Geldof's threat to quit Blair's Africa Commission
But official papers released to the National Archives in Kew, west London, show he was outraged when – after just one meeting – the commissioners were sent a document setting its 'emerging conclusions'.
In an angry letter to the commission's director of policy, the economist Sir Nick Stern, dated August 9 2004, he said it was impossible to have come to any conclusions it such a short period of time.
The former rock star warned that he was not prepared to serve on a body which was simply there to push 'pre-determined government policy'.
'To be clear, policy must be determined by the commission independently sitting and independently deliberating and concluding of its own volition. This distinction is vital. If I have got this wrong please inform me so I may tender my resignation,' he wrote.
'More broadly, the whole notion of emerging solutions is laughable. If the solution to the misery of Africa can be 'concluded' within a mere six week time span, it is a truly remarkable feat.
'How blind we must all have been these past years. The fact is that there are not and cannot as yet be any emerging conclusions.
'The commission will lose all credibility if it is not clearly seen to be an independent entity. If it seems to advance pre-determined government policy it will be correctly viewed as a laughable grotesque.'
Geldof went on to complain that the involvement of some of the commissioners – including some of those from Africa – appeared to have been 'minimal'.
'Is it not the secretariat's function, on behalf of the chair, to ensure that this is not the case? Or is this all some farcical political game played out at the expense of the wretchedly poor? If so, I ain't playing.'
Sir Nicholas wrote back hurriedly to assure him the that the document was not an attempt pre-empt the commission's findings, and that the input from British politicians had been 'comparatively minor'.
'Far from being an attempt to rush conclusions the paper is intended to to be a tool to help promote discussion and ensure a real interchange between commissioners at the second meeting in October,' he wrote.
'I would be very keen to sit down and discuss these questions with you; perhaps we could meet for a drink as soon as we are both around?'
Geldof's reply is not recorded in the files, but he was sufficiently placated to carry on.
After the Gleneagles summit the following year agreed to double aid to Africa and extend debt relief, he hailed it as 'mission accomplished'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on the legacies of slavery: the response to Edinburgh's report must go beyond academia
The British campaign against slavery and the slave trade has long been recognised as an inspiration for later social movements. But for centuries, the brutality inflicted on the millions of African people who were bought and sold into chattel slavery in British colonies was either veiled from view or treated as a sin that was expunged when it was abolished. New research from the University of Edinburgh, about its history of involvement in slavery and the slave trade, is part of a belated reckoning by UK institutions with this disturbing aspect of their past. Another Scottish university, Glasgow, was among the first to embark on such a process. In response to evidence about substantial gifts from plantation owners and slave traders, it partnered with the University of the West Indies on a reparative justice programme in 2019. Edinburgh's report highlights a minimum of £30m in funds raised, over the years, from numerous donors with links to slavery, and points to the university's historic role as a 'haven' for racist thinkers, some of them prominent advocates of the pseudoscience of phrenology. It also criticises the university for being less active in the abolitionist movement than others. Recommendations, to which the university is weighing its response, include the establishment of a new racism and colonialism study centre, the renaming of buildings, and efforts to diversify the university's staff and student body, with a particular focus on the low number of Black students and academics. But as well as new policies and financial decisions such as the creation of new scholarships or a summer school, the research demands a reaction beyond the institution itself. The University of Edinburgh has a prominent role in the life of the Scottish capital, with Gordon Brown and John Swinney among its alumni. Steps to address injustices within academia, which are part of the legacy of slavery, are important. But the point of such investigations goes beyond this. As well as prompting internal changes, the report should promote stronger public understanding of the ways in which present-day unfairness is rooted in the abusive practices and ideologies of the past. For too long, the myriad ways in which our modern world was shaped by grossly unequal colonial-era relations were glossed over as historians focused on other topics – often those which showed Britain in a favourable light. But the truth is that traces of the exploitative dynamics of previous centuries are all around us: in our global financial system; in the landscapes and built environments of former imperial powers and the countries they colonised; in museum collections; and in the histories of organisations such as the Guardian, which examined its own links to slavery in the Cotton Capital project. Institutions with centuries of power and influence behind them, and endowments of obscure provenance, have a responsibility to be open that some have started to recognise. Universities such as Edinburgh cannot, in good conscience, continue to trade on past achievements unless they are also honest about the parts of their past that provoke anger and regret. But reflecting on historical events, while necessary, is not sufficient. As this report makes clear, the challenge for organisations that benefited directly from slavery, and colonial-era exploitation more broadly, is to ensure that their actions in the present are guided by awareness of the past.
Metro
26 minutes ago
- Metro
Keir Starmer tried to rekindle 'bromance' with Donald Trump during visit
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Sir Keir Starmer wants to relight his 'bromance' with Donald Trump, a body language expert told Metro. Judy James said the British prime minister appeared 'anxious' as he greeted the US president at Trump's golf club in Turnberry, Scotland, today. Trump began day three of his four-day visit to Scotland by meeting Sir Keir and his wife, Lady Victoria, at the steps of the resort. Sir Keir 'looked anxious and rather awkward next to Trump' as the Republican ranted about Gaza, windmills and tariffs to reports outside, said James. But the session was awkward from the get-go, the communication expert said, after Starmer lost out on a handshake when greeting Trump. James said: 'Starmer looked like a man on a mission to get his non-verbal 'bromance sight bite'. '[Trump] suddenly went for the hand on the shoulder, a gesture he's used before when he clamped Trump's shoulder in the White House as he presented the President with his invite from the King. 'It came more as a 'lightning' gesture, with his arm flashing out. Trump's response was to hold his right hand out for a shake rather than to reciprocate with any mutual patting.' Trump 'owned' the initial greeting of the Starmers, James said, as he made Victoria the 'focus of his gaze and flattery more than the eager PM'. James added: 'As Trump turned to the press, drowned out by bagpipes, Starmer adopted a more obsequious pose beside him, standing with his hands clasped together around waist or lower chest height. 'There was one moment when he requested to join in as Trump spoke, raising his hand and opening his mouth in a non-verbal interruption, but Trump didn't pause, leaving Starmer to pretend he was just studying his fingernails instead.' Sir Keir folded his arms as Trump spoke about Gaza, where Palestinians are facing impending famine amid Israeli blockages, the UN says. Figures shared with Metro by an aid group on the ground show how food prices have swollen in the enclave, with a bag of flour now costing £414. Trump said he did not agree with Israeli leader Netanyahu that there is no starvation in Gaza, adding that 'those children look very hungry'. During these remarks, Sir Keir appeared 'anxious and rather awkward', James said, adding that his crossed arms were akin to a 'body barrier'. She added: 'Otherwise it was Starmer letting off a non-stop flurry of anxiety rituals, from a cuff-fiddle to a cuff-stroke, a fiddling with his tie and belt and some licking of his lips to suggest his mouth was dry.' When Trump laid into 'nasty' Sadiq Khan, telling reporters he was doing a 'terrible job' as Mayor of London, the Prime Minister finally interjected. Holding his hand up to cut off the President, Sir Keir forced a chuckle, to remind Trump: 'He's a friend of mine, actually'. More Trending Elsewhere, Trump said he was 'disappointed' in the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, for not ending the war in Ukraine. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He told reporters: 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv, and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever. 'You have bodies lying all over the street. And I say that's not the way to do it.' With Russia's war against Ukraine in its third year, Trump said Putin has up to 12 days to make peace or face sanctions, rather than the 50-day deadline he set earlier this month. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Joey Barton branded 'bitter and twisted' after vile posts about England's Euro 2025 win MORE: EU to pay higher tariffs than UK after bagging Trump trade deal at golf course MORE: What's stopping Keir Starmer from recognising Palestine as a state?
Rhyl Journal
42 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Trump brands Khan a ‘nasty person' as Starmer jumps to Mayor's defence
The US President said he was 'not a fan' of London's Labour Mayor, when asked if he will visit the UK's capital city. Speaking to reporters at his Turnberry golf resort in South Ayrshire, Mr Trump said: 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. 'I think he's done a terrible job, the Mayor of London … a nasty person.' The Prime Minister intervened to say: 'He's a friend of mine, actually.' Mr Trump went on to add: 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.' In response to comments made by Mr Trump during a press conference on Monday, a spokesperson for the Mayor said: 'Sadiq is delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world. 'He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer. 'Perhaps these are the reasons why a record number of Americans have applied for British citizenship under his presidency.' This is not the first time the president has hit out at Sir Sadiq after he previously branded him a 'stone cold loser' and challenged him to an IQ test. Sir Sadiq has also previously described Mr Trump as 'a poster boy for racists'.
