Ryan Reynolds pitched 'SNL 50' joke about Justin Baldoni lawsuit: 'That was his idea,' claims staffer
Ryan Reynolds is at the center of controversy after an 'SNL 50' staffer claimed he was behind the joke referencing his wife Blake Lively's legal drama with Justin Baldoni. During the anniversary special, Reynolds stood up from his seat next to Lively for a segment with Tina Fey and Amy Poehler, where he quipped, 'Great! Why? What have you heard?'—a remark that many believe alluded to Lively's legal battle with her former 'It Ends With Us' co-star.
Wally Feresten, the show's longtime cue card handler, alleged on the 'Fifi, Fev and Nick' podcast that the joke was Reynolds' own idea. 'He had a different line in rehearsal and he pitched that to replace it,' Feresten claimed.
'That was his idea.' The 'SNL' staffer added, 'We wouldn't want to do anything too controversial unless they were in on it.' However, a source close to Reynolds has denied the claims, as has NBC.
The backlash was swift. Baldoni's attorney, Bryan Freedman, weighed in on the moment during an appearance on 'Hot Mics with Billy Bush,' saying, 'I'm unaware of anybody, frankly, whose wife has been sexually harassed and has made jokes about that type of situation. I can't think of anyone who's done anything like that. So it surprised me.'
An insider later told Page Six that Baldoni's legal team may use Reynolds and Lively's 'SNL 50' appearance to their advantage. 'Justin is taking this lawsuit in all seriousness and isn't making a public mockery out of it,' the source said.
The controversy escalated when Lively filed an amended complaint in a New York federal court following the backlash to Reynolds' joke. The new legal documents reportedly allege that other women involved with the film have come forward, claiming Baldoni's actions on set made them uncomfortable.
Meanwhile, social media reactions have been divided, with some calling Reynolds' joke 'tone-deaf' and others defending it as a harmless remark. 'Gross. So they're supporting the bullies too,' one social media user commented, while another wrote, 'SNL has always been sooo problematic. Highlighting the abusers while making fun of the victims.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
5 days ago
- Express Tribune
Chris Pratt mourns Jonathan Joss death after Parks and Recreation co-star fatally shot in San Antonio
Actor Chris Pratt has paid tribute to his Parks and Recreation co-star Jonathan Joss following news of the actor's death in a fatal shooting in San Antonio, Texas. Joss, best known for portraying Chief Ken Hotate in five episodes of the NBC sitcom between 2011 and 2015, was pronounced dead at the scene on Sunday, June 1. He was 59. Chris Pratt reacts to the loss of 'Parks and Recreation' co-star Jonathan Joss: 'Damn. RIP Jonathan. Always a kind dude. He played Ken Hotate in Parks and was also in Mag 7. Sad to see. Prayers up. Hug your loved ones.' — Pop Crave (@PopCrave) June 3, 2025 Joss was also widely recognized for voicing John Redcorn on the long-running animated series King of the Hill. In addition to their work on Parks and Recreation, Pratt and Joss appeared together in the 2016 film The Magnificent Seven, where Joss played an exiled Comanche warrior and Pratt was one of the titular Seven. Reacting to the news, Pratt shared a message on his Instagram Story: 'Damn. RIP Jonathan. Always such a kind dude. He played Ken Hotate in Parks and was also in Mag 7. Sad to see. Prayers up. Hug your loved ones.' Nick Offerman, who played Ron Swanson on Parks and Recreation, also reflected on the loss, telling People magazine: 'The cast has been texting together about it all day and we're just heartbroken. Jonathan was such a sweet guy and we loved having him as our Chief Ken Hotate. A terrible tragedy.' Joss's husband, Tristan Kern de Gonzales, claimed in a Facebook post that the couple had been subjected to ongoing homophobic harassment in their neighborhood, including threats and a house fire. He alleged they had received repeated warnings that their home would be set on fire. However, the San Antonio Police Department stated there is currently 'no evidence to indicate Mr. Joss' murder was related to his sexual orientation.' As the investigation continues, friends and colleagues are remembering Joss for his kindness and significant contributions to television and film.
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
Judge dismisses Blake Lively emotional distress claims against Justin Baldoni
A federal judge has ruled that Blake Lively's claims for emotional distress against Justin Baldoni will no longer be considered in their ongoing legal battle. The decision comes amid heated exchanges between the parties over Lively's refusal to turn over medical records relevant to the emotional distress allegations. U.S. District Judge Lewis Liman denied Baldoni's motion to compel Lively to provide a HIPAA release for access to therapy notes and other medical documents. The judge's order was based on Lively's representation that she intends to withdraw those specific claims. However, the court declined Lively's request to dismiss the claims without prejudice — meaning she could potentially refile them later — without a formal agreement with Baldoni's side. If the claims are not dismissed, the court will bar Lively from presenting any emotional distress evidence. According to court filings, Baldoni's attorneys argued that Lively sought to drop the emotional distress claims without releasing her medical information, thereby preventing the defense from disproving those claims. They accused Lively of attempting to preserve the right to refile after discovery closes while refusing to disclose evidence. Lively's legal team, led by Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, dismissed the motion as a 'press stunt' and criticized Baldoni's lawyers for abusing court procedures. They stated that Lively's withdrawal of the claims was voluntary and that she still intends to pursue emotional distress damages through other allegations, including sexual harassment and retaliation. The dispute arises from a lawsuit filed by Lively in the Southern District of New York, where she alleges Baldoni sexually harassed her on the set of the 2024 film It Ends With Us and retaliated against her with a smear campaign. Baldoni has countersued Lively and her husband, Ryan Reynolds, seeking $400 million in damages for extortion and defamation tied to a New York Times article. Currently, six related lawsuits concerning the events surrounding the film are active across various courts. The ruling marks a significant development in this complex, high-profile legal conflict.
Express Tribune
6 days ago
- Express Tribune
Blake Lively says emotional distress claims against Justin Baldoni remain amid conflicting statements
Blake Lively is refuting claims that she has dropped her emotional distress allegations against It Ends With Us director and co-star Justin Baldoni, despite statements from his legal team and email exchanges indicating otherwise. The dispute centres on her 10th and 11th causes of action, related to intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, filed in her December 31 lawsuit. In a letter to Judge Lewis J. Liman, Baldoni's lawyer Kevin Fitz of Meister Seelig & Fein stated, 'Ms. Lively's counsel recently advised us, in writing, that Ms. Lively is withdrawing her IED Claims.' The claims are linked to a broader request by Baldoni's team for medical and mental health records, including HIPAA authorisations. Lively's team responded firmly, rejecting this as a misrepresentation. Her attorneys, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, said, 'This is a routine part of the litigation process that is being used as a press stunt,' adding that Lively 'continues to allege emotional distress' through other claims, including sexual harassment and retaliation. Baldoni's lawyers argue that Lively must either dismiss the emotional distress claims with prejudice—preventing refiling—or comply with discovery requests. 'She can't have it both ways,' Fitz asserted, asking the court to compel Lively to produce medical documentation. Lively's legal team has not confirmed whether an amended complaint is forthcoming. They maintain her core claims and potential for further damages remain active and substantial under California law. With a trial date set for March 9 2026 and damages exceeding $400 million at stake, the legal back-and-forth continues to unfold.
