More than 200 jobs cut at International Labour Organization as US slashes funding
GENEVA - The Geneva-based International Labour Organization (ILO) has axed about 225 jobs due to cutbacks in U.S. funding at the United Nations agency, its head said on Wednesday.
The job losses, which affect posts at the ILO's Geneva headquarters and in the field, follow the U.S. administration's decision to reduce voluntary contributions under President Donald Trump, ILO Director-General Gilbert F. Houngbo said.
"One job loss is too many ... You would not imagine the mood that has generated within my staff," he told reporters in Geneva.
The ILO head also raised the possibility of relocating some of the agency's operations out of Geneva, one of the world's most expensive cities, to ease financial pressures, which is also part of broader talks on reform.
Potential locations could be European cities such as Turin, Budapest, or Bonn, or further afield in places including Doha and Pretoria, Houngbo said.
Short-term contractors and employees at some other U.N. agencies like the International Organization for Migration have already been informed of redundancies.
But thousands more job losses could be on the way as international agencies grapple with funding shortages due to the withdrawal of aid by the Trump administration and other donors.
"The U.S. is the top contributor for assessed and voluntary contribution, so our challenge is double," Houngbo said, highlighting also a broader pullback in financial support among member states.
The U.S. accounts for 22% of the ILO's $880 million two-year budget for 2026-2027, expected to be approved at the ILO's International Labour Conference next week.
"Worst case scenario, we may have to consider a revised budget. I don't recall the last time that happened to the ILO," Houngbo said.
He said he is developing a business continuity plan in case of further cuts to financial support, and that the ILO will be implementing a freeze on external recruitment, as well as launching a voluntary redundancy programme. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Several social media users shared screenshots of the drastic hike in Grab fares. SINGAPORE – Some Grab customers in Singapore were taken aback on Aug 20 after the ride-hailing mobile app briefly displayed fares that exceeded $1,000 due to a glitch. The unusually high fares , even for short trips within the country, were visible for about 20 minutes from around noon . In response to queries, a Grab spokesperson said the price spike was the result of a temporary display error. 'We encountered a temporary system issue that led to abnormally high prices being wrongly displayed in our app,' the company said in a statement. 'The issue has been resolved, and the app is now functioning as usual. We deeply regret the inconvenience caused.' Bloomberg reported that users in neighbouring Malaysia also experienced similar pricing anomalies. Several users took to social media to share screenshots of the drastic hike in fares. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Emergency broadcast system to alert S'pore public of disasters on their mobile phones: Edwin Tong Singapore New annual course will groom future leaders of Singapore's Chinese community Singapore Singapore indie cinema The Projector owes over $1.2m to creditors Life Five things to do at Singapore Night Festival – from kampung chilling to spotting luminous crabs Asia Calls to cut ties: Malaysia flag furore tests PH-BN relations Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 Business New CDC job-matching drive may bring overlooked front-line roles closer to applicants: Experts Among them was Facebook user Tan Kwee Yong, who wrote: 'I never knew (travelling) from my Military Camp to another Military Camp (would) cost a quarter of my pay.' His fare was listed as $1,511.80. In another screenshot, the cost of a ride from Tampines to Kinex mall in Katong was listed as $1,012. One user commented: 'I wonder if anyone checked the fare or simply clicked on book.' Grab's system is designed such that bookings with unusually high fares would not have typically gone through. However, the company is in the midst of doing checks and those who were charged for the high fares would be compensated. Grab, which is backed by US-based Uber Technologies, is the dominant ride-hailing operator in Singapore, as well as other markets in region including Malaysia and Thailand. Uber exited South-east Asia in 2018, transferring its operations to Grab in exchange for a stake in the company. Grab now faces stiff competition from Indonesia's GoTo Group and several smaller rivals in the region.
AsiaOne
an hour ago
- AsiaOne
Well-mannered White House welcome for Ukraine leaves many questions, World News
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump gathered European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy for a hastily arranged White House meeting on Monday (Aug 18) to discuss a path to ending Russia's war in Ukraine. Here are takeaways from the talks: Warm tone, little substance Seven European leaders, the Ukrainian president, their motorcades, dozens of Trump administration staff and more than 100 journalists swarmed the White House campus on Monday in anticipation of the unusual meeting. Would Trump and Zelenskiy agree on a path to peace? Or would their latest Oval Office session devolve into a bitter squabble as in February? Neither scenario occurred. Zelenskiy, chided for his appearance and manner in February, adjusted both. Wearing more formal clothing and repeatedly expressing his gratitude to Trump, he was greeted by a far more complimentary US president than in the past. But, despite Trump's vow to assist in Ukraine's security after a hypothetical peace deal, there was no immediate sign that any party had substantially changed position on land swaps, security guarantees or sanctions. Instead, Trump ended with promises to host a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to address the many remaining issues. Heaping praise "Have you said 'thank you' once?" US Vice President JD Vance asked Zelenskiy in February, accusing him of failing to show sufficient gratitude for US support. On Monday, Zelenskiy made sure that was not an issue. His opening remarks in the Oval Office included eight thank-yous, mostly for Trump. "Thank you so much, Mr. President ... thank you for your attention. Thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop killings and stop this war. Thank you," Zelenskiy said. He included the US first lady, who sent a letter to Putin about abducted children in Ukraine. "Using this opportunity, my thanks to your wife," the Ukrainian president said. "And thanks to all our partners and that you supported this format. And after our meeting, we're going to have leaders who are around us, the UK and France, Germany... all partners around Ukraine supporting us. Thanks (to) them. Thank you very much for your invitation." Unlike in February, Vance this time sat largely silent. Combat formal The stakes of the meeting could not have been higher. But one of the most-asked questions among diplomats in DC could not have been more frivolous: Would the Ukrainian president wear a suit? The answer: kind of. Zelenskiy showed up to the White House in what one European diplomat described as "almost a suit." His black jacket had tiny lapels and jetted chest pockets. He did not wear a tie. His attire, which split the difference between the battlefield and the boardroom, could be described as combat formal. Those sartorial details matter when it comes to dealing with the US president, who was upset that Zelenskiy did not wear a suit for their February meeting. Zelenskiy passed the fashion test this time, however. When one journalist in the Oval Office said Zelenskiy looked "fabulous," Trump chimed in to agree. "I said the same thing," Trump told reporters. Divide over ceasefire The assembled European leaders, Zelenskiy included, were careful to paper over policy disagreements with Trump, keeping their comments vague and showering the US president with compliments. But one point of disagreement did bubble to the surface. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told the assembled leaders and media that he wanted to see Putin agree to a ceasefire. Trump had long pushed for a ceasefire in Ukraine. But he largely jettisoned that goal after meeting with Putin last week in Alaska, a shift that was widely seen as a diplomatic defeat for Ukraine. The US president now says he is fine trying to move directly to a peace deal. "To be honest, we all would like to see a ceasefire," Merz said. "I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let's work on that." Trump pushed back, arguing he has solved many conflicts without first reaching a ceasefire. [[nid:721540]] Whose boots on the ground? One of the great mysteries that hung over the summit was what support the US would give to secure any Russia-Ukraine deal long term. Trump hasn't offered US troops' "boots on the ground" to guarantee Ukraine's security from Russia, reflecting American reticence to commit to military entanglements or a head-to-head confrontation with a nuclear power. Instead, he has offered weapons sales and promised that Americans will do business in Ukraine, assurances that Ukrainians see as far less than a security guarantee. Europeans are preparing for a peacekeeping mission backed by their forces. Yet, asked explicitly whether US security guarantees for Ukraine could include US troops in the country, Trump did not rule it out. Instead, he teased an announcement as soon as Monday on the topic. "We'll let you know that, maybe, later today," Trump said. He said Europe was the "first line of defence" but that "we'll be involved." What's next Trump said he would call Putin and set up a trilateral meeting with Ukraine at a time and place to be determined. Despite some private misgivings, the assembled leaders agreed that such a meeting was a logical next step. Still, the path forward is more complex than Trump and his allies are letting on. For one, Russia has delayed and obstructed high-level meetings with Ukraine in the past, and it was not immediately clear that Putin would actually sit down with Zelenskiy, who he frequently describes as an illegitimate leader. Additionally, it is unclear how much a principal-level meeting would actually advance the cause of peace. The gulf between the Russian and Ukrainian positions is vast. The Kremlin said on Monday the presence of Nato troops in Ukraine is a non-starter, a stance that would be hard for Ukraine to swallow. Russia is also calling for Ukraine to fork over significant chunks of territory that Kyiv controls, another proposal that Ukraine's leaders are not entertaining. [[nid:721555]]
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Evicted Afghan refugees huddle in Islamabad park, dreading return home
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Saima, 27, with her three-week-old baby boy Danial, sleeps, as they, along with other families, take shelter at a public park after being evicted, as Pakistan has started to deport documented Afghan refugees ahead of its deadline for them to leave, in Islamabad, Pakistan, August 10, 2025. REUTERS/Akhtar Soomro ISLAMABAD - Evicted from their homes and huddling under plastic sheets after heavy rains, Afghan refugees in a park near government offices in Islamabad said they had nowhere to go as Pakistan pressures landlords to expel documented families. Among them is Samia, 26, from Afghanistan's Hazara minority, a Shi'ite community long persecuted at home, who gave birth just three weeks ago. "I came here when my baby was seven days old, and now it has been 22 days … we have no food, and my baby was sick but there was no doctor," she said, wearing damp clothes and shoes caked in mud as she cuddled her son, Daniyal whose body bore a rash. The United Nations says Pakistan has begun deporting documented Afghans before a Sept. 1 deadline that could force more than a million to leave. The action comes despite about 1.3 million holding refugee registration documents, while 750,000 have Afghan identity cards issued in Pakistan. Samia now lives on the park's wet ground, among 200 families who cook, sleep and dry their belongings there after nights of rain. Plastic sheets serve as makeshift shelters, and children and parents spend their days battling mud, sun and hunger. Families pool the little money they have to buy potatoes or squash, cooking small portions over open fires to share with several people. The women use the washroom in a nearby mosque. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Emergency broadcast system to alert S'pore public of disasters on their mobile phones: Edwin Tong Singapore New annual course will groom future leaders of Singapore's Chinese community Singapore Grab users in Singapore shocked by fares of over $1,000 due to display glitch Singapore Singapore indie cinema The Projector owes over $1.2m to creditors Life Five things to do at Singapore Night Festival – from kampung chilling to spotting luminous crabs Asia Calls to cut ties: Malaysia flag furore tests PH-BN relations Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 Business New CDC job-matching drive may bring overlooked front-line roles closer to applicants: Experts Sahera Babur, 23, another member of the Hazara community, who is nine months pregnant, spoke with tears in her eyes. "If my baby is born in this situation, what will happen to me and my child?" she said, adding that police had told her landlord to evict her family because they were Afghan. Dozens of policemen stood at the edge of the park in Pakistan's capital when Reuters visited, watching the camp. Refugees said officers regularly told them to leave or risk being taken away. Police denied harassment. Jawad Tariq, a deputy inspector general, said refugees were only asked to leave voluntarily or move to holding centres. Pakistan's information ministry did not respond to a text message requesting comment. Refugees say they have been left in limbo for years. "UNHCR gave us promises … but they have not visited us," said Dewa Hotak, 22, an Afghan and former television journalist. The agency's spokesperson in Pakistan, Qaiser Khan Afridi, called the situation "precarious", adding that Afghans unable to regularise their stay faced arrest, deportation and homelessness. He said the agency was pressing Islamabad to create a registration mechanism and reiterated its call not to return people to a country where their lives may be in danger. Many at the camp say they cannot go back to Afghanistan because of the risks. Ahmad Zia Faiz, a former adviser in Afghanistan's interior ministry, said he feared reprisals for serving in the previous government, adding, "If we return to Afghanistan, there is a risk of being killed." Pakistan, host to millions of Afghans since the 1979 Soviet invasion, has stepped up expulsions under a 2023 crackdown, blaming Afghans for crime and militancy, charges rejected by Kabul. Neighbouring Iran's plan to deport more than a million more adds to a refugee return crisis aid groups call the biggest since the Taliban takeover in 2021. The green grass and serene vistas in Islamabad's park stand in stark contrast to the lives of those camping there. "My message to the world is to see our situation," Samia said, clutching her newborn. REUTERS
