
Taxing the richest — what G20 decided
By AFP - Nov 19,2024 - Last updated at Nov 19,2024
Leaders attending the meeting on Sustainable Development and Energy Transition pose for a group photo after the third session of the G20 Leaders' Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on Tuesday (AFP photo)
RIO DE JANEIRO — Anti-poverty campaigners have hailed a decision by G20 leaders meeting in Rio to make sure the world's billionaires "are effectively taxed."
Getting the super-rich to cough up more in taxes has been a priority of left-wing Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who is hosting the summit of the world's biggest economies.
How much tax do billionaires pay?
Lula, a former metalworker who grew up in poverty, complains that the super-rich pay proportionately much less tax than the working class.
A 2021 White House study showed that the wealthiest 400 billionaire families in the US paid an average federal individual tax rate of 8.2 per cent, compared to 13 per cent for the average taxpayer.
According to anti-poverty NGO Oxfam, the richest 1 per cent have accumulated $42 trillion in new wealth over the past decade
It says the richest one percent have more wealth than the lowest 95 per cent combined.
Increasing taxes on the wealthiest is also seen as a way to boost state coffers at a time of ballooning budget deficits and as developing countries seek huge amounts of funding to help them weather global warming.
"Tax the rich" has for years been a battle cry of the global left, while a group of US self-described Patriotic Millionaires have themselves called for higher tax bills.
In Rio, activists projected giant slides on buildings during the G20 summit marked "Tax the super rich for people and planet."
French economist Gabriel Zucman, an expert on inequality who authored a report on the issue for Brazil's G20 presidency, estimated that if the planet's 3,000 billionaires paid at least 2 per cent of their wealth in income tax each year, governments would rake in an extra $250 billion in revenue.
What did the G20 decide?
Proposals for a minimum global income tax pushed by Brazil, Colombia, France, South Africa, Spain and the African Union have come to naught with the US and Germany among the naysayers.
In a move hailed as marking progress, however, G20 finance ministers in July for the first time agreed to "engage cooperatively to ensure that ultra-high-net-worth individuals are effectively taxed."
On Monday, G20 leaders corroborated that decision in a statement with the same wording.
Zucman called it a "historic decision."
Oxfam Brazil said Lula had "lit a path toward a more just and resilient world."
But it warned that "real change" would only come about when countries increased taxes enough "to dramatically reduce inequality" and raise trillions of dollars towards fighting poverty and climate change.
In 2021, more than 130 countries agreed on a minimum tax for multinational companies, establishing that they should pay at least 15 per cent in taxes on their profits.
Is real change likely?
With US President-elect Donald Trump returning to the White House in January, flanked by the world's richest man, billionaire Elon Musk, in a top role, chances of further progress appear slim in the medium-term.
The Forbes magazine billionaires list shows that 16 of the world's 20 richest people are US citizens.
Trump has pledged to slash rather than increase taxes.
Argentina's libertarian President Javier Milei, a fan of Trump, on Monday rejected the G20's tax proposals as well as their backing for greater state intervention to fight hunger.
He touted "free-market capitalism" as a panacea for poverty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Roya News
9 hours ago
- Roya News
Freedom flotilla approaches Gaza after reaching Egypt
A humanitarian aid vessel carrying 12 activists is now sailing along Egypt's coast en route to the besieged Gaza Strip, according to organizers from the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. The ship, Madleen, departed Sicily last week loaded with essential relief supplies intended for Palestinians in Gaza. The mission's goal, as stated by the coalition, is to "break Israel's blockade on Gaza," which has been in place since before the 2023 outbreak of war. 'We are now sailing off the Egyptian coast,' German human rights activist Yasemin Acar told Agence France-Presse (AFP), confirming the passengers are in good condition. In a Saturday statement from London, the International Committee for Breaking the Siege of Gaza confirmed that the vessel had entered Egyptian waters. The group said it is coordinating closely with international legal and human rights organizations to protect those on board, warning that any attempt to intercept the ship would be 'a blatant violation of international humanitarian law.' European Parliament member Rima Hassan, also among the passengers, appealed to world leaders to 'guarantee safe passage for the Freedom Flotilla.' "Israel" has previously responded with force to similar maritime efforts. In 2010, a raid by "Israeli" commandos on the Turkish ship Mavi Marmara, which was part of a previous aid flotilla, left 10 civilians dead. More recently in May, another ship from the coalition, the Conscience, reportedly came under drone fire, prompting emergency interventions by Malta and Cyprus. Earlier in its current voyage, Madleen temporarily diverted course near Crete to respond to a distress call from a migrant boat. Activists aboard rescued four Sudanese migrants who had jumped overboard in an attempt to avoid being pushed back to Libya. The rescued individuals were later transferred to an EU Frontex ship. The Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which began its efforts in 2010, represents a network of civil society groups demanding an end to the humanitarian blockade of Gaza. "Israel" imposed the latest round of severe restrictions on March 2, only partially easing them since, despite mounting international condemnation.


Roya News
a day ago
- Roya News
France opens genocide complicity investigations over Gaza aid blockade
French anti-terror authorities have opened two investigations into allegations of genocide-related crimes, following accusations that French-"Israeli" nationals participated in efforts to obstruct humanitarian aid destined for Gaza earlier this year. According to France's national anti-terror prosecutor's office (PNAT), the probes are centered on possible "complicity in genocide," "incitement to genocide," and "complicity in crimes against humanity" between January and May 2024. These mark the first known French criminal inquiries into potential violations of international law linked to the war in Gaza. The investigations were triggered by two separate legal complaints. One was filed in November by the Jewish French Union for Peace and a French-Palestinian victim, targeting individuals allegedly tied to hardline pro-"Israel" groups "Israel is forever" and "Tzav-9." The complaint claims they physically blocked trucks carrying humanitarian aid at "Israeli" border checkpoints. Lawyers representing the plaintiffs expressed relief at the decision to move forward with a probe. 'We are pleased that the events from January 2024 are now being scrutinized — a time when no one wanted to hear anything about genocide,' said attorneys Damia Taharraoui and Marion Lafouge. Sources close to the case said the incidents in question occurred at the Nitzana and Karam Abu Salem crossings, where demonstrators, including relatives of "Israeli" captives, reportedly forced aid trucks to turn back. A second complaint, filed by the group Lawyers for Justice in the Middle East (CAPJO), presented videos, photos, and public statements as evidence against the same individuals. In a separate case made public the same day, the grandmother of two French children killed in an "Israeli" airstrike in Gaza submitted a legal complaint to the Paris court, accusing "Israel" of genocide and murder. The strike reportedly took the lives of 6-year-old Janna and 9-year-old Abderrahim Abudaher on Oct. 24, 2023. 'We believe these children are dead as part of a deliberate organised policy targeting the whole of Gaza's population with a possible genocidal intent,' said the family's lawyer, Arie Alimi. The children's younger brother, Omar, was severely injured and remains in Gaza under the care of their mother. Although filed against unnamed parties, the grandmother's complaint directly accuses "Israeli" Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his government, and the military. Notably, the children's mother, a French citizen, was convicted in absentia in 2019 for allegedly funding terrorism through donations to Hamas and Islamic Jihad members. While no court has officially labeled the conflict as genocide, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has repeatedly instructed the Israeli Occupation to allow humanitarian aid into Gaza and to avoid actions that could amount to genocide. Despite this, UN agencies report that the entire population of Gaza remains at risk of famine. Tensions have further escalated over reports that Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) fired on Palestinians attempting to collect food from a US-backed aid distribution point, prompting backlash and leading several international NGOs and the UN to distance themselves from the operation. Concerns have been raised that the aid program is shaped to align with IOF goals. Meanwhile, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, citing war crimes and crimes against humanity. A similar case against Hamas commander Mohammed Deif was dropped in February after it was confirmed he had been killed.


Roya News
3 days ago
- Roya News
Trump announces travel ban on 12 countries, restrictions on 7 others
US President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday, reinstating a controversial travel ban from his first term, barring citizens from 12 countries from entering the United States and imposing restrictions on seven others, effective 12:01 AM Monday, June 9, 2025. The move aims to address national security concerns but has sparked criticism for its broad scope and potential impact. The banned countries include Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Partial restrictions apply to Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela, affecting immigrant visas and certain non-immigrant travel. Exceptions are made for US permanent residents, existing visa holders, Afghans with Special Immigrant Visas, diplomats, athletes, and dual nationals with passports from unaffected countries. Trump cited deficient vetting, high visa overstay rates, and terrorism risks, referencing a recent Boulder, Colorado, attack by an Egyptian national who overstayed a tourist visa, though Egypt is not on the list. The proclamation follows a January 20 executive order directing agencies to identify high-risk countries. Critics, including #AfghanEvac's Shawn VanDiver, called the ban a 'moral disgrace,' particularly for targeting Afghans who aided US forces. Oxfam warned it would trap people fleeing war and persecution. The policy, upheld by the Supreme Court in 2018 after earlier legal challenges, may face new lawsuits. Trump indicated the list could expand, with Egypt under review. The ban aims to avoid the chaos of the 2017 rollout, which caused airport detentions and protests. Affected travelers and advocates are bracing for impact as the policy nears implementation.