Pro-Net partners Amtel for cleaner EV battery disposal
This collaboration will see Pro-Net tap into Amtel's expertise in maximising the lifespan of EV batteries for a more sustainable, circular economy.
This will ensure that the battery's valuable materials can be recovered and repurposed for secondary applications, such as to manufacture new batteries or as energy storage solutions, thus minimising waste.
Pro-Net CEO Zhang Qiang said the company is fully committed to sustainability and helping the nation transition to green mobility.
'We also want to ensure that in doing so, the process remains green as well. While there isn't an official government mandate yet, we are taking early steps to safeguard the proper disposal of EV batteries, ensuring that the recycling process remains economically viable while being environmentally friendly,' he said in a statement.
Based on projections by the Malaysia Automotive, Robotics and IoT Institute (MARii), it is estimated that by 2050, 870,000 EV batteries will require recycling in Malaysia, which calls for the necessary frameworks to guide the proper collection, processing, and disposal of EV battery waste. This is critical for the long-term sustainability of EVs amidst their rapid adoption.
The EV battery disposal will be conducted in accordance with government-mandated regulations under the Department of Environment's Electronic Scheduled Waste Information System (eSWIS).
Amtel invests heavily in research and development including exploring new uses for EV battery cells.
A key focus is repurposing these cells for secondary applications such as energy storage solutions to support a sustainable and circular energy ecosystem.
Amtel Cellular CEO Lim Hun Teik said this partnership underscores the mutual commitment to not only advancing electric mobility, but also building the essential ecosystem around it – including high-quality after-sales support, safe battery management, and responsible end-of-life handling.
'We are fully aligned with Pro-Net's mission to deliver innovation on wheels, and we are excited to play a vital part in ensuring peace of mind for EV owners throughout their vehicle lifecycle,' he said.
The Proton e.MAS 7 utilises a high-tech short-blade LFP battery that is designed to help prevent battery-related issues and ensure the safety of the vehicle and its occupants. It is one of the biggest selling points that has made the Proton e.MAS 7 the best-selling EV in Malaysia for 2025 to date.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump slaps additional 25pct tariff on India over Russian oil trade
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Wednesday ordered an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. The tariff, set to take effect in three weeks, comes on top of a separate 25 per cent duty entering into force on Thursday, according to the text of the executive order released by the White House. The order also threatens potential penalties on other countries deemed to be "directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil." Exemptions remain for items targeted by separate sector-specific duties such as steel and aluminium, and categories that could be hit like pharmaceuticals. Trump has been ramping up pressure on India after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, as Russia's devastating invasion of its pro-western neighbour drags on. India's national security adviser was in Moscow on Wednesday, media in New Delhi reported, coinciding with a visit by US envoy Steve Witkoff. India's foreign ministry earlier said US pressure to stop it buying Russian oil was "unjustified and unreasonable" and that it would protect its interests.--AFP
The Star
21 hours ago
- The Star
INTERACTIVE: EV boom highlights charging bay shortage
An electric vehicle being charged at a public charging station at Aeon Mall Shah Alam. — IZZRAFIQ ALIAS/The Star PETALING JAYA: A surge in electric vehicle (EV) sales is outpacing the growth in the number of charging stations being built. Malaysia's vehicle-to-charger ratio currently stands at 13 EVs per charger nationwide, an increase of 18% compared to 11 a year ago. As of June 30, figures from the Malaysia Electric Vehicle Charging Network (MEVnet) dashboard show that there were 4,161 public EV charging bays across 1,374 locations nationwide. This is a 61% increase from The Star's previous analysis in July 2024 when 2,585 bays were installed. Despite the increasing number of charging stations being built, EV registrations have been rising at an even faster pace. There are currently 52,418 EVs on the roads as of June 30 this year, with a sharp increase recorded since January. The first six months of this year saw 17,143 electrical vehicles registered, a 60.8% year-on-year jump from 10,663 units in the same period last year. May 2025 saw the highest-ever monthly registration with 4,152 EVs. Malaysia has set a national target of installing 10,000 public charging bays at 4,025 stations by 2025, a goal first laid out under the Low Carbon Mobility Blueprint (2021–2030). While Malaysia is still far from meeting the objective, Kuala Lumpur has already hit its target with 1,192 charging bays installed, which is 132.44% of its 900-unit target. Penang ranks second with 393 bays in place, which is 65.5% of its 600-bay goal. Johor is third with 466 bays, which is 42.36% of its 1,100-bay target. 'While the installation of over 4,000 EV charging bays is commendable, it is still not fully adequate to meet the growing and future demand,' said PLANMalaysia director-general Datuk Dr Alias Rameli. He noted that many EV owners, especially those in landed properties, rely on private home chargers, which are not counted under the government's public infrastructure targets. Dr Alias said there has been a noticeable increase in planning submissions for new EV charging bays, particularly from private firms and local authorities in high-growth corridors like the Klang Valley; Johor Bahru; and Penang. The MEVnet platform enables spatial mapping of existing and planned infrastructure, allowing more efficient rollout and reducing land-use conflicts. However, challenges persist. Dr Alias highlighted that identifying suitable sites for chargers in dense urban areas remains a key constraint. 'In mature urban zones, limited space, competing land uses, and retrofitting existing buildings present significant hurdles,' he said. He also pointed to regulatory misalignment between planning authorities, utility providers, and safety regulators which differences in interpretation of technical requirements often result in delays. To address this, PLANMalaysia has introduced the Garis Panduan Perancangan (GPP) EVCB, a unified planning guideline for EV charging bays and has conducted capacity-building initiatives with local planning authorities to streamline approval processes.
New Straits Times
a day ago
- New Straits Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the United States tariff shock hasn't sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook — and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They didn't, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' currencies. But, to some extent, the steep drop in sterling after the referendum vote and the dollar's plunge on President Donald Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact, at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no "big bang" economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right, even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020 and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly GDP print — confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. What's more, it's taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell three per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared with the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the City. The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to one per cent off US gross domestic product over time. That's a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit, which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that's growing at a roughly two per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP and where tech and AI trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman said in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is "the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire, then doing it again every year. Forever." In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes don't necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex economies. The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU, some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out.
