Democrats push for tougher resistance to Trump as anger mounts
Democrats are starting to push for a stronger response to President Trump as his policies fuel anger with the party's base.
Members of the party believe Trump has enjoyed a honeymoon period during his first month in office as Democrats have so far failed to coalesce around a unified counter-message — but at least some of them want that to change.
As frustration grows over Trump's actions, including his efforts to dismantle parts of the federal government, some in the party are voicing the need to get tougher.
'He's pushing the boundaries of a system as far as they can go,' said one Democrat who works for an outside organization planning to take action as part of the burgeoning new resistance.
'This guy is doing some crazy s–t,' a second Democrat, who is also involved in planning efforts, added. 'This isn't jamming through a nominee. This is when it starts to be alarming.'
It is a dramatic shift in tone for Democrats. After Trump won a second term in November, some Democrats — stung by the devastating election results — said they were willing to find ways to work with the incoming president. Even if they weren't open to finding common ground with Trump, they said they didn't want a repeat of the 2017 effort to immediately push back against him early on.
But less than a month into Trump's return to the Oval Office, Democrats say a different kind of movement is emerging. Strategist Anthony Coley, who worked in the Biden administration, acknowledged the frustration among Democrats.
'The first phase of the last the weeks was Democrats being really gun-shy,' Coley said. 'Now folks are really, really tired and can't sit back and watch him destroy the country that we love without any pushback at all. That's the phase we're in now.'
Progressives in particular are tired of sitting on the sidelines. In recent weeks, they've watched quietly as the president's early resurgence caused chaos and confusion. Behind the scenes, several told The Hill they have been plotting their course of action. Up until this point, many had been afraid to be blamed for his win and had uniformly gotten behind Democrats even when they were skeptical of their party's direction.
That slow burn hasn't been working, liberals agree, and are starting to try newer ways to call out Trump. Some are looking to the grassroots for reliable messengers. By doing so, they've frustrated centrist Democrats on Capitol Hill who have reportedly taken issue with leading activist-minded groups like MoveOn and Indivisible who want a more aggressive approach than what the party is currently pushing.
Progressives maintain that a stronger response is necessary from their flank amid moderates' hesitation, which some believe is what helped bring back Trump.
'While Elon Musk is pouring gasoline and dropping lit matches across the federal government, voters don't want their elected representatives acting like deer in the headlights,' said Karthik Ganapathy, a progressive strategist who worked for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
There's an informal search for progressive leadership starting to take place. For now, many see Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) as being the most proactive and unapologetic member of Congress when it comes to Trump. She has been consistently poking the president and has gone after his allies like Musk and other billionaires on social media to provoke a response. It's the clearest sign that she's encouraging other Democratic lawmakers to play offense even when out of power.
'AOC in particular is modeling what effective, clear leadership looks like,' Ganapathy said. 'Making sense of the chaos and helping people understand what they can do to make a difference. We need more members following her lead.'
The group that helped usher Ocasio-Cortez into office, Justice Democrats, has taken an outside-in strategy to Trump. They've started recruiting more left-wing candidates in hopes of ousting moderates who they see as ineffective at countering the right's agenda. Progressives say the tactic is more necessary now than in previous cycles because Trump has expanded his own power in Washington. Activists close to the group see more progressive firepower as not only good for the party's direction but also necessary for building a bench less afraid to fight against the GOP.
While some have taken a candidate audit, by focusing on adding more talent gearing for combat, others on the left have become increasingly focused on certain policies and public sentiments. The most notable many have highlighted is the unequal distribution of wealth that Trump has flaunted since his inauguration by prioritizing the most elite members of society. Despite winning over a working-class coalition to make his return to office possible, the president has sent a message that he values the ideas of ultra-rich innovators to guide his policies.
Progressives are identifying openings in that lane, with some honing in on what they see as Trump's authoritarian mindset around money in politics. While Ocasio-Cortez is leading the left's anti-Trump effort in the House, newer voices in the Senate are also showing up to make that case. Beyond Democratic socialist Sanders, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) is laying out attacks that show a distinction between Trump's Republican Party and Democrats, especially around economic anxiety. Some on the left want him to take the critiques even farther and disregard shrugs from within their party.
'If he really says what I think he should say the invitations to go on MSNBC will magically suddenly dry up,' said Matt Duss, a former senior advisor to Sanders in the Senate, urging Democrats to unify around a popular anti-corruption message.
While progressives favor a bomb-throwing style to get their message across, Coley said Democrats have to be methodical about how they're communicating this time around. The right is more activated and has shown an interest in sparring with liberal leaders. Musk and other Trump allies have called for members of the Squad to face primary challengers, hoping to extinguish any grassroots style uprising they're looking to mount.
'The media ecosystem has evolved substantially,' he said. 'To be successful, Democrats are going to have to learn how to do that successfully. They can't just put out statements and press releases that have been reviewed five times. They've got to speak authentically.'
But Coley also cautioned that Democrats 'can't chase every car.'
'They've got to be thoughtful and strategic and fast,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
31 minutes ago
- CBS News
About 200 Marines begin Los Angeles deployment at Westwood Federal Building
Approximately 200 Marines arrived in Los Angeles to begin an assignment to guard the Wilshire Federal Building on Friday, according to an Army general, marking a rare occasion where military forces will be deployed on U.S. soil. President Trump last \weekend federalized and deployed more than 2,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to L.A. after protests erupted in the light of immigration enforcement operations throughout the city and nearby areas. The move to send military has been described as "authoritarian" by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, while Mr. Trump said Friday morning that the "city would be burning to the ground right now" had he not activated the troops. Newsom has challenged the decision in a lawsuit. A federal judge sided with Newsom and blocked Mr. Trump from sending troops on Thursday night, but an appeals court temporarily halted the order later that evening. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit scheduled another hearing on the case for June 17. The troops are allowed to stay in L.A. at least until that date. US Marines walk on the parking lot of the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, California, on June 13, 2025. A judge has ordered Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard to the state, saying the president's decision to deploy them to protest-hit Los Angeles over Governor Gavin Newsom's objections was "illegal." Protests against Trump's harsh immigration policies spread on June 11 across the United States despite a military-backed crackdown in Los Angeles and threats by the hard-right Republican president to use "heavy force." ETIENNE LAURENT/AFP via Getty Images During a news conference Friday morning, Maj. Gen. Scott M. Sherman said the Marines arrived in L.A. Thursday night. They began their assignment in Westwood around noon on Friday. Sherman added that the sole mission of the deployed Marines is to protect federal property and personnel, like the Federal Building. The Marines will be armed with weapons and wearing crowd control gear such as a riot shield, baton and gas masks. "I would like to emphasize that the soldiers will not participate in law enforcement activities," Sherman said. "Rather, they'll be focused on protecting federal law enforcement personnel." Sherman confirmed that the National Guard soldiers who have been deployed since Sunday have also not participated in law enforcement activity. No troops have been injured since arriving in L.A. "They have watched federal law enforcement arrest personnel as they were protecting," Sherman said. "They have not had to detain anyone at this point." It's not yet clear what assignments the other 500 deployed Marines will receive in L.A. Sherman said he couldn't speculate on future operations, but recent training has centered around defending federal property. "That's the mission we've really focused on them to do," he said. "They've already started with the Wilshire [Federal] Building today, and we will progress from there." As of Friday morning, there were 56,300 individuals in ICE detention centers across the country, a record for the agency, according to internal government data obtained by CBS News. On Thursday and Wednesday, ICE recorded 1,400 and 1,600 nationwide immigration arrests, respectively, the statistics indicate. ICE arrests have increased by more than 100% since President Trump's first 100 days in office, but they remain well below the 3,000 daily arrest rate demanded by the White House. contributed to this report.


CNBC
37 minutes ago
- CNBC
White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, Reuters sources say
The White House earlier this month directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters. Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinize Musk's contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new U.S. missile defense system. Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately $22 billion in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk ventures. "We'll take a look at everything," the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6. In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the "Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts." In a separate statement, a spokesperson at NASA said the agency "will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met." Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defense Department responded to requests for comment. The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is "for political ammunition," one of the people said. Whether the U.S. government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security and the public interest. "There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts," said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. "Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security." Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the U.S. government in much of its aerospace and defense work – launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the "Golden Dome" missile shield planned by Trump. Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president – such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender – his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX. Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly $5 billion contract with NASA, is the only U.S. vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a U.S. intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with U.S. defense and intelligence services.


CBS News
37 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pittsburgh-area leaders react to strikes in Israel and Iran
KDKA is reaching out to local leaders to get their reaction to the strikes in Israel and Iran. Thursday, Israel launched unprecedented strikes on the Islamic country. The target: Iran's nuclear program. The Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh is reacting to the move. "Shocked at the intensity of the attack but also we had intelligence leading up to this that something was going to be happening, so not completely out of the blue," said Shawn Brokos, the Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh's director of community security. The federation is in contact with law enforcement. On Thursday night, they sent emails to members of the community, urging them to be vigilant. "Which is not new, but to also employ best practices for security and we are also coordinating with local police as far as having some additional marked units and a police presence at a lot of our events this weekend," Brokos explained. Friday, Iran struck back, hoping to send a message of its own by launching retaliatory missiles in Tel Aviv. President Trump said on social media Friday that Iran should agree to a nuclear deal before there is nothing left. One expert said it's hard for decisions to be made once the fighting is underway. "Decision making is probably partly paralyzed. We don't know how much Iran's effective capabilities have been destroyed or hampered as a result of Israeli operations," explained Ali Vaez, the International Crisis Group's Iran Project director. KDKA-TV reached out to the Islamic Center of Pittsburgh and the Muslim Association of Greater Pittsburgh for comment, but didn't hear back.