission to address the findings. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'People deserve to know they'll have a decent income in retirement — but the truth is that is not the reality facing many. 'The Pensions Commission laid the groundwork, and now, two decades later, we are reviving it to tackle the barriers that stop too many saving in the first place.' The British Chambers of Commerce said that any costs to businesses on top of National Insurance contributions and the Employment Rights Bill would have to be 'gradual'. And they must be paused if economic conditions worsen, giving businesses time to adjust to increased costs, it added. Rain Newton-Smith, director-general of the Confederation of British Industry, said there must be a consensus in business, Government and society that the system is affordable for employers and workers. Pension expert on how to retire early- Scotish Widows


Times
10 minutes ago
- Times
Bar, café and retail jobs are society's heartbeat
W hen a government starts expressing reverence for 'working people', run for the hills. Or at least check your savings, start economising and look around for a side hustle. Last October, accompanied by Sir Keir Starmer's rhetoric about 'the dignity of work and of every worker', the chancellor's budget embraced a pig-headed manifesto commitment not to touch individual pay packets in a way that would be noticed. It stealthily froze tax thresholds, raised capital gains and hammered family farms — right on top of a disastrous harvest year — but refused to nudge up even slightly the national insurance element that everyone on PAYE sees in their payslip. It was all on employers instead. This was, frankly, a cosmetic political decision, blowing a kiss to workers and a raspberry to paymasters. But the effect was that while avoiding ripples which might rock little boats it caused a tsunami of lost opportunities. Sure, voters would have grumbled at personal NI rises, maybe reduced consumer spending a bit, but they would soon have got used to the new level. Particularly if chances were visibly burgeoning for everyone in a growing economy.

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Labour Governments at London and Cardiff are at odds
Nothing is worse than when families continue to bicker and lie to each other. This time Wales' public services will not face cuts despite a shortfall in covering a rise in employers' National Insurance contributions, according to Labour's Welsh secretary. Jo Stevens' comments appear to contradict the Welsh Government's finance secretary, Mark Drakeford, who previously warned he was facing a £36m black hole. Who can the people of Wales believe, with one blaming the other to save his job and the other defending Starmer? Many thanks Andrew Nutt, Bargoed