
Fancy coffee shop swamped with protests after fed-up customer reveals she was charged for having croissant cut in half
The woman, who has not been named in local media, visited Audrey Patisserie in Oderzo on Sunday for breakfast, ordering two coffees and a pastry.
4
4
4
But when she asked staff to slice the croissant so she could share it with her mother, she later discovered an extra €0.10 (around 9p) charge on the bill.
Fuming, she shared the receipt online, writing: 'It's not about the cost, it's the principle.'
Her post spread like wildfire, sparking an avalanche of fury from social media users.
One user blasted: 'You have to hate your customers to charge them €0.10 to cut a croissant in half.
'A total lack of elegance, refinement, and empathy.
'They should bring hotel management students to your restaurant to show them how not to treat your customers. Pathetic.'
Another piled on: 'Disgusting cappuccino and they ask 10 cents to cut a croissant in half, never again, how squalid.'
A third raged: '€0.10 what a disgrace… just to cut a croissant!!!'
The backlash left café owner Massimiliano Viotto under siege, as his shop was bombarded with negative reviews.
He said: 'We were flooded with one-star reviews from people who have never even visited our shop.
Customer Charged Surprise $5 'Bitching Fee' at Pizzeria After Speaking Up
'Our Google rating dropped from 4.5 to 3.5, but we're confident it will recover with time and dedication.'
Viotto denied the charge was a rip-off, even though it doesn't appear on the menu, claiming it covers the use of an extra plate and napkin and the 'skill' needed to cut a pastry.
Bafflingly, a photo from the café shows a staff member simply snipping through a croissant with a pair of scissors while steadying it with a fork.
He insisted: 'It's not a scam. It is a conscious choice that we defend with pride.'
The row adds to Italy's growing reputation for bizarre summer surcharges.
Last year, a woman in Arezzo revealed she was slapped with a £50 fee to cut her own birthday cake in a restaurant.
And it's not the only baffling bill making headlines.
A man has told how he was left scratching his head after a local restaurant added a mysterious 'S Charge' to his tab.
The 2.75% extra fee — around 70 cents — appeared despite him paying in cash, meaning it couldn't be a card surcharge.
Posting the receipt online, he wrote: 'After eating at a local restaurant I noticed a charge on the receipt I did not recognize and have never seen before.
'I emailed the contact listed on their website a week ago but never received a response.
'Can someone tell me what is the S Charge (2.75%)? Can't be a credit card up charge since I paid cash.'
The post sparked heated debate, with most guessing it was some form of service charge.
4
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Heinz's new ketchup smoothie slammed as ‘nasty' with fans outraged by unusual flavour combo
THE launch of a ketchup smoothie has been given an almost criminal reception from sceptical food fans. Heinz linked up with US firm Smoothie King for the concoction — which blends its tomato ketchup with acai sorbet, apple juice, strawberries, and raspberries. 3 3 But the creation, available in Smoothie King stores in the US has been labelled 'disgusting' and 'nasty' on social media. In June, Heinz unveiled a new ketchup which some customers claimed was "better than the original". The "game-changing" condiment has 35 per cent more tomatoes, a "DRASTICALLY" different colour, and even boasts several health benefits. Heinz's Tomato Ketchup Zero sent sauce fans into an online frenzy - with many claiming the new sauce has a better taste. The new Zero ketchup no added sugar and salt, unlike its original counterpart. According to the beloved sauce brand, 9 in 10 customers said "it delivers the great quality you'd expect from Heinz", and tastes better than "other 'Zero' products". Bewildered shoppers poured out on social media, with many shocked at the new launch. Another chimed in: "IS THAT KETCHUP ZERO I'VE NEVER SEEN ONE WHAT IS THAT?" While a third user said: "It's DRASTICALLY different in colour than ketchup I have what the hell." Heinz also said that the release meets consumer trends, as "50,000 Brits say their top food priority is healthier choices with less sugar and salt". 'Revolting' shoppers scream as Heinz launches 'repulsive' new sauce inspired by smash hit movie 3


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Zelenskiy says Russia seems more inclined now to a ceasefire
KYIV, Aug 6 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Wednesday that Russia seemed "more inclined" to a ceasefire, but details of a potential deal are of great significance and neither Ukraine nor the U.S. should be deceived by Moscow. President Donald Trump said his special envoy Steve Witkoff's meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Wednesday delivered "great progress," but Trump gave no specifics. Following the meeting, Zelenskiy had a call with Trump, joined by European allies. "Ukraine will definitely defend its independence. We all need a lasting and reliable peace. Russia must end the war that it itself started," Zelenskiy said on X. Trump, who has signalled frustration with Putin in recent weeks and has given the Russian president until Friday to make peace with Ukraine or face tougher sanctions, hailed Witkoff's visit as highly productive. But a White House official said the secondary sanctions that Trump has threatened against countries doing business with Russia were still expected to be implemented on Friday. An executive order introducing additional 25% tariffs on India for Russian oil imports was signed on Wednesday. "The pressure on (Russia) works. But the main thing is that they do not deceive us in the details – neither us nor the U.S.," Zelenskiy said. Ukraine has repeatedly called for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire. Russia, which now controls about a fifth of Ukrainian territory and proceeds with its advances on the eastern front, rejected the idea. National security advisers from Ukraine and allied nations were to meet soon to work out a "joint stance", Zelenskiy added.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Bain & Company given £24m of state contracts after UK ban lifted
Bain & Company has been awarded almost £24 million of state contracts since the British government backed down on a ban on the consultancy over alleged state corruption in South Africa. Bain, based in Boston, Massachusetts, and one of the world's biggest management consultancy firms, was given a three-year ban in August 2022 by the Cabinet Office from bidding for government contracts. It was barred over what Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Cabinet Office minister at the time, alleged was 'grave professional misconduct, which renders its integrity questionable'. • Big three consultancies 'rarely worth hiring', say executives The British government's decision followed an inquiry in South Africa into so-called 'state capture' during the presidency of Jacob Zuma, which criticised the role of international firms, including Bain. The company made a legal challenge against the decision of Boris Johnson's government, which it argued was 'based on a flawed process', and pledged to improve its corporate governance. The ban was abruptly lifted in March 2023 after less than eight months; Whitehall sources said a legal challenge could have left the taxpayer with a large bill. An analysis of state contracts by Tussell, the data company, for The Times shows that Bain has since been awarded nine state contracts worth a combined £23.9 million, including with the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office. Lord Hain, a former Labour minister and anti-apartheid campaigner, who lobbied the Johnson administration and current government over Bain, said he was 'very disappointed' it had received any British state contracts. 'I trust that there will be no more. Just because it's apparently legally not possible to ban them is no reason to award them any government work.' Bain was approached for comment on the UK contracts. A government spokesman said: 'Bain colluded with the former government of South Africa to damage state organisations. Whilst decisions on the exclusion of Bain from bidding for UK government contracts were made by the previous government, the government will take strong action against any future supplier misconduct wherever it is found.' Sources said the MoD contracts were awarded through an existing central government management consultancy framework. The government has new powers under the Procurement Act 2023 to take action against suppliers involved in misconduct but they are not retrospective. In October Hain wrote to Pat McFadden, minister for intergovernmental relations, urging a fresh ban on contracts. In his response in January, McFadden said that he had requested legal advice on options to extend a ban but was told 'no legal route existed'. Bain was accused of undermining the South African Revenue Service (Sars) through consultancy work that allegedly benefited Mr Zuma's allies. The management consultancy firm, which was founded in 1973 and operates in 40 countries, has said that it has taken 'significant measures' to strengthen its governance for public sector contracts. 'While there were no findings from two official commissions of inquiry of any illegal actions by Bain, we accepted responsibility for the events at that time and repaid all fees, with interest, to Sars.' Earlier this month, Bain said that it was 'winding down' consulting operations in South Africa and that its Johannesburg office will become a services hub supporting Bain's global operations.