Cleverly hits out at populist ‘fantasy' amid London mayor bid speculation
Sir James also declined to explicitly rule out a bid for City Hall or another run for the party leadership as he was questioned about his political future following his defeat in the contest to replace Rishi Sunak last year.
But he said he had 'reconciled' himself with the result of the 2024 Tory leadership race and said the party should stop 'cycling through leaders'.
Appearing at the Institute For Public Policy Research (IPPR) think tank on Tuesday, the senior backbencher called for greater accountability in politics by reducing the 'cloud of quangos' in the system.
Sir James said the 'go-to excuse for populist politicians' is to pretend 'difficult choices and trade-offs don't exist' and attack the Civil Service.
'I have lost count of the number of political gurus who said we should smash the system and start again from scratch,' he told the audience.
'Tempting though that may be, it is totally unrealistic, because all we need to do to deliver that is mobilise the alternative, anti-woke, right-wing civil service that's waiting in the wings to take things over when the Civil Service that we currently have is got rid of.
'Simple. It's also a fantasy. It's a complete nonsense. It's excuse-making, and it's weak.'
Instead, he said further action was needed to tackle the 'tangle of quangos, commissioners, panels advisory bodies, all making decisions, almost none of whom have been voted for, and none of whom can be voted out.'
Delighted to welcome @JamesCleverly to @IPPR – he is arguing for more honesty and more accountability in politics. https://t.co/tZuKPDA5GC pic.twitter.com/z4Z0T8ApqU
— Harry Quilter-Pinner (@harry_qp) July 15, 2025
He warned a 'disconnect between decision-making and accountability' introduces 'moral hazard' and 'erodes the very institutions upon which we rely'.
In a Q&A following the speech, the former Cabinet minister insisted he had 'reconciled' himself to his defeat at the leadership election and would not 'jump' into his next career move as he faced questions about his future.
Asked whether he was eyeing a bid for London mayor, another run for the Tory leadership or planning to remain on the back benches, he said: 'I like being in government.
'I don't like being in opposition, which is why I'm clear that I will play my part in helping to get Conservatives back into government, at every level of government.
'Exactly what I do next? I've forced a discipline on myself which is not to jump at something.
'I ran for leader. I didn't get it. I reconciled myself to that and I promised myself that I would spend some time thinking about exactly what I would do next.
'I know everyone will write into that 'Cleverly refuses to discount dot dot dot' – nothing I can do about that, you're going to write what you're going to write.
'But the simple fact of the matter is, I am focused on what I've always focused on, which is getting a Conservative government at every level to serve the British people, and that's my mission.'
He sought to strike an optimistic note about the future of the Conservative Party as it flounders in the polls, arguing it is 'the oldest and most successful political movement in human history' because 'we adapt, we evolve, we fight back'.
Sir James acknowledged opinion poll momentum for Reform posed a challenge for the Tories, but insisted Nigel Farage's party faced its own dilemma in seeking to be both 'new' and 'a repository for disgruntled former Conservatives'.
The rise of Reform is not unique to the UK, @JamesCleverly tells @harry_qp.
"'Smash the system' is an excuse, it's an easy way of ducking the problem" he says. pic.twitter.com/me59ht1guh
— IPPR (@IPPR) July 15, 2025
The senior Tory said: 'If their sales pitch is 'we're not like the old political parties', but they are mainly populated with people from my party, it's going to be really hard for them to reconcile that sales pitch.'
He hit out at former party members defecting to Reform, adding: 'I don't think it's smart. I don't think it's right.
'I think people lose credibility, particularly with people who have… very, very recently (stood as Conservatives) who then basically say 'the thing that made me realise I wasn't really a Tory was being booted out of office by the electorate'.'
Reflecting on his Tory leadership bid and whether he still harboured ambitions for the top job, he said: 'We have got to get out of this habit of cycling through leaders in the hope that ditching this one and picking a new one will make life easy for us.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Brits have NO faith in Labour to keep our streets safe – and it's not hard to understand the reasons why
THIS new polling confirms what many of us already knew — Britain has become a lawless country. It lays bare the lack of faith the British people have in Labour to make our streets and communities safe. 2 2 And it's not hard to understand the reasons why. Total crime is now 50 per cent higher than it was in the 1990s. Police no longer investigate or attend shoplifting or theft. Violent repeat offenders are released early and two-tier policing has completely eroded trust. People feel that Keir Starmer is not tough on crime and he goes easy on the criminals. As for Conservatives, they have broken Britain and their own brand is broken, too. They are no longer the party of law and order. The decline that we see today began during their 14 failed years in office. Successive Tory governments cut thousands of police officers but oversaw an explosion in the population. It is clear to me that they should be in hiding for the damage they have done and must simply never be forgiven. Reform UK will fix broken Britain and restore law and order in our country. The British people deserve nothing less. This is a topic you'll be hearing a lot more about from us over the next few days and weeks. Career criminals will be put on notice. This is a national emergency and, after years of complacency by the other parties, it's clear that lawless Britain needs Reform.
Scotsman
13 hours ago
- Scotsman
Former defence secretary adept at keeping head down under fire
Former Tory defence secretary Sir Ben Wallace who has said he makes 'no apology' for applying for an injunction blocking reporting about the leak of data on Afghans who supported British forces. Thousands of people are being relocated to the UK as part of a secret £850 million scheme set up after the breach (Picture: James Manning/PA Wire) The big story of the week has been the High Court lifting the super-injunction which suppressed press coverage of a Ministry of Defence leak of Afghan refugees' personal details. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... This is only the latest scandal to have hit the UK's botched withdrawal from Kabul in 2021. The first scandal was the withdrawal itself. Thousands of Afghans who had worked for the UK military and whose lives were therefore under threat from the Taliban were left stranded on the tarmac at Kabul Airport while the family pets of British staff were airlifted out. We now discover that some of them are still in Afghanistan four years later. All of this happened in Boris Johnson's time in Downing Street. I assume he really couldn't have cared less what happened to those left behind and didn't give a toss about the cats and dogs either. The foreign secretary Dominic Raab didn't even bother coming back from holiday. Raab was a typical member of Boris Johnson's inner circle; faceless, utterly forgettable and completely incompetent. He did not even have the air of a government minister. He looked like he should have been the manager of a branch of the Carphone Warehouse in Slough. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Six months later, in February 2022, a spreadsheet containing the personal details of 19,000 Afghans was released 'in error', putting the lives of a further 100,000 at risk. The government's response, we now learn, was to to organise a massive cover-up to save their own necks, going as far as taking out a super-injunction to prevent the story even being mentioned in the press. The defence secretary at the time of the affair, Ben Wallace, said he took 'full responsibility' for the leak but offered no apology for the use of the super-injunction, claiming it was done to not 'put in peril those we need to help out'. I suspect he did it because he saw his own career was 'in peril', and he succeeded, as he stayed in the job for another year and served under Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak. Not many others escaped the night of the long knives when Liz the Lettuce started her 46-day reign of incompetent zealotry. As a former army officer, he was clearly skilled at keeping his head down when under fire. Being ex-military, he was at least qualified to be defence secretary, unlike his successor Grant Schapps who held a whole raft of posts in government, in which he was invariably well out of his depth. As a side hustle, he ran a series of get-rich-quick schemes under a variety of assumed names. As faceless as Raab, but with an added air of shiftiness, I would never have bought a second-car off the bloke, let alone left him in charge of the armed forces. In other words, exactly the sort of safe pair of hands needed to be in charge of keeping this whole scandal under wraps. Now the super-injunction has been lifted, the whole mess is left for the current government to clear up. Keir Starmer has hardly been a glowing success in his first year in office. However, in comparison to Johnson and his self-serving cronies, he appears to be the embodiment of integrity.
Spectator
14 hours ago
- Spectator
Ted Heath deserves to be remembered for more than his blemishes
For anyone born as I was, in the seventies, Edward Heath – who died 20 years ago this week – was a frequent presence in the news, and not always for the best of reasons. He was the silver-haired, curmudgeonly ex-prime minister nursing an implacable rage against his successor Margaret Thatcher, the cabinet colleague who'd ousted, then eclipsed him. Against her monetarist policies he railed, perhaps justly, though in a way that seemed at times bitingly personal. On global issues, with which he much concerned himself, Heath often appeared to be defending the indefensible. The tyrant Saddam Hussein he described as an 'astute person, a clever person'; he was openly against Western intervention in Bosnia, and came close to being a no-bones apologist for a brutal communist regime in China with whom he had, it was said, opaque business links. A confirmed bachelor, seemingly asexual, Heath cut an isolated figure, fuming in the wilderness, all too often reviled by the party he'd once led. How had this man ever become prime minister? The picture he painted of himself, it turned out, didn't do him justice, because to know something of Edward Heath, his beliefs and their formation, is to gain increasing respect for him. Heath had once seemed the great hope of conservatism, the Balliol-educated son of a Kent builder who would lead the party away from its stuffy, class-ridden image and make it fit for the modern age. The Mirror called him 'a new kind of Tory leader…who has fought his way to the top by guts, ability and political skill.' The Panorama programme pushed him as 'the man for those Conservatives who think the party needs a 'tiger in its tank.'' Even Marcia Williams, political secretary to opponent Harold Wilson, gushed about Heath's 'clean and shining silver hair, well-tended and suntanned face, immaculate blue suit and tie.' Yesterday's man once looked like tomorrow's saviour. There seem, in fact, to have been two distinct Edward Heaths – before and after he became party leader. In his Oxford days, he'd been President of the Oxford Union and head of the Conservative Association, attracting plaudits wherever he went. He'd visited Spain during the Civil War and travelled widely in Germany, attending a Nazi rally. There he saw Hitler speak and met Goebbels, Goering and Himmler, returning from the experience an ardent anti-appeaser. As artillery officer in the Second World War, he'd fought bravely through France and the low countries, described by one admiring major as 'the most capable officer I met in any department during the four years in which I had command.' In 1946, Heath attended the Nuremberg Trials, and became, ever after, a convinced Europhile: 'My generation did not have the option of living in the past; we had to work for the future…Only by working together right across our continent had we any hope of creating a society which would uphold the true values of European civilisation.' Finally, as PM, he got his wish, taking us into Europe on New Year's Day 1973. Many, seeing the wholesale dismantling of that legacy, will surely continue to feel that he was right. Certainly, he had legions of admirers in his early days. Elected as MP for Bexley in 1950, he was promoted under Eden a few years later, becoming, in Lord Chancellor David Kilmuir's description, 'the most brilliant Chief Whip of modern times…the most promising of the new generation of Conservatives.' Even Tony Benn rolled over for Heath: 'How you manage to combine such a friendly manner,' he wrote, 'with such an iron discipline is a source of respectful amazement to us all.' With his classical conducting and his yachting – the latter of which he excelled at, winning two international cups – Heath had real hinterland too. 'He changed the scale of my thinking,' said one colleague who worked for him. 'He is what I would like to be.' But it was as leader and then PM that his limitations became clear. 'Gone,' as minister Ian Gilmour put it, 'was the genial, human and successful Chief Whip and in his place…was a brusque and dour leader of the party.' In speeches, Heath was leaden and uninspiring, forever torturing the House with turgid, fact-laden addresses. His honesty and integrity were acknowledged, but party members sniped about his social background (his voice was almost comically posh and plodding, though the 'ow' sounds gave him away). They also speculated darkly and ad nauseam about his 'confirmed bachelor' status ('The voters of Aldershot,' wrote Julian Critchley, 'evidently much preferred dull wives to no wives at all.') Curt and brusque, with a deadpan humour too subtle for many and an intolerance of dissent, Heath made needless enemies among MPs and party members. What stands out, though, is the loyalty and affection many close colleagues went on feeling towards this awkward, bloody-minded man. 'I don't know what it is – it's a mystery to me,' said Willie Whitelaw. 'I only know I trust him more than I've ever trusted anyone.' Having won a surprise election victory in 1970, Heath, a meticulous planner, arrived with the boldest of intentions, speaking of 'a change so radical, a revolution so quiet and yet so total that it will go far beyond the programme for a Parliament.' Yet his free-market, non-interventionist aims quickly hit the rocks. Soon he was bailing out companies and, amidst an endless barrage of walkouts and work-to-rules, caving into union demands like the best of them. Following two miners' strikes, a compulsory 'three-day week' to conserve energy, and an eye-watering five 'states of emergency' in four years, Heath went to the country in 1974, losing by a wafer to Harold Wilson. When he lost another election later that year, it was clear to everyone except Heath himself that it was time for change. Enter Margaret Thatcher, and the Great Sulk began. At conference after conference, Heath lambasted her policies, all attempts at a rapprochement scotched by him. He denounced her to the press as a 'traitor' and at one public event, presented with a chocolate image of her face, reportedly picked up a knife and stabbed it into splinters, to the glee of onlooking hacks. In an open letter to the Times, his biographer and onetime acolyte George Hutchinson laid into him: 'You are already estranged from a number of old friends…You are in danger of losing the goodwill and respect of the party.' Heath, as so often, sailed on regardless. Yet as he did so, his real achievements – taking us into Europe, the abolition of Resale Price Maintenance – seemed to recede on the horizon. Heath may now be the forgotten man – widely considered a failed prelude to Thatcherism – yet this is unjust. What the electorate could embrace in the eighties – after a decade of industrial woe, an IMF bail-out and the Winter of Discontent – was miles on from what they'd have swallowed a decade before. As Ian Gilmour put it: 'To attack Ted Heath for not having behaved like Margaret Thatcher is little more sensible than to say that the First World War could have been won more cheaply by using the methods of the second.' Meanwhile, his term in office has lessons for today's bunch of leaders. Kemi Badenoch, in her great policy-purdah, might recall Heath's rigorous planning and lofty aims for national renewal – all torpedoed, within weeks, by the intransigence of actual, unforeseen events. Keir Starmer could reflect on the words of Enoch Powell (probably Heath's deadliest foe) about the perils of abandoning core policies: 'Does my right hon. Friend not know that it is fatal for any Government or party or person to seek to govern in direct opposition to the principles on which they were entrusted with the right to govern?' As for Heath himself, he deserves, perhaps, more credit than he's customarily given. The smouldering resentment of his later years too often undermined what was at times a formidable, even inspirational career. As Labour MP Denis Macshane pointed out, he had, by the end of it all, 'made and lived more history than any other British politician in active service.' The last word, though, surely goes to Philip Ziegler, his official biographer: 'He was a great man, but his blemishes, though by far less considerable, were quite as conspicuous as his virtues, and it is too often by his blemishes that he is remembered.'
