PM: Tories have questions to answer over Afghan data breach and superinjunction
Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a scheme set up after the breach which was kept secret as the result of a superinjunction imposed in 2023 which was only lifted on Tuesday.
At Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir said: 'We warned in opposition about Conservative management of this policy and yesterday, the Defence Secretary set out the full extent of the failings that we inherited: a major data breach, a superinjunction, a secret route that has already cost hundreds of millions of pounds.
'Ministers who served under the party opposite have serious questions to answer about how this was ever allowed to happen.'
He suggested the Conservatives should 'welcome' scrutiny from the Commons Defence Committee.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said: 'This episode raises significant constitutional issues.'
Downing Street later declined to say what questions former ministers should face but said Sir Keir was 'angry' about the breach.
Sir Keir's press secretary said: 'The Prime Minister is angry at such a terrible breach that had such grave consequences being allowed to happen.
'Which is why it's clear that there are questions that need to be answered by Conservative ministers who, in their own words, have talked about the ineptitude of the Conservative government at the time.'
She also pointed to comments from former veterans minister Johnny Mercer, who described the handling of the breach as 'farcical' and 'the most hapless display of incompetence by successive ministers and officials that I saw in my time in government'.
Tory former defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace said he makes 'no apology' for applying for the initial injunction and insisted it was 'not a cover-up' but was motivated by the need to protect people in Afghanistan whose safety was at risk.
The key facts on the Afghan Resettlement data incident that took place in 2022, and the action we are taking to support those impacted.
Defence Minister @LukePollard explains 👇 pic.twitter.com/DY3SbBSmgp
— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) July 16, 2025
A dataset of 18,714 who applied for the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (Arap) was released in February 2022 by a defence official who emailed a file outside authorised government systems.
The Ministry of Defence only became aware of the blunder when excerpts from the dataset were posted anonymously on a Facebook group in August 2023, and a superinjunction was granted at the High Court in an attempt to prevent the Taliban from finding out about the leak.
Then defence secretary Sir Ben said he had applied for a four-month standard injunction shortly before leaving office but on September 1 2023, when Grant Shapps took the role, the Government was given a superinjunction.
Sir Ben said he did now know why the superinjunction was granted 'but nevertheless, I think the point here is I took a decision that the most important priority was to protect those people who could have been or were exposed by this data leak in Afghanistan, living amongst the Taliban who had no regard for their safety, or indeed potentially could torture them or murder them', he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
He also defended his actions in an article in the Telegraph.
'I make no apology for applying to the court for an injunction at the time. It was not, as some are childishly trying to claim, a cover-up,' he said.
The leak led to the creation of a secret Afghan relocation scheme – the Afghanistan Response Route – in April 2024.
The scheme is understood to have cost around £400 million so far, with a projected final cost of about £850 million.
A total of around 6,900 people are expected to be relocated by the end of the scheme.
The official responsible for the email error was moved to a new role but not sacked.
Defence Secretary John Healey said he was not going to 'lead a witch hunt after a defence official'.
'This is much bigger than the mistake of an individual,' he told the BBC.
The superinjunction was in place for almost two years, covering Labour and Conservative governments.
Kemi Badenoch has said sorry on behalf of the Conservatives for the leak.
'On behalf of the government and on behalf of the British people, yes, because somebody made a terrible mistake and names were put out there… and we are sorry for that,' she told LBC.
Between 80,000 and 100,000 people, including the estimated number of family members of the Arap applicants, were affected by the breach and could be at risk of harassment, torture or death if the Taliban obtained their data, judges said in June 2024.
However, an independent review, commissioned by the Government in January 2025, concluded last month that the dataset is 'unlikely to significantly shift Taliban understanding of individuals who may be of interest to them'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
It will take decades to unpick Starmer's ludicrous ‘deals'
If Donald Trump practices the art of the deal, Keir Starmer gets closer to the art of the steal. Unfortunately, though, it's everyone else that is stealing from us, and not the other way around. As soon as Labour got in I could see the writing was on the wall. Desperate to curry favour with the unions, Starmer sent his ministers out to solve the unrest in the public sector. He sanctioned Wes Streeting to hand over a 22 per cent pay rise to the junior doctors. Labour boasted that they'd fixed the problem in the NHS and everything would now flourish. This week those same doctors will go out on strike because the government can't give them any more. Next came the train drivers. After paralysing the country for months they accepted 15 per cent to return to a normal timetable. The Secretary of State for Transport Louise Haigh, who later had to resign over a fraud conviction, paid the money with no conditions. As a result the train drivers continue to milk the system, work four days a week and enjoy hopelessly arcane practices. Then we come to the international negotiations. Sadly Starmer has fared no better than his Cabinet. Let's consider the Chagos Islands. When Labour got into power it wasn't entirely clear whether Mauritius actually wanted them. And with much huffing and puffing from Nigel Farage - who was covertly suggesting that he would get Donald Trump to veto any deal - it looked for all the world that the fire sale would never happen. But thanks to Tony Blair's diplomat in chief Jonathan Powell and the Attorney General Lord Hermer a deal was struck. The bad news is that we are face paying the thick end of around £56 billion over the next several years. Hardly a bargain. As I said at the time on my show, it's like paying someone £25,000 to take away your 35 year old banger that needs lots of work and an MOT. Next up it was the French. Before the rather ludicrous summit this month in London where Starmer got into full love-in mode with Emanuel Macron, he had already sold off our fishing rights to the French in return for a completely nebulous promise that the gendarmerie of Normandy might try a bit harder to stop illegal migrants from clambering onto some small boats. £771 million pounds later, they're still coming. And now they're being handed free life jackets too. Quite a ridiculously low return for our investment. Since the summit Starmer's negotiations skills have gone into overdrive. Thanks to his interventions it now looks like we will be paying vast sums into the coffers of the European Union in order to harmonise our food standards and to equalise our carbon markets. And we haven't even got to our trade deals yet. The one with Europe certainly looks like one way traffic with the UK as the supplicant in the relationship. We pay, they play seems to be the mantra for the Foreign Office. India meanwhile appears to be the beneficiary of a spectacular deal to open businesses in the UK which will be given special treatment when it comes to levels of income tax and national insurance. Indian citizens will be enabled to come to Britain and work on a temporary basis and be better off than their British counterparts. And it isn't clear, as with most deals with this Labour government, exactly what we are getting in return. Then we turn to the USA. Forget the cringeworthy moment of Starmer producing a letter from King Charles in the Oval Office out of his breast pocket, and instead focus on what has actually happened since the deal was done - much more recently than Labour would have you believe. We have bought around £1 billion of military jets from America, but we are still subject to tariffs on steel, on cars and on a host of other exports that didn't used to pay them. It's a no win situation for the UK because walking into a room with a begging bowl isn't going to impress Donald Trump. He's taken the Prime Minister for a very long and costly ride. This week an increasingly irrelevant and nervous looking PM entertained the leaders of Germany and the Czech Republic. He signed the Kensington Treaty with the former and a memorandum of understanding with the latter. All nonsense of course. If you were a betting man, or woman, in a casino you'd always bet against Two Tier Keir. He loses at the tables every time.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Dining across the divide: ‘He talked about cancel culture going too far – Gregg Wallace came up'
Occupation Sustainability lead in the construction industry Voting record Labour in the last election, but feels more aligned with the Green party Amuse bouche Ben was a Pampers baby model. 'I think my mum was paid for it, and got a healthy supply of nappies' Occupation Retired from a career in aviation Voting record Conservative in the last election. Previously either Conservative or Lib Dem Amuse bouche Neil likes to write, and has a computer full of unfinished novels. 'I'm good at beginnings, middles and ends, but I can't make any match' Neil I was expecting a rabid Marxist, but my first impressions of Ben were that he was a really charming chap, and so he proved to be. He's married with four children. I'm also married with four children, but I also have grandchildren. I had crispy squid with a mango, chilli and lime salsa to begin with, then a lemon sole. Ben We were both wearing tan chinos and a blue shirt. We were a guarded to begin with, sounding each other out. I also had the calamari, then a sea bass with new potatoes and a white creamy sauce. The food was phenomenal. Neil Woke is a word I struggle to use. We need to get back to the old 'sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me'. You shouldn't go around saying stuff that is clearly offensive, or not true, and, if someone does, you've got every right to say, 'Don't speak to me like that', but don't completely rip them apart. Ben I think young people are far more aware of their mental health, of the impact of trauma, of wanting to be able to live their lives in a certain way. For me, that's what we mean when we talk about woke culture, and it's a positive thing. I think Neil feels it has all gone too far, and he talked about cancel culture. Gregg Wallace came up. Neil If it was just for saying something a bit stupid, which I'm sure we've all done, Gregg shouldn't have lost his livelihood. It should have been: look, Gregg, you're being an idiot, don't say stuff like that, it's not appropriate. And that's it, walk away. But some parts of the media have ripped him apart. If it transpires he's done something worse, any physical contact, that's a different story – then you're on your own, mate. Ben I agree that you have to be really careful with cancel culture. I'm also OK accepting apologies from people. I do, however, believe there are people in the public domain who need to be able to stand up and be counted. If someone has been found to have made inappropriate sexual comments, then absolutely I don't think that person should be working in that industry or sector again. Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Neil I've never voted Labour, but in my view Tony Blair was the best Conservative prime minister we've had in decades! Starmer's heart's in the right place, but he could do with exhibiting a little bit more charisma. Come on, Keir, a little bit more pizzazz. Ben I grew up in a very Tory household, and became more progressive. I do agree with sensible conservative values, but I haven't ever seen those in place. I'm not a staunch Labour voter, either; I'm a tactical voter. Neil Three of my grandchildren live in Cornwall, and in the next 10 years they may be looking to buy somewhere. I wouldn't like to think they'll be priced out by people with second homes, but by the same token I'm not going to deny the right of somebody to do what they want with their money. An act of government that says you can only ever own one home wouldn't be appropriate; it's like a tax on being wealthy, and there are other taxes on being wealthy. Ben I am quite happy with a local authority saying we don't have enough housing for people, so we're going to ban Airbnb, or double the council tax on them, or whatever. Their job is to make sure local people can thrive. Ben Social media algorithms pitch people against each other. Sitting down with someone, having a discussion, is a very human way of being able to resolve some challenges. Neil It was a case of good old-fashioned British compromise. We weren't shouty – no shaking of fists or banging the drum like you might see from our colleagues across the Atlantic. Ben gave me a lift home. Charming chap. Additional reporting: Kitty Drake Ben and Neil ate at The Wimborne Pig in Dorset Want to meet someone from across the divide? Find out how to take part
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Trump says he will help Afghans stuck in the UAE
WASHINGTON, July 20 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said on Sunday he would help Afghans detained in the United Arab Emirates for years after fleeing their country when its Taliban leaders extended control over it. Trump, a Republican who has criticized high levels of immigration, suspended refugee resettlement after he took office in January. In April, the Trump administration terminated temporary deportation protections for thousands of Afghans in the U.S. "I will try to save them, starting right now," Trump said in a post on Truth Social that linked to an article on the Afghans held in limbo there. The UAE, a close security partner of the United States, agreed in 2021 to temporarily house several thousand Afghans evacuated from Kabul as the Taliban ousted the U.S.-backed government during the final stages of the U.S.-led withdrawal. Canada agreed in 2022 to resettle about 1,000 of the Afghans still held in the UAE after a U.S. request. It is unclear how many remain in the Gulf country. Nearly 200,000 Afghans have been brought to the U.S. by former President Joe Biden's administration since the chaotic U.S. troop withdrawal from Kabul. Refugees include family members of Afghan-American U.S. military personnel, children cleared to reunite with their parents, relatives of Afghans already admitted and tens of thousands of Afghans who worked for the U.S. government during the 20-year war.
