Agents take Rs 1 lakh for rental car licences, says Vijai
GFP MLA Vijai Sardesai on Saturday alleged that agents have been collecting Rs 1 lakh for rent-a-cab licences, which is then passed to transport minister Mauvin Godinho's personal assistant.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
He said the sudden halt on rent-a-cab licences is a govt move to pre-empt scam revelations in the House.
'The department has appointed agents in Margao, Panaji, and Vasco, and they are taking Rs 1 lakh in cash from each applicant. They are now refusing to return the money,' said Sardesai.
'One agent from Margao has taken money from 250 to 300 people... that is Rs 3 crore. Some vehicles have arrived and owners are paying premiums, but they have not received the letter from the transport department, so they can't get their cars. The agents claim that some money was given to the minister, and the minister says he is going to make a movie on Ram Mandir,' said Sardesai.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
17 minutes ago
- United News of India
SC slams Allahabad HC for making film producer pay Rs 25 Lakh before Mediation in cheating FIR, quashes case
New Delhi, Jul 19 (UNI) The Supreme Court has strongly criticised the Allahabad High Court for directing film producer Shailesh Kumar Singh to pay Rs 25 lakh to a complainant as a precondition for referring a cheating FIR dispute to mediation, despite it being a purely civil matter. A Bench comprising Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan quashed the FIR registered against Singh, co-founder and production head of Karma Media and Entertainment LLP, calling the High Court's approach 'disturbing' and contrary to settled law on quashing criminal proceedings. 'We are quite disturbed by the manner in which the High Court has passed the impugned order. The High Court first directed the appellant to pay Rs 25 lakh to the complainant and thereafter directed him to appear before the Mediation Centre. That's not what is expected of a High Court… What is expected is to look into the allegations in the FIR along with the material on record,' the Bench observed. The FIR, filed on January 9, 2025 at Hariparwat Police Station in Agra, alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 60(b), 316(2), and 318(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The complainant, a promoter of Polaroid Media engaged in financing media projects, accused Singh of cheating in connection with an oral business agreement between their companies. Singh approached the High Court seeking quashing of the FIR, arguing that it was a civil commercial dispute being given a criminal colour. However, the High Court on March 7 directed him to pay Rs 25 lakh to the complainant, appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, and pay Rs 5,000 as mediation fees, while restraining his arrest conditionally. The Supreme Court noted that the High Court failed to examine whether the FIR disclosed any criminal offence and instead turned the proceedings into a recovery mechanism. 'How many times the High Courts are to be reminded that to constitute an offence of cheating, there has to be something more than prima facie on record to indicate that the intention of the accused was to cheat the complainant right from the inception,' the Court said. The Bench emphasised that even if Singh owed money under the oral agreement, it did not amount to cheating unless there was fraudulent intent from the beginning. It held that the FIR was an abuse of the criminal process and quashed it, clarifying that the complainant remained free to pursue recovery proceedings in an appropriate civil forum. 'We fail to understand why the High Court should undertake such exercise. The High Court may either allow the petition saying no offence is disclosed, or reject it if a case is made out. Why should the High Court make an attempt to help the complainant recover the amount due and payable by the accused,' the Court remarked. Advocate Sana Raees Khan appeared for Singh, Advocate Anand Mishra represented the complainant, and Advocate Shaurya Krishna appeared for the State of Uttar Pradesh. UNI SNG RN
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Situation of many schools in state is deplorable: Satheesan
Kochi: Opposition leader VD Satheesan hit out at the govt on Saturday saying the situation of many schools across the state was deplorable. The condition of Thevalakkara school is particularly poor, according to the child rights commission, he said at a news conference in Kochi. Everyone is responsible for this condition, he said. "Govt needs to take the initiative to improve the poor state of schools. That's why opposition sent a letter to govt. An audit was initiated to check the safety of all schools in Paravur constituency. A questionnaire with 30 questions was prepared for this purpose," Satheesan said. "The audit will cover the safety of buildings and boundary walls, trees, kitchen hygiene and measures to prevent food poisoning. After receiving the audit report, various agencies, including govt, will be tasked with implementing necessary actions. Such tragic incidents should not happen again," he added. "It is not correct for a minister to say that the child should not have climbed up, which was the cause of the accident. Govt must take steps to prevent such incidents in future," he said. "Departments should not be blaming each other as everyone has the responsibility. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Govt's decision to resolve the strike at Kerala University is not being criticised. Opposition was the first to demand that the issues be resolved," Satheesan said. "It is the children who are caught in the conflict between govt and governor. Instead of discussing and resolving minor issues, a situation has been created where no one can enter universities in Kerala," Satheesan alleged. "If the protest was against the governor, why were universities shut down and staff and students beaten?" he asked. Satheesan expressed confidence of UDF coming back to power with over 100 seats. He said Rs 742 crores collected by govt for the poor in Wayanad was not being used. "Despite receiving such a large amount, no houses were built for the poor in Wayanad, no rent was provided, no assistance for the treatment of those with serious illnesses and no help for children's education was given," he alleged. MSID:: 122784113 413 |
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Love jihad' threat to nation's integrity, says court, gives man 7-yr jail sentence
Representative photo A Yamunanagar court has sentenced a man to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for sexually assaulting and intimidating a minor Hindu girl to coerce her into a relationship with a Muslim juvenile, terming the case one of 'love jihad'. The court also imposed a fine of Rs 1 lakh on the convict and said such acts were 'a potential threat' to the nation's sovereignty and integrity. While acknowledging that 'love jihad' is not a legal term under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita or the Pocso Act , the court described it as a 'purported campaign by Muslim men to convert non-Muslim women to Islam by pretending to be in love.' In Nov last year, a 14-yearold girl filed a complaint at City Yamunanagar police station, naming Shahbaj and a juvenile. She alleged the boy had stalked her on her way to school while Shahbaj pressured her to befriend him. The FIR invoked sections 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) and 351(2) (criminal intimidation) of BNS, and sections 17 (abetment), 8 (sexual assault) and 12 (sexual harassment of a child) under Pocso. The defence counsel, SS Nehra, argued that the accused was falsely implicated. However, additional sessions judge Ranjana Aggarwal, in her July 17 order, said Shahbaj systematically tried to force an interfaith relationship through 'allurement and inducement.' The court awarded him four years under Pocso Section 8, two years under Section 12, and one year under BNS Section 351(2), with fines totalling Rs 1 lakh. All sentences will run consecutively
