logo
Why is Ryanair charging in pounds for items on a flight when the menu says euros? CRANE ON THE CASE

Why is Ryanair charging in pounds for items on a flight when the menu says euros? CRANE ON THE CASE

Daily Mail​3 days ago
My family and I make regular trips from Leeds Bradford airport to Málaga-Costa del Sol as we have a holiday home in Spain.
We often fly with Ryanair and sometimes buy food, drinks and duty free items from the catalogue on the plane.
We used to pay in cash, but since 2022 on-board purchases have been card only.
The menu and catalogue on the flights are priced in euros, so we pay with our Spanish bank account which is euro-denominated.
Recently, though, I checked my bank account and realised I was paying more than I thought for these items.
For example, a bottle of water cost €4.10 instead of €3.60 and two cartons of cigarettes cost €118.98 and not €110. What is happening? E.V, Leeds
Helen Crane of This is Money replies: As the school holidays descend and families prepare to jet off to sunnier climes, it's crucial to watch out for cheeky card charges.
It is a rule of thumb that, when abroad, you should opt to pay in the local currency.
That means you get the regular Visa or Mastercard exchange rate. But if you pay in GBP, the merchant can apply an inferior, local exchange rate, which can be much more expensive. This is known as dynamic currency conversion.
But how does it work on a plane, which might fly across several countries?
Airlines usually offer payment in the country the flight originates from as the default. So if you were flying from Malaga to Leeds, you'd expect to be charged in euros, and vice versa in pounds.
You therefore always paid using your Spanish bank account on return flights with Ryanair.
> Best bank accounts to get fee-free spending abroad
As an Irish firm, Ryanair lists the prices on its menus in euros. That is fair enough, as long as parched passengers pay for their drinks in euros, too - or willingly face any charges associated with paying in another currency.
But as you have discovered, that isn't always the case.
The reason it seems you have been overcharged for some of your purchases is because you were actually charged in pounds, without your knowledge, on flights from Spain to the UK where the 'local' currency was euros.
You would, for example, pay for a bottle of water that you thought was €3.60, assuming this was in euros - but it would actually be in pounds, and on your bank statement that would become €4.10.
You say the card is handed over to the flight attendant, rather than them bringing the machine to you, so you can't see what is on the screen.
As you weren't paying in the 'local' currency, you were also subject to Ryanair's inferior exchange rate which ramped up the price further. What's worse, your bank would then charge you to convert the GBP payment back to euros.
These are small amounts, but as you travel so regularly it has added up. Since 2022 when you had to stop paying in cash, you think you might have overpaid hundreds, as you regularly buy drinks and snacks for your grandchildren on flights, as well as stocking up on duty free items.
Since you cottoned on to this payments palaver, you have complained to Ryanair, and also asked cabin crew to explain the rules. Neither has been able to give you a straight answer.
You were told in response to your formal complaint that 'By default, the currency for flights to the UK is GBP, not EUR. Euro has to be specifically chosen to be used.'
However, it is not clear whether this is the 'local' currency for the flight, or simply the default currency for the card payment machine.
A cabin crew member told you that, on flights either to or from the UK, the card machine was set to GBP as the default and that cabin crew needed to ask customers what currency they wanted to pay in. In your experience, this has not happened.
When I contacted Ryanair, it said: 'All Ryanair passengers regardless of their destination can choose to pay in GBP, EUR or Polish zloty for inflight purchases.'
Ryanair also disputed the amounts you gave for the purchases, saying that you were charged €3.50 for a £3.26 bottle of water and €100 for £95 of cigarettes. This is different from the bank statements you showed me.
Ryanair continued: 'Prices displayed in our inflight magazine are in EUR, as this is the base currency in Europe. If passengers choose to pay in GBP, the amount and currency is displayed on the payment device prior to payment.
'These passengers purchased items onboard in GBP. GBP payments are then sent to the passenger's bank.
'If a passenger's bank account is a EUR account, the bank will then convert the charge made in GBP back to EUR at their rate.'
I asked exactly how passengers were informed about which currency their payment would be taken in, and what the 'local' currency was.
Was this displayed on the card machine, and if not, should the cabin crew tell the passenger the currency they are paying in or does the passenger have to ask?
Ryanair simply replied: 'At the time of purchase passengers are informed of the amount and currency.'
It also pointed me to page 23 of its inflight magazine, though this does not contain any information about currency other than to say that 'we monitor all prices and exchange rates, and these are subject to change.'
I then asked a lawyer for their view on whether prices could be displayed in euros on a flight, but passengers then charged in GBP as the default currency.
Jennifer Obaseki, founder of London-based Obaseki Solicitors, said: 'Legally, this is permissible - as long as the pricing and currency conversion are made clear and are not misleading.
However, she added that: 'The moment a passenger is charged in a different currency than that advertised, transparency becomes paramount.'
Obaseki said the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations of 2008 require retailers to provide 'accurate and complete' pricing information and ensure any currency conversions or added charges are 'clearly communicated prior to sale'.
'In essence, if goods are priced in euros but charged in pounds, the exchange rate and final GBP amount must be disclosed before the transaction is completed,' she said.
As a general rule of thumb, passengers should assume that the 'local' currency on a flight is the one of the country you departed from - but crucially, also ask what currency they are being charged in.
If it isn't the local one, ask to change to that - especially if you have a card which is denominated in the local currency.
If you do like to buy things on flights, it is also worth checking that your payment card will be accepted.
Flyers on various airlines say they have been told they can't use e-money cards such as Revolut and Monzo cards in the air, and some airlines will only accept them if they are used via an Apple or Google wallet.
Tui, for example, does not accept Monzo.
In addition, many airlines don't accept pre-paid cards, such as a Post Office travel money card.
This is because transactions made in the air are processed after the flight lands.
Flyers could pay using empty cards, and in the case of cash cards that can't go overdrawn the airline might never recoup the money.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TONY HETHERINGTON: Dad's £54,000 van has a brake fault but he can't get a refund
TONY HETHERINGTON: Dad's £54,000 van has a brake fault but he can't get a refund

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

TONY HETHERINGTON: Dad's £54,000 van has a brake fault but he can't get a refund

Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. Ms S.L. writes: My father purchased a new Mercedes Vito from LSH Auto in Stockport. This is a high-spec five-seater vehicle which he and my mother bought for £54,344, intending to take the family to France this summer. Soon after purchase, it became apparent that the van has a grave fault with its automatic emergency braking system. Now LSH Auto has the van, which my father took back, and his money. Tony Hetherington replies: The van's fault is pretty frightening. It would brake suddenly and violently when there were no other vehicles near it and no objects in its path. Your father contacted LSH Auto for advice and took the van back to be checked. The same random braking then happened while one of the dealer's engineers was at the wheel. This was so dramatic he ruled it could not be taken back on public roads. LSH Auto is not some backstreet second-hand car company. It is a Mercedes-Benz dealer with a large, impressive site and its most recent accounts show a one-year turnover of £255 million. Staff contacted Mercedes-Benz in Germany and then told your father that the van had a software problem for which there was no current solution. A new system was needed and this could take six months to a year. Your father, quite reasonably, expected to get his money back, but you told me that Mercedes-Benz wanted LSH Auto to pay, while the Stockport company wanted the Germans to pay. Meanwhile, LSH Auto refused to release the van unless your father signed a legal waiver to agree that if the van caused any injury to anyone, or any damage to other vehicles or property, LSH Auto and Mercedes would not be held liable. Not surprisingly, your father refused to sign, which meant that, when you contacted me, LSH Auto had both the van and the £54,344 – and your family's Channel ferry booking looked as though it had been sunk without trace. I put all this to both LSH Auto and Mercedes. If the van had a fault so serious that it was dangerous to drive, surely this means it was not fit to be sold in the first place? A few hours later, your father received a call from the Stockport dealer, offering a full refund. I received a statement from the firm that did not go this far but did tell me that LSH Auto 'is in active discussion with the customer'. It took about a fortnight for the cash to land in your father's bank account, and for LSH Auto to give me an updated statement saying that management 'has been in active discussions with the customer and has now resolved the concerns raised'. I suspect the delay in paying may have been the time it took the dealer to agree with Mercedes exactly who would foot the bill. Tripadvisor won't take off N.W. writes: I owned a hotel in Blackpool for many years, and as part of our advertising we used the Business Advantage scheme from Tripadvisor. I sold the hotel in January and informed Tripadvisor, but it has just charged me £680 subscription to the scheme. I cannot find a way to cancel. Tony Hetherington replies: Tripadvisor describes Business Advantage as a subscription service that attracts and influences potential customers by adding various bells and whistles to the hotel's page on its website. You paid for Business Advantage with your credit card, so when the subscription was due for renewal, Tripadvisor simply charged your card. When I contacted Tripadvisor, I was told it had no record of your cancellation and it would accept a cancellation only from the hotel's email address. I explained again that you had sold the hotel so had no access to its emails. Tripadvisor's answer was to tell you to ask the new owner to take over the payments. You barely know the new owner, though. I asked Tripadvisor repeatedly whether it plans to carry on collecting payments from you for ever, but it would not answer. You have decided to write off the £680, but I suggest you warn your card issuer of this dispute, in case Tripadvisor collects more payments. And it would do no harm to have your solicitor write to Tripadvisor, making clear you are withdrawing any permission it imagines it has to take more money from you.

Maya Jama flaunts her jaw-dropping figure in a TINY bikini before packing on the PDA boyfriend Ruben Dias amid their romantic Ibiza getaway
Maya Jama flaunts her jaw-dropping figure in a TINY bikini before packing on the PDA boyfriend Ruben Dias amid their romantic Ibiza getaway

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Maya Jama flaunts her jaw-dropping figure in a TINY bikini before packing on the PDA boyfriend Ruben Dias amid their romantic Ibiza getaway

Maya Jama flaunted her jaw-dropping figure in a tiny bikini before sharing a steamy kiss with boyfriend Ruben Dias amid their sun-soaked Ibiza getaway on Saturday. The Love Island host, 30, took to her Instagram with snaps of her loved up trip with the Manchester City star, 27, as they topped up their tans before enjoying a romantic meal. Maya looked nothing short of incredible in the tiny brown two piece as she relaxed in her luxurious accommodation with incredible sea views. She also posted snaps of a shirtless Ruben who showcased his muscles as he lit a BBQ before later heading off to explore the island on a bike ride. The couple then cosied up while enjoying a swanky meal and leaned in for a smooch as they dined with pals. Maya captioned the post: 'La isla de la magia' which translates to 'The Magic Island' and smitten Ruben quickly commented with a love heart emoji. Maya has been dating Ruben for several months and recently confirmed their romance on social media. The pair have appeared to have gone from strength to strength with the sportsman flying out to Spain to support Maya while she is filming Love Island. As she shared an album of fun snaps soaking up the sun, Ruben also shared some moments with Maya. Alongside the post Ruben confirmed his love for the star and penned: 'Sun, love, crocodiles, some fits and one advice.' And Maya appeared to approve of his sweet declaration as she commented with a love heart and fire emoji. The couple are believed to have met after the stunner caught the Portuguese player's eye when they met at the European Music Awards (EMAs) in November. Their romance was finally confirmed after they were seen packing on the PDA at KSI's Baller League event in April. And posting a snap with her new boyfriend for the first time, Maya looked incredible in a triangle bikini while soaking up some sun on a boat. She was later diving into the water while Ruben filmed her from the top deck. Maya went Instagram official with her boyfriend Ruben earlier this year, when she shared a video for the first time. The TV star was all smiles in the clip as she sat alongside the footballer in a car heading back to her house. The presenter has been seen at multiple football games over the last few months to watch Dias live in action for Man City. Footage of the pair last month showed them with their arms around each other before he leant into her neck for a peck. Ruben tried to fly under the radar and keep a low profile as he stepped out in casual clothes and a cap. A source told The Sun: 'Maya and Ruben seemed very close, very loved up and were clearly very comfortable with each other. 'They were chatting to others around them but gravitated back to each other. They seem very happy with each other.' It was the first time they were seen in public since they were thought to have started dating - though Maya has often hinted at the romance by sharing snaps of flowers she has been sent.

Wunderkind trades blows with wounded WPP as ad giant's shares slump
Wunderkind trades blows with wounded WPP as ad giant's shares slump

Daily Mail​

time40 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Wunderkind trades blows with wounded WPP as ad giant's shares slump

A fierce row has broken out between media giant WPP and one of its former rising stars after he launched an extraordinary attack on the business, accusing it of 'making it up as it goes along'. Ajaz Ahmed, who set up ad agency AKQA as a student in 1994, told The Mail on Sunday that London-based WPP had lost its way and was 'more focused on winning awards' than winning the clients needed to compete on the world stage. It came as one of Britain's most senior media bosses said WPP had 'lost a lot of business' and was failing to convince prospective clients of its strengths. But insiders at WPP have hit back, saying Ahmed has 'an axe to grind'. WPP has been beset by falling profits and the rise of artificial intelligence that threatens to make ad agencies extinct. The firm lost its crown as the world's biggest advertising group to France's Publicis last year and its share price has fallen 44 per cent in the past 12 months. It issued a profit warning this month, citing 'continued macro uncertainty' as clients cut back on ad spending due to turmoil in the global economy. But Ahmed said the firm's problems ran deeper, saying WPP had 'failed to deliver meaningful growth' with 'little evidence of a compelling long-term vision'. He said: 'Its UK-centric structure feels parochial in a landscape where global growth is driven by US-based companies.' Ahmed also said WPP's attempt to get workers back into the office four days a week had 'demotivated staff and damaged trust'. But a well-placed source at the firm said Ahmed had 'left a mess' at AKQA and this was an attempt to 'settle a score', adding: 'Lots of board members had wanted to fire him but he was protected by some senior management.' Another insider wished Ajaz 'would move on', accusing him of making 'very generalist claims'. 'A lot of people who leave WPP have a habit of commenting on it,' the insider added, a reference to its former boss Sir Martin Sorrell, who left in 2018. AKQA shot to fame due to its focus on the growing influence of the then-new internet advertising market. Its clients have included video streaming giant Netflix, payment firm Visa and taxi app Uber. In 2012, WPP took control of AKQA in a deal valuing it at nearly £350 million. After more than a decade under WPP, Ahmed quit as head of AKQA in October last year and has re-emerged as the head of a new agency called He is not alone in his assessment of WPP. One of the UK's most senior media executives told The Mail on Sunday the ad giant had 'lost a lot of business' to Publicis. The source also said potential clients were confused by WPP's efforts to use AI to create cheaper and faster marketing campaigns, saying: 'It says it is investing millions. But what does that mean?' This month, WPP said Microsoft executive Cindy Rose would replace Mark Read as chief executive at the end of the year. A WPP spokesman said: 'Ahmed is now competing with his former employer. After two years of underperformance, AKQA is back winning business. 'WPP's AI strategy has been well received, by existing and prospective clients as demonstrated in significant extensions and wins in the past 12 months such as Amazon, Johnson & Johnson and Unilever.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store