logo
Inside unhappy Germany's unsettling lurch to the right

Inside unhappy Germany's unsettling lurch to the right

Families are making the most of the summer when I arrive in the German city of Erfurt, where wooden houses and shops line narrow streets that lead to open parks and squares. Friends are catching up to shop, drink and dine near a river that gurgles beneath an old stone bridge.
If Germany needs more tourists, it only has to issue a picture of Erfurt to sell more flights. The food is good, the beer even better. This town, halfway from Frankfurt to Berlin, has all the outward signs of happiness – especially when I visit at the height of summer and talk to locals over drinks. But I'm visiting to learn about the shadows beneath the sunshine.
Like other parts of Germany, this community is turning further to the right.
Fed up with the dominant political parties, many voters are shifting their support to new leaders who have been labelled extreme – and even called Nazis. One party in particular, the Alternative fur Deutschland, or AfD, was once dismissed as a fringe group. Now it is on centre stage.
'It's devastating,' says Klara Verdachtsfall, 27, a student. She admits the personal toll from the election results earlier this year that continued the rise of the AfD, a party she is desperate to stop. She joins thousands of others at protests as part of a group called Auf die Platz, a phrase that means 'on your marks' when runners are about to start a race. In Germany, this political race is deadly serious.
'Whenever we get word of a right-wing demonstration that's being planned, we've been protesting,' she says. 'We set up a demonstration to counter it, to always show people that the city is not for right-wing extremists, it's for all of us.'
Voters swung hard to the right in this district at the national election in February.
The AfD gained 26.9 per cent of the vote – up from 16.3 per cent four years ago. It did even better in the neighbouring districts: 40.4 per cent in Eisenach; 40.6 per cent in Gotha. The party, formed only a dozen years ago, is giving voice to real anger in the community.
'Wages have not been rising, and the cost of living has significantly increased,' says Verdachtsfall. 'We are seeing tougher times. The AfD is very good at offering extremely easy solutions for situations that are very long-running, very complex and not as easy to be answered, which many people find appealing.'
This is not only happening in Germany. Others have growing parties that appeal to the right – think Nigel Farage and Reform in the UK, or Marine Le Pen and her National Rally in France. But nowhere experiences this like Germany, a country traumatised by two catastrophic wartime defeats, the echoes of Adolf Hitler and decades of communist rule that divided east and west.
Now the big question for Germany, and for Europe, is whether this shift to the right is only a passing reaction from a sullen electorate or a sign of things to come.
While its critics despise the AFD, it is winning hearts and minds with its platform. It opposes 'woke' gender politics, wants to quit the Paris Agreement on climate change, vows to exit the euro currency, and is in favour of better relations with Russia despite the war in Ukraine.
Most importantly, it is adamantly against the 3.3 million asylum seekers who now call Germany home after waves of migration over the past decade – including Muslims who arrived after the collapse of Syria. The AfD's federal leader, Alice Weidel, wants migrants deported. 'I have to be honest with you: if it's going to be called remigration, then that's what it's going to be: remigration,' she said in January.
Tesla founder Elon Musk is a fan. So is US Vice President JD Vance, who met Weidel in January and declared this week that Europe was at risk of 'civilisational suicide' by failing to control its borders.
The power of the protest vote
The two parties that dominated German politics for generations, the Social Democratic Party (SPD) on the left and the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) on the right, have been put on notice. While CDU leader Friedrich Merz became chancellor in February, he had to rely on the SPD. At state level in Erfurt, the CDU also governs in coalition with the SPD. But the single biggest party in the state parliament of Thuringia, the Landtag, is not one of the old ones. It is the AfD.
'For some, the AfD is a channel to voice their protest,' says Antonios Souris, the chair of German Politics at the Free University of Berlin.
'There are some voters who vote for the AfD despite its positions and candidates, and there are others who vote for them because of its positions and candidates.
'All around the globe, the far-right vote is driven by nativism: the idea that 'non-native' people, ideas, and customs are a danger to the nation state, which needs to be homogeneous.'
Karl Arzheimer, University of Mainz
'However, protest voting is rather economically motivated – although cultural issues are pretty present in the media. East Germany became a stronghold of the AfD due to the economic deprivation of some of its regions and then, recently, the wide perception of becoming poorer following inflation.'
The German economy shrank by 0.1 per cent in the June quarter, the country's statistics office reported on Wednesday. The minimum wage, at €12.82 per hour – about $23 – is one of the highest in Europe, and it is rising. But the unemployment rate is stubbornly high, at 6.3 per cent, and almost 3 million people are out of work.
Kai Arzheimer, the professor of politics at the University of Mainz, says Germany is going through a political earthquake – and that migration and cultural issues have more power than economics alone.
'Resistance to immigration and multiculturalism and more specifically Islamophobia is really the driving force behind the AfD's success,' he says. 'The common theme is resistance to social, political, and cultural change. But immigration remains the most important issue for their voters.
Loading
'All around the globe, the far-right vote is driven by nativism: the idea that 'non-native' people, ideas, and customs are a danger to the nation state, which needs to be homogeneous.
'Nativism is not confined to the far right, but what really sets them apart is their disdain for the liberal elements of democracy: minority protections, free media, and independent judiciary, checks and balances, rules and procedures. This authoritarian streak appeals to their voters, or at least does not put them off.'
'Security in difficult times'
I came to Erfurt to talk to people about what happens next. The city shares a key factor with others that have turned to the right: the sense that it has been left behind. An old brick building here, a former Stasi headquarters that once held 5000 political prisoners, is a reminder that Erfurt was part of East Germany. It is wealthier than other cities of the former German Democratic Republic, but families still have lower incomes than those in the west.
'I'm a child of the GDR,' says Pascal Franz. Born in Erfurt in 1989, the year the Berlin Wall came down, he can see the disappointment of people who feel betrayed by unification. He lists the problems he sees around him: greater inequality, global warming, environmental pollution and the impact of the war in Ukraine. He believes the pandemic eroded trust in politics, the result of unpopular decisions on quarantine and health.
'People look for security in difficult times, and the reflex for many is to pursue conservative values,' he says. 'And the AfD is skilfully using social media to appeal to younger people in particular.'
Henryk Balkow, 44, was raised in a village near Erfurt with the promise that everyone would gain an equal share of the nation's wealth – the GDR lie that crumbled with the Wall. Even now, he says, the anxiety about inequality is part of the unease that gives rise to the right: 'People are very sensitive when they have that feeling that somebody is getting a little bit more than me.'
Loading
Migrants have become the target, he says, because they have brought so much change. In one example, he says, a village near Erfurt with 500 residents learned at short notice that an old army barracks would be used to house 150 refugees. Neither group spoke English; each struggled to understand the other. He says the village was one of the first to shift to the AfD.
Balkow hopes the AfD implodes. 'There is a core in the AfD which is not just conservative – they are Nazis, just extreme Nazis. But there are a lot of politicians in the AfD who are opportunists. A lot of them were in another party before, and the AfD ticket was just like a fast lane to success for only a little bit of work.'
Those inside the AfD – the very people called 'extremist' – believe this trend is not about extremism at all. They say they are succeeding because the major parties have failed so badly.
'The AfD addresses problems that are burning on many people's minds and we offer solutions for them,' says Wiebke Muhsal, who represents a state district east of Erfurt.
'Yes, citizens want a restriction on immigration, but this is also tied to their sense of justice. It is unjust that elderly people can no longer live off their pensions, parents have to work harder and harder to feed their children, while at the same time our country is being de-industrialised and tax money is being distributed abroad or to foreigners.'
Like other AfD politicians, Muhsal knows how to provoke. She wore a niqab in state parliament in 2016 to call for it to be banned, one year before One Nation leader Pauline Hanson did the same in the Australian Senate. There was an outcry, but it did not deter voters. The AfD gained 11 seats in the Landtag in 2014, the year Muhsal was elected, and it doubled to 22 seats in 2019. It rose again to 32 seats at the state election last year.
'By labelling us as right-wing extremists, the established parties and the media try to silence us or ensure that no one listens to us,' she tells me by email.
'After all, who would talk to an extremist!? This shows above all that the others have no arguments to counter us, only their propaganda.'
To fight at the ballot box, or in the courts?
Germany now faces an agonising question – is it repeating the 1930s? Journalists are usually loath to draw parallels with that decade, but my visit to Erfurt tells me there is no taboo in mentioning the rise of Hitler and the ruins of the Weimar Republic. The critics of the AfD are open about the way Hitler gained support through democratic means before replacing the republic with the Third Reich.
Loading
The AfD leader in Thuringia, Björn Höcke, has shown in the past that he is not held back by sensitivities about history.
He has criticised the Holocaust memorial in Berlin and deplored the way Germany remembers the crimes of the past. He was fined last year for using a key phrase that used to be heard at Nazi rallies: 'Everything for Germany'.
Arzheimer, the professor of politics at the University of Mainz, says there are 'Weimar vibes' in the way the dominant parties are now barely able to form a government. And he says it is wrong to regard the AfD as mainstream or conservative.
'They shifted from a softly Eurosceptic platform to a radical right platform around 10 years ago but did not stop there,' he says. 'The party is dominated by a faction that openly embraces volkisch nationalism, a hyper-nationalist, racist ideology that predates Nazism. Their MPs employ members of right-wing extremist organisations in considerable numbers.'
He points to another development: a decision by the German domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, to label the party a 'confirmed right-wing extremist' group. The AfD is appealing this decision, made in May, but the classification has not been withdrawn.
'This is not some fringe group,' says Arzheimer. 'Given its substantial electoral support and the resources that come with it, the AfD is a danger for democracy in Germany.' His conclusion? The Federal Constitutional Court would probably ban the party if the government or parliament chose to trigger this formal process. For now, there is no sign they will do so.
None of this is apparent when I walk the streets of Erfurt during a glorious summer. Germany remains a powerful and prosperous country. It is not alone in Europe in feeling the shift of an unhappy electorate. Here, however, the past casts a longer shadow.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australian Race Discrimination Commissioner calls out festering hatred
Australian Race Discrimination Commissioner calls out festering hatred

The Australian

time8 hours ago

  • The Australian

Australian Race Discrimination Commissioner calls out festering hatred

Skilled migrants are hitting barriers in every aspect of their lives in Australia, the Race Discrimination Commissioner says. Speaking in Canberra on Wednesday, Giridharan Sivaraman said systemic and structural racism was limiting Australia's economic output and quality of life. 'Structural racism goes beyond racist slurs or harassment, though these are harmful enough,' he said at the National Press Club. 'Just as sexism isn't just about individual men treating women badly, racism isn't just about personal prejudice. It's the way our laws, policies, institutions, and entrenched norms consistently produce worse outcomes for people based on their race.' Efforts to address systemic racism could follow other anti-discrimination reform, Mr Sivaraman said. Giridharan Sivaraman says there are clear steps which can be taken to address systemic racism in Australia. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman 'When employers could fire women for falling pregnant, we didn't just shrug and accept it,' Mr Sivaraman said. 'Women, unions and allies advocated and we changed the law … That sense of justice you felt when fighting for equality, for what's right – that's exactly what we must supply to structural racism.' Mr Sivaraman's speech traversed the ongoing racism and dehumanisation felt by First Nations people, the difficulties migrants faced settling into modern Australia, and the effects of the war in Gaza on communities here. 'The war in Gaza has triggered a terrifying surge of anti-Semitism, anti-Palestinian racism, anti-Arab racism and Islamophobic hate,' he said. 'Mentioning those different forms of racism doesn't mean equating them. Mentioning one doesn't invalidate another.' The Race Discrimination Commissioner's speech touched on broad facets of Australian society, including racism, sexism, multiculturalism and identity. Picture: NewsWire / Glenn Campbell Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim Australians were dehumanised by the Israeli-caused devastation in Gaza, he said. 'When the massacre of 1200 Jews and Israelis by Hamas on October 7 is not acknowledged, it dehumanises them. By extension, Jewish and Israeli Australians,' Mr Sivaraman said. International conflicts affected Australians for varying reasons, he said. 'Of course we don't want conflict here, but we can't distance ourselves from the inhumanity that occurs, wherever it is occurring, overseas,' Mr Sivaraman said. Communities here were deeply impacted by what was happening overseas in many different ways, he said. 'Sometimes it's because their families, friends and relatives have been killed or hurt,' Mr Sivaraman said. 'Or it's because they can identify with the people that are being killed or hurt.' Mr Sivaraman told an anecdote of a couple who moved to Australia on skilled migrant visas but whose qualifications were not recognised and their workplace interactions were layered in idioms. These skilled migrants were forced to take jobs that did not make full use of their skills, there was nowhere for them to pray, and they were shut out from advancing up the hierarchy into leadership positions. In November, the Australian Human Rights Commission released a National Anti-Racism Framework. The road map has 63 recommendations across the legal, justice, health, education, media and arts sectors. 'We are talking about solutions that actually benefit everyone. They benefit everyone in terms of the general happiness and wellbeing of the society,' Mr Sivaraman said. 'They will benefit in terms of the economic impacts.' Mr Sivaraman called on Prime Minster Anthony Albanese to publicly support, and fund, the recommendations. Blair Jackson Reporter Blair's journalism career has taken him from Perth, to New Zealand, Queensland and now Melbourne. Blair Jackson

After years of backsliding, the ADF is growing again. What's behind the recruitment uptick?
After years of backsliding, the ADF is growing again. What's behind the recruitment uptick?

The Advertiser

time11 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

After years of backsliding, the ADF is growing again. What's behind the recruitment uptick?

The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has been facing a recruitment crisis for years. A lack of young people wanting to join has prompted a variety of responses from the force, including opening eligibility to some foreigners. Given talk of chronic shortages and a perennial recruitment crisis in Western volunteer forces, it's somewhat surprising to see there's finally been some progress. Recruitment has risen by 17 per cent over last year's figure. This exceeds planned growth and reverses a steady decline over the past 15 years, albeit still falls around 1000 people short of the financial year target of 8105. Applications were also up by a whopping 28 per cent. So what has changed to explain this turnaround? In order to maintain it and be better prepared for the security challenges Australia faces, we need to know what's behind it. In short, the recruitment drive is working. We were commissioned by the ADF to examine declining recruitment. As of June last year, only 80 per cent of the 69,000 personnel needed to meet future challenges had signed up. We wanted to know why. Some of reasons are cultural: young Australians today - those in Gen Z - have more circumspect attitudes to nation and duty compared to previous generations. They also face greater mental health challenges that - rightly or wrongly - make many feel unsuited to serve their country. Economic factors play a role too. Low unemployment and a perception of better opportunities, work conditions and future prospects in the private sector also contribute. We can make sense of the Australian figures by eliminating some possible explanations. The first is the idea that international conflict is driving recruitment. Looking at comparable countries with volunteer defence forces, it turns out Australia is not alone in rising interest in military careers. This year, the United States army met its target of recruiting 61,000 troops annually several months early. The German Bundeswehr reported a year-on-year recruitment uptick of 28 per cent in late July. In the United Kingdom, there was a 19 per cent rise in people joining the regular armed forces. And Canada's defence forces have just seen a 10-year high in recruitment, up by a staggering 55 per cent. So are people joining the armed forces in response to geopolitical issues? Not necessarily. For many young Germans, for example, the Ukraine war is deeply and personally affecting. Yet there is no evidence it's responsible for increased sign-ups. Our own security challenges - such as China's growing international assertiveness - are therefore not likely to be a driver here. Alternatively, we can look closer to home to see what's behind the recruitment boost. Typically, military service is a steady gig in bad economic times. But price rises have been largely reined in, unemployment remains relatively low and consumer confidence has improved. Economic factors are unlikely to explain what is going on. One possibility is young people's attitudes. The US Army has singled out renewed patriotism among youth as a reason. This is not likely to be the case in Australia. If anything, there are indications to the contrary. Former army chief Peter Leary blamed poor recruitment and retention on falling national pride. It's also unlikely fundamental values such as nationalism can change quickly enough to explain the sudden recruitment boost. It also could be that the image of the military has improved. We have had two high-profile commissions: the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide and the Brereton Afghanistan Inquiry. It is conceivable these softened the ADF's reputation in the direction of Gen Z, signalling strong ethics and transparency. A recent survey from UNSW researchers, however, suggests that while these perceptions matter, there is limited awareness of the commissions and the issues that caused them. Military recruitment depends on the employer as much as on the employee. Has the ADF done something to make service more attractive? It seems it has. One example is mental and physical fitness standards. Commentators have argued mental health concerns can stop young people signing up. And stringent requirements mean less than 10 per cent of applicants are accepted. The ADF lowered medical requirements in 2024. This included requirements around acne, outed as "stupid" by Defence Personnel Minister Matt Keogh. This made sense as military roles are becoming more diverse. With fewer soldiers on the front line, there's less need for high-level mental and physical stamina. Another suggestion was to make the ADF more competitive in the "war for talent" in an increasingly fierce labour market. This too has been done: better pay, study, housing and health support are all part of a A$600 million government package. These measures also explain why, as more new soldiers were recruited, fewer existing ones quit: attrition fell from about 10 per cent down to 7.9 per cent. There were more measures, such as improving the processing of applications, and allowing citizens of New Zealand, Canada, the US and the UK to apply. According to Keogh, this generated some 500 extra applications. He also suggested the biggest driver was embedding ADF recruitment adverts into the media frequented by the target group of 16-25 year olds: TikTok and video games. What does all this tell us? As none of the underlying reasons why young Australians serve have changed since last year, it seems the ADF's recruitment initiative has hit the mark. The range of measures - targeted advertising, better pay and conditions, or eligibility criteria - make it hard to tell which did the work. It may be a combination of all of them. But as of July 1, the full-time ADF workforce was at 61,189 people. Given the force's target is 69,000 by the 2030s, there's some work still left to do. The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has been facing a recruitment crisis for years. A lack of young people wanting to join has prompted a variety of responses from the force, including opening eligibility to some foreigners. Given talk of chronic shortages and a perennial recruitment crisis in Western volunteer forces, it's somewhat surprising to see there's finally been some progress. Recruitment has risen by 17 per cent over last year's figure. This exceeds planned growth and reverses a steady decline over the past 15 years, albeit still falls around 1000 people short of the financial year target of 8105. Applications were also up by a whopping 28 per cent. So what has changed to explain this turnaround? In order to maintain it and be better prepared for the security challenges Australia faces, we need to know what's behind it. In short, the recruitment drive is working. We were commissioned by the ADF to examine declining recruitment. As of June last year, only 80 per cent of the 69,000 personnel needed to meet future challenges had signed up. We wanted to know why. Some of reasons are cultural: young Australians today - those in Gen Z - have more circumspect attitudes to nation and duty compared to previous generations. They also face greater mental health challenges that - rightly or wrongly - make many feel unsuited to serve their country. Economic factors play a role too. Low unemployment and a perception of better opportunities, work conditions and future prospects in the private sector also contribute. We can make sense of the Australian figures by eliminating some possible explanations. The first is the idea that international conflict is driving recruitment. Looking at comparable countries with volunteer defence forces, it turns out Australia is not alone in rising interest in military careers. This year, the United States army met its target of recruiting 61,000 troops annually several months early. The German Bundeswehr reported a year-on-year recruitment uptick of 28 per cent in late July. In the United Kingdom, there was a 19 per cent rise in people joining the regular armed forces. And Canada's defence forces have just seen a 10-year high in recruitment, up by a staggering 55 per cent. So are people joining the armed forces in response to geopolitical issues? Not necessarily. For many young Germans, for example, the Ukraine war is deeply and personally affecting. Yet there is no evidence it's responsible for increased sign-ups. Our own security challenges - such as China's growing international assertiveness - are therefore not likely to be a driver here. Alternatively, we can look closer to home to see what's behind the recruitment boost. Typically, military service is a steady gig in bad economic times. But price rises have been largely reined in, unemployment remains relatively low and consumer confidence has improved. Economic factors are unlikely to explain what is going on. One possibility is young people's attitudes. The US Army has singled out renewed patriotism among youth as a reason. This is not likely to be the case in Australia. If anything, there are indications to the contrary. Former army chief Peter Leary blamed poor recruitment and retention on falling national pride. It's also unlikely fundamental values such as nationalism can change quickly enough to explain the sudden recruitment boost. It also could be that the image of the military has improved. We have had two high-profile commissions: the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide and the Brereton Afghanistan Inquiry. It is conceivable these softened the ADF's reputation in the direction of Gen Z, signalling strong ethics and transparency. A recent survey from UNSW researchers, however, suggests that while these perceptions matter, there is limited awareness of the commissions and the issues that caused them. Military recruitment depends on the employer as much as on the employee. Has the ADF done something to make service more attractive? It seems it has. One example is mental and physical fitness standards. Commentators have argued mental health concerns can stop young people signing up. And stringent requirements mean less than 10 per cent of applicants are accepted. The ADF lowered medical requirements in 2024. This included requirements around acne, outed as "stupid" by Defence Personnel Minister Matt Keogh. This made sense as military roles are becoming more diverse. With fewer soldiers on the front line, there's less need for high-level mental and physical stamina. Another suggestion was to make the ADF more competitive in the "war for talent" in an increasingly fierce labour market. This too has been done: better pay, study, housing and health support are all part of a A$600 million government package. These measures also explain why, as more new soldiers were recruited, fewer existing ones quit: attrition fell from about 10 per cent down to 7.9 per cent. There were more measures, such as improving the processing of applications, and allowing citizens of New Zealand, Canada, the US and the UK to apply. According to Keogh, this generated some 500 extra applications. He also suggested the biggest driver was embedding ADF recruitment adverts into the media frequented by the target group of 16-25 year olds: TikTok and video games. What does all this tell us? As none of the underlying reasons why young Australians serve have changed since last year, it seems the ADF's recruitment initiative has hit the mark. The range of measures - targeted advertising, better pay and conditions, or eligibility criteria - make it hard to tell which did the work. It may be a combination of all of them. But as of July 1, the full-time ADF workforce was at 61,189 people. Given the force's target is 69,000 by the 2030s, there's some work still left to do. The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has been facing a recruitment crisis for years. A lack of young people wanting to join has prompted a variety of responses from the force, including opening eligibility to some foreigners. Given talk of chronic shortages and a perennial recruitment crisis in Western volunteer forces, it's somewhat surprising to see there's finally been some progress. Recruitment has risen by 17 per cent over last year's figure. This exceeds planned growth and reverses a steady decline over the past 15 years, albeit still falls around 1000 people short of the financial year target of 8105. Applications were also up by a whopping 28 per cent. So what has changed to explain this turnaround? In order to maintain it and be better prepared for the security challenges Australia faces, we need to know what's behind it. In short, the recruitment drive is working. We were commissioned by the ADF to examine declining recruitment. As of June last year, only 80 per cent of the 69,000 personnel needed to meet future challenges had signed up. We wanted to know why. Some of reasons are cultural: young Australians today - those in Gen Z - have more circumspect attitudes to nation and duty compared to previous generations. They also face greater mental health challenges that - rightly or wrongly - make many feel unsuited to serve their country. Economic factors play a role too. Low unemployment and a perception of better opportunities, work conditions and future prospects in the private sector also contribute. We can make sense of the Australian figures by eliminating some possible explanations. The first is the idea that international conflict is driving recruitment. Looking at comparable countries with volunteer defence forces, it turns out Australia is not alone in rising interest in military careers. This year, the United States army met its target of recruiting 61,000 troops annually several months early. The German Bundeswehr reported a year-on-year recruitment uptick of 28 per cent in late July. In the United Kingdom, there was a 19 per cent rise in people joining the regular armed forces. And Canada's defence forces have just seen a 10-year high in recruitment, up by a staggering 55 per cent. So are people joining the armed forces in response to geopolitical issues? Not necessarily. For many young Germans, for example, the Ukraine war is deeply and personally affecting. Yet there is no evidence it's responsible for increased sign-ups. Our own security challenges - such as China's growing international assertiveness - are therefore not likely to be a driver here. Alternatively, we can look closer to home to see what's behind the recruitment boost. Typically, military service is a steady gig in bad economic times. But price rises have been largely reined in, unemployment remains relatively low and consumer confidence has improved. Economic factors are unlikely to explain what is going on. One possibility is young people's attitudes. The US Army has singled out renewed patriotism among youth as a reason. This is not likely to be the case in Australia. If anything, there are indications to the contrary. Former army chief Peter Leary blamed poor recruitment and retention on falling national pride. It's also unlikely fundamental values such as nationalism can change quickly enough to explain the sudden recruitment boost. It also could be that the image of the military has improved. We have had two high-profile commissions: the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide and the Brereton Afghanistan Inquiry. It is conceivable these softened the ADF's reputation in the direction of Gen Z, signalling strong ethics and transparency. A recent survey from UNSW researchers, however, suggests that while these perceptions matter, there is limited awareness of the commissions and the issues that caused them. Military recruitment depends on the employer as much as on the employee. Has the ADF done something to make service more attractive? It seems it has. One example is mental and physical fitness standards. Commentators have argued mental health concerns can stop young people signing up. And stringent requirements mean less than 10 per cent of applicants are accepted. The ADF lowered medical requirements in 2024. This included requirements around acne, outed as "stupid" by Defence Personnel Minister Matt Keogh. This made sense as military roles are becoming more diverse. With fewer soldiers on the front line, there's less need for high-level mental and physical stamina. Another suggestion was to make the ADF more competitive in the "war for talent" in an increasingly fierce labour market. This too has been done: better pay, study, housing and health support are all part of a A$600 million government package. These measures also explain why, as more new soldiers were recruited, fewer existing ones quit: attrition fell from about 10 per cent down to 7.9 per cent. There were more measures, such as improving the processing of applications, and allowing citizens of New Zealand, Canada, the US and the UK to apply. According to Keogh, this generated some 500 extra applications. He also suggested the biggest driver was embedding ADF recruitment adverts into the media frequented by the target group of 16-25 year olds: TikTok and video games. What does all this tell us? As none of the underlying reasons why young Australians serve have changed since last year, it seems the ADF's recruitment initiative has hit the mark. The range of measures - targeted advertising, better pay and conditions, or eligibility criteria - make it hard to tell which did the work. It may be a combination of all of them. But as of July 1, the full-time ADF workforce was at 61,189 people. Given the force's target is 69,000 by the 2030s, there's some work still left to do. The Australian Defence Force (ADF) has been facing a recruitment crisis for years. A lack of young people wanting to join has prompted a variety of responses from the force, including opening eligibility to some foreigners. Given talk of chronic shortages and a perennial recruitment crisis in Western volunteer forces, it's somewhat surprising to see there's finally been some progress. Recruitment has risen by 17 per cent over last year's figure. This exceeds planned growth and reverses a steady decline over the past 15 years, albeit still falls around 1000 people short of the financial year target of 8105. Applications were also up by a whopping 28 per cent. So what has changed to explain this turnaround? In order to maintain it and be better prepared for the security challenges Australia faces, we need to know what's behind it. In short, the recruitment drive is working. We were commissioned by the ADF to examine declining recruitment. As of June last year, only 80 per cent of the 69,000 personnel needed to meet future challenges had signed up. We wanted to know why. Some of reasons are cultural: young Australians today - those in Gen Z - have more circumspect attitudes to nation and duty compared to previous generations. They also face greater mental health challenges that - rightly or wrongly - make many feel unsuited to serve their country. Economic factors play a role too. Low unemployment and a perception of better opportunities, work conditions and future prospects in the private sector also contribute. We can make sense of the Australian figures by eliminating some possible explanations. The first is the idea that international conflict is driving recruitment. Looking at comparable countries with volunteer defence forces, it turns out Australia is not alone in rising interest in military careers. This year, the United States army met its target of recruiting 61,000 troops annually several months early. The German Bundeswehr reported a year-on-year recruitment uptick of 28 per cent in late July. In the United Kingdom, there was a 19 per cent rise in people joining the regular armed forces. And Canada's defence forces have just seen a 10-year high in recruitment, up by a staggering 55 per cent. So are people joining the armed forces in response to geopolitical issues? Not necessarily. For many young Germans, for example, the Ukraine war is deeply and personally affecting. Yet there is no evidence it's responsible for increased sign-ups. Our own security challenges - such as China's growing international assertiveness - are therefore not likely to be a driver here. Alternatively, we can look closer to home to see what's behind the recruitment boost. Typically, military service is a steady gig in bad economic times. But price rises have been largely reined in, unemployment remains relatively low and consumer confidence has improved. Economic factors are unlikely to explain what is going on. One possibility is young people's attitudes. The US Army has singled out renewed patriotism among youth as a reason. This is not likely to be the case in Australia. If anything, there are indications to the contrary. Former army chief Peter Leary blamed poor recruitment and retention on falling national pride. It's also unlikely fundamental values such as nationalism can change quickly enough to explain the sudden recruitment boost. It also could be that the image of the military has improved. We have had two high-profile commissions: the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide and the Brereton Afghanistan Inquiry. It is conceivable these softened the ADF's reputation in the direction of Gen Z, signalling strong ethics and transparency. A recent survey from UNSW researchers, however, suggests that while these perceptions matter, there is limited awareness of the commissions and the issues that caused them. Military recruitment depends on the employer as much as on the employee. Has the ADF done something to make service more attractive? It seems it has. One example is mental and physical fitness standards. Commentators have argued mental health concerns can stop young people signing up. And stringent requirements mean less than 10 per cent of applicants are accepted. The ADF lowered medical requirements in 2024. This included requirements around acne, outed as "stupid" by Defence Personnel Minister Matt Keogh. This made sense as military roles are becoming more diverse. With fewer soldiers on the front line, there's less need for high-level mental and physical stamina. Another suggestion was to make the ADF more competitive in the "war for talent" in an increasingly fierce labour market. This too has been done: better pay, study, housing and health support are all part of a A$600 million government package. These measures also explain why, as more new soldiers were recruited, fewer existing ones quit: attrition fell from about 10 per cent down to 7.9 per cent. There were more measures, such as improving the processing of applications, and allowing citizens of New Zealand, Canada, the US and the UK to apply. According to Keogh, this generated some 500 extra applications. He also suggested the biggest driver was embedding ADF recruitment adverts into the media frequented by the target group of 16-25 year olds: TikTok and video games. What does all this tell us? As none of the underlying reasons why young Australians serve have changed since last year, it seems the ADF's recruitment initiative has hit the mark. The range of measures - targeted advertising, better pay and conditions, or eligibility criteria - make it hard to tell which did the work. It may be a combination of all of them. But as of July 1, the full-time ADF workforce was at 61,189 people. Given the force's target is 69,000 by the 2030s, there's some work still left to do.

‘Destroyed my life': Vladimir Putin's ‘secret daughter' slams him in cryptic post
‘Destroyed my life': Vladimir Putin's ‘secret daughter' slams him in cryptic post

Herald Sun

timea day ago

  • Herald Sun

‘Destroyed my life': Vladimir Putin's ‘secret daughter' slams him in cryptic post

Don't miss out on the headlines from Leaders. Followed categories will be added to My News. Russian President Vladimir Putin's alleged secret daughter has spoken out against her father in a cryptic post, condemning the man who 'destroyed' her and 'took millions of lives'. Elizaveta Krivonogikh, a 22-year-old art school graduate living in Paris who is believed to be the leader's youngest daughter, shared the messages on her private Telegram, in line with her increasing openness on Instagram as she's started to share more images of herself, The New York Post reported. 'It's liberating to be able to show my face to the world again,' she wrote, according to German magazine Bild. 'It reminds me of who I am and who destroyed my life.' The Telegram chat, named 'Art of Luiza', references her work pseudonym Luiza Rozova. Ms Krivonogikh didn't explicitly name Putin in either post, but has also never shot down the popular theories surrounding her true parentage. The budding artist was born in 2003 after a suspected affair between Putin and her mother, Svetlana, the President's then-housekeeper. The bombshell was first revealed after a 2020 investigation by Russian media outlet Proekt, citing Ms Krivonogikh's 'phenomenal resemblance' to Putin. He isn't listed on her birth certificate, but 'Vladimirovna' was included, translating to 'daughter of Vladimir'. In 2021, slain journalist and Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny exposed Ms Krivonogikh's Instagram, which showcased her life of luxury and her family's staggering wealth that many have attributed to their connection with the country's pesident. While Ms Krivonogikh originally celebrated life in the spotlight, she retreated after Russia invaded Ukraine in 2021 and her Instagram was suddenly shut down. She's since returned to the platform, but was more reserved in her posting at first, hiding her face in many photos. She's now seemingly changed her tune – and swapped sides on the devastating war after previously mourning her inability to 'make an extra lap around my beloved St Petersburg'. Ms Krivonogikh has since denounced her previous lifestyle of obscene wealth, speaking openly against her alleged father's actions in Ukraine. She also works in a Parisian art gallery that specialises in anti-war works. Ms Krivonogikh also adopted an extra pseudonym, Elizaveta Rudnova, inspired by Putin's late ally Oleg Rudnov – a cheeky stab at her elusive parentage. Still, critics of Putin haven't quite bought her reshaped image and insist that she shouldn't be working in a space where she could be interacting with Ukrainians, regardless of her stance. 'Am I really responsible for the activities of my family, who can't even hear me?' Ms Krivonogikh wrote. Putin is also rumoured to share two secret sons, a 10-year-old and a six-year-old, with his former gymnast lover and Olympic gold medallist Alina Kabaeva. This article originally appeared on The New York Post and was reproduced with permission Originally published as 'Destroyed my life': Vladimir Putin's 'secret daughter' slams him in cryptic post

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store