logo
Judge temporarily blocks MNPS from removing LEAD Cameron as zoned middle school

Judge temporarily blocks MNPS from removing LEAD Cameron as zoned middle school

Yahoo15-02-2025

A judge granted a temporary injunction on behalf of charter school network LEAD Public Schools on Friday, blocking a move by Metro Nashville Public Schools to remove a LEAD campus as a zoned neighborhood school.
LEAD filed suit against MNPS in December, arguing that a decision to remove LEAD Cameron Middle School as the default zoned school in its cluster constituted a breach of contract. The suit also argued that the move to zone students to another traditional middle school in the area would crater both its enrollment and funding and could ultimately force LEAD Cameron to close.
The suit said the move would cause "extreme irreparable harm" to the school and the community around it, and asked the court to block the district's decision.
LEAD is a network of public charter schools that operates five campuses in Nashville, including LEAD Cameron, which is located in the Glencliff neighborhood. The school serves a large population of students of color and students who are economically disadvantaged.
Lawsuit: Nashville school rezoning will cause 'irreparable harm' to LEAD Cameron Middle
The temporary injunction granted Friday means LEAD Cameron will remain a zoned middle school for the 2025-26 school year. The case is still pending, and a final decision will be made once it concludes.
"This decision protects the stability of our LEAD Cameron community and ensures that our students can continue to thrive in the supportive and high-quality learning environment they deserve," LEAD said in an emailed statement issued Friday.
Metro Director of Law Wally Dietz also issued a statement following the ruling.
"We respectfully disagree with the ruling and are evaluating next steps," he said in an email.
The suit, filed in Davidson County Chancery Court, states that a 2021 agreement between LEAD and MNPS designates LEAD Cameron as a zoned school, meaning students who wish to attend public school are automatically enrolled there, unless they opt out to attend a magnet or choice school.
The partnership between LEAD and the district, which began in 2010, was the first of its kind. At present, LEAD Cameron is the only public charter that also functions as a zoned public school. Charter schools are are typically governed by a nonprofit and given more autonomy in how they operate.
Parents could still opt into attending LEAD Cameron if it is ultimately removed as a zoned option.
Reach children's reporter Rachel Wegner at RAwegner@tennessean.com or follow her on Bluesky @RachelAnnWegner.
This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Nashville schools: Removal of LEAD Cameron from zoned schools blocked

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X
Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X

Mark Cuban criticized Bluesky for becoming an echo chamber, warning it was driving some users away. Engagement on Bluesky has plunged since February, with far fewer daily unique users. Cuban questioned BlueSky's future, citing vanishing nuance and an absence of some topics. In a series of Bluesky posts, the billionaire investor and entrepreneur criticized the platform for fostering an echo chamber that he said was driving users away and inadvertently boosting traffic back to Elon Musk 's X. "The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage," Cuban wrote, linking to a Washington Post opinion piece headlined "BlueSky's decline stems from never hearing from the other side." Once known for "great give-and-take discussions on politics and news," Cuban said Bluesky had become a monoculture where dissent was unwelcome and nuance was vanishing. "Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to 'agree with me or you are a Nazi fascist,'" he posted. A graph of Bluesky's unique daily posters supports his concern. On February 28, Bluesky had more than 1 million unique users daily. Since then, engagement has plummeted, with June 7 and 8 hovering well below that peak at about 670,000 daily posters. The Musk factor BlueSky's rise accelerated following the election of President Donald Trump, whom CEO Musk backed financially, and after X introduced new terms of service. Many X users migrated to Bluesky, with some 2.5 million joining in one week in November. Some were seeking a friendlier, more open platform with less hate speech and misinformation, and more control over what content is shown in their feeds. A startup, BlueArk, even sprang up to help users migrate their X/Twitter histories to Bluesky, porting over millions of posts and creating the illusion of continuity on a new platform. At the time, Cuban told Business Insider he preferred Bluesky over alternatives due to its variety of content and growing engagement. Now, some of the earliest and most visible converts, including Cuban, are questioning whether the migration created a new community, or just repackaged the same silos. "Why would anyone stop using Twitter if the only topic that is acceptable to you is news and politics?" he asked. Cuban also criticized the platform's culture, saying: "The replies on here may not be as racist as Twitter, but they damn sure are hateful." Posts about AI, business, or healthcare — traditionally strong areas for Cuban — often gain little traction or were met with outright hostility, he added.

Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X
Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

Mark Cuban says Bluesky's echo chamber is hurting engagement — and boosting Elon Musk's X

Mark Cuban is sounding the alarm on Bluesky's declining engagement — and he's not pulling his punches. In a series of Bluesky posts, the billionaire investor and entrepreneur criticized the platform for fostering an echo chamber that he said was driving users away and inadvertently boosting traffic back to Elon Musk 's X. "The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage," Cuban wrote, linking to a Washington Post opinion piece headlined "BlueSky's decline stems from never hearing from the other side." Once known for "great give-and-take discussions on politics and news," Cuban said Bluesky had become a monoculture where dissent was unwelcome and nuance was vanishing. "Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to 'agree with me or you are a Nazi fascist,'" he posted. A graph of Bluesky's unique daily posters supports his concern. On February 28, Bluesky had more than 1 million unique users daily. Since then, engagement has plummeted, with June 7 and 8 hovering well below that peak at about 670,000 daily posters. The Musk factor BlueSky's rise accelerated following the election of President Donald Trump, whom CEO Musk backed financially, and after X introduced new terms of service. Many X users migrated to Bluesky, with some 2.5 million joining in one week in November. Some were seeking a friendlier, more open platform with less hate speech and misinformation, and more control over what content is shown in their feeds. A startup, BlueArk, even sprang up to help users migrate their X/Twitter histories to Bluesky, porting over millions of posts and creating the illusion of continuity on a new platform. At the time, Cuban told Business Insider he preferred Bluesky over alternatives due to its variety of content and growing engagement. Now, some of the earliest and most visible converts, including Cuban, are questioning whether the migration created a new community, or just repackaged the same silos. "Why would anyone stop using Twitter if the only topic that is acceptable to you is news and politics?" he asked. Cuban also criticized the platform's culture, saying: "The replies on here may not be as racist as Twitter, but they damn sure are hateful." Posts about AI, business, or healthcare — traditionally strong areas for Cuban — often gain little traction or were met with outright hostility, he added.

Did FIFA move 2026 World Cup matches outside US due to concerns over Trump's immigration policies?
Did FIFA move 2026 World Cup matches outside US due to concerns over Trump's immigration policies?

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Did FIFA move 2026 World Cup matches outside US due to concerns over Trump's immigration policies?

In June 2025, TikTok users claimed FIFA, the international soccer governing body, decided to relocate scheduled U.S.-hosted 2026 World Cup matches to Mexico or Canada — countries that are already hosting some matches. According to social media users' posts and videos, this consideration followed FIFA receiving thousands of complaints from players, coaches and fans who refused to travel to the U.S. due to concerns over stringent immigration policies imposed by President Donald Trump's administration. For example, in early June, a TikTok user published a video (archived) announcing FIFA decided to no longer allow the U.S. to host World Cup matches in 2026. The clip received over 1.5 million views. The clip's narrator recounted the story as follows: FIFA has decided to hold the World Cup in 2026, and it will not be held in the United States. FIFA has decided to take away the United States' qualification as the host country of the cup, and the responsibility directly lies with President Trump. The organization is facing a major mechanical problem after thousands of players, coaches and fans announced that they would not travel to this country, which is due to the policy. Trump's crazy immigration has generated fear, tension and negative reactions at the international level. Athletes and delegation members are afraid of being arrested. Or even with valid visas, fans all over the world consider the United States an unsafe place. For a major event like the World Cup, the situation is so serious that several countries have announced that they will boycott the event. If it is still held in the United States, it will be a direct blow to the spirit of football unity. This is why FIFA has already taken action. The official move of the competition to Mexico and Canada offers safer and more popular conditions for both players and fans. The United States was originally the main contractor and thus lost the world's largest sports event. All of this was due to the political crisis caused by Trump's policies. Leave your comments and share this news. Other users also shared this rumor on Bluesky (archived), Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived), TikTok (archived) and X (archived). However, searches of Bing, DuckDuckGo, Google and Yahoo, as well as The Associated Press, CNN, Fox News and The Washington Post, found no credible reporting about FIFA seriously considering relocating U.S.-hosted World Cup matches outside the U.S., at least not as of this writing in early June 2025. Rather, this matter marked the latest chapter of users sharing false or unfounded rumors, including some posts featuring the use of artificial-intelligence (AI) tools. Snopes contacted FIFA's media relations representatives to inquire about the rumor's accuracy and will update this article with more information as it becomes available. The aforementioned lookups of search engines located some relevant news regarding Trump's policies and the 2026 World Cup, though again no reports confirmed the central claim about FIFA deciding to move U.S.-hosted games to Canada or Mexico. For example, in March, FIFA President Gianni Infantino met with Trump at the White House, with FIFA reporting Trump reaffirmed support for the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup and 2026 World Cup tournaments. On April 25, The Associated Press reported U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, a member of the Democratic Party in Oregon, asked the Trump administration to reconsider policies impacting travelers arriving in the U.S., including citing upcoming sporting events like the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. In early May, NBC News reported members of Trump's Cabinet warned World Cup visitors to the U.S. not to overstay their visas. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem also cast the tournament as "an opportunity for the world to become a friendlier place," adding, "We will take care of their documentation and travel documents, and it will go smoothly. And we will make sure that they can come and enjoy and bring their families and friends and make memories together." On May 13, Politico (archived) reported the details of a letter (archived) the Human Rights Watch organization addressed to Infantino. The letter cited Human Rights Watch's "grave concerns" about Trump's immigration policies, and urged Infantino to be "prepared to reconsider the hosting decision" if the safety of fans and players couldn't be guaranteed. Other reports told of concerns about long visa appointment wait times, as well as European countries issuing travel advisories for the U.S. Two days later, on May 15, Reuters (archived) reported Infantino reassured that "the world is welcome in America," referencing the 2025 and 2026 tournaments. Trump's travel ban, which targets 12 countries and adds restrictions on others, includes exceptions for "any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics or other major sporting event as determined by the Secretary of State." For further reading, a previous fact check examined the time Budweiser deleted a social media post around the time of an announcement concerning the 2022 World Cup in Qatar. Associated Press News: Breaking News | Latest News Today. Baio, Ariana. "Fears That Trump Reforms Could Keep World Cup 2026 Fans out of the US." The Independent, 31 Jan. 2025, Boykoff, Jules, and Dave Zirin. "With ICE Out of Control, How Can the US Cohost the 2026 World Cup?" The Nation, 31 Mar. 2025, "Breaking News, Latest News and Videos." CNN, Cai, Sophia, et al. "Trump Ramps up Plans for 2026 World Cup amid Friction with Neighbors: 'Tensions Are a Good Thing.'" Politico, 8 May 2025, Cooper, Jonathan J. "Trump Will Lead Task Force Preparing for 2026 World Cup." The Associated Press, 7 Mar. 2025, "DuckDuckGo - Protection. Privacy. Peace of Mind." DuckDuckGo, Dunbar, Graham. "What the Trump Travel Ban Means for the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympic Games." The Associated Press, 5 June 2025, "Find out When a TikTok Was Posted with This Free Tool." Trevor Fox, Fox News - Breaking News Updates | Latest News Headlines | Photos & News Video. Google. Leira, Javier. "US Will Welcome International Fans for World Cup, Says FIFA President." Reuters, 15 May 2025, "Letter to FIFA Re. Human Rights Responsibilities in 2026 World Cup." Human Rights Watch, 6 May 2025, Microsoft Bing. Peterson, Anne M. "Wyden Asks Trump Administration Officials to Reconsider Travel Policies Ahead of the World Cup." The Associated Press, 25 Apr. 2025, "Restricting The Entry of Foreign Nationals to Protect the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats." The White House, 4 June 2025, Tabet, Alex. "Trump's Cabinet Members Warn FIFA World Cup Visitors Not to Overstay Their Visas." NBC News, 6 May 2025, The Washington Post. "US President Donald Trump Reaffirms Support for FIFA Tournaments during Meeting with Gianni Infantino." Inside FIFA, 7 Mar. 2025, "View the FIFA World Cup 26TM Match Schedule." FIFA, Walker, Ali. "Top Human Rights Group Challenges FIFA over Trump and 2026 World Cup." POLITICO, 13 May 2025, Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store